CORRECTION article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1652479
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Recovery College model: state of the art, current research developments and future directionsView all 8 articles
Correction: The content of Recovery College courses in England: a 71 college document analysis
Provisionally accepted
- Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
"The READ method of document analysis was followed (20)."A sentence was repeated. A correction has been made to the section 2 Materials and methods, 2.3 Data collection and analysis, Paragraph 2: "Following the pilot round of using the typology deductively on the one hundred course titles, discussions were held between analysts to highlight discrepancies in coding, refine the framework and maximize rater concordance."Reference 24 was cited in the wrong sentence and should have been cited in place of reference 25. The number of key mechanisms of change was incorrectly given as four. A correction has been made to the section 4 Discussion, Paragraph 3: "Furthermore, a study of RC students identified five key mechanisms of change."There was a mistake in Table 1 0 (0 to 0) 4 ( 6)There was a formatting error in reference 11. It should be:"Thornhill H, Dutta A. Are recovery colleges socially acceptable? BJPsych Int. ( 2016) 13:6-7. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000000878".The original version of this article has been updated.
Keywords: Recovery college, document analysis, fidelity measure, Course content, Inductive content analysis
Received: 23 Jun 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.