Abstract
In the last decade, technological advances, combined with an improved appreciation of the ability of saliva to inform caregivers about both oral health and systemic disease, have led to the emergence of salivary diagnostic platforms. However, the majority of these assays have targeted diseases that more commonly affect the adult population, largely neglecting infants and children who arguably could benefit the most from non-invasive assessment tools for health monitoring. Gaining access into development, infection, and disease through comprehensive “omic” analyses of saliva could significantly improve care and enhance health access. In this review, we will highlight novel applications of salivary diagnostics in pediatrics across the “omic” spectrum, including at the genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, microbiomic, and metabolomic level. The challenges to implementing salivary platforms into care, including the effects of age, diet, and developmental stage on salivary components, will be reviewed. Ultimately, large-scale, multicenter trials must be performed to establish normative biomarker values across the age spectrum to accurately discriminate between health and disease. Only then can salivary diagnostics truly translate into pediatric care.
Introduction
Serum biomarkers have long been the gold standard for diagnostic testing (–). However, in recent years, advances in biotechnology, combined with a clinical demand for more user-friendly and non-invasive platforms, have led to the emergence of salivary diagnostic assays to better monitor disease, infection, and development (–). Perhaps, no other patient population could benefit more from these advances than pediatrics. The avoidance of serial phlebotomy for monitoring our most at-risk patients reduces trauma and limits anemia (, ). Further, as national and international organizations, such as the United States Food and Drug Association (USFDA) now mandate enrollment of children in clinical trials, assays that do not rely on invasive blood sampling offer a safer, more appealing alternative (–). While the benefits of salivary analysis in the pediatric population are plentiful, translating assays into clinical care remains a challenge. Salivary assay development for the adult population has seen exponential growth in recent decades, while diagnostics that aim at the unique diseases and conditions affecting infants and children lag significantly behind (Figure 1). Defining the clinical significance of individual variations in biomarker levels, determining thresholds that clearly discriminate between health and disease, and understanding the impact of age, diet, and development on the composition of saliva present hurdles to implementation. Nevertheless, a wealth of information can be gained from a mere drop of human saliva. From predicting physiological development and biological functions, to microbial and metabolic analyses, saliva is providing pediatric caregivers and researchers with an exciting new tool for exploration (, –).
Figure 1
In this review, we will highlight novel applications of salivary analyses across the “omic” spectrum, including at the genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and microbiomic level. The important impact of age and development on saliva components will be reviewed, and specific attention will be given to emerging platforms for use in both neonatal and pediatric populations. Limitations to assay development and clinical implementation will be discussed to further our understanding of both the applicability and the translatability of salivary diagnostics in the pediatric population.
Salivary Variation Across the Pediatric Age Spectrum
Though largely composed of water, human saliva contains electrolytes, microorganisms, enzymes, proteins, immunoglobulins, nucleic acids, enzymes, hormones, mucins, and drugs (–). Commercially available collection and stabilizing kits (e.g., DNA Genotek, Oasis Diagnostics®) allow for both ease of collection and stabilization of constituents, often for weeks at a time at room temperature. These components, whether molecule, transcript, protein, metabolite, or microbe, are reflective of both the age and developmental stage of the individual (–). For example, salivary enzymes, such as amylase, are known to increase from early infancy through adolescence, ultimately peaking in adulthood (–). Salivary electrolyte levels are also known to vary with age. Calcium and magnesium are significantly higher in infancy compared to later in life; sodium to potassium ratios reach their highest levels in adolescence, likely corresponding to aldosterone surges associated with puberty (). Such analyte concentration variability presents both opportunities and challenges for the investigator. The ability to non-invasively monitor growth and development, in real time, provides great promise (Figure 2). However, an investigator must be aware of biological changes that occur with age, as well as unique patient populations and situations, which may directly affect the oral cavity and its constituents, ultimately impacting the reliability and applicability of salivary assays.
Figure 2
There are critical environmental and developmental changes that take place in early life that also have a direct impact on saliva. For infants born prematurely (<37 weeks’ gestation), not only may the ongoing development of salivary glands impact filtration, secretion, and diffusion of molecules into saliva () but also mode of birth (cesarean vs. vaginal), initiation of feeds, and type of nutrition (breast milk vs. formula), may directly affect microbial colonization and diversification in the oral cavity. In recent years, multiple investigators have begun to describe and highlight the rapid microbial colonization of the human shortly after birth (–). Deviations from normal deliveries, delays in the initiation of enteral nutrition, and prolonged hospitalizations are now known to significantly impact colonization of the gastrointestinal (GI) system (–). As the entry point to the GI system and a critical player in overall GI health, saliva undoubtedly is equally affected by these variables. In addition, studies have shown a significant increase in oral microbial colonization and taxa variability as an infant grows and develops (). Teeth eruption during the first few months to years of life and exposure to solid foods are considered to be the major contributors to this variability (, ). Oral bacteria that reside in gingival crevices and around teeth begin to emerge with tooth eruption. In parallel, both albumin and immunoglobulin (Ig) G levels rise in saliva with increasing mucosal permeability (). Further, studies have shown that with the introduction of solid foods, salivary peptidomal profiles are altered () and Ig levels shift from non-specific innate immunity to specific immune response elements, e.g., IgA and β-2 microglobulin of MHC class I. These alterations are believed to reflect the development of adaptive immune responses after exposure to different noxious dietary and environmental substances (, ). These age-specific differences remind investigators that they must consider the developmental stage of an individual when designing and importantly, interpreting salivary assays. Normative values and microbial diversification will vary with age, and assay interpretation must reflect these findings appropriately.
Salivary “Omics”
Salivary Genomics
The oral cavity, though not saliva in particular, has offered caregivers a direct, non-invasive source of genomic material. In recent years, genetic testing has moved away from reliance upon invasive blood sampling toward user-friendly buccal swabs (, ). From commercially available at-home genetic testing kits (e.g., http://23andme.com, http://Ancestry.com) to paternity testing in the NICU, the ease with which sufficient quality and quantity of DNA samples can be obtained has markedly improved (). However, beyond cellular DNA which is best harvested through cells, saliva is likely a rich source of cell-free and exosomal DNA that may provide caregivers with specific opportunities to monitor the overall health of the individual and further explore cell-to-cell communication (–). While research in this area continues to emerge, it is easy to see its applicability to child health. Genomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA is directly impacting the field of cancer biology (). Oncologists may now monitor the genomes of cell-free tumor DNA in plasma samples in order to generate targeted and personal therapies, assess drug resistance, and monitor a patient’s response to therapy by quantitative analysis of tumor load. Analysis of salivary cell-free DNA may provide similar insight and be highly beneficial in children affected by cancer who are already undergoing countless needle sticks and invasive procedures. Indeed, Pu et al. have recently demonstrated the applicability of a salivary assay for the detection of a genomic deletion in the epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (). While future studies are needed to demonstrate the role of cell-free salivary DNA in child health, it nevertheless offers yet another opportunity to improve delivery of care in this vulnerable population.
Salivary Transcriptomics
Our laboratory was one of the first to publish real-time developmental information available at a transcriptomic (RNA or gene expression) level in the newborn (–). In our original article, we demonstrated that transcripts, indicative of all major organ systems, were readily detected in an infant’s mouth (). Genes identified were known to play a role in the developing GI, nervous, and hematological systems. While the trafficking mechanisms of these gene transcripts remain largely unknown, these initial hypothesis discovery experiments led to a series of targeted assays aimed at better defining developmental milestones and phenotypes.
Using high-throughput screening tools, such as multiplexed reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, on total RNA extracted from as little as 5 µL of neonatal saliva, we have been able to identify a panel of genes whose combined expression profiles may help neonatal caregivers to objectively assess oral feeding skills (, ). Genes identified on the panel are involved in diverse biological functions including hunger signaling (AMPK, NYP2R), palate development (WNT3), and sensory integration (NPHP4, PLXNA1). In initial studies, the combined salivary expression profile of these biomarkers was shown to be up to 78% accurate in predicting mature oral feeding skills in the newborn. In addition, our laboratory has been the first to link expression levels of a well-described speech–language gene, FOXP2, to oral feeding success in the newborn (, ). These experiments have laid the foundation for future studies to non-invasively explore developmental biology in our youngest patients and offer caregivers an enormous opportunity to utilize salivary transcriptomics to further explore, diagnose, and potentially prevent other areas of neonatal pathology where disrupted development results in unique and often life-threatening diseases including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), or retinopathy of prematurity. However, as a newly emerging field, it is important to recognize the potential impact of growth and biology on assay applicability. As stated previously, defining normative values across the age spectrum, exploring sex differences in expression patterns, understanding the role of salivary gland development, microbial colonization patterns, diet, and tooth eruption on gene expression will take prospective, collaborative, multicenter trials. Failing to perform the necessary experiments, such as observational studies to examine developing microbial colonization patterns or to establish normative reference genes for appropriate gene expression analyses over time, will directly impact our ability to translate these exciting discoveries to the bedside.
Salivary Proteomics and Metabolomics
Saliva has been estimated to contain approximately 2,000 peptides, comprising 40–50% of total secreted body proteins (). Unlike nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) that traditionally require the additional step of extraction prior to analysis, salivary proteins may be detected and quantified directly after collection. This ease of processing, combined with their relative stability compared to either DNA or RNA, makes proteins ideal biomarkers. Recent advances in technology and bioinformatics has allowed for the comprehensive profiling of hundreds to thousands of proteins from a single sample source to improve our understanding of the physiological, as well as the pathological, status of the human being (–).
To date, salivary protein biomarkers have been described for multiple adult oral and systemic diseases, including breast, pancreatic, and oral cancers (–), as well as autoimmune diseases, such as Sjögren’s disease, diffuse systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (). Moreover, studies have investigated the role of salivary proteomic analyses to predict myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus types 1 and 2, and pulmonary diseases (–69). While the pediatric patient population is ripe for similar diagnostic advances, here too, an investigator must pay specific attention to unique circumstances, including ongoing and rapid development as well as hormonal changes associated with puberty, which may impact proteomic analyses in newborns, infants, and children.
The salivary proteome varies from childhood to adolescence and is often dependent upon growth (70–72). For example, concentrations of salivary insulin growth factor (IGF-I) may vary and serve as an indicator of skeletal growth throughout childhood (71). Nutritional status of the child also affects salivary biomarkers. Malnourished children have specific salivary proteomic variations associated with protein energy under nutrition or PEU (73), and children affected with type 1 diabetes have been shown to have higher levels of salivary pro-inflammatory biomarkers compared to healthy controls. Conversely, there is a growing body of research examining salivary metabolomics that may predict metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and obesity in children. A recent study of 744 children (age 11) showed that salivary levels of c-reactive protein, salivary insulin, and leptin were higher and adiponectin levels lower in obese children compared to healthy normal weight children (74). Other studies tested the applicability and reliability of using salivary glucose levels as a surrogate for blood levels (75–77). With the use of a regression equation, salivary glucose values could accurately be converted to blood glucose levels, providing patients, especially children with type 1 diabetes, with a non-invasive tool for self-monitoring (78).
Beyond assessing the nutritional and metabolic status of children, there have been a limited number of studies utilizing salivary proteins for disease detection in this population. Salivary biomarkers for familial juvenile SLE, a more aggressive form of the disease known to causes widespread tissue damage and inflammation, have been described (79). Interestingly, there have also been recent studies showing aberrant protein expression in the saliva of children affected with autism spectrum disorder. Research has shown that there are decreased levels of three proteins, statherin, histatin 1, and acidic proline-rich protein, in the saliva of autistic children compared to healthy controls (80, 81). In addition, Wormwood and colleagues have recently demonstrated that salivary proteomic analyses of children can inform caregivers about developing cognitive functions (82). The ability of saliva to provide a window into disrupted neurodevelopment holds enormous promise for the field, allowing caregivers insight into areas of the body once believed only to be accessible though costly neuroimaging (e.g., MRI, CT) or invasive procedures (e.g., cerebral spinal fluid, blood).
Salivary Microbiomics and Metagenomics
According to the World Health Organization, infectious diseases are the leading cause of death of children and adolescents worldwide (83). Improved methods for earlier detection of infections, particularly in developing nations where blood sampling is not only invasive but also impractical, holds the potential for significantly improving outcomes. While the healthy human mouth contains as many as 500 million bacterial cells with more than 700 different colony species (84–86), it can also harbor and shed pathological infections. Upper respiratory infections, such as the influenza virus and human bocavirus HboV-1, a mild respiratory disease, can be detected in the saliva up to 1 year after primary infection (87, 88). In addition, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein–Barr virus, human herpes virus (HHV) 6, and HHV7 can all be detected in human saliva (89–91). CMV, the most common cause of congenital hearing loss in children in developed countries (92), was one of the first viruses to be successfully detected through salivary analysis in the newborn (93). These initial reports showed not only that the virus was as readily detectable in saliva compared to more traditional assays using urine but also that saliva had a higher sensitivity for CMV detection compared to blood (94). Most recently, saliva has been shown to be an important biofluid for monitoring infectious Zika virus particles (95, 96). Salivary assays aimed at Zika RNA detection may prove to be a valuable tool for caregivers who are tracking exposure rates, transmission, and shedding of the virus.
In addition to the specific microbial detection, saliva also contains IgA, IgM, and IgG, which can assess immunological status and response to infection (97). For instance, studies have reported both the detection of specific antibodies to rotavirus infection in saliva (98), as well as the immunological response after administration of the vaccine (99). Similarly, rubella-specific IgM antibodies are detectable in children’s saliva (100), as are IgG levels of children who are seropositive for mumps, measles, and the herpes simplex virus (101, 102). Moreover, the hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency viruses, and Salmonella typhi can all be identified through the use of advanced technological approaches for Ig detection in the salivary fluid of children (103–105).
One of the more interesting aspects of working with saliva as a biofluid for clinical assessment is the fact that it harbors hundreds of organisms. In recent years, the field of metagenomics, defined as the genomes of all the organisms living in a specific environment in the human body, has emerged (106). Our ability to analyze not simply human gene and protein expression but also the organisms residing in the mouth that may be responsible for such a response, provides yet another opportunity to improve child health. Unique microbial colonization patterns have been shown to be associated with disease including childhood caries, NEC, and metabolic syndrome. Identifying aberrant microbial colonization patterns, while simultaneously monitoring an individual’s unique immune and inflammatory response, may allow for the development of preventative strategies to improve health outcomes (86, 107).
Other Considerations and Applications
In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control reported that the prevalence of children ≥12 years old using illicit drug was 12% (107), and the use of non-medical psychotherapeutic drugs was 2.5%. Sadly, as drug abuse has become increasingly common, novel detection methods, including those that can be performed easily in the either home or office under direct visualization, are needed. Salivary drug screening assays have already been approved by the USFDA and are available for medical and commercial use (e.g., http://americanscreeningcorp.com). Cocaine, amphetamines, opioids, benzodiazepines, and tetra-hydro-cannabinoids, among others, can all be detected and quantified in saliva (108–111). Further, concentrations of drug metabolites of a variety of prescribed drugs are also measurable in saliva (112, 113), making ease of obtaining therapeutic levels without invasive, serial phlebotomy possible.
Conclusion
Salivary diagnostics are primed to have an important impact on infant and child health. Whether accessing the genome, exploring real-time gene and protein expression during development, or evaluating the metabolic and infectious status of the individual, applying the latest technological advances to salivary analysis can provide valuable insight into the health of the child in a safe, non-invasive manner. However, careful attention must be made to age, diet, and developmental stage when designing assays. Establishing normative values of gene and protein expression, as well as metabolites and microbes, to account for normal variations across the age spectrum can only be achieved through prospective, large-scale, multicenter trials. Only then can data be interpreted appropriately and the hope of translating salivary diagnostic into pediatric carefully realized.
Statements
Author contributions
JM conceived of, wrote, and edited this review. MH wrote and edited this review. Please note: JM is the senior and last author on this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BenitoJAcedoYMedranoLBarcenaEGarayRPArriEA. Usefulness of new and traditional serum biomarkers in children with suspected appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med (2016) 34:871–6.10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.011
2
WangHHuJChenL. Decreased serum miR-503 level in children with nephrotic syndrome. Clin Lab (2015) 61:1917–26.10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.150407
3
OderaGVairaDHoltonJDowsettJFAnsaldiN. Serum pepsinogen I and IgG antibody to Camplylobacter pylori in non-specific abdominal pain in childhood. Gut (1989) 30:912–6.10.1136/gut.30.7.912
4
ScheuringUSkopnikHRothBUhlenbruckGMetzgarRS. Analysis of pancreatic serum markers in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pancreas (1991) 6:229–33.10.1097/00006676-199103000-00016
5
KeaneMFallonRRiordanAShawB. Markedly raised levels of C-reactive protein are associated with culture-proven sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr (2015) 104:e289–93.10.1111/apa.12978
6
HedegaardSSWisborgKHvasAM. Diagnostic utility of biomarkers for neonatal sepsis – a systematic review. Infect Dis (2015) 47:117–24.10.3109/00365548.2014.971053
7
ZahngYSunJLinCCAbemayorEWangMBWongDT. The emerging landscape of salivary diagnostics. Peridontol 2000 (2016) 70:38–52.10.1111/prd.12099
8
BonneNJWongDT. Salivary biomarker development using genomic, proteomic and metabolomic approaches. Genome Med (2012) 4:82.10.1186/gm383
9
SchaferCASchaferJJYakobMLimaPCamargoPWongDT. Saliva diagnostics: utilizing oral fluids to determine health status. Monogr Oral Sci (2014) 24:88–98.10.1159/000358791
10
JavaidMAAhmedASDurandRTranSD. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res (2016) 6:66–75.10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.08.006
11
NunesLAMussaviraSBindhuOS. Clinical and diagnostic utility of saliva as a non-invasive diagnostic fluid. Biochem Med (2015) 5:177–92.10.11613/BM.2015.018
12
RangerMGrunauRE. Early repetitive pain in preterm infants in relation to the developing brain. Pain Manag (2014) 4:57–67.10.2217/pmt.13.61
13
VinallJGrunauRE. Impact of repeated procedural pain-related stress in infants born very preterm. Pediatr Res (2014) 75:584–7.10.1038/pr.2014.16
14
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Clinical Research Involving ChildrenFieldMJBehrmanRE, editors. Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2004). 2, The Necessity and Challenges of Clinical Research Involving Children. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25553/
15
AutmizguineJBenjaminDKJrSmithPBSampsonMOverchkinePCohen-WolkowiezMet alPharmacokinetic studies in infants using minimal-risk study designs. Curr Clin Pharmacol (2014) 9:350–8.10.2174/1574884709666140520153308
16
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Additional Protections for Children. (2001). Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RunningClinicalTrials/ucm119111.htm
17
BaumBJYatesJRIIISrivastavaSWongDTMelvinJE. Scientific frontiers: emerging technologies for salivary diagnostics. Adv Dent Res (2011) 23:360–8.10.1177/0022034511420433
18
HartRWMaukMGLiuCQiuXThompsonJAChenDet alPoint-of-care oral-based diagnostics. Oral Dis (2011) 17:745–52.10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01808.x
19
WongDT. Salivomics. J Am Dent Assoc (2012) 143:19S–24S.10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0339
20
LeeYHWongDT. Saliva: an emerging biofluid for early detection of diseases. Am J Dent (2009) 22:241–8.
21
SegalAWongDT. Salivary diagnostics: enhancing disease detection and making medicine better. Eur J Dent Educ (2008) 12(Suppl 1):22–9.10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00477.x
22
HumphreySPWilliamsonRT. A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. J Prosthet Dent (2001) 85:162–9.10.1067/mpr.2001.113778
23
CarpenterGH. The secretion, components, and properties of saliva. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol (2013) 4:267–76.10.1146/annurev-food-030212-182700
24
DrobitchRKSvenssonCK. Therapeutic drug monitoring in saliva: an update. Clin Pharmacokinet (1992) 23:365–79.10.2165/00003088-199223050-00003
25
Ben-AryehHFisherMSzargelRLauferD. Composition of whole unstimulated saliva of healthy children: changes with age. Arch Oral Biol (1990) 35:929–31.10.1016/0003-9969(90)90075-L
26
SalvoliniEMazzantiLMartarelliDDi GiorgioRFrattoGCuratolaG. Changes in the composition of human unstimulated whole saliva with age. Aging (1999) 11:119–22.
27
RedmanRS. Development of the salivary glands. In: SreebnyLM, editor. The Salivary System. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1987). p. 2–17.
28
SevenhuysenGPHolodinskyCDawesC. Development of salivary α-amylase in infants from birth to 5 months. Am J Clin Nutr (1984) 39:584–8.
29
RossiterMABarrowmanJADandAWhartonBA. Amylase content of mixed saliva in children. Acta Paediatr Scand (1974) 63:389–92.10.1111/j.1651-2227.1974.tb04815.x
30
YangZ-MChenL-HZhangMLinJZhangJChenWWet alAge differences of salivary alpha-amylase levels of basal and acute responses to citric acid stimulation between Chinese children and adults. Front Physiol (2015) 6:340.10.3389/fphys.2015.00340
31
ChenLHYangZMChenWWLinJZhangMYangXRet alAttenuated acute salivary α-amylase responses to gustatory stimulation with citric acid in thin children. Br J Nutr (2015) 113:1078–85.10.1017/S0007114515000446
32
CastagnolaMInzitariRFanaliCIavaroneFVitaliADesiderioCet alThe surprising composition of the salivary proteome of preterm human newborn. Mol Cell Proteomics (2011) 10:M110.003467.10.1074/mcp.M110.003467
33
Nuriel-OhayonMNeumanHKorenO. Microbial changes during pregnancy, birth, and infancy. Front Microbiol (2016) 7:1031.10.3389/fmicb.2016.01031
34
RautavaS. Early microbial contact, the breast milk microbiome and child health. J Dev Orig Health Dis (2016) 7:5–14.10.1017/S2040174415001233
35
MunyakaPMKhafipourEGhiaJE. External influence of early childhood establishment of gut microbiota and subsequent health implications. Front Pediatr (2014) 2:109.10.3389/fped.2014.00109
36
Dominguez-BelloMGCostelloEKContrerasMMagrisMHidalgoGFiererNet alDelivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107:11971–5.10.1073/pnas.1002601107
37
GronlundMMLehtonenOPEerolaEKeroP. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr (1999) 28:19–25.10.1097/00005176-199901000-00007
38
DiGiulioDBRomeroRAmoganHPKusanovicJPBikEMGotschFet alMicrobial prevalence, diversity and abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS One (2008) 3:e3056.10.1371/journal.pone.0003056
39
MorzelMJeanninALucchiGTruntzerCPecqueurDNicklausSet alHuman infant saliva peptidome is modified with age and diet transition. J Proteomics (2012) 75:3665–73.10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.028
40
MorzelMPalickiOChabanetCLucchiGDucoroyPChambonCet alSaliva electrophoretic protein profiles in infants: changes with age and impact of teeth eruption and diet transition. Arch Oral Biol (2011) 56:634–42.10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.12.015
41
LamsterIB. Evaluation of components of gingival crevicular fluid as diagnostic tests. Ann Periodontol (1997) 2:123–37.10.1902/annals.1997.2.1.123
42
AdriaanseMPVreugdenhilACVastmansVGroeneveldLMolenbroeckSSchottDA. Human leukocyte antigen typing using buccal swabs as accurate and non-invasive substitute for venipuncture in children at risk for celiac disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2016) 31:1711–16.10.1111/jgh.13331
43
WitsøESteneLCPaltielLJonerGRønningenKS. DNA extraction and HLA genotyping using mailed mouth brushes from children. Pediatr Diabetes (2002) 3:89–94.10.1034/j.1399-5448.2002.30205.x
44
VandewoestyneMVan HoofstatDFranssenAVan NieuwerburghFDeforceD. Presence and potential of cell free DNA in different types of forensic samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet (2013) 7:316–20.10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.12.005
45
YaoWMeiCNanXHuiL. Evaluation and comparison of in vitro degradation kinetics of DNA in serum, urine and saliva: a qualitative study. Gene (2016) 15:142–8.10.1016/j.gene.2016.06.033
46
TuMWeiFYangJWongD. Detection of exosomal biomarker by electric field-induced release and measurement (ERIFM). J Vis Exp (2015) 95:52439.10.3791/52439
47
OxnardGRPaweletzCPShollLM. Genomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA in patients with cancer. JAMA Oncol (2016).10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2835
48
PuDLiangHWeiFAkinDFengZYanQet alEvaluation of a novel saliva-based epidermal growth factor receptor mutation detection for lung cancer: a pilot study. Thorac Cancer (2016) 7:428–38.10.1111/1759-7714.12350
49
MaronJLJohnsonKLRockeDMCohenMGLileyAJBianchiDW. Neonatal salivary analysis reveals global developmental gene expression changes in the premature infant. Clin Chem (2010) 56:409–16.10.1373/clinchem.2009.136234
50
MaronJL. The neonatal transcriptome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med (2015) 6:a026369.10.1101/cshperspect.a026369
51
MaronJL. Exploring the neonatal salivary transcriptome: technical optimization and clinical applications. Clin Biochem (2011) 44:467–8.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.03.019
52
MaronJLHwangJSPathakSRuthazerRRussellRLAlterovtizG. Computational gene expression modeling identifies salivary biomarker analysis that predict oral feeding readiness in the newborn. J Pediatr (2014) 166:282–8.10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.065
53
MaronJLJohnsonKLDietzJAChenMLBianchiDW. Neuropepetide Y2 receptor (NPY2R) expression in saliva predicts feeding immaturity in the premature neonate. PLoS One (2012) 7:e37870.10.1371/journal.pone.0037870
54
ZimmermanEMakiMMaronJ. Salivary FOXP2 expression and oral feeding success in premature infants. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud (2016) 2:a000554.10.1101/mcs.a000554
55
ZimmermanEMaronJL. FOXP2 gene deletion and infant feeding difficulties: a case report. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud (2016) 2:a000547.10.1101/mcsa000547
56
AmadoFLoboMJDominguesPDuarteJAVitorinoR. Salivary peptidomics. Expert Rev Proteomics (2010) 7(5):709–21.10.1586/epr.10.48
57
WeiFWongDT. Point-of-care platforms for salivary diagnostics. Chin J Dent Res (2012) 15:7–15.
58
SpielmannNWongDT. Saliva: diagnostics and therapeutic perspectives. Oral Dis (2011) 17:345–54.10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01773.x
59
WongDT. Salivary diagnostics powered by nanotechnologies, proteomics and genomics. J Am Dent Assoc (2006) 137:313–21.10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0180
60
PasicMDYousefGMDiamandisEP. The proteomic revolution in laboratory medicine. Clin Biochem (2013) 6:397–8.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.02.012
61
AmadoFMVitorinoRMDominguesPMLoboMJDuarteJA. Analysis of the human saliva proteome. Expert Rev Proteomics (2005) 2:521–39.10.1586/14789450.2.4.521
62
SchulzBLCooper-WhiteJPunyadeeraCK. Saliva proteome research: current status and future outlook. Crit Rev Biotechnol (2013) 33:246–59.10.3109/07388551.2012.687361
63
HuSLooJAWongDT. Human saliva proteome analysis and disease biomarker discovery. Expert Rev Proteomics (2007) 4:531–8.10.1586/14789450.4.4.531
64
JohnMALiYZhouXDennyPHoCMMontemagnoCet alInterleukin 6 and interleukin 8 as potential biomarkers for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2004) 130:929–35.10.1001/archotol.130.8.929
65
MishraSSaadatDKwonOLeeYChoiWSKimJHet alRecent advances in salivary cancer diagnostics enabled by biosensors and bioelectronics. Biosens Bioelectron (2016) 81:181–97.10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.040
66
HuSWangJMeijerJIeongSXieYYuTet alSalivary proteomic and genomic biomarkers for primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 56:3588–600.10.1002/art.22954
67
RahimMARahimZHAhmadWAHashimOH. Can saliva proteins be used to predict the onset of acute myocardial infarction among high-risk patients. Int J Med Sci (2015) 12:329–35.10.7150/ijms.11280
68
NicholasBLSkippPBartonSSinghDBagmaneDMouldRet alIdentification of lipocalin and apolipoprotein A1 as biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2010) 181:1049–60.10.1164/rccm.200906-0857OC
69
HirtzCChevalierFSommererNRaingeardIBringerJRossignolMet alSalivary protein profiling in type I diabetes using two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Clin Proteomics (2006) 2:117–27.10.1385/CP:2:1:117
70
CabrasTPisanoEBoiROlianasAManconiBInzitariRet alAge-dependent modifications of the human salivary secretory protein complex. J Proteome Res (2009) 8:4126–34.10.1021/pr900212u
71
NayakSBhadWADoshiUH. The relationship between salivary insulin-like growth factor I and quantitative cervical maturational stages of skeletal maturity. J Orthod (2014) 41:170–4.10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000091
72
MessanaICabrasTIavaroneFManconiBHuangLMartelliCet alChrono-proteomics of human saliva: variations of the salivary proteome during human development. J Proteome Res (2015) 14:1666–77.10.1021/pr501270x
73
FontelesCSdos SantosCFda Silva AlvesKSde Miranda MotaACDamascenoJXFontelesMC. Comparative proteomic analysis of human whole saliva of children with protein-energy undernutrition. Nutrition (2012) 28:744–8.10.1016/j.nut.2011.10.005
74
ShiPGoodsonJMHartmanMLHasturkHYaskellTVargasJet alContinuous metabolic syndrome scores for children using salivary biomarkers. PLoS One (2015) 10:e0138979.10.1371/journal.pone.0138979
75
AbikshyeetPRameshVOzaN. Glucose estimation in the salivary secretion of diabetes mellitus patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes (2012) 5:149–54.10.2147/DMSO.S32112
76
AgrawalRPSharmaNRathoreMSGuptaVBJainSAgarwalVet alNon-invasive method for glucose level estimation by saliva. J Diabetes Metab (2013) 4:1–5.10.4172/2155-6156
77
TwetmanSNederforsTStahlBAronsonS. Two-year longitudinal observations of salivary status and dental caries in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Dent (1992) 14:184–8.
78
KadashettiVBaadRMalikNShivakumarKMVibhuteNBelgaumiUet alGlucose level estimation in diabetes mellitus by saliva: a bloodless revolution. Rom J Intern Med (2015) 53:248–52.10.1515/rjim-2015-0032
79
AbrãoALFalcaoDPde AmorimRFBezerraACPombeiroGAGuimarãesLJet alSalivary proteomics: a new adjuvant approach to the early diagnosis of familial juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Med Hypotheses (2016) 89:97–100.10.1016/j.mehy.2016.02.010
80
CastagnolaMMessanaIInzitariRFanaliCCabrasTMorelliAet alHypo-phosphorylation of salivary peptidome as a clue to the molecular pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorders. J Proteome Res (2008) 7:5327–32.10.1021/pr8004088
81
Ngounou WetieAGWormwoodKLRussellSRyanJPDarieCCWoodsAG. A pilot proteomic analysis of salivary biomarkers in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res (2015) 8:338–50.10.1002/aur.1450
82
WormwoodKLAslebaghRChannaveerappaDDupreeEJBorlandMMRyanJPet alSalivary proteomics and biomarkers in neurology and psychiatry. Proteomics Clin Appl (2015) 9:899–906.10.1002/prca.201400153
83
WHO Fact Sheet. Children: Reducing Mortality (2016). Available from: https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs178/en/
84
ParahitiyawaNBScullyCLeungWKYamWCJinLJSamaranayakeLP. Exploring the oral bacterial flora: current status and future directions. Oral Dis (2010) 16:136–45.10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01607.x
85
Lif HolgersonPÖhmanCRönnlundAJohanssonI. Maturation of oral microbiota in children with or without dental caries. PLoS One (2015) 10:e0128534.10.1371/journal.pone.0128534
86
FabianTKFejerdyPCsermelyP. Salivary genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics: the emerging concept of the oral ecosystem and their use in the early diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Curr Genomics (2008) 9:11–21.10.2174/138920208783884900
87
SuekiAMatsudaKYamaguchiAUeharaMSuganoMUeharaTet alEvaluation of saliva as diagnostic materials for influenza virus infection by PCR-based assays. Clin Chim Acta (2015) 453:71–4.10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.006
88
MartinETKuypersJMcRobertsJPEnglundJAZerrDM. Human bocavirus-1 primary infection and shedding in infants. J Infect Dis (2015) 212:516–24.10.1093/infdis/jiv044
89
de FrançaTRCarvalhoADGomesVBGueirosLAPorterSRLeaoJC. Salivary shedding of Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus in people infected or not by human immunodeficiency virus 1. Clin Oral Investig (2012) 16:659–64.10.1007/s00784-011-0548-5
90
CannonMJStowellJDClarkRDollardPRJohnsonDMaskKet alRepeated measures study of weekly and daily cytomegalovirus shedding patterns in saliva and urine of healthy cytomegalovirus-seropositive children. BMC Infect Dis (2014) 14:569.10.1186/s12879-014-0569-1
91
YamamotoYMorookaMHashimotoSIhraMYoshikawaT. Analysis of the shedding of three β-herpesviruses in urine and saliva of children with renal disease. J Med Virol (2014) 86:505–11.10.1002/jmv.23782
92
SmithRJHShearerAEHildebrandMSCampGV. Deafness and hereditary hearing loss overview. In: PagonRAAdamMPArdingerHHWallaceSEAmemiyaABeanLJHet al, editors. GeneReviews®.Seattle, WA: University of Washington (1999). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1434/
93
SternHTuckerSM. Cytomegalovirus infection in the newborn and in early childhood. Lancet (1965) 2:1268–71.10.1016/S0140-6736(65)92283-X
94
RossSAAhmedAPalmerALMichaelsMGSánchezPJBernsteinDIet alDetection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of saliva or urine specimens. J Infect Dis (2014) 210:1415–8.10.1093/infdis/jiu263
95
BarzonLPacentiMBertoASinigagliaAFranchinELavezzoEet alIsolation of infectious Zika virus from saliva and prolonged viral RNA shedding in a traveller returning from the Dominican Republic to Italy, January 2016. Euro Surveill (2016) 21(10):30159.10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.10.30159
96
BarzonLPacentiMBertoASinigagliaAFranchinELavezzoEet alDetection of Zika virus in saliva. J Clin Virol (2015) 68:53–5.10.1016/j.jcv.2015.04.021
97
BrandrzaegP. Synthesis and secretion of human salivary immunoglobulins. In: GarrettJREkströmJAndersonLC, editors. Glandular Mechanisms of Salivary Secretion: Frontiers of Oral Biology. (Vol. 10), Basel: Karger (1998). p. 167–99.
98
JayashreeSBhanMKKumarRRajPGlassRBhandariN. Serum and salivary antibodies as indicators of rotavirus infection in neonates. J Infect Dis (1988) 158:1117–20.10.1093/infdis/158.5.1117
99
FriedmanMGSegalBZedakaRSarovBMargalithMBishopRet alSerum and salivary responses to oral tetravalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine in newborns. Clin Exp Immunol (1993) 92:194–9.10.1111/j.1365-2249.1993.tb03379.x
100
EcksteinMBBrownDWFosterARichardsAFGilbertCEVijayalakshmiP. Congenital rubella in south India: diagnosis using saliva from infants with cataract. BMJ (1996) 312:161.10.1136/bmj.312.7024.161
101
SpicherVMBouvierPSchlegel-HaueterSEMorabiaASiegristCA. Epidemiology of herpes simplex virus in children by detection of specific antibodies in saliva. Pediatr Infect Dis J (2001) 20:265–72.10.1097/00006454-200103000-00010
102
VainioKSamdalHHÅnestadGWedegeESkutlabergDHBransdalKTet alDetection of measles-and mumps-specific IgG antibodies in paired serum and oral fluid samples from Norwegian conscripts. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (2008) 27:461–5.10.1007/s10096-008-0460-3
103
AroraGSheikhSPallagattiSSinghBSinghVASinghR. Saliva as a tool in the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen in patients. Compend Contin Educ Dent (2012) 33:174–6.
104
ArchibaldDWJohnsonJPNairPAlgerLSHebertCADavisEet alDetection of salivary immunoglobulin A antibodies to HIV-1 in infants and children. AIDS (1990) 4:417–20.10.1097/00002030-199005000-00006
105
Zaka-ur-RabZAbqariSShahabTIslamNShuklaI. Evaluation of salivary anti-Salmonella typhi lipopolysaccharide IgA ELISA for serodiagnosis of typhoid fever in children. Arch Dis Child (2012) 97:236–8.10.1136/adc.2011.300622
106
Belda-FerrePAlcarazLDCabrera-RubioRRomeroHSimón-SoroAPignatelliMet alThe oral metagenome in health and disease. ISME J (2012) 6:46–56.10.1038/ismej.2011.85
107
WadeWG. Has the use of molecular methods for the characterization of the human oral microbiome changed our understanding of the role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease?J Clin Periodontol (2011) 38(Suppl 11):7–16.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01679.x
108
Centers for Disease Control. Health, United States, 2015 with Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus15.pdf
109
BoskerWMHuestisMA. Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse. Clin Chem (2009) 55:1910–31.10.1373/clinchem.2008.108670
110
GuinanTRonciMKobusHVoelckerNH. Rapid detection of illicit drugs in neat saliva using desorption/ionization on porous silicon. Talanta (2003) 99:791–8.10.1016/j.talanta.2012.07.029
111
CámporaPBermejoAMTaberneroMJFernandezP. Quantitation of cocaine and its major metabolites in human saliva using gas chromatography-positive chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-PCI-MS). J Anal Toxicol (2003) 27:270–4.10.1093/jat/27.5.270
112
FisherDSPatridgeSJHandleySACouchmanLMorganPEFlanaganRJ. LC-MS/MS of some atypical antipsychotics in human plasma, serum, oral fluid and haemolysed whole blood. Forensic Sci Int (2013) 229:145–50.10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.021
113
SoodSPGreenVIVievaLL. Routine methods in toxicology and therapeutic drug monitoring by high-performance liquid chromatography. VI: a rapid microscale method for determination of caffeine in plasma and saliva. Ther Drug Monit (1989) 11:361–4.10.1097/00007691-198905000-00023
Summary
Keywords
saliva, diagnostics, pediatrics, newborns, genetics
Citation
Hassaneen M and Maron JL (2017) Salivary Diagnostics in Pediatrics: Applicability, Translatability, and Limitations. Front. Public Health 5:83. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00083
Received
12 September 2016
Accepted
03 April 2017
Published
20 April 2017
Volume
5 - 2017
Edited by
Paul Desmond Slowey, Oasis Diagnostics, USA
Reviewed by
Angelo D’Ambrosio, University of Turin, Italy; Michael Noll-Hussong, University of Ulm, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Hassaneen and Maron.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jill L. Maron, jmaron@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Digital Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.