Abstract
Objectives: As the United States (U.S.) population rapidly ages, the incidence of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRDs) is rising, with racial/ethnic minorities affected at disproportionate rates. Much research has been undertaken to test, sequence, and analyze genetic risk factors for ADRDs in Caucasian populations, but comparatively little has been done with racial/ethnic minority populations. We conducted a scoping review to examine the nature and extent of the research that has been published about the genetic factors of ADRDs among racial/ethnic minorities in the U.S.
Design: Using an established scoping review methodological framework, we searched electronic databases for articles describing peer-reviewed empirical studies or Genome-Wide Association Studies that had been published 2005–2018 and focused on ADRD-related genes or genetic factors among underrepresented racial/ethnic minority population in the U.S.
Results: Sixty-six articles met the inclusion criteria for full text review. Well-established ADRD genetic risk factors for Caucasian populations including APOE, APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 have not been studied to the same degree in minority U.S. populations. Compared to the amount of research that has been conducted with Caucasian populations in the U.S., racial/ethnic minority communities are underrepresented.
Conclusion: Given the projected growth of the aging population and incidence of ADRDs, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities, increased focus on this important segment of the population is warranted. Our review can aid researchers in developing fundamental research questions to determine the role that ADRD risk genes play in the heavier burden of ADRDs in racial/ethnic minority populations.
Introduction
As the United States (U.S.) population rapidly ages, the incidence of Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD) is on the rise (1, 2). Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the sixth leading cause of death in the U.S. and the fifth leading cause of death for those age 65 years and older (1, 2). In the U.S., 5.7 million people are living with AD, which is projected to grow to 13.9 million adults (3.3% of the population) by 2060 (2). Although the primary risk factor for ADRD is age, race, and ethnicity are also associated with ADRD (2–4).
The U.S. population is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, with Census projections showing that the country will be a “majority–minority” nation by 2050. That is, racial/ethnic minorities will comprise more than 50% of the population by this date (5). African Americans are twice as likely as Non-Hispanic Whites to have AD, while Hispanics are 1.5 times as likely to have AD compared to their Non-Hispanic White counterparts (1). Also by 2050 in the U.S., it is estimated that the proportion of racial/ethnic minorities who suffer from AD will double in size compared to current figures (6). Regarding rates of diagnoses, in particular, African Americans are diagnosed later in the course of ADRD than White patients. Quinones et al. (7) suggest that this is likely due to cultural factors and normalization of ADRD symptoms as part of the usual aging process. There are also noted disparities in cognitive decline and impairment with racial/ethnic minorities suffering greater cognitive decline after ADRD diagnosis compared to other groups (8–10), potentially related to socio-economic resources, such as education quality, development of cognitive reserve, financial means, and early midlife stressors (7). Racial/ethnic health disparities in the U.S. proliferate, are multilayered, and are rooted in a variety of structural and historical inequalities that continue to disproportionately burden racial/ethnic minorities. These disparities underscore the need to examine the factors underlying ADRD in racial/ethnic minority U.S. populations.
As our population ages and the size of our minority populations increase in the U.S., understanding the burden of ADRD on our aging populations can aid in providing insight into the most appropriate and effective public health actions. For example, to provide the best care and community support for aging minority populations, it is valuable to understand any patterns of genetic risk factors to address comorbid disease management, environmental, and socio-economic factors that may affect ADRD prevention, diagnosis, and progression. Similarly, more precise knowledge of differences in prevalence of ADRD in minority populations is useful for policy planning when allocating resources, ensuring access to care, and improving quality of care (11).
Much research has been undertaken to test, sequence, and analyze genetic risk factors for ADRD in White populations, but comparatively little has been done with racial/ethnic minority populations (12). In fact, examining genetic factors in heath disparities research has sometimes led to intense controversy (13, 14), oftentimes for concern of the racialization of medicine, misuse of pharmacogenomics, and racial biology (15–17). In studies that have explored ADRD genetic risk factors in minorities, the study sizes have been relatively small, making the conclusions about genetic associations less powerful. Some data appears to show differences in the genetic etiologies between Caucasians and African Americans, especially relating to the APOE gene, which needs to be explored further (11, 18, 19).
There are multiple types of AD classified by age at onset and method of inheritance. The two main categories from a genetic perspective are Early Onset Alzheimer's Disease (EOAD) and Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD). According to the National Institute on Aging website, EOAD is also referred to as Familial Alzheimer's Disease and follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, meaning that only one allele from either parent is required to cause disease. EOAD is caused by mutations in three genetic loci, APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 (20–22). Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease, which is also referred to as Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease, is polygenic, meaning that multiple genes along with environmental factors contribute to the risk of AD, age of onset, and severity of disease (20, 21). APOE is one of the most well-established genetic risk factors for LOAD and has implications for risk of other types of AD (20, 21).
The APOE e4 allele is a strong risk factor for Sporadic or Late-Onset Familial AD, with the degree of risk increased with two copies of the allele (homozygous e4/e4), but possession of an e4 allele is not in itself necessary to produce AD or sufficient alone to cause the disease (23). Homozygosity in genetics refers to an individual with two copies of the same allele at a particular genetic loci or gene, while heterozygosity refers to the presence of two different alleles at a loci or gene (24). The effects of homozygosity and heterozygosity for the e4 allele has been studied extensively in European American populations, with homozygotes having a 12 times increased risk of LOAD, and heterozygotes having a 2–3 times increased risk of LOAD (18, 19). In African American populations and Hispanic populations, e4 heterozygosity or homozygosity does not correlate with increased risk of AD, indicating that other genetic and environmental factors are responsible for the increased incidence and prevalence of AD in these populations (25–27).
Examining genetic risk factors for ADRDs in minority populations can deepen our understanding of the interaction between biological or genetic factors and socio-ecological determinants of health. It also has the potential to aid in preventive care and early diagnosis for these populations with greater incidence of ADRDs (28). To better understand the risk profile of racial/ethnic minorities who are impacted by ADRD, research should be conducted to comprehend the disease mechanism in these populations, including influential genetic risk factors. If advances in genomic medicine continue to be valid, reliable, and promising, racial/ethnic minorities should be afforded the opportunities to participate in research at similar rates as their White counterparts (13). Other systematic reviews have been conducted in this general subject area. These reviews have had a more segmented focus, with some examining one specific gene and others focusing on a specific population (29, 30). Additional scoping or systematic reviews were focused on a single type of ADRD, such as Lewy Body Dementia or LOAD (31, 32). To explore this gap in the literature, we conducted a scoping review to examine the nature and extent of research that has been published about the genetic factors of ADRDs among racial/ethnic minorities in the U.S.
Methods
Search Strategy and Selection Criteria
Our study protocol was developed using the established and peer-reviewed scoping review methodological framework and updated based on prior ADRD-focused scoping reviews (33–38). Scoping reviews are a useful format used to explore fields of study not already well-explored or defined. A scoping review is a “preliminary assessment of the potential size and scope of available research literature. It aims to identify the nature and extent of research evidence” [(39), p. 31]. Scoping reviews can be utilized for a variety of research purposes including discovering the scope of existing research in a field of study, in order to identify gaps in the literature for future study. Scoping reviews can also be used to explore the need for a systematic review and the potential value of a systematic review (34, 38).
The databases used to conduct the search were PubMed, CINAHL, and Science Direct. We chose to limit the search to those articles published from 2005 to 2019, as 2005 is when next generation DNA sequencing was available, allowing for more extensive genetic studies with larger sample sizes (40). We conducted a search within the databases using a combination of three concepts: (1) ADRD Genes, (2) Populations and Minority Groups, and (3) ADRDs. The search used a combination of terms from the three concepts to find articles relevant to our research questions. Specific ADRD candidate gene terms were chosen by recent data from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) (41, 42). Some included terms were: APOE, beta Amyloid Protein Precursor, CD2AP, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, PSEN1, PSEN2, STM2, APP, TREM2, African American, Alaska Native, Arabs, Asian American, Ethnic Groups, Hispanic American, Native American, Jews, Minority Groups, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Lewy Bodies, Lewy Body Disease. Inclusion criteria for the review were (1) articles published after January 1, 2005, (3) available in English, (3) peer reviewed empirical studies or Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) (4) that focus on or include an underrepresented minority population in the U.S., (5) that focus on ADRDs, and (6) that focus on ADRD-related genes or genetic factors.
Data Extraction and Synthesis
The study selection process included three interrelated steps: Title/abstract reviews, full-article reviews, and reviewers' examination of reference lists from full articles to identify articles for possible inclusion (43). First, five out of nine of our team members were randomly assigned to review the 1,134 article titles and abstracts in Covidence systematic review online software, with each abstract randomly assigned to two reviewers. Two team members were designated as arbitrators for review discrepancies. When a discrepancy occurred between reviewers (e.g., one “Yes, include in the review” and one “No, do not include in the review”), the designated team members arbitrated the discrepancy. When both randomly assigned reviewers marked an abstract as “Yes” for inclusion, Covidence automatically moved it into the full article review list. Once all titles and abstracts were reviewed twice and all discrepancies arbitrated, the research team then performed a complete review of the resulting 115 articles. Seven team members were randomly assigned a set of articles for full review and the same inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. A data abstraction tool was developed to facilitate review of the full articles and to abstract relevant data. The tool included 21 questions to aid in summarizing the key characteristics of each article. Discrepancies on final article selection and data extraction were then arbitrated by two team members with consultation with the rest of the research team. Once all full articles had been determined, the abstracted data were converted to a Microsoft Excel file for management.
Results
Studies Identified
From the searches in all three databases there were a total of 1,891 articles and 14 additional articles identified from reference lists, for a total of 1,905. We removed 771 duplicates, for a total 1,134 articles for the abstract review stage. During the title abstract review we excluded 1,019 articles due to the following reasons: published outside of the date range, article not available in English, dissertation, metanalysis, systematic review, scoping review, not focused on ADRD, not focused on minority U.S. population, not focused on ADRD genetic factors. After title abstract review, 115 articles remained for full text review. An additional 49 articles were excluded during the full-text review stage if the criteria were not met through examination of the full article. The full text review resulted in 66 included articles (see Figure 1).
Figure 1
Populations and Genes Examined
Tables 1, 2 present the general characteristics of the studies included in the full-text review. Table 3 presents a detailed listing of the characteristics of the articles that were included in the full-text review. Among the resulting 66 studies, most of the studies (n = 41, 62%) were focused on African Americans as the population of interest followed by those focusing on the Hispanic population (n = 28, 42%). Asian American populations were examined in seven out of the 66 studies (11%), and Native American/Alaska Natives populations were included in only one study (1.5%) (Table 1).
Table 1
| Characteristic | Number | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Publication year | ||
| 2005–2006 | 7 | 10.6 |
| 2007–2008 | 6 | 9.1 |
| 2009–2010 | 5 | 7.6 |
| 2011–2012 | 9 | 13.6 |
| 2013–2014 | 15 | 22.7 |
| 2015–2016 | 9 | 13.6 |
| 2017–2018 | 15 | 22.7 |
| Race/Ethnicitya | ||
| African American | 41 | 62.1 |
| Hispanic American | 28 | 42.4 |
| Asian American | 7 | 10.6 |
| Native American/Alaska Native | 1 | 1.5 |
| Sample size | ||
| 0–100 | 3 | 4.5 |
| 101–500 | 11 | 16.7 |
| 501–1,000 | 10 | 15.2 |
| 1,001–1,500 | 11 | 16.7 |
| 1,501–2,000 | 7 | 10.6 |
| 2,001–2,500 | 4 | 6.1 |
| 2,501–3,000 | 2 | 3.0 |
| 3,001–3,500 | 2 | 3.0 |
| 3,501–4,000 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 4,001–4,500 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 4,501 or more | 15 | 22.7 |
| Type of study | ||
| Case-control | 18 | 27.3 |
| Cross-sectional | 15 | 22.7 |
| Cohort | 12 | 18.2 |
| Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) | 9 | 13.6 |
| Longitudinal | 5 | 7.6 |
| Other | 5 | 7.6 |
| Case report/case study | 2 | 3.0 |
Characteristics of studies included in the full-text review (N = 66).
Some articles included multiple races/ethnicities in the study sample.
Table 2
| Characteristic | Number | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Type of ADRDa | ||
| Lewy Body Dementia | 1 | 1.5 |
| Mild Cognitive Impairment | 2 | 3.0 |
| Cognitive Decline | 2 | 3.0 |
| Vascular Dementia | 4 | 6.1 |
| Early onset AD (EOAD) | 7 | 10.6 |
| Alzheimer's Disease | 13 | 19.7 |
| Type of ADRD not specified | 20 | 30.3 |
| Late Onset AD (LOAD) | 26 | 39.4 |
| ADRD risk genes identifiedb | ||
| PSEN2 | 1 | 1.5 |
| AKAP9 | 2 | 3.0 |
| GRIN3B | 2 | 3.0 |
| SORL1 | 2 | 3.0 |
| CR1 | 3 | 4.5 |
| APP | 4 | 6.1 |
| PSEN1 | 4 | 6.1 |
| ABCA7 | 6 | 9.1 |
| CLU | 6 | 9.1 |
| PICALM | 7 | 10.6 |
| APOE | 43 | 65.2 |
| Other | 42 | 63.6 |
Type of ADRD and risk genes identified in full-text review articles (N = 66).
Some articles examined more than one type of ADRD.
Some articles included multiple risk genes.
Table 3
| Author and year | Study design | URM group | Data source | Sample size* | Type of ADRD | Gene(s) included |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akomolafe et al. (44) | Case-control | African American | MIRAGE Study | 511 cases, 679 controls* | EOAD, LOAD | NOS3, APOE |
| Arnold et al. (45) | Cohort | Puerto Rican | Original data | 283 | EOAD, LOAD | PSEN1 |
| Beeri et al. (46) | Longitudinal, cohort | African American | ACCORD-MIND Study | 466 | Cognitive Decline | HP |
| Borenstein et al. (47) | Prospective, cohort | Japanese American | The Kame Project | 1,859 | Alzheimer's disease | APOE |
| Borenstein et al. (48) | Prospective, cohort | Japanese American | The Kame Project | 1,859 | Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease | APOE |
| Bressler et al. (49) | GWAS | African Americans | The ARIC Study | 10,359* | LOAD | APOE, ABCA7, BIN1, CD2AP, CDS33, CELF1, EPHA1, MS4A4E, NME8, PICALM, PKT2B, ZCWPW1, |
| Campos et al. (50) | Case-control | Hispanic Americans, Amerindians | Original data | 56 cases, 56 controls* | Alzheimer's Disease | APOE |
| Carrion-Baralt et al. (51) | Cohort | Puerto Ricans | Original data | 87 | Alzheimer's Disease | APOE |
| Conway et al. (52) | Case-control, targeted sequencing | African Americans | Mayo Clinic | 5,924 cases, 5,173 controls* | EOAD, LOAD, Lewy Body Dementia | ABI3, APOE, PLCG2 |
| Cukier et al. (53) | Case-control | African Americans, Caribbean Hispanics | HIHG and ADGC data sets | 149 cases, 137 controls* | LOAD | ABC1, ABCA7 |
| Desai et al. (54) | Case-control | African Americans | ADRC data set | 1,059 cases, 716 controls* | LOAD | BDNF |
| Edwards-Lee et al. (55) | Family study | African Americans | Original data | 7 | EOAD (autosomal dominant) | APP, PS1, MAPT |
| Erlich et al. (56) | Case-control study | African Americans | MIRAGE Study | 520 cases, 677 controls* | Alzheimer's Disease | PON1, PON2, PON3 |
| Fitten et al. (57) | Cross-sectional study | Hispanic Americans | ADRC data set, OVMC data set | 290* | Alzheimer's Disease, Vascular Dementia | APOE |
| Ghani et al. (58) | Case-control, GWAS | Hispanic Americans | Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project, Estudio Familiar de Influencia Genetica de Alzheimer Study | 547 cases, 542 controls* | LOAD | APOE, CLU, PICALM, BIN1 |
| Gonzalez et al. (59) | Cohort study | Hispanic Americans | The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) | 10,887* | Alzheimer's Disease | APOE |
| Harwood et al. (60) | Cross-sectional study | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | Original data | 685 | Alzheimer's Disease | APOE |
| He et al. (61) | Cross-sectional study | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | Original data | 439 | Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | APOE |
| Hendrie et al. (62) | Case-control study | African Americans | Original data | 221 cases, 218 controls | MCI, Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease | APOE |
| Hohman et al. (63) | Case-control, GWAS | African Americans | ADGC | 1,840 cases, 3,804 controls | LOAD | APOE, STM2, ABCA7, CR1, PICALM, BIN1, EPHA1, CD33, SLC24A4, GRIN3B, FERMT2, MS4A6A |
| Janicki et al. (64) | Cohort study | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP) | 1,686* | Alzheimer's Disease | APOE, CYP19 |
| Jin et al. (65) | Case-control | African Americans | Knight-ADRC + NIA-LOAD, Mayo Clinic, Indiana University, WHICAP, Emory University | 906 cases, 2,487 controls* | LOAD | TREM2 |
| Janicki et al. (66) | Prospective Cohort study | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | WHICAP | 1,686* | Alzheimer's Disease | ESR1 |
| Kim et al. (67) | Longitudinal prospective community-based study | African Americans | IIDP | 1,858* | AD, Dementia | CD2AP, CBS, DTWD2, DYNC111, JRKL-AS1, BIRC8, HCY |
| Kuller et al. (68) | Longitudinal cohort study | African Americans | Pittsburgh Cardiovascular Health Study | 532 | LOAD | APOE |
| Kunkle et al. (69) | Case-control study, GWAS | African Americans | HIHG/CWRU, NIMH Genetic Studies of Alzheimer's Disease Cohort, NCRAD/NIA-LOAD, African American Alzheimer's Disease Genomics Coalition (AAADGC) | 2,762 cases, 2,812 controls* | LOAD | ABCA7 |
| Kwon et al. (70) | Cohort study | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | Original data | 1,309* | LOAD | APOE |
| Lee et al. (71) | Nested Case-control study, prospective | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | Original data | 296 cases, 428 controls* | AD | SORL1 |
| Lee et al. (72) | Family-based cohort study, GWAS | Caribbean Hispanic | Original data | 1,161 individuals from 209 families | Familial LOAD | APOE, PSEN1, 5q15, 7q36.3, 14q32.12, 17q25.1, 17p13 |
| Lee (73) | Family-based case-control and unrelated case-control study, GWAS | Caribbean Hispanics | ADRC | 693 cases, 442 controls* | LOAD | APOE, 12p13 |
| Lee (74) | Nested case-control GWAS | Caribbean Hispanics | WHICAP and EFIGA datasets | 549 cases, 544 controls | LOAD | CLU, PICALM, BIN1, PSEN1, GHITM, C10orf99, PCDH21, LRT2, LRT1, RGR, DGKB, HPCAL1, ODC1 |
| Lee (75) | Family-based cohort study | Caribbean Hispanics | WHICAP and EFIGA datasets | 2,888 | EOAD, LOAD | PSEN1, SNX25, PDLIM3, SORBS2, SH3RF3, NPHP1 |
| Livney (76) | Cross-sectional study | African American, Hispanic Americans | Original data | 1,341 | AD | APOE |
| Logue (77) | Case-control study | African Americans | MIRAGE, GenerAAtions, ADNI, GenADA, NIA-LOAD, FHS | 3,568 cases, 6,205 controls* | APOE, PVRL2, CLU, PICALM, BIN1, EPHA1, MS4A, ABCA7, and CD33, TOMM40 | |
| Logue et al. (78) | Case-control | African Americans | MIRAGE Study, GenerAAtions Study | 422 cases, 394 controls | EOAD, LOAD | AKAP9, APOE, BIN1, CLU, CR1, PICALM, MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33, ABCA7, EPHA1, SORL1, ACE, PSEN1, PSEN2, APP |
| Logue et al. (79) | Case-control | African Americans | MIRAGE Study, GenerAAtions Study, National Cell Repository for Alzheimer's Disease (NCRAD), Ibadan/Indianapolis (INDY) Study | 489 cases, 472 controls | LOAD | ABCA7, AKAP9, KIAA0196, KANSL1, CNN2, TRIM2 |
| Marden et al. (80) | Cohort | African Americans | Health and Retirement Study (HRS) | 7,690* | AD and Dementia | APOE, BIN1, CLU, ABCA7, CR1, PICALM, MS4A6A, CD33, MS4A4E, CD2AP |
| Marden et al. (81) | Cohort | African Americans | HRS | 8,253* | AD | APOE, CLU, CR1, PICALM |
| McAninch et al. (82) | Cohort | African Americans | Original data | 12,348* | AD | DIO2 |
| Melville et al. (83) | Case-control | African Americans | MIRAGE Study, ADNI Study | 1,146 cases, 956 controls* | AD, MCI | APOE, PICALM, F5/SELP, LHFP, GCFC2, SYNPR, TTC27 |
| Mez et al. (84) | Case-control | African Americans | ADGC, GenerAAtions, MIRAGE, CHAP | 1,825 cases, 3,784 controls | LOAD | APOE, ABCA7, COBL, SLC10A2 |
| Mount et al. (85) | Cross-sectional, retrospective | African Americans | ADCR | 65 | LOAD | APOE |
| Murrell et al. (86) | Cohort | African Americans | Original data | 480 | LOAD | APOE |
| N'Songo et al. (87) | Cohort | African Americans | Original data | 198 cases, 350 controls | EOAD | APP, PSEN1, PSEN2 |
| O'Bryant et al. (88) | Cohort | Mexican Americans | Project FRONTIER, TARCC | 1,628 | MCI | APOE |
| O'Bryant et al. (89) | Cohort, CBPR | Mexican Americans | Project FRONTIER, TARCC | 1,069* | MCI, AD | APOE |
| Olarte et al. (90) | Population-based, case series | Hispanics | HCFA | 680 | Sporadic and familial AD | APOE |
| Pedraza et al. (91) | Case-control | African Americans | Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Data, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, Mayo Clinic LOAD-GWAS | 476 cases, 2,443 controls* | LOAD | CLU, CR1, PICALM |
| Peila et al. (92) | Nested case-control | Japanese-Americans | Honolulu-Asia Aging Study (HAAS), Honolulu Heart Program (HHP) | 283 cases, 573 controls | AD, Vascular Dementia | APOE, TGF-β1 |
| Petrovich et al. (93) | Longitudinal, cohort | Japanese-Americans | The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study | 375 | AD | APOE |
| Qian et al. (94) | Prospective, cohort | Latinos | NACC, Rotterdam Study, Framingham Heart Study, and Sacramento Area Latino Study (SALSA) | 16,844* | AD | APOE |
| Rajabli et al. (95) | Case-control | African Americans, Hispanic Americans | HGDP (Human Genome Diversity Project) | 1,986 cases, 3,899 controls* | LOAD | APOE |
| Reitz et al. (96) | Case-control | African Americans and Caribbean Hispanics | Toronto dataset, NIA-LOAD, MIRAGE Caucasian dataset, MIRAGE African American dataset, Miami Caucasian, Caribbean Hispanic dataset | 2,809 cases, 3,482 controls | AD | SORCS1, APP, Aβ, SORL1 |
| Reitz et al. (97) | Case-control | Caribbean Hispanics | DMS-IV, NINCDS-ADRDA | 160 cases, 294 controls | LOAD | IDE, KIF1, HHEX |
| Reitz et al. (98) | Case-control | African Americans | CHAP, MARS/CORE, UM/VU | 1,968 cases, 3,928 controls | LOAD | ABCA7, APOE |
| Rippon et al. (99) | Family-based cohort study | Latinos | NINDCS-ADRDA | 1,498 | Familial AD | APOE |
| Roses et al. (100) | Cohort | African Americans, Japanese Americans | Bryan ADRC Database/Repository, Coriell Cell Repositories | 447* | LOAD | TOMM40, APOE |
| Sacyzynsky et al. (101) | Cohort | Japanese-Americans | The Honolulu Heart Program, Cooperative Lipoprotein Study | 929 | Dementia | APOE |
| Sawyer et al. (102) | Prospective cohort | African Americans | Duke EPESE Study | 2,076* | Cognitive decline (CD) | APOE |
| Simino et al. (103) | Cohort | African Americans | CHARGE, the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project | 1,414* | AD | Amyloid-β, KLKB1, F12, PLIN2, ITPRIP |
| Tosto et al. (104) | Cohort | Caribbean Hispanics | NIA-LOAD, EFIGA | 8,116* | LOAD | APOE ε4 |
| Vardarajan et al. (105) | Case-control | African Americans | ADGC | 8,309 cases, 7,366 controls* | AD | APP, KIAA1033, SNX1, SORL1, SNX3, RAB7A |
| Vardarajan et al. (106) | Family and cohort-based genetic association study | Caribbean Hispanics | Original data | 464 familial subjects—(350 affected, 114 unaffected), 498 unrelated controls | LOAD | SORL1 |
| Weiner et al. (107) | Case-control | Choctaw Indians | Original data (Choctaw Indians) and UT Southwestern Alzheimer's Disease Center (ADC) | 78 cases, 39 controls* | AD | APOE |
| Yu et al. (108) | Longitudinal, cohort | African Americans | Religious Orders Study (ROS), Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP), Minority Aging Research Study (MARS) | 2,388* | AD | APOE, TOMM40 |
Detailed listing of studies included in the full-text review.
Article included multiple races/ethnicities in the study sample.
There were many different study designs represented in our results. The most common study design was a case control study design, with 18 included articles using this design. The next most frequently found study design was cross-sectional with 15 included studies in this category. There were nine GWAS which is expected because candidate risk genes for ADRD in minority populations have not been fully established. There were five longitudinal studies in the results and two case studies. Lastly, there were five studies that could not be classified into one of these categories (Table 1).
Many different types of ADRDs were represented in our search results. The most frequently examined type of AD in our results was LOAD (n = 26, 40%), followed by AD (n = 12, 18%) and EOAD (n = 7, 11%). Vascular Dementia was the focus of four articles out of the total 66 results (n = 4, 6%). Both Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Cognitive Decline were examined in two articles each (n = 2, 3%). Lewy Body Dementia was the subject of one article (n = 1, 1.5%). Lastly, there were 20 articles that did not specify a particular ADRD designation (n = 20, 30%) (Table 2).
In terms of specific ADRD risk genes, APOE was examined in most studies, with 44 out of 66 included studies examining this genetic risk factor. Other potential ADRD risk genes that were examined by multiple studies included ABCA7, CLU, CR1, PICALM, APP, PSEN1, SORL1 and AKAP9, APP, and PSEN1 are well-established genetic risk factors for EOAD, but in total, they were examined in only eight out of 66 included studies (Table 2).
Discussion
Our findings provide an overview of the published literature examining the association between genetic factors and ADRD risk among racial/ethnic minorities in the U.S. These findings help to illuminate knowledge gaps and suggest whether further study should be undertaken to assess more comprehensively the role that ADRD genes play in AD rates and disease outcomes for minority populations.
Regarding the extent of the genes examined in the studies that we found, APOE was examined in most studies, with 44 out of 66 included studies examining this genetic risk factor. This corresponds with extant ADRD genetic risk factor research findings in general, as APOE is the most well-established genetic risk factor for Sporadic or LOAD (23). We found that well-established ADRD genetic risk factors for Caucasian populations including APOE, APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 have not been studied to the same degree in minority U.S. populations. The APOE genotype has been shown to be less predictive of ADRD risk in African American, Asian American, Hispanic American, and Native American populations (26, 27, 29, 98). Other genetic risk factors may play a larger role in ADRD genetic risk in these populations, with potential candidates including genes with various functions such as ABCA7, CLU, CR1, PICALM, SORL1, AKAP9, and TREM2 (26, 27, 29, 98, 109). These genes were noted in our review, however with far less frequency than APOE. Preliminary findings indicate that there may be a more complex polygenic profile of ADRD genetic risk in these populations, and this has potential implications for the possible polygenic nature of ADRD risk in all populations (27, 59, 87).
In comparison to the amount of research that has been conducted on Caucasians in the U.S., we found that some minority communities were vastly underrepresented in the research, namely Hispanics, Native Americans, and Asian Americans. Though the number of studies on ADRD genetic risk factors in minority populations has increased over time, especially for certain populations such as African Americans, more comprehensive studies with large sample sizes should be performed to establish key genetic risk factors for these populations as well (27, 109–112). Among the studies in our review, sample size for non-GWAS studies started as low as N = 19 for a case report design. As the sample size increases and more diverse persons are included, additional, more statistically sound conclusions can be made about the associations between genetic expression and disease outcome.
Additionally, comparative studies with both minority and majority population group samples would be useful in examining genetic risk factors, as well as the effects of environment and other factors. Studies exploring genetic risk factors in these populations is warranted to determine the role that both genes and environmental factors play in increased ADRD risks in these populations. A larger, systematic review of existing literature on genetic risk factors for minority U.S. populations would be an appropriate next step in better understanding the existing study landscape with intentions toward implementing GWAS and meta-analyses for diverse U.S. populations.
Knowledge gaps in the disease mechanism among racial/ethnic minority populations is a critical indicator of inequities in genetics and genomics research in these communities, as well as a lack of equity in the health care system for these groups (112). Advancements in genetic medicine and genomic research proliferate, unfortunately not at the same rate for all persons. The impact that disproportionate expansion, innovation, and progress in the field can have on health disparities is significant (12, 112). With that in mind, it is also important to acknowledge that while genetic inquiry is crucial to understanding the disparities present in ADRD, it is not the sole risk factor. Other factors such as environment and socio-environmental context, are implicated in the distribution of racial health disparities, and in fact, the complex interplay of all these factors contribute to many disease outcomes (12, 113, 114).
Of additional consideration as an important implication of this research, particularly for minority populations, is the potential of stigma related to ADRD diagnosis. Some groups have been found to consider dementia as a normal part of aging (115), while others may find shame in an AD diagnosis or the need to keep such health information private (116–118). We highlight these studies as further evidence of the need to focus research in racially and ethnically diverse communities. Furthermore, we acknowledge that such research should consider both quantitative and qualitative approaches.
This study is not without limitations. First, while we conducted a systematic and structured process for the scoping review, we did not evaluate the quality of the evidence presented or the authors' research methods as part of this review. Second, some studies more clearly identified the characteristics of interest for our review than others, and as such, some of the data presented was left to the interpretation of the authorship team. Third, we acknowledge that there is limited generalizability of our findings to research that has been conducted in the U.S. among racial/ethnic minorities. That said, we find that an important strength of this review is in identifying the knowledge gaps in examining and understanding the genetic factors associated with ADRD among racial/ethnic minority populations, which is of growing disease and economic burden in the U.S.
Conclusion
Based our findings, we recommend that additional studies be undertaken to map out and more deeply explore ADRD genetic risk factors among racial/ethnic minority populations in the U.S. at levels comparable to non-minority populations. An increased number of larger scale studies of racially/ethnically diverse persons can aid researchers in making more powerful conclusions about genetic associations in ADRD among populations most affected. Examining genetic risk factors for ADRDs in minority populations can deepen our understanding of the interaction between biological or genetic factors and socio-ecological determinants of health. Furthermore, understanding the role of genetic predisposing factors has the potential to increase preventive health measures and screening, which could lead to reduced time to diagnosis and improved ADRD disease management. Lastly, ethical concerns about the impact that this knowledge of genetic risk factors may have on the health and well-being of individuals must be addressed as we continue to obtain more data on these genetic factors. As our population ages and the size of our minority populations increase in the U.S., understanding the burden of ADRD on our aging populations can aid in providing insight into the most appropriate and effective public health actions.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
LR conceptualized the study, was a scoping reviewer, and contributed to the manuscript narrative. LI and DF were scoping reviewers, contributed to the manuscript narrative, and helped to edit the manuscript. NR was a scoping reviewer and contributed to the manuscript narrative. BA-C, AR, KL, SU, and QM were scoping reviewers and helped to edit the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
Alzheimer's Association Report: 2020 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimers Dement. (2020). 16:391–460. 10.1002/alz.12068
2.
HebertLEWeuveJScherrPAEvansDA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. (2013). 80:1778–83. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5
3.
MatthewsKAXuWGagliotiAHHoltJBCroftJBMackDet al. Racial and Ethnic Estimates of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in the United States (2015-2060) in Adults Aged ≥ 65 years. Alzheimers Dement. (2019) 15:17–24. 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.3063
4.
ChenCZissimopoulosJM. Racial and ethnic differences in trends in dementia prevalence and risk factors in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. (2018) 4:510–20. 10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.009
5.
SteenlandKGoldsteinFCLeveyAWhartonW. A meta-analysis of Alzheimer's disease incidence and prevalence comparing African-Americans and Caucasians. J Alzheimers Dis. (2016) 50:71–6. 10.3233/JAD-150778
6.
ColbySLOrtmanJM. Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060. Population estimates and projections: current population reports. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau (2015). Available online at: http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf (accessed March 22, 2021).
7.
ShinJDoraiswamyPM. Underrepresentation of African Americans in Alzheimer's trials: a call for affirmative action. Front Aging Neurosci. (2016) 8:123. 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00123
8.
QuiñonesARKayeJAlloreHGBotoseneanuAThielkeSM. An agenda for addressing multimorbidity and racial and ethnic disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. (2020) 35:153331752096087. 10.1177/1533317520960874
9.
PetersonRLFainMJButlerAEEhiriJECarvajalSC. The role of social and behavioral risk factors in explaining racial disparities in age-related cognitive impairment: a structured narrative review. Aging, Neuropsychol Cogn. (2019) 27:173–96. 10.1080/13825585.2019.1598539
10.
WeuveJBarnesLLMendes de LeonCFRajanKBBeckTAggarwalNTet al. Cognitive aging in black and white Americans. Epidemiology. (2018) 29:151–9. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000747
11.
ZuelsdorffMOkonkwoOCNortonDBarnesLLGrahamKLClarkLRet al. Stressful life events and racial disparities in cognition among middle-aged and older adults. J Alzheimers Dis. (2020) 73:671–82. 10.3233/JAD-190439
12.
FroehlichTEBogardus STJrInouyeSK. Dementia and race: are there differences between African Americans and Caucasians?. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2001) 49:477–84. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49096.x
13.
MartinARKanaiMKamataniYOkadaYNealeBMDalyMJ. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet. (2019) 51:584–91. 10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x
14.
MoonesingheRJonesWHonoréPATrumanBIGrahamG. Genomic medicine and racial/ethnic health disparities: promises, perils, and the challenges for health care and public health policy. Ethn Dis. (2009) 19:473–8.
15.
HuntLMMegyesiMS. Genes, race and research ethics: who's minding the store?. J Med Ethics. (2008) 34:495–500. 10.1136/jme.2007.021295
16.
LeeSS. Pharmacogenomics and the challenge of health disparities. Publ Health Genomics. (2009) 12:170–9. 10.1159/000189630
17.
RotimiCN. Are medical and nonmedical uses of large-scale genomic markers conflating genetics and 'race'?. Nat Genet. (2004) 36(11 Suppl):S43–7. 10.1038/ng1439
18.
ScharffDPMathewsKJJacksonPHoffsuemmerJMartinEEdwardsD. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved. (2010) 21:879–97. 10.1353/hpu.0.0323
19.
BergCNSinhaNGluckMA. The effects of APOE and ABCA7 on cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease risk in African Americans: a focused mini review. Front Hum Neurosci. (2019) 13:387. 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00387
20.
PotterHWisniewskiT. Apolipoprotein E: essential catalyst of the Alzheimer amyloid cascade. Int J Alzheimers Dis. (2012) 2012:489428. 10.1155/2012/489428
21.
BertramLMcQueenMBMullinKBlackerDTanziRE. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat Genet. (2007) 39:17–23. 10.1038/ng1934
22.
BertramLTanziRE. Alzheimer disease risk genes: 29 and counting. Nat Rev Neurol. (2019) 15:191–2. 10.1038/s41582-019-0158-4
23.
CacaceRSleegersKVan BroeckhovenC. Molecular genetics of early-onset Alzheimer's disease revisited. Alzheimers Dement. (2016) 12:733–48. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.01.012
24.
RobertsJSPattersonAKUhlmannWR. Genetic testing for neurodegenerative diseases: Ethical and health communication challenges. Neurobiol Dis. (2020) 141:104871. 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104871
25.
ElstonRCSatagopanJMSunS. Genetic terminology. Methods Mol Biol. (2012) 850:1–9. 10.1007/978-1-61779-555-8_1
26.
Graff-RadfordNRBesserLMCrookJEKukullWADicksonDW. Neuropathologic differences by race from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Alzheimers Dement. (2016) 12:669–77. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.004
27.
HeffernanALChidgeyCPengPMastersCLRobertsBR. The neurobiology and age-related prevalence of the ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's Disease Cohorts. J Mol Neurosci. (2016) 60:316–24. 10.1007/s12031-016-0804-x
28.
MezJMardenJRMukherjeeSBrewsterPHamiltonJLGilsanzPet al. P2-076: Alzheimer's disease genetic risk variants beyond Apoe ε4 predict mortality in the adult changes in thought (ACT) study. Alzheimers Dement. (2016) 12:P637–8. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1281
29.
BerkowitzCLMosconiLRahmanAScheyerOHristovHIsaacsonRS. Clinical application of APOE in Alzheimer's prevention: a precision medicine approach. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. (2018) 5:245–52. 10.14283/jpad.2018.35
30.
TangM-XSternYMarderKBellKGurlandBLantiguaRet al. The APOE-epsilon4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer disease among African Americans, whites, and Hispanics. JAMA. (1998) 279:751–5. 10.1001/jama.279.10.751
31.
HuangMWangDXuZXuYXuXMaYet al. Lack of genetic association between TREM2 and Alzheimer's disease in East Asian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. (2015) 30:541–6. 10.1177/1533317515577128
32.
HuqAJFransquetPLawsSMRyanJSebraRMastersCLet al. Genetic resilience to Alzheimer's disease in APOE ε4 homozygotes: a systematic review. Alzheimers Dement. (2019) 15:1612–23. 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.05.011
33.
SanghviHSinghRMorrinHRajkumarAP. Systematic review of genetic association studies in people with Lewy Body Dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2020) 35:436–48. 10.1002/gps.5260
34.
AndrewsSJMcFallGPBoothADixonRAAnsteyKJ. Association of Alzheimer's disease genetic risk loci with cognitive performance and decline: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. (2019) 69:1109–36. 10.3233/JAD-190342
35.
ArkseyHO'MalleyL. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. (2005) 8:19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616
36.
PetersMDGodfreyCMKhalilHMcInerneyPParkerDSoaresCB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. (2015) 13:141–6. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
37.
FriedmanDBBecofskyKAndersonLABryantLLHunterRHIveySLet al. Public perceptions about risk and protective factors for cognitive health and impairment: a review of the literature. Int Psychogeriatr. (2015) 27:1263–75. 10.1017/S1041610214002877
38.
RescinitiNVTangWTabassumMPearsonJLSpencerSMLohmanMCet al. Knowledge evaluation instruments for dementia caregiver education programs: a scoping review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. (2020) 20:397–413. 10.1111/ggi.13901
39.
TriccoACLillieEZarinWO'BrienKKColquhounHLevacDet al. Prisma Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SCR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. (2018) 169:467–73. 10.7326/M18-0850
40.
GrantMJBoothA. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. (2009) 26:91–108. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
41.
UreñaSIngramLALeithKLohmanMCRescinitiNRubinLet al. Mentorship and training to increase diversity of researchers and practitioners in the field of aging and Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review of program characteristics. J Aging Health. (2021) 33:48–62. 10.1177/0898264320953345
42.
TanziREBertramL. New frontiers in Alzheimer's disease genetics. Neuron. (2001) 32:181–4. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00476-7
43.
KilpinenHBarrettJC. How next-generation sequencing is transforming complex disease genetics. Trends Genet. (2013) 29:23–30. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.001
44.
AkomolafeALunettaKLElrichPMCupplesLABaldwinCTHuyckMet al. Genetic association between endothelial nitric oxide synthase and Alzheimer disease. Clin Genet. (2006) 70:49–56. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00638.x
45.
ArnoldSEVegaIEKarlawishJHWolkDANunezJNegronMet al. Frequency and clinicopathological characteristics of presenilin 1 Gly206Ala mutation in Puerto Rican Hispanics with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. (2013) 33:1089–95. 10.3233/JAD-2012-121570
46.
BeeriMSLinHMSanoMSpringerRRLiuXBendlinBBet al. Association of the haptoglobin gene polymorphism with cognitive function and decline in elderly african american adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes-memory in diabetes (accord-mind) study. JAMA Netw Open. (2018) 7:e184458. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4458
47.
BorensteinARWuYMortimerJASchellenbergGDMcCormickWCBowenJDet al. Developmental and vascular risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. (2005) 26:325–34. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.04.010
48.
BorensteinARWuYBowenJDMcCormickWCUomotoJMcCurrySMet al. Incidence rates of dementia, Alzheimer disease, and vascular dementia in the Japanese American population in Seattle, WA: the Kame Project. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. (2014) 28:23–9. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182a2e32f
49.
BresslerJMosleyTHPenmanAGottesmanRFWindhamBGKnopmanDSet al. Genetic variants associated with risk of Alzheimer's disease contribute to cognitive change in midlife: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. (2017) 174:269–82. 10.1002/ajmg.b.32509
50.
CamposMEdlanSPeavyG. An exploratory study of APOE-ε4 genotype and risk of Alzheimer's disease in Mexican Hispanics. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2013) 61:1038-y40. 10.1111/jgs.12292
51.
Carrión-BaraltJMeléndez-CabreroJRodríguez-UbiñasHSchmeidlerJBeeiMAngeloGet al. Impact of APOE ε4 on the cognitive performance of a sample of non-demented Puerto Rican Nonagenarians. J Alzheimer Dis. (2009) 18:533–40. 10.3233/JAD-2009-1160
52.
ConwayOCarrasquilloMWangXBredenbergJReedyJStricklandSet al. ABI3 and PLCG2 missense variants as risk factors for neurodegenerative diseases in Caucasians and African Americans. Mol. Neurodegener. (2018) 13. 10.1186/s13024-018-0289-x
53.
CukierHKunkleBVardarajanBRolatiSHamilton-NelsonKKohliMet al. ABCA7 frameshift deletion associated with Alzheimer disease in African Americans. Neurol. Genet. (2016) 2:34–8. 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000079
54.
DesaiPDeKoskySKambohI. Genetic variation in the cholesterol 24-hydroxylase (CYP46) gene and the risk of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci. Lett. (2002) 328:9–12. 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00443-3
55.
Edwards-LeeTRingmanJMChungJWernerJMorganAHyslopGet al. An African American family with early-onset Alzheimer disease and an APP (T714I) mutation. Neurology. (2005) 64:23. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149761.70566.3E
56.
ElrichPLunettaKCupplesAHuyckMGreenRBaldwinCet al. Polymorphisms in the PON gene cluster are associated with Alzheimer disease. Hum Mol Genet. (2006) 15:77–85. 10.1093/hmg/ddi428
57.
FittenJOrtizFFairbanksLBartzokisGLuPKleinEet al. Younger age of dementia diagnosis in a Hispanic population in southern California. Int J Geriatr. (2014) 29:586–93. 10.1002/gps.4040
58.
GhaniMSatoCLeeJReitzCMorenoDMayeuxRet al. Evidence of recessive Alzheimer disease loci in a Caribbean Hispanic data set: Genome-wide survey of runs of homozygosity. JAMA Neurol. (2013) 70:1261–7. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3545
59.
GonzálezHMTarrafWJianXVasquezPMKaplanRThyagarajanBet al. Apolipoprotein E genotypes among diverse middle-aged and older latinos: study of latinos-investigation of neurocognitive aging results (HCHS/SOL). Sci Rep. (2018) 8:17578. 10.1038/s41598-018-35573-3
60.
HarwoodDGKalechsteinABarkerWWet al. The effect of alcohol and tobacco consumption, and apolipoprotein E genotype, on the age of onset in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2010) 25:511–8. 10.1002/gps.2372
61.
HeJFariasSMartinezOReedBMungasDDecarliC. Differences in brain volume, hippocampal volume, cerebrovascular risk factors, and apolipoprotein E4 among mild cognitive impairment subtypes. Arch Neurol. (2009) 66:1393–9. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.252
62.
HendrieHCMurrellJBaiyewuOLaneKAPurnellCOgunniyiAet al. APOE ε4 and the risk for Alzheimer disease and cognitive decline in African Americans and Yoruba. Int Psychogeriatr. (2014) 26:977–85. 10.1017/S1041610214000167
63.
HohmanTJCooke–BaileyJNReitzCJunGNajABeechamGWet al. Global and local ancestry in African-Americans: Implications for Alzheimer's disease risk. Alzheimers Dement. (2016) 12:233–43. 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.012
64.
JanickiSCParkNChengRSchupfNClarkLNLeeJH. Aromatase variants modify risk for Alzheimer's disease in a multiethnic female cohort. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2013) 35:340–6. 10.1159/000343074
65.
JanickiSCParkNChengRClarkLNLeeJHSchupfN. Estrogen receptor α variants affect age at onset of Alzheimer's disease in a multiethnic female cohort. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2014) 38:200–13. 10.1159/000355559
66.
JinSCCarrasquilloMMBenitezBATaraSCarrellDPatelDet al. TREM2 is associated with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease in African Americans. Mol Neurodegener. (2015) 10:19. 10.1186/s13024-015-0016-9
67.
KimSNhoKRamananVKLaiDForoudTMLaneKet al. Genetic Influences on Plasma Homocysteine Levels in African Americans and Yoruba Nigerians. J Alzheimers Dis. (2016) 49:991–1003. 10.3233/JAD-150651
68.
KullerLHLopezOLBeckerJTChangYNewmanAB. Risk of dementia and death in the long-term follow-up of the Pittsburgh Cardiovascular Health Study-Cognition Study. Alzheimers Dement. (2016) 12:170–83. 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.08.165
69.
KunkleBWCarneyRMKohliMANajACNelsonKLHWhiteheadPLet al. Targeted sequencing of ABCA7 identifies splicing, stop-gain and intronic risk variants for Alzheimer disease. Neurosci Lett. (2017) 649:124–9. 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.04.014
70.
KwonODKhaleeqAChanWPavlikVNDoodyRS. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and age at onset of Alzheimer's disease in a quadriethnic sample. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2010) 30:486–91. 10.1159/000322368
71.
LeeJHChengRSchupfNManlyJLantiguaRSternYet al. The association between genetic variants in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease in an urban, multiethnic, community-based cohort. Arch Neurol. (2007) 64:501–6. 10.1001/archneur.64.4.501
72.
LeeJHChengRRogaevaEMengYSternYSantanaVet al. Further examination of the candidate genes in chromosome 12p13 locus for late-onset Alzheimer disease. Neurogenetics. (2008) 9:2. 10.1007/s10048-008-0122-8
73.
LeeJHBarralSChengRChaconISantanaVWilliamsonJet al. Age-at-onset linkage analysis in Caribbean Hispanics with familial late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurogenetics. (2008) 9:127–38. 10.1007/s10048-007-0103-3
74.
LeeJHChengRBarralSReitzCMedranoMLantiguaRet al. Identification of novel loci for Alzheimer disease and replication of CLU, PICALM, and BIN1 in Caribbean Hispanic individuals. Arch Neurol. (2011) 68:320–8. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.292
75.
LeeJHChengRVardarajanBLantiguaRDumeyeerDROrtmannWet al. Genetic Modifiers of Age at Onset in Carriers of the G206A Mutation in PSEN1 With Familial Alzheimer Disease Among Caribbean Hispanics. JAMA Neurol. (2015) 72:1043–51. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1424
76.
LivneyMGClarkCMKarlawishJHCartmellSNegronMNunezJet al. Ethnoracial differences in the clinical characteristics of Alzheimer's disease at initial presentation at an urban Alzheimer's disease center. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2011) 19:430–9. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181f7d881
77.
LogueMWSchuMVardarajanBNBurosJGreenRCGoRCPet al. A comprehensive genetic association study of Alzheimer disease in African Americans. Arch Neurol. (2011) 68:1569–79. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.646
78.
LogueMWSchuMVardarajanBNFarellJBennettDABuxbaumJDet al. Two rare AKAP9 variants are associated with Alzheimer's disease in African Americans. Alzheimers Dement. (2014) 10:609–18. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.010
79.
LogueMWLancourDFarrellJSimhinaIFallinMDLunettaKLet al. Targeted Sequencing of Alzheimer Disease Genes in African Americans Implicates Novel Risk Variants. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:592. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00592
80.
MardenJRWalterSTchetgen TchetgenEJKawachiIGlymourMM. Validation of a polygenic risk score for dementia in black and white individuals. Brain Behav. (2014) 4:687–97. 10.1002/brb3.248
81.
MardenJRMayedaERWalterSVivotATchetganEJTKawachiIet al. Using an Alzheimer Disease Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Memory Decline in Black and White Americans Over 14 Years of Follow-up. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. (2016) 30:195–202. 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000137
82.
McAninchERajanKEvansDJoSChakerLPeetersRet al. A common DIO2 polymorphism and Alzheimer disease dementia in African and European Americans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 103:505–30. 10.1210/jc.2017-01196
83.
MelvilleSBurosJParradoAVardarajanBLogueMShenLet al. Multiple loci influencinghippocampal degeneration identified by genome scan. Ann Neurol. (2012) 72:108–20. 10.1002/ana.23644
84.
MezJChungJJunGKriegelJBouriasAShervaRLogueMet al. Two novel loci, COBL andSLC10A2, for Alzheimer's disease in African Americans. Alzheimer's Dement. (2017) 13:45-81. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.002
85.
MountDAshleyALahJLeveyAGoldsteinF. Is ApoE ε4 Associated with Cognitive Functioning in African Americans Diagnosed with Alzheimer Disease? An Exploratory Study. South Med J. (2009) 102:945–8. 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181b21b82
86.
MurrellJRPriceBLaneKABaiyewuOGurejeOOgunnieyiAet al. Association of apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease in African Americans. Arch Neurol. (2006) 63:431–4. 10.1001/archneur.63.3.431
87.
N'SongoACarrasquilloMMWangXBurgessJDNguyenTAsmannYWet al. African American exome sequencing identifies potential risk variants at Alzheimer disease loci. Neurol Genet. (2017) 3:e141. 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000141
88.
O'BryantSEJohnsonLBalldinVEdwardsMBarbarRWilliamsBet al. Characterization of Mexican Americans with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. (2013) 33:373–9. 10.3233/JAD-2012-121420
89.
O'BryantSEJohnsonLReischJEdwardsMHallJBarbarRet al. Risk factors for mild cognitive impairment among Mexican Americans. Alzheimers Dement. (2013) 9:622–31. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.12.007
90.
OlarteLSchupfNLeeJHTangMXSantanaVWilliamsonJet al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 and age at onset of sporadic and familial Alzheimer disease in Caribbean Hispanics. Arch Neurol. (2006) 63:1586–90. 10.1001/archneur.63.11.1586
91.
PedrazaOAllenMJennetteKCarrasquiloMCrookJSerieDet al. Evaluation of memory endophenotypes for association with CLU, CR1, and PICALM variants in black and white subjects. Alzheimers Dement. (2014) 10:205–13. 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.016
92.
PeilaRYucesoyBWhiteLRJohnsonVKashonMLWuKet al. A TGF-beta1 polymorphism association with dementia and neuropathologies: the HAAS. Neurobiol Aging. (2007) 28:1367–73. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.06.004
93.
PetrovitchHRossGWHeQLockJUMarkesberyWDavisDet al. Characterization of Japanese-American men with a single neocortical AD lesion type. Neurobiol Aging. (2008) 29:1448–55. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.026
94.
QianJWoltersFJBeiserAHaanMIkramMAKarlawishJet al. APOE-related risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia for prevention trials: An analysis of four cohorts. PLoS Med. (2017) 14:e1002254. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002254
95.
RajabliFFelicianoBECelisKNelsonKLHWhiteheadPLAdamsLDet al. Ancestral origin of ApoE ε4 Alzheimer disease risk in Puerto Rican and African American populations. PLoS Genet. (2018) 14:e1007791. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007791
96.
ReitzCTokuhiroSClarkLNConradCVonsattelJPHazratiLNet al. SORCS1 alters amyloid precursor protein processing and variants may increase Alzheimer's disease risk. Ann Neurol. (2011) 69:47–64. 10.1002/ana.22308
97.
ReitzCChengRSchupfNLeeJHMehtaPDRogaevaEet al. Association between variants in IDE-KIF11-HHEX and plasma amyloid β levels. Neurobiol Aging. (2012) 199:e13–7. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.005
98.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDGthe PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. (2009) 339:b2535. 10.1136/bmj.b2535
99.
RipponGATangMXLeeJHLantiguaRMedranoMMayeuxR. Familial Alzheimer disease in Latinos: interaction between APOE, stroke, and estrogen replacement. Neurology. (2006) 66:35–40. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000191300.38571.3e
100.
RosesADLutzMWSaundersAMGoldgaberDSaulRet al. African-American TOMM40'523-APOE haplotypes are admixture of West African and Caucasian alleles. Alzheimers Dement. (2014) 10:592–601. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.009
101.
SaczynskiJSWhiteLPeilaRLRodriguezBLLaunerLJ. The relation between apolipoprotein A-I and dementia: the Honolulu-Asia aging study. Am J Epidemiol. (2007) 165:91–9. 10.1093/aje/kwm027
102.
SawyerKSachs-EricssonNPreacherKJBlazerDG. Racial differences in the influence of the APOE epsilon 4 allele on cognitive decline in a sample of community-dwelling older adults. Gerontology. (2009) 55:105–20. 10.1159/000137666
103.
SiminoJWangZBresslerJChourakiVYangQYounkinSGet al. Whole exome sequence-based association analyses of plasma amyloid-β in African and European Americans; the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities-Neurocognitive Study. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0180046. 10.1371/journal.pone.0180046
104.
TostoGBirdTDTsuangDBennettDABoeveBFCrushagaCet al. Polygenic risk scores in familial Alzheimer disease. Neurology. (2017) 88:1180–86. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003734
105.
VardarajanBNBruesegemSYHarbourMEet al. Identification of Alzheimer disease-associated variants in genes that regulate retromer function. Neurobiol Aging. (2012) 33:e15–e30. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.04.020
106.
VardarajanBNZhangYLeeJHChengRBohmCGhaniMet al. Coding mutations in SORL1 and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. (2015) 77:215–27. 10.1002/ana.24305
107.
WeinerMFHynanLSRossettiHWomackKBRosenbergRNGongYHet al. The relationship of cardiovascular risk factors to Alzheimer disease in Choctaw Indians. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2011) 19:423–9. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181e89a46
108.
YuLLutzMWWilsonRSBurnsDKRosesADSaundersAMet al. APOE ε4-TOMM40 '523 haplotypes and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in older Caucasian and African Americans. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e7–e9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0180356
109.
ReitzCJunGNajARajbhandaryRVardarajanBNWangL-Set al. Variants in the ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA7), apolipoprotein E ϵ4, and the risk of late-onset Alzheimer disease in African Americans. JAMA. (2013) 309:1483–92. 10.1001/jama.2013.2973
110.
BarnesLLLeurgansSAggarwalNTShahRCArvanitakisZJamesBDet al. Mixed pathology is more likely in black than white decedents with Alzheimer dementia. Neurology. (2015) 85:528–34. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001834
111.
KunkleBWSchmidtMKleinH-UNajACHamilton-NelsonKLLarsonEBet al. Novel Alzheimer disease risk loci and pathways in African American individuals using the african genome resources panel: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. (2021) 78:102–13. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3536
112.
NussbaumRL. Genome-wide association studies, Alzheimer disease, and understudied populations. JAMA. (2013) 309:1527–8. 10.1001/jama.2013.3507
113.
WojcikGLGraffMNishimuraKKTaoRHaesslerJGignouxCRet al. Genetic analyses of diverse populations improves discovery for complex traits. Nature. (2019) 570:514–8. 10.1038/s41586-019-1310-4
114.
McGinnisJMWilliams-RussoPKnickmanJR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood). (2002) 21:78–93. 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78
115.
AdlerNENewmanK. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). (2002) 21:60–76. 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60
116.
MahoneyDFCloutterbuckJNearySZhanL. African American, Chinese, and Latino family caregivers' impressions of the onset and diagnosis of dementia: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Gerontologist. (2005) 45:783–92. 10.1093/geront/45.6.783
117.
JangYKimGChiribogaD. Knowledge of Alzheimer's disease, feelings of shame, and awareness of services among Korean American elders. J Aging Health. (2010) 22:419–33. 10.1177/0898264309360672
118.
LiuDHintonLTranCHintonDBarkerJC. Reexamining the relationships among dementia, stigma, and aging in immigrant Chinese and Vietnamese family caregivers. J Cross Cult Gerontol. (2008) 23:283–99. 10.1007/s10823-008-9075-5
Summary
Keywords
genetic risk factors, Alzheimer's disease, race, ethnicity, minority, review
Citation
Rubin L, Ingram LA, Resciniti NV, Ashford-Carroll B, Leith KH, Rose A, Ureña S, McCollum Q and Friedman DB (2021) Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease in Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations in the U.S.: A Scoping Review. Front. Public Health 9:784958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.784958
Received
29 September 2021
Accepted
23 November 2021
Published
24 December 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Tushar Trivedi, Regional Medical Center, United States
Reviewed by
Xiangzhu Zhu, Vanderbilt University, United States; Marcos Vasconcelos Pais, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Rubin, Ingram, Resciniti, Ashford-Carroll, Leith, Rose, Ureña, McCollum and Friedman.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lucy A. Ingram lannang@sc.edu
This article was submitted to Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.