Abstract
Background and aims:
Metabolic syndrome is common nowadays and may increase risk of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular complications and even mortality. Renal cysts are also frequently found during routine examination. However, the relationship between simple renal cysts (SRCs) and metabolic syndrome remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association of SRCs with metabolic syndrome.
Methods:
A total of 16,216 subjects aged ≥18 years were enrolled in this study. SRCs were diagnosed with ultrasonography by finding: sharp, thin posterior walls, a round/oval shape, absence of internal echoes, and posterior enhancement. SRCs were categorized by number (0, 1, and ≥2) and size (<2 and ≥2 cm). Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed according to the consensus statement from the International Diabetes Federation.
Results:
In multivariate analysis, SRCs were positively related to metabolic syndrome (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06–1.34). The risk of metabolic syndrome was higher for SRCs with a number ≥2 (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08–1.68) and size ≥2 cm (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.61). When considering the SRC number and size concomitantly, SRCs with a number ≥2/size ≥2 cm (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98) or <2/size ≥2 cm (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04–1.62) were positively related to metabolic syndrome.
Conclusions:
Simple renal cysts were found to be related to a higher risk of metabolic syndrome, and the association is more significant in those with larger (sizes ≥2cm) or plural (numbers ≥2) SRCs.
Introduction
Renal cystic diseases are classified into inherited, developmental and acquired condition according to their etiologies (, ). Simple renal cysts (SRCs) are a common type of acquired cysts, or part of acquired cystic kidney diseases (), and are often found incidentally. The prevalence of SRCs varies from 5.0 to 20.8% in different countries (, ). One cross-sectional study demonstrated that the prevalence was 10.7% among Taiwanese people (), and it is believed that the incidence of SRCs increases with age (, –). SRCs are thought to be benign, asymptomatic lesions in clinical practice, rarely requiring invasive intervention (). However, studies have revealed that SRCs were associated with hypertension, elevated serum creatinine, and hyperuricemia (, –). Thus, more studies are needed to elucidate whether SRCs are potentially related to other negative health impacts.
Although the definition of metabolic syndrome differs among organizations, the key components include insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, central obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (). The diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome are easily accessed and were applied rapidly in clinical practice (–). The importance of metabolic syndrome has been raised nowadays since the presence of metabolic syndrome increases the risk of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (), cardiovascular complications and mortality ().
Previous studies have targeted the association of SRCs with individual cardio-metabolic related disorders, such as obesity () hypertension (), prehypertension (), renal dysfunction (, ), and hyperuricemia (). However, study that focus on the relationship between metabolic syndrome and SRCs is lacking. Furthermore, whether the characteristics of SRCs, such as the size or number of SRCs have impacts on metabolic syndrome remains indeterminate. Considering that metabolic syndrome significantly raises the risk of DM, heart disease, and mortality, investigating the possible impact of SRCs on metabolic syndrome may provide one additional route for further researches and clinical practice of metabolic abnormalities. Thus, the aim of the present study was to clarify the association of SRCs with metabolic syndrome.
Methods
Study population
Subjects who underwent a health examination were recruited at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital from June 2001 to August 2009. A total of 16,216 subjects were enrolled for final analysis after excluding subjects aged <18 years, taking medication for obesity management, history of bariatric surgery, pregnant women, or history of or abdominal sonography with the following findings: renal stone, renal cyst with calcification, any cause of hydronephrosis, medullary sponge kidney disease, medullary cystic kidney disease, renal ectopia, polycystic kidney disease, renal tumor, renal transplantation and status post-nephrectomy, and incomplete data. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Taiwan (IRB number: B-ER106-066).
A standardized self-reported questionnaire was completed by every participant and was used to obtain demographic information, medical history, and lifestyle habits, including smoking, alcohol drinking, and regular exercise. Current alcohol drinkers were defined as those who had at least one alcoholic drink per week for at least the previous 6 months (). Current smoking status was defined as at least 20 cigarettes per month during the past 6 months. Regular exercise was defined as exercise at least three times per week for a minimum of 20 min ().
Body height and weight were measured by a certified anthropometry instrument (to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kilograms) divided by height (m) squared (kg/m2). Subjects with a BMI ≥27 kg/m2 were defined as obese according to the guidelines of the Department of Health in Taiwan (). Waist circumference (WC) was measured from the midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest with a standing posture (to the nearest 0.1 cm) at the end of a normal expiration. After 5 min of rest, the right branchial artery blood pressure was measured in the supine position by using a DINAMAP vital sign monitor (model 1846SX; Critikon, Irvine, CA) with an appropriate-sized cuff. Two blood pressure readings were taken separately under an interval of at least 5 min. Hypertension was diagnosed by a positive history of hypertension and the reading from the right brachial artery showing a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 140 mmHg or more, or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90 mmHg or more ().
After overnight fasting for 12 h, all participants received blood sampling for biochemical examinations, which included the following: fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), uric acid and creatinine. Serum TC, TG and HDL-C levels were determined in the central laboratory of NCKUH with an autoanalyzer (Hitachi 747E, Tokyo, Japan). Patients' 2-h post-load glucose (2-h PG) was checked after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test for all participants without DM or pregnancy. DM was defined as a positive history, FPG ≥126 mg/dl, 2-h PG ≥200 mg/dl or HbA1c ≥6.5% ().
All participants were divided into two groups by the presence of metabolic syndrome or not, which was defined according to the consensus statement from the International Diabetes Federation (). Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed if a participant had central obesity (WC ≥90 cm in men or ≥80 cm in women) and fulfilled ≥2 of the following four components: (1) FPG ≥ 100 mg/dl or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes; (2) BP ≥ 130/85 mmHg or under treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension; (3) HDL-C < 40 mg/dl in men or <50 mg/dl in women or under drug treatment for reduced HDL-C; and, (4) TG ≥ 150 mg/dl or under drug treatment for dyslipidemia. All participants underwent abdominal sonographic examination (Toshiba Xario/SSA = 660A Ultrasound Machine; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan, with a 3.5-MHz transducer). The diagnosis of SRCs was based on the criteria of abdominal sonography, including: (1) sharp, thin posterior walls, (2) round/oval shape, (3) absence of internal echoes, and (4) posterior enhancement (). We further categorized SRCs according to their sizes (<2 and ≥2 cm) and numbers (<2 and ≥2).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed by using Windows SPSS 17.0 statistical software (Chicago, Illinois, USA). In univariate analysis, the comparison of continuous variables was carried out using Student's t-tests and categorical variables by Pearson Chi square tests between two groups. A binary logistic regression model was performed to investigate whether the SRCs were associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome. Other independent factors included age, gender, obesity, creatinine, uric acid, alcohol drinking, smoking, and regular exercise. Furthermore, the associations of the size, number, and the combined characteristics of SRCs with metabolic syndrome were also examined. The p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
A total of 16,216 subjects were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the presence of metabolic syndrome. Table 1 shows the clinical characteristic between participants with (n = 4,071) and without metabolic syndrome (n = 12,145). Subjects with metabolic syndrome were predominantly older males and tended to have higher BMI, SBP, DBP, FPG, cholesterol, TG, uric acid, and creatinine, as well as the prevalence of obesity, hypertension, DM, and current tobacco and alcohol consumption, together with a lower HDL-C and prevalence of regular exercise.
Table 1
| Variables | Metabolic syndrome | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No (n = 12,145) | Yes (n = 4,071) | ||
| Age, years | 47.6 ± 12.6 | 54.3 ± 12.0 | <0.001 |
| Male | 6,959 (57.3) | 2,751 (67.6) | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.5 ± 3.2 | 27.1 ± 3.3 | <0.001 |
| BMI ≥27 kg/m2 | 1,440 (42.6) | 1,941 (47.7) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 81.0 ± 12.0 | 115.6 ± 1,457.9 | 0.009 |
| Central obesity | 2,866 (23.6) | 3,453 (84.8) | <0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg | 114.8 ± 15.8 | 131.4 ± 18.6 | <0.001 |
| DBP, mmHg | 67.9 ± 10.1 | 76.9 ± 11.1 | <0.001 |
| Elevated BP* | 1,867 (15.4) | 2,319 (57) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 1,357 (11.2) | 1,843 (45.3) | <0.001 |
| FPG, mg/dl | 89.3 ± 17.0 | 111.2 ± 40.1 | <0.001 |
| Hemoglobin A1c, % | 5.6 ± 0.7 | 6.4 ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
| Hyperglycemia (FPG >100 mg/dl) | 1,103 (9.1) | 2,274 (55.9) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1,128 (9.3) | 1,662 (40.8) | <0.001 |
| Cholesterol, mg/dl | 194.5 ± 36.7 | 204.0 ± 39.2 | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dl | 108.5 ± 61.8 | 207.5 ± 133.1 | <0.001 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia (TG >150 mg/dl) | 1,746 (14.4) | 2,886 (70.9) | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dl | 52.0 ± 13.5 | 39.1 ± 9.3 | <0.001 |
| Low HDL-C** | 3,023 (24.9) | 3,092 (76) | <0.001 |
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 0.87 ± 0.40 | 0.93 ± 0.44 | <0.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73m2 | 95.2 ± 16.0 | 88.3 ± 16.9 | <0.001 |
| Uric acid, mg/dl | 5.9 ± 1.5 | 6.7 ± 1.6 | <0.001 |
| ALT, U/L | 29.7 ± 32.8 | 43.6 ± 40.3 | <0.001 |
| Current alcohol consumption | 1,344 (11.1) | 525 (12.9) | 0.002 |
| Current smoking | 1,234 (10.2) | 556 (13.7) | <0.001 |
| Regular exercise ≥3/week | 1,010 (8.3) | 279 (6.9) | 0.003 |
Comparisons of clinical characteristics between subjects with and without metabolic syndrome.
Data expressed as means ± standard deviation or number (percent).
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Elevated BP: SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg.
Low HDL: HDL < 40 mg/dl in males and < 50 in females.
Table 2 further demonstrated that subjects with SRCs have higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome. It also showed that those with larger (size ≥2 cm) or plural (number ≥2) SRCs were more likely to have metabolic syndrome.
Table 2
| Variables | Metabolic syndrome | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No (n = 12,145) | Yes (n = 4,071) | ||
| Presence of renal cyst | |||
| No | 11,026 (90.8) | 3,487 (85.7) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 1,119 (9.2) | 584 (14.3) | |
| Renal cyst, number | |||
| < 2 | 854 (7.0) | 409 (10.0) | <0.001 |
| ≥2 | 265 (2.2) | 32 (4.3) | |
| Renal cyst, size | |||
| < 2 cm | 747 (6.2) | 347 (8.5) | <0.001 |
| ≥2 cm | 372 (3.1) | 237 (5.8) | |
| Renal cyst, number and size | |||
| Number < 2 and size < 2 cm | 588 (4.8) | 246 (6.0) | <0.001 |
| Number ≥2 and size < 2 cm | 159 (1.3) | 101 (2.5) | |
| Number < 2 and size ≥2 cm | 266 (2.2) | 163 (4.0) | |
| Number ≥2 and size ≥2cm | 106 (0.9) | 74 (1.8) | |
Relationship between metabolic syndrome and renal cyst by Pearson Chi-square test.
Data expressed as means ± standard deviation or number (percent).
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Table 3 demonstrates the multiple logistic regression model for the relationship between SRCs and metabolic syndrome with adjustment for other covariates, including age, gender, obesity, creatinine, uric acid, alcohol consumption, smoking, and regular exercise. SRCs were associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome (model 1, OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06–1.34, p = 0.007). We further explored the relationship between the number and size of SRCs and metabolic syndrome (models 2–4), and found that the associated risk of metabolic syndrome was significantly higher in those with an SRC number ≥2 (model 2, OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08–1.68, p = 0.008) and size ≥2 cm (model 3, OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.61, p = 0.003). Model 4 revealed that when the number and size of the SRCs were considered concomitantly, those with an SRC size ≥2 cm had higher associated risk of metabolic syndrome, regardless of whether the number of SRCs was single (OR:1.30, 95% CI: 1.04–1.62, p = 0.021) or multiple (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98, p = 0.040). In subjects with an SRC number ≥2 and < 2 cm, the associated risk for metabolic syndrome was statistically borderline (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.98–1.73, p = 0.065). Singular SRCs of < 2 cm were not associated with higher risk of metabolic syndrome (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.88–1.24, p = 0.645). However, both number ≥2/size ≥2 cm (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98, p = 0.04) and number < 2/size ≥2 cm (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04–1.62, p = 0.021) were positively related to metabolic syndrome. In addition, metabolic syndrome was also positively associated with older age, obesity, uric acid level and smoking, but inversely related to regular exercise.
Table 3
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Age, 40–65 vs. < 40 years | 2.84 (2.53–3.19)*** | 2.84 (2.53–3.19)*** | 2.84 (2.53–3.19)*** | 2.84 (2.53–3.19)*** |
| Age, >65 vs. < 40 years | 5.88 (5.06–6.84)*** | 5.84 (5.02–6.80)*** | 5.85 (5.03–6.81)*** | 5.82 (5.00–6.77)*** |
| Male vs. female | 0.94 (0.85–1.04) | 0.94 (0.85–1.03) | 0.94 (0.85–1.04) | 0.94 (0.85–1.03) |
| Obesity, yes vs. no | 5.92 (5.42–6.45)*** | 5.92 (5.42–6.46)*** | 5.91 (5.42–6.45)*** | 5.92 (5.42–6.46)*** |
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 0.91 (0.82–1.02) | 0.91 (0.81–1.02) | 0.91 (0.82–1.02) | 0.91 (0.81–1.02) |
| Uric acid, mg/dl | 1.31 (1.27–1.35)*** | 1.31 (1.27–1.35)*** | 1.31 (1.27–1.35)*** | 1.31 (1.27–1.35)*** |
| Current alcohol consumption, yes vs. no | 0.92 (0.81–1.04) | 0.92 (0.80–1.04) | 0.92 (0.81–1.04) | 0.92 (0.80–1.04) |
| Current smoking, yes vs. no | 1.50 (1.32–1.71)*** | 1.51 (1.32–1.71)*** | 1.50 (1.32–1.71)*** | 1.50 (1.32–1.71)*** |
| Regular exercise ≥3/week, yes vs. no | 0.75 (0.64–0.87)*** | 0.75 (0.65–0.88)*** | 0.75 (0.64–0.88)*** | 0.75 (0.65–0.88)*** |
| Simple renal cysts, yes vs. no | 1.18 (1.05–1.34)** | |||
| Number of simple renal cysts | ||||
| <2 vs. none | 1.13 (0.98–1.30) | |||
| ≥2 vs. none | 1.35 (1.08–1.68)** | |||
| Size of simple renal cysts | ||||
| <2 cm vs. none | 1.10 (0.95–1.28) | |||
| ≥2 cm vs. none | 1.33 (1.10–1.61)** | |||
| Combination of number and size | ||||
| Number < 2 and size < 2 cm vs. none | 1.04 (0.88–1.24) | |||
| Number ≥2 and size < 2 cm vs. none | 1.30 (0.98–1.73) | |||
| Number < 2 and size ≥2 cm vs. none | 1.30 (1.04–1.62)* | |||
| Number ≥2 and size ≥2 cm vs. none | 1.42 (1.02–1.98)* | |||
Logistic regression models for the association of simple renal cysts with metabolic syndrome.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Bold values denote statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level.
Discussion
Principal findings
Our study found that presence of SRCs is positively associated with risk of metabolic syndrome, especially in those with larger or plural SRCs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association of SRCs and its characteristics with metabolic syndrome with adjustments for many important cardio-metabolic variables in a relatively large population. Although the mechanism underlying the link between SRCs and metabolic syndrome is still unclear, recent studies showed that SRCs were found to be associated with an increased risk of albuminuria in young adults () and SRCs are also associated with worse renal function in type 2 diabetes patients (). The negative impact of SRCs in general population of this study was similar to young adults and diabetes patients in the two studies mentioned above (, ).
SRCs and metabolic disorders
According to previous studies about the association between SRCs and cardio-metabolic factors, it has been confirmed that SRCs are associated with elevated blood pressure (, ). Lee et al. found that SRCs were related to prehypertension and hypertension and larger (size ≥2 cm) and multiple renal cysts (number ≥2), which further elevated the associated risk of prehypertension and hypertension (). Hong et al. () also demonstrated a positive relationship between hypertension and SRCs, especially in those with larger (size ≥1.4 cm) or multiple (number ≥2) SRCs (). Nevertheless, the association between SRCs and DM remains inconsistent (, –, ), and adjustments for important covariates, such as age (), sex (), blood pressure (–), and lifestyle habits (e.g. smoking (–, ), alcohol consumption (, –, ) and exercise (, –, ) are lacking in previous studies. Although high BMI was positively associated with SRCs in a healthy Korean population (), the association of SRCs with central obesity and dyslipidemia has not been studied. Our study showed that subjects with SRCs may have a higher associated risk of metabolic syndrome after adjusting other variables. The associated risk of metabolic syndrome were higher in subjects with SRCs, especially for sizes ≥2 cm or numbers ≥2.
Mechanism of SRCs and metabolic syndrome
The exact mechanism for the relationship between SRCs and metabolic syndrome remains unclear. However, SRCs were found to have impacts on (1) renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), (2) insulin resistance, and (3) chronic inflammation, which are all essential in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome (, ). The serum renin level was higher in subjects with multiple (number ≥2) and larger (size ≥2 cm) SRCs (), which may increase RAAS activity and contribute to the development of elevated blood pressure (, ). In addition, renalase, derived from the kidney, of which levels were lower in subjects with renal cysts (), may play a role through its degradation of serum catecholamines in the blood (). Lower renalase levels in subjects with SRCs () may possibly result in excess catecholamine, and thus partially contributes to increased insulin resistance. We also additionally analyzed the relationship between SRCs and MS with concomitant consideration of individual MS component (Supplementary Table 2). The statistical significance of the positive relationship between SRCs and MS were attenuated to be insignificant when elevated blood pressure or hyperglycemia was adjusted, but the association between SRCs and MS remained significant when hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C or central obesity was adjusted in separate models. The results provided that the association of SRCs and MS might be mediated by abnormal blood pressure and hyperglycemia. As for SRCs and chronic inflammation, subjects with SRCs had more activated RAAS, which may induce increased systemic inflammation (, ). Furthermore, excess of catecholamine caused by lower renalase levels in subjects with SRCs, also potentially increased systemic inflammation (–). Therefore, elevated activity of RAAS, increased insulin resistance and chronic systemic inflammation may help to explain the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome in subjects with SRCs.
In this study, metabolic syndrome was also shown to be positively related to older age, obesity, uric acid level and cigarette smoking; in contrast, regular exercise was inversely related to the risk of metabolic syndrome. These results are compatible with previous studies (, –). Aging was commonly associated with increased body fat, decreased muscle mass () and increased oxidative stress (), which were all crucial for developing insulin resistance and subsequent metabolic syndrome (, , ). In addition, age was also found to be associated with formation and growth of SRCs (). Previous study also showed an increase in the frequency of cysts with advanced age and growth in volume with a doubling of their volume after about 10 years (). Besides, our analysis also showed that age was the major factor that associated with SRCs (shown in Supplementary Table 1). As a result, age may potentially modulate the interaction between SRCs and MS. Obesity was associated with visceral fat deposit, elevated free fatty acid levels, and increased systemic inflammatory cytokines (, ), which may inevitably result in the evolution of metabolic syndrome. As for uric acid level and metabolic syndrome, previous studies have demonstrated that uric acid not only induced hepatic gluconeogenesis, hepatic fat accumulation and oxidative stress, but also exacerbated the development of insulin resistance, hypertension and metabolic syndrome (, ). Smoking was also found to be associated with metabolic syndrome through its effect on elevating blood pressure, increasing insulin resistance and altering lipid metabolism (). A previous study found that exercise helped correct metabolic imbalance by reducing blood pressure, blood sugar and triglyceride levels, and waist circumference, as well as by increasing the serum HDL-C level (), which may partially explain the inverse relationship between regular exercise and metabolic syndrome.
Limitation
This study has the strength of a relatively large sample, comprehensive serologic data and concomitant adjustment of important covariates of metabolic syndrome. However, there are also several limitations to this study. First, because this study had a cross-sectional design, it is impossible to establish a causal relationship between metabolic syndrome and renal cysts. Second, we did not obtain the detailed dietary histories of the participants in this study. Third, the information of some diseases such as maturity onset diabetes of the young type 5 (MODY 5) or hyperaldosteronism, which may correlate renal cyst with metabolic syndrome (–), is lacking. Although the prevalence of MODY 5 and hyperaldosteronism is relatively low, further study with comprehensive information of such diseases is still helpful to clarify their impacts on relationship between SRCs and metabolic syndrome. Fourth, thorough evaluation of metabolic syndrome includes more specific laboratory information including high sensitivity C-reactive protein, inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, microalbuminuria as well as endothelial function measurements (–), which were not examined in this study. Apart from this, the serum renalase, an enzyme that may potentially explain the interaction between renal cysts and metabolic syndrome, was not available. Therefore, future investigation that takes account of both renalase and thorough evaluation of metabolic syndrome may be necessary to disclose the possible mechanism about the relationship between SRCs and metabolic syndrome.
In conclusion, SRCs were related to a higher associated risk of metabolic syndrome, and the association is more significant in those with larger (sizes ≥2 cm) or plural (numbers ≥2) SRCs. Our data suggest that presence of SRCs, even with incidental finding, might require a further survey of potential metabolic syndrome. Although there have been some predictive models of metabolic syndrome (–), clinical application of SRCs in the risk stratification needs further investigation.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan (Grant Number: NCKUH-11103034).
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: W-CS. Methodology: W-CS, Z-JS, and C-YC. Formal analysis and investigation: Z-JS and C-YC. Writing—original draft preparation: W-CS and Y-TC. Writing—review and editing: W-CS, Y-TC, and J-SW. Resources: Y-TC, F-HL, Y-CY, C-JC, and J-SW. Supervision: J-SW. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the investigators and staff of the Department of Family Medicine and Health Management Center of National Cheng Kung University Hospital for excellent research assistance. We are also grateful to Paul Spence (Foreign Language Center, College of Liberal Arts, National Cheng Kung University) for the assistance of editing this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.951638/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
KatabathinaVSKotaGDasyamAKShanbhogueAKPrasadSR. Adult renal cystic disease: a genetic, biological, and developmental primer. Radiographics. (2010) 30:1509–23. 10.1148/rg.306105513
2.
BonsibSM. The classification of renal cystic diseases and other congenital malformations of the kidney and urinary tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2010) 134:554–68. 10.5858/134.4.554
3.
SimmsRJOngAC. How simple are 'simple renal cysts'?Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2014) 29:iv106–12. 10.1093/ndt/gfu106
4.
TeradaNAraiYKinukawaNYoshimuraKTeraiA. Risk factors for renal cysts. BJU Int. (2004) 93:1300–2. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04844.x
5.
PedersenJFEmamianSANielsenMB. Simple renal cyst: relations to age and arterial blood pressure. Br J Radiol. (1993) 66:581–4. 10.1259/0007-1285-66-787-581
6.
ChangCCKuoJYChanWLChenKKChangLS. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of simple renal cyst. J Chin Med Assoc. (2007) 70:486–91. 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70046-7
7.
ChenJMaXXuDCaoWKongX. Association between simple renal cyst and kidney damage in a Chinese cohort study. Ren Fail. (2019) 41:600–6. 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1632718
8.
HanYZhangMLuJZhangLHanJZhaoFet al. Hyperuricemia and overexcretion of uric acid increase the risk of simple renal cysts in type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:3802. 10.1038/s41598-017-04036-6
9.
OzverenBOnganerETurkeriLN. Simple renal cysts: prevalence, associated risk factors and follow-up in a health screening cohort. Urol J. (2016) 13:2569–75.
10.
LeeCTYangYCWuJSChangYFHuangYHLuFHet al. Multiple and large simple renal cysts are associated with prehypertension and hypertension. Kidney Int. (2013) 83:924–30. 10.1038/ki.2012.481
11.
ChoiJD. Clinical characteristics and long-term observation of simple renal cysts in a healthy Korean population. Int Urol Nephrol. (2016) 48:319–24. 10.1007/s11255-015-1186-7
12.
EckelRHGrundySMZimmetPZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. (2005) 365:1415–28. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66378-7
13.
KipKEMarroquinOCKelleyDEJohnsonBDKelseySFShawLJet al. Clinical importance of obesity versus the metabolic syndrome in cardiovascular risk in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Circulation. (2004) 109:706–13. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115514.44135.A8
14.
SmithSR. Importance of diagnosing and treating the metabolic syndrome in reducing cardiovascular risk. Obesity. (2006) 14(Suppl 3):128S−34S. 10.1038/oby.2006.292
15.
GrundySMCleemanJIDanielsSRDonatoKAEckelRHFranklinBAJret al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. (2005) 112:2735–52. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404
16.
MoreiraGCCipulloJPCiorliaLACesarinoCBVilela-MartinJF. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome: association with risk factors and cardiovascular complications in an urban population. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e105056. 10.1371/journal.pone.0105056
17.
KongXMaXZhangCSuHGongXXuD. Increased risk of kidney damage among Chinese adults with simple renal cyst. Int Urol Nephrol. (2018) 50:1687–94. 10.1007/s11255-018-1880-3
18.
HasegawaEMFullerRChammasMCde MelloFMGoldenstein-SchainbergC. Increased prevalence of simple renal cysts in patients with gout. Rheumatol Int. (2013) 33:413–6. 10.1007/s00296-012-2380-x
19.
Chou YT LiCHShenWCYangYCLuFHWuJSChangCJ. Association of sleep quality and sleep duration with serum uric acid levels in adults. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0239185. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239185
20.
ChuNF. Prevalence of obesity in Taiwan. Obes Rev. (2005) 6:271–4. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00175.x
21.
American Diabetes A. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. (2010) 33 Suppl1:S62–9. 10.2337/dc10-S062
22.
AlbertiKGZimmetPShawJ. Metabolic syndrome–a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. (2006) 23:469–80. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01858.x
23.
WhelanTF. Guidelines on the management of renal cyst disease. Can Urol Assoc J. (2010) 4:98–9. 10.5489/cuaj.10023
24.
BooHJLeeJEChungSMJangHRHuhWKimDJet al. The presence of simple renal cysts is associated with an increased risk of albuminuria in young adults. Korean J Intern Med. (2022) 37:425–33. 10.3904/kjim.2020.576
25.
WeiLXiaoYXiongXLiLYangYHanYet al. The relationship between simple renal cysts and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front Physiol. (2020) 11:616167. 10.3389/fphys.2020.616167
26.
HongSLimJHJeongIGChoeJKimCSHongJH. What association exists between hypertension and simple renal cyst in a screened population?J Hum Hypertens. (2013) 27:539–44. 10.1038/jhh.2013.12
27.
RochlaniYPothineniNVKovelamudiSMehtaJL. Metabolic syndrome: pathophysiology, management, and modulation by natural compounds. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. (2017) 11:215–25. 10.1177/1753944717711379
28.
ZhuLZhaoXZengPZhuJYangSLiuAet al. Study on autonomic dysfunction and metabolic syndrome in Chinese patients. J Diabetes Investig. (2016) 7:901–7. 10.1111/jdi.12524
29.
Ribeiro-OliveiraAJr.NogueiraAIPereiraRMBoasWWDos SantosRASimões e SilvaAC. The renin-angiotensin system and diabetes: an update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. (2008) 4:787–803. 10.2147/VHRM.S1905
30.
DasUN. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. J Transl Intern Med. (2016) 4:66–72. 10.1515/jtim-2016-0022
31.
ElciogluOCAfsarBTakirMToprakAEBakanABakanSet al. Renalase: another puzzle piece between hypertension and simple renal cysts?Int Urol Nephrol. (2015) 47:1181–6. 10.1007/s11255-015-1008-y
32.
LuftFC. Renalase, a catecholamine-metabolizing hormone from the kidney. Cell Metab. (2005) 1:358–60. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.008
33.
CrowleySDRudemillerNP. Immunologic effects of the renin-angiotensin system. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 28:1350–61. 10.1681/ASN.2016101066
34.
SriramulaSFrancisJ. Tumor necrosis factor - alpha is essential for angiotensin ii-induced ventricular remodeling: role for oxidative stress. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0138372. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138372
35.
LiGXuJWangPVelazquezHLiYWuYet al. Catecholamines regulate the activity, secretion, and synthesis of renalase. Circulation. (2008) 117:1277–82. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.732032
36.
GuoXWangLVelazquezHSafirsteinRDesirGV. Renalase: its role as a cytokine, and an update on its association with type 1 diabetes and ischemic stroke. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. (2014) 23:513–8. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000044
37.
FlierlMARittirschDHuber-LangMSarmaJVWardPA. Catecholamines-crafty weapons in the inflammatory arsenal of immune/inflammatory cells or opening pandora's box?Mol Med. (2008) 14:195–204. 10.2119/2007-00105.Flierl
38.
SaklayenMG. The global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep. (2018) 20:12. 10.1007/s11906-018-0812-z
39.
CarnethonMRLoriaCMHillJOSidneySSavagePJLiuK. Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome: the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study, 1985-2001. Diabetes Care. (2004) 27:2707–15. 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2707
40.
SunKLiuJNingG. Active smoking and risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e47791. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047791
41.
El AssarMAnguloJRodrÃguez-MañasL. Oxidative stress and vascular inflammation in aging. Free Radic Biol Med. (2013) 65:380–401. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.003
42.
HildrumBMykletunAHoleTMidthjellKDahlAA. Age-specific prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program: the Norwegian HUNT 2 study. BMC Public Health. (2007) 7:220. 10.1186/1471-2458-7-220
43.
TeradaNAraiYKinukawaNTeraiA. The 10-year natural history of simple renal cysts. Urology. (2008) 71:7–11. discussion 11–2. 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.075
44.
EsserNLegrand-PoelsSPietteJScheenAJPaquotN. Inflammation as a link between obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2014) 105:141–50. 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.04.006
45.
BattelliMGBortolottiMPolitoLBolognesiA. The role of xanthine oxidoreductase and uric acid in metabolic syndrome. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. (2018) 1864:2557–65. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.05.003
46.
KanbayMJensenTSolakYLeMRoncal-JimenezCRivardCet al. Uric acid in metabolic syndrome: from an innocent bystander to a central player. Eur J Intern Med. (2016) 29:3–8. 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.11.026
47.
CalhounDA. Aldosteronism and hypertension. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2006) 1:1039–45. 10.2215/CJN.01060306
48.
FalloFPilonCUrbanetR. Primary aldosteronism and metabolic syndrome. Horm Metab Res. (2012) 44:208–14. 10.1055/s-0031-1295412
49.
MateusJCRiveraCO'MearaMValenzuelaALizcanoF. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5 a multisystemic disease: a case report of a novel mutation in the HNF1B gene and literature review. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. (2020) 6:16. 10.1186/s40842-020-00103-6
50.
ShieldsBMHicksSShepherdMHColcloughKHattersleyATEllardS. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): how many cases are we missing?Diabetologia. (2010) 53:2504–8. 10.1007/s00125-010-1799-4
51.
MohammadiMGozashtiMHAghadavoodMMehdizadehMRHayatbakhshMM. Clinical significance of serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels in patients with metabolic syndrome. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. (2017) 6:74–9.
52.
SinghYGargMKTandonNMarwahaRKA. study of insulin resistance by HOMA-IR and its cut-off value to identify metabolic syndrome in urban Indian adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. (2013) 5:245–51. 10.4274/Jcrpe.1127
53.
TziomalosKAthyrosVGKaragiannisAMikhailidisDP. Endothelial dysfunction in metabolic syndrome: prevalence, pathogenesis and management. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2010) 20:140–6. 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.08.006
54.
RidkerPMWilsonPWGrundySM. Should C-reactive protein be added to metabolic syndrome and to assessment of global cardiovascular risk?Circulation. (2004) 109:2818–25. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000132467.45278.59
55.
GuoHJiangWZhaoBXiongYLuZA. Predictive model of metabolic syndrome by medical examination: evidence from an 8-year chinese cohort. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. (2021) 14:4459–67. 10.2147/DMSO.S314550
56.
SoldatovicIVukovicRCulaficDGajicMDimitrijevic-SreckovicV. siMS score: simple method for quantifying metabolic syndrome. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0146143. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146143
57.
KimJMunSLeeSJeongKBaekY. Prediction of metabolic and pre-metabolic syndromes using machine learning models with anthropometric, lifestyle, and biochemical factors from a middle-aged population in Korea. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:664. 10.1186/s12889-022-13131-x
Summary
Keywords
renal cyst, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, hypertension, metabolic disease
Citation
Shen W-C, Sun Z-J, Chou C-Y, Chou Y-T, Lu F-H, Yang Y-C, Chang C-J and Wu J-S (2022) Association of simple renal cysts with metabolic syndrome in adults. Front. Public Health 10:951638. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.951638
Received
24 May 2022
Accepted
22 August 2022
Published
03 November 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Ryuki Kassai, Fukushima Medical University, Japan
Reviewed by
Monika Wójtowicz-Marzec, Medical University of Lublin, Poland; Anji Xiong, Nanchong Central Hospital, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Shen, Sun, Chou, Chou, Lu, Yang, Chang and Wu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jin-Shang Wu jins@mail.ncku.edu.tw
This article was submitted to Family Medicine and Primary Care, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.