Introduction
Among older adults, falls are common and the leading cause of fatal and non-fatal injuries (1). In the United States, one in four older adults ages 65 and older reports falling each year (2). On average, 100 older adults died every day because of falls in 2021 (2) and estimates of medical costs of fatal and non-fatal older adult falls are ~$50 billion annually (3). About 20% of falls require medical attention (4). Falls leading to injuries can affect levels of activity, psychosocial status, and quality of life. Even when falls do not require medical attention, the experience of falling can result in fear of falling (5). While a reasonable level of concern can prevent engagement in risky activities, fear of falling that is disproportionate with functional abilities can prevent engagement in activities necessary to maintain health and wellbeing. Fear of falling is associated with depressive symptomatology (6), impacts gait (7), leads to activity curtailment (8–10), and increased fall risk (5, 8).
Trends
Between 2001 and 2021, the number of Americans dying from unintentional falls increased from 15,000 to over 44,000 as the crude death rate rose from 5.3 (per 100,000 population) to 13.5 (1). No demographic is unaffected. Among racial and ethnic groups, White older adults have the highest death rate from falls, and the biggest increase, however death rates are rising among Black seniors, Hispanic seniors, Asian seniors, and Native American seniors alike (11). While this trend is not completely understood, there may be several contributors. Some of the increase in fall mortality may be due to innovations in medical record keeping that document causes and circumstances of injuries (12), demographic trends and pharmacological factors are also at play. Older adults are living longer. Globally, the number of persons aged 60 years or over is expected to more than double, from 841 million people in 2013 to more than 2 billion in 2050 (13) and many are or will be living with frailty, co-morbidities and chronic health conditions that could increase fall risk (14, 15). Fourteen medication classes, most of which are psychotropic medications, have been identified as fall-risk increasing drugs (FRID) (16). Although falls are widely recognized as common and preventable adverse drug events (17), healthcare professionals must make decisions about deprescribing FRID that consider patient preferences and the trade-offs between competing health conditions (18, 19).
Community-based fall prevention interventions
The value of multifactorial, individualized clinical interventions in preventing falls among community-dwelling older adults at risk for falls is well-established (20). For older adults at low risk for falls, primary prevention involving annual re-assessment of fall risk is recommended (20). Community-based fall prevention programs are important compliments to clinical approaches to fall risk management and several have been evaluated through randomized trials and found to reduce fall risk. These programs reflect diverse approaches, ranging from exercise-based programs (e.g., Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance or Enhanced Fitness, an arthritis friendly falls prevention program) to interventions featuring cognitive behavioral therapy to address activity restriction associated with fear of falling (e.g., Matter of Balance (MOB) (21). Importantly, these programs are cost effective. Carande-Kulis et al. (22) estimated the net benefit and return on investment (ROI) of three evidence-based fall prevention programs. Otago, a program that targets frail older adults and is delivered at home by a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant, had a 1-year net benefit of $121.85 and 36% ROI. Tai Chi: Moving for Better Balance, a group program for enhancing strength and balance, had a 1-year net benefit of $529.86 and 509% ROI. Stepping On, a program focusing on balance and strength exercises; medication review; vision review; and home modifications, had a 1-year net benefit of $134.37 and 64% ROI (22).
Ackerman et al. found that Enhanced Fitness participants had similar total healthcare costs to non-participants during year 1 of the program, but during Year 2, participants' adjusted total healthcare costs were $1,186 lower (p < 0.005) healthcare costs of non-participants (23). In a separate study, Howland et al. investigated the ROI on MOB and estimated a ROI of 144% if all older adults presenting at Massachusetts Emergency Departments were referred to MOB and 50% of the older adults referred complied by enrolling in the program (24). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMMS) conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating the cost impact of MOB and found that compared to controls (matched on prior year healthcare utilization and costs, co-morbidities, demographics, and region of residence) those who had participated in MOB had significantly lower overall healthcare costs ($938) and healthcare utilization, and reduced mortality during the post-participation year (25).
Primary care referrals to community-based fall prevention programs
Notwithstanding evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, community-based programs have not had population level effects on older adult falls, in part because referral to these programs has not been well integrated into primary care practice. Smith et al. surveyed health care providers in New York state and reported that < 20% referred older adult patients to community-based fall prevention programs (26). In a survey of primary care providers at two Massachusetts Accountable Care Organizations, Howland et al. (27) found that only 9% reported having referred an older adult patient to a community-based fall prevention program during the previous year. The infrequency of referrals is one aspect of a larger problem: many respondents had limited knowledge of fall risk assessment and intervention. While most respondents believed that older adults should be assessed for fall risk and most believed that assessment would identify risk factors that could be modified, only about half believed that they had the expertise to conduct fall risk assessment and only about two thirds believed that assessing older adult patients for fall risk was prevailing practice among their peers. Only 14% were aware of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) toolkit which was created by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to help health care providers incorporate fall risk assessment, treatment, and referral into clinical practice, and to facilitate patient referrals to community-based fall prevention programs (28). Only 15% were familiar with MOB, the most widely disseminated community fall prevention program in Massachusetts (29).
Self-selection into community-based fall prevention programs is problematic
Community-based fall prevention programs are most often offered by public organizations (e.g., area agencies on aging, township-based park districts) and private organizations (e.g., YMCA's) that serve older adults. While some of these entities may employ health care professionals, most community fall prevention programs are marketed directly to the public. Few participants are referred by healthcare professionals.
This model is problematic. First, fear of falling is an independent fall risk factor (5). Those who self-select for fall prevention programs, by definition, have some measure of fall prevention self-efficacy, while some of those who do not elect to participate may lack falls self-efficacy. Thus, without encouragement from their healthcare professionals, those who may benefit the most from fall prevention programs may be least likely to participate. Second, falls can be a sign of early or underlying health conditions (30), they are reliable and strong predictors of subsequent falls (31, 32) and injurious falls predict future falls requiring medical care (33, 34). Consequently, individualized assessment and targeted intervention is indicated for older adults presenting in an emergency department or other clinical settings with a fall (35, 36). Older adults who self-select into community-based fall prevention programs without interfacing with health care professionals may experience delays in receiving timely medical attention may, or such attention may not be received at all. This compounds a well-documented existing problem: follow-up studies of patients discharged from treatment for fall injury indicate that few are referred to or receive fall-prevention intervention (37–40). Third, to realize their full potential for population-level impact, community-based programs must be broadly disseminated and engage a substantial portion of the population. It is unlikely that community-based fall prevention will be scaled up to yield population-level decreases in older adult fall risk without referrals from health care professionals.
Discussion
Primary care-based health care professionals are uniquely positioned to refer older adults to evidence-based fall prevention programs and thereby enhance the potential of population level impacts of these and future community-based interventions. In addition to access to older adults presenting at all points on the fall risk continuum, the increase in use of team-based primary care models supports assessment and management of fall risk among older adults. Most falls in community-dwelling older adults result from a combination of risk factors, a multifactorial assessment is indicated for older adults at high risk for falling (20). Interprofessional team members can draw from their collective expertise to work with older adults to identify and prioritize modifiable risk factors and refer older adult patients to community-based programs that best meet individualized needs.
Fortunately, primary care-based health care professionals have several mechanisms available for reimbursement of fall prevention services that can lead to referral to community-based programs. Falls-related services may be reimbursable through negotiation with private plans or by Medicare (41). Annual Wellness Visits (AWV), which the US CMMS began reimbursing in 2011, are a particularly important vehicle for reimbursement. Findings from studies of Texas Medicare data for 2014–2018, highlight the potential for AWV data to inform fall prevention interventions and other health promotion practices (42).
Although health care is shifting away from fee-for-service reimbursement to alternative payment models, fee for service is still the norm for most primary care practices (43). Several Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes apply to fall prevention services provided in primary care clinics. For example, occupational therapists working in primary care can apply CPT codes to a range of relevant services, many of which highlight the increasingly evident relationship between self-management of chronic medical conditions and fall prevention (44). These services include but are not limited to individualized strategies for adherence to medications, activity/exercise programs, and education regarding activities of daily living (ADLs), activity modification and general exercise (43).
Finally, primary care providers can utilize resources made available through the National Council on Aging (NCOA) and the CDC. Both the NCOA and CDC are leading efforts to educate healthcare professionals on the importance of referring older adult patients to community-based fall prevention programs. With funding from the Administration on Living (ACL), the NCOA has created the National Falls Prevention Resource Center for Professionals (45). Health care professionals can contact the Center to learn about State Fall Prevention Coalition and local fall prevention programs. The Center also provides a detailed listing of fall prevention programs that meet ACL criteria for evidence-based programs specifically for falls prevention. The aforementioned STEADI Toolkit is a comprehensive set of materials designed for use in primary care that includes the Algorithm for Fall Risk Screening, Assessment, and Intervention (28). The algorithm recommends that older adults who are screened, found to be at risk for falls and presenting with poor gait, strength, and balance should be further assessed and also be referred to evidence-based fall prevention programs. The STEADI algorithm also indicates that older adults screened and found not to be at risk for falls should be referred to community exercise or fall prevention programs.
Since STEADI was launched in 2012, important insights into successful implementation of fall prevention practices in primary care have been gained (46). Health care professionals in primary care who combine these lessons learned with strategic efforts to learn about the evidence-based fall prevention programs available in their own health care system or communities will be well-positioned to fulfill the critical role they play in facilitating referrals to community-based fall prevention programs.
Statements
Author contributions
JH: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EWP: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
EWP is a Lead Trainer for MaineHealth. MaineHealth is the license-granting agency for Matter of Balance/Lay Leader Model. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal/index (accessed June 15, 2023).
2.
KakaraRBergenGBurnsEStevensM. Nonfatal and fatal falls among adults aged ≥65 years-United States, 2020-2021. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2023) 72:938–43. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7235a1
3.
FlorenceCSBergenGAtherlyABurnsEStevensJDrakeC. Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults. J Amer Geriatr Soc. (2018) 66:693–8. 10.1111/jgs.15304
4.
SterlingDAO'ConnorJABonadiesJ. Geriatric falls: injury severity is high and disproportionate to mechanism. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. (2001) 50:116–9. 10.1097/00005373-200101000-00021
5.
FriedmanSMMunozBWestSRubinGSFriedLP. Falls and fear of falling: which comes first? A longitudinal prediction model suggests strategies for primary and secondary prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2002) 50:1329–35. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50352.x
6.
GambaroEGramagliaCAzzolinaDCampaniDDal MolinAZeppegnoP. The complex associations between late life depression, fear of falling and risk of falls: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Ageing Res Rev. (2022) 73:101532. 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101532
7.
DelbaereKSturnieksDLCrombezGLordSR. Concern about falls elicits changes in gait parameters in conditions of postural threat in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2009) 64:237–42. 10.1093/gerona/gln014
8.
CummingRGSalkeldGThomasMSzonyiG. Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. (2000) 55:M299–305. 10.1093/gerona/55.5.M299
9.
DelbaereKCrombezGVanderstraetenGWillemsTCambierD. Fear-related avoidance of activities, falls and physical frailty. A prospective community-based cohort study. Age Ageing. (2004) 33:368–73. 10.1093/ageing/afh106
10.
ZijlstraGAvan HaastregtJCvan EijkJTvan RossumEStalenhoefPAKempenGI. Prevalence and correlates of fear of falling, and associated avoidance of activity in the general population of community-living older people. Age Ageing. (2007) 36:304–9. 10.1093/ageing/afm021
11.
Santos-LozadaAR. Trends in deaths from falls among adults aged 65 years or older in the US. J Am Med Assoc. (2023) 329:1605–7. 10.1001/jama.2023.3054
12.
HuGBakerSP. An explanation for the recent increase in the fall death rate among older Americans: a subgroup analysis. Public Health Rep. (2012) 127:275–81. 10.1177/003335491212700307
13.
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Population Ageing.New York, NY: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2013).
14.
Samper-TernentRKarmarkarAGrahamJReistetterTOttenbacherK. Frailty as a predictor of falls in older Mexican Americans. J Aging Health. (2012) 24:641–53. 10.1177/0898264311428490
15.
BarnettKMercerSWNorburyMWattGWykeSGuthrieB. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, cross-sectional study. Lancet. (2012) 380:37–43. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2
16.
SeppalaLJPetrovicMRygJBahatGTopinkovaESzczerbińskaKet al. STOPPFall (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk): a Delphi study by the EuGMS Task and Finish Group on Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs. Age Ageing. (2021) 50:1189–99. 10.1093/ageing/afaa249
17.
MairAFernandez-LlimosFAlonsoAHarrisonCHurdingSKempenTet al. Polypharmacy Management by 2030: a Patient Safety Challenge. 2nd ed. Coimbra: SIMPATHY Consortium (2017).
18.
SeppalaLJvan der VeldeNMasudTBlainHPetrovicMvan der CammenTJet al. EuGMS task and finish group on fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs): position on knowledge dissemination, management, and future research. Drugs Aging. (2019) 36:299–307. 10.1007/s40266-018-0622-7
19.
TinettiMEKumarC. The patient who falls: “it's always a trade-off.” J Am Med Assoc. (2010) 303:258–66. 10.1001/jama.2009.2024
20.
Montero-OdassoMvan der VeldeNMartinFCPetrovicMTanMPRygJet al. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing. (2022) 51:afac205. 10.1093/ageing/afac205
21.
National Council on Aging. Evidence Based Programs. (2023). Available online at: https://www.ncoa.org/evidence-based-programs (accessed January 27, 2024).
22.
Carande-KulisVStevensJAFlorenceCSBeattieBLAriasI. A cost benefit analysis of three older adult fall prevention intervention. J Safety Res. (2015) 52:65–70. 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.12.007
23.
AckermannRTWilliamsBNguyenHQBerkeEMMaciejewskiMLLoGerfoJP. Healthcare cost differences with participation in a community based group physical activity benefit for Medicare managed care health plan members. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2008) 56:1459–65. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01804.x
24.
HowlandJShankarKNPetersonEWTaylorA. Savings in acute care costs if all older adults treated for fall-related injuries completed Matter of Balance. Inj Epidemiol. (2015) 2:25. 10.1186/s40621-015-0058-z
25.
Centersfor Medicare & Medicaid Services. Report to Congress: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services evaluation of community-based wellness and prevention programs under Section 4202 (b) of the Affordable Care Act. (2013). Available online at: https://www.cms.gov.reports (accessed December 14, 2023).
26.
SmithMLStevensJAEhrenreichHWilsonADSchusterRJCherryCOet al. Healthcare providers' perceptions and self-reported fall prevention practices: findings from a large New York health system. Front Public Health. (2015) 3:17. 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00017
27.
HowlandJHackmanHTaylorAO'HaraKLiuJBruschJ. Older adult fall prevention practices among primary care providers at accountable care organizations: a pilot study. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0205279. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205279
28.
StevensJ. The STEADI Toolkit: a fall prevention resource for healthcare providers. IHS Primary Care Provider. (2013) 39:162–66.
29.
HowlandJTreadwayNJTaylorAAPetersonEW. A statewide baseline inventory of evidence-based fall prevention programs for older adults. Inj Epidemiol. (2015) 2:12. 10.1186/s40621-015-0046-3
30.
HoffmanGJTinettiMEHaJAlexanderNBMinLC. Prehospital and posthospital fall injuries in older US adults. J Am Med Assoc. (2020) 3:e2013243. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13243
31.
AmbroseAPaulGHausdorffJM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. (2013) 75:51–61. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009
32.
RubensteinLJosephsonK. Falls and their prevention in elderly people: what does the evidence show?Med Clin North Am. (2006) 90:807–24. 10.1016/j.mcna.2006.05.013
33.
TiedemannASherringtonCOrrTHallenJLewisDKellyAet al. Identifying older people at high risk of future falls: development and validation of a screening tool for use in emergency departments. Emerg Med J. (2013) 30:918–22. 10.1136/emermed-2012-201783
34.
CloseJLordSAntonovaEMartinMLensbergBTaylorMet al. Older people presenting to the emergency department after a fall: a population with substantial recurrent healthcare use. Emerg Med J. (2012) 29:742–7. 10.1136/emermed-2011-200380
35.
RussellMHillKDayLBlackberryISchwartzJGiummarra DorevitchMet al. A randomized controlled trial of a multifactorial falls prevention intervention for older fallers presenting to emergency departments. J Amer Geriatr Soc. (2010) 58:2265–74. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03191.x
36.
HowlandJ. Older Adult Falls in the ED: Opportunity for Prevention?Irving, TX: ACEP Geriatric Medicine Section Newsletter (2015).
37.
ShankarKNTreadwayNJTaylorAABraudAHPetersonEWHowlandJ. Older adult falls prevention behaviors 69 days post-discharge from an urban emergency department after treatment for a fall. Inj Epidemiol. (2017) 4:18. 10.1186/s40621-017-0114-y
38.
NaughtonCMcGrathEDrennanJJohnsonFLyonsITreacyPet al. The profile and follow-up of patients who attend the emergency department following a fall. Int Emerg Nurs. (2012) 20:243–50. 10.1016/j.ienj.2011.07.005
39.
SalterAEKhanKMDonaldsonMGDavisJCBuchananJAbu-LabanRBet al. Community-dwelling seniors who present to the emergency department with a fall do not receive Guideline care and their fall risk profile worsens significantly: a 6-month prospective study. Osteoporos Int. (2006) 17:672–83. 10.1007/s00198-005-0032-7
40.
DonaldsonMGKhanKMDavisJCSalterAEBuchananJMcKnightDet al. Emergency department fall-related presentations do not trigger fall risk assessment: a gap in care of high-risk outpatient fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2005) 41:311–17. 10.1016/j.archger.2005.04.008
41.
National Council on Aging. Reimbursement of Fallsrelated Services With Current Procedural Terminology. (2017). Available online at: https://www.ncoa.org/article/reimbursement-of-fallsrelated-services-with-current-procedural-terminology-cpt-code-flyer (accessed January 27, 2024).
42.
TzengH-MRajiMATahashilderIKuoY-F. Association between Medicare annual wellness visits and prevention of falls and fractures in older adults in Texas, USA. Prev Med. (2022) 164:107331. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107331
43.
Dahl-PopolizoSSauberTMMookadamM. How occupational therapy can contribute to the primary care team and reduce physician burden. Fam Pract Manag. (2023) 30:15–9.
44.
MackenzieLClemsonL. Can chronic disease management plans including occupational therapy and physiotherapy services contribute to reducing falls risk in older people. Aust Fam Physician. (2014) 43:211–5.
45.
National Council on Aging. National Falls Prevention. (2023). Available online at: https://www.ncoa.org/professionals/health/center-for-healthy-aging/national-falls-prevention-resource-center (accessed January 27, 2024).
46.
CaseyCMParkerEMWinklerGLiuXLambertGHEkstromE. Lessons learned from implementing CDC's STEADI falls prevention algorithm in primary care. Gerontologist. (2017) 57:787–96. 10.1093/geront/gnw074
Summary
Keywords
older adults, falls, primary care, falls prevention, community-based programs
Citation
Howland J and Peterson EW (2024) The critical role of primary care health care professionals in referring older adults to community-based fall prevention programs. Front. Public Health 12:1377972. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377972
Received
28 January 2024
Accepted
04 March 2024
Published
13 March 2024
Volume
12 - 2024
Edited by
Ljiljana T. Majnaric, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia
Reviewed by
Danijela Nujić, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Howland and Peterson.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jonathan Howland jhowl@bu.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.