Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 21 October 2024
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome

The association between brominated flame retardants exposure with Parkinson’s disease in US adults: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2016

Jia-jie Lv,&#x;Jia-jie Lv1,2Yi-chi Zhang&#x;Yi-chi Zhang3Xin-yu Li,&#x;Xin-yu Li1,3Lin-jie Zhang,&#x;Lin-jie Zhang1,2Zhuo-ma Yixi,&#x;Zhuo-ma Yixi1,2Cheng-hao Yang,
&#x;Cheng-hao Yang1,2*Xu-hui Wang,
&#x;Xu-hui Wang1,2*
  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Putuo People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that environmental factors play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Humans are simultaneously exposed to multiple brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in the environment. However, the relationship between BFRs and PD remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the overall association between BFRs and PD in a nationally representative US population and to further identify significant chemicals.

Methods: This study used data from 7,161 NHANES participants from 2009 through 2016. The serum BFRs registry included PBDE-28, PBDE-47, PBDE-85, PBDE-99, PBDE-100, PBDE-153, PBDE-154, PBDE-183, PBDE-209, and PBB-153. A survey-weighted generalized logistic regression model with restricted cubic splines (RCS) was used to evaluate the association between single BFRs exposure and periodontitis. Meanwhile, weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were used to evaluate the overall association of mixed frankincense powder with periodontitis and to identify significant chemicals. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.

Results: Among the 7,161 participants, 65 had PD. PD patients were older (mean age 57.79 vs. 46.57 years) and had a higher proportion of females (70.86%) compared to non-PD participants. Serum levels of PBB-153 were significantly higher in those with PD. Logistic regression analyses revealed a non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship between serum PBB-153 and PD risk. The risk of PD increased with higher PBB-153 levels up to the 3rd quartile (Q3), beyond which the risk declined (Q3 vs. Q1: OR = 4.98, 95% CI = 1.79–13.86; Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.03–10.08). PBB-153 (43.40%), PBDE-153 (24.75%), and PBDE-85 (19.51%) contributed most to the weighted quantile sum index associated with PD risk. Bayesian kernel machine regression confirmed the inverted U-shaped dose–response pattern for PBB-153 and the overall BFR mixture. Restricted cubic spline analyses corroborated the non-linear relationship between PBB-153 and PD, which was more pronounced among women and those aged 37–58 years. Sensitivity analyses substantiated these findings.

Conclusion: This nationally representative cross-sectional study revealed a novel non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship between serum levels of the brominated flame retardant PBB-153 and Parkinson’s disease risk in U.S. adults. The risk increased with higher PBB-153 exposure up to a point, beyond which it declined. This complex dose–response pattern highlights the importance of considering potential hormetic mechanisms and effect modifiers when evaluating environmental exposures and neurodegenerative diseases. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying biological pathways and inform risk mitigation strategies.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder distinguished by motor symptoms such as tremors, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability, alongside non-motor manifestations including cognitive impairment, autonomic dysfunction, and sleep disturbances (1). It is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease, affecting approximately 1% of individuals over the age of 60 (2). Despite substantial research efforts, the precise etiology of PD remains largely unresolved, with both genetic and environmental factors implicated in its pathogenesis.

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are a group of synthetic compounds extensively employed in consumer products such as electronics, furniture, and textiles to reduce flammability (3). Concerns have been raised about these compounds due to their environmental persistence, bioaccumulative potential, and possible adverse health effects. A number of studies have examined the association between BFR exposure and various health outcomes, including neurodevelopmental disorders, endocrine disruption, and carcinogenesis (4, 5).

The potential link between BFR exposure and neurodegenerative diseases like PD has been explored, though the findings are not definitive. Certain studies suggest that specific BFRs, notably polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), may contribute to PD pathogenesis by mechanisms such as oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction (6, 7). Conversely, other investigations have reported no significant association or have presented conflicting evidence (8, 9).

Given the potential implications of BFR exposure for PD risk, the current body of evidence remains limited and necessitates further exploration. Most existing studies have concentrated on specific BFR congeners or have been conducted in animal models or in vitro systems, underscoring the need for comprehensive evaluations of BFR exposure and its possible connection to PD in human populations.

These inconsistent findings underscore the critical need for additional research to clarify the potential relationship between BFR exposure and PD, particularly within the context of the U.S. population, where BFR usage is widespread. Understanding this association has significant implications for public health, environmental policy, and the development of preventive and therapeutic strategies for age-related diseases, including Parkinson’s disease. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), controlling for multiple confounders. We employed various models to investigate the association between individual and combined BFR exposure and the incidence of PD in U.S. adults.

Materials and methods

Study population

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a broad interdisciplinary research project initiated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assess the health and nutritional status of populations in the United States. The primary goal of NHANES is to collect, analyze, and publish health, nutrition, and environmental exposure data in the United States. It has been conducted annually since the 1960s and covers all age groups in the country. In this study, PD data were investigated and four survey periods (2009–2010, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, and 2015–2016) were combined to improve accuracy. The study included 7,161 participants aged between 18 and 80 years. Figure 1 outlines the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study. The NHANES study ethics review board approved the study protocol for the period 2009–2016, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow chart of the study.

Exposure: brominated flame retardants

In the NHANES dataset, PBB-153 and 9 PBDEs in serum were measured using automated liquid–liquid extraction and subsequent sample purification (NHANES, 2019). However, in this study, we only considered PBB-153 and nine PBDEs with a detection rate greater than 50% (10). Namely, 2,4,4′-tribromodiphenyl ether (BDE-28), 2,2′,4,4′- tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47), 2,2′,3,4,4′-pentabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-85), 2,2′,4,4′,5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-99), 2,2′,4,4′,6-pentabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-100), 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′- hexabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-153), 2,2′,4,4′,5,6′-hexabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-154), 2,2′,3,4,4′,5′,6-heptabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-183), decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209), and 2,2′,4,4′,5, 5′-hexabromobiphenyl (PBB-153).

Outcome: Parkinson’s disease

In this study, participants were identified with PD by specifying “Second Level Category Name” as “ANTIPARKINSON AGENTS” in the Prescription Medications document. Based on the responses to questions regarding prescription medication, this determination was made. Since this method of identification was limited by medications and codes included in the NHANES, an individual had to be receiving treatment for PD to be classified as having it. Those who did not report taking an anti-parkinsonian medication were classified as not having PD. The definition of the disease is based on previous studies (11, 12).

Covariates

This study considered several sociodemographic characteristics based on previous research, including age, sex, race, education level, marital status, poverty income ratio (PIR), smoking status, drinking status, body mass index (BMI), metabolic equivalent (MET), and comorbidity index (CCI). Race was categorized as Mexican American, white, black, or other. Education level was less than high school, high school, or college or above. Marital status was living with a peer, single, or married. PIR measured socioeconomic status as the ratio of household income to poverty line, categorized as low, medium, or high. Smoking status was coded as never, former, or current smoker. Drinking status included never, former, mild, moderate, and heavy drinker categories. Comorbidities included conditions like diabetes, heart disease, lung disease, hypertension, and cancer. A CCI score calculated the number and severity of conditions, with higher scores indicating greater impact on prognosis.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square test and t-test were used to evaluate the demographic characteristics of subjects with different PD states. Serum BFRs were Ln transformed to obtain an approximately normal distribution (continuous variables) or divided into four quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) as categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between serum BFRs and the risk of PD. All analyses were performed for age, sex (male or female), race/ethnicity (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or other), education, marital status, metabolic equivalent (MET), alcohol use status, body-mass index (BMI), household income/poverty ratio (PIR), and other covariates Correction. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation of Ln conversion to BFRs. Because the weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression performed well in describing environmental mixtures, we used this regression to explore the overall effect of serum BFRs on PD onset. The R package (“gWQS “) allows empirical calculation of a WQS index consisting of a weighted sum of individual BFRs concentrations. The WQS index ranges from 0 to 1, representing the level of mixed exposure to brominated furoic acid, and components of concern with non-negligible weights were identified. The final results were interpreted as the simultaneous effect of adding a quantile of mixed BFRs on PD. In addition, we conducted a Pearson correlation analysis to examine the relationships between different PBDE congeners. This analysis helps to understand whether the PBDEs are interrelated, which could influence their cumulative effects on health outcomes (Supplementary Figure 1).

First, weighted multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between serum BFRs and PD. Finally, three different models were constructed. No adjustments were made to the original model. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and race; Based on Model 1, Model 2 was further adjusted for other demographic factors (race, BMI, PIR, MET, and education), CCI, and lifestyle factors (such as smoking and alcohol consumption). Second, considering the potential nonlinear, non-additive relationship between bromamphetamine and PD, Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) was used to assess the combined effect of all bromamphetamine and PD prevalence (“BKMR “package) and the dose–response relationship between single bromamphetamine and PD prevalence to determine the risk of other bromamphetamine and PD prevalence as a function of concentration. 5,000 simulation analyses based on normal approximation were performed using the quasi-Bayesian Monte Carlo method. Subsequently, after screening, we found that PBB-153 was significantly associated with PD incidence. In order to clarify the nonlinear relationship between the two, we performed smooth curve fitting (penalty spline method). Finally, to assess the robustness of the results, we performed sensitivity analyses targeting people younger than 60 years to further validate the association between PBB-153 and PD onset. Statistical analyses were performed with the use of R software 4.3.0 (Core Team, Vienna, Austria). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of participants

A total of 7,161 subjects were included in the study, including 65 patients with Parkinson’s disease. Table 1 lists the characteristics of the participants according to PD and non-PD groups. The average age of PD patients was 57.79 years, which was significantly higher than 46.57 years of non-PD patients (p < 0.0001). Among the patients, the proportion of female patients was significantly higher than that of male patients (70.86% vs. 29.14%). Participants’ age, sex, race, marital status, MET, and CCI were also significantly different by PD status (all p < 0.05, Table 1). In addition, education, household income, alcohol consumption, and smoking status were also not statistically different between PD and non-PD patients. Furthermore, in response to serum BFR concentrations, serum PBB155 was significantly higher in participants with PD than in those without PD (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristics of participants by Parkinson’s disease, NHANES 2009–2016.

Associations between serum BFRs and PD risk

In the multiple Logistic regression analysis, each serum BFRs concentration was Ln transformed to fit a normal distribution. After controlling for confounding factors, there was a significant positive correlation between PBB-153 PD and 8 kinds of BFRs (p < 0.05). In the original model, with each unit increase of PBB-153 concentration, the prevalence of PD increased by 32% (OR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.61, p < 0.05). In model 1 (adjusted for gender and race), each unit increase in PBB153 concentration was associated with 31% increased prevalence of PD (OR: 1.31, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.64, p < 0.05). In model 2 (adjusted for related factors based on model 1), each unit increase in PBB153 concentration was associated with a 23% increase in PD prevalence (OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 0.96, 1.57, p < 0.05). Other BFRs were positively or negatively correlated with PD incidence, but the results were not statistically significant. Secondly, BFRs were divided into quartiles (Q1–Q4) to explore the relationship between different concentrations of BFRs and the risk of PD. After controlling for potential confounders, a significant dose–response relationship was found between PBB153 and the risk of PD (p for trend <0.001, Table 2). The risk of PBB-153 Q3 was 4.98 times that of Q1 (OR = 4.98, 95%CI: 1.79, 13.86, p < 0.05). The risk of PBB-153Q4 was 3.23 times higher than that of Q1 (OR = 3.23, 95%CI: 1.03, 10.08, p < 0.05). In addition, PBB-153 (43.40%), PBDE-153 (24.75%), and PBDE-85 (19.51%) were the most weighted in the WQS model (Figure 2A). Figure 2B shows a box diagram representing the weight (%) distribution for each BFR in the WQS model. PBB153 has the highest mass distribution and widest range, while other compounds have a smaller and more concentrated mass distribution. The figure illustrates the uncertainty and variability of the weights assigned to each compound in different models (Figure 2B).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses by the weighted linear model.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Weighted values of brominated flame retardants for PD in WQS models. (A) Bar Chart Representation of Top Compounds, (B) Box Plot of Weight Distribution Across Compounds. Models were adjusted for gender, age, race, education, PIR, marital status, BMI, MET, drinking alcohol status, smoking status and CCI.

Associations of all BFRs with PD in BKMR analyses

We showed the association between serum BFRs and the risk of PD by BKMR model analysis (Figure 3). Interestingly, we found that most of the single BFRs were positively associated with PD, but PBB-153 showed an “inverted U” trend of first increasing and then decreasing the risk of PD. This is also in line with the findings of the above analysis, that is, the risk of PBB-153Q3 is 4.98 times that of Q1 (OR = 4.98, 95%CI: 1.79, 13.86, p < 0.05), and the risk of PBB-153Q4 is 3.23 times that of Q1 (OR = 3.23, 95%CI: 1.03 vs. 10.08, p < 0.05) (Table 2; Figure 3A). The risk of mixed BFRs and PD also reflected a trend that was similar to that seen in PBB-153, in which the risk first increased and then decreased (Figure 3B). In Figure 3B, we present the combined effects of all serum BFRs on PD risk. It is important to clarify that PBB-153 was included in the analysis alongside other BFRs. The estimated risk shown in the figure reflects the cumulative effect of all BFRs, including PBB-153, as their concentrations vary across different percentiles. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the overall impact of BFR exposure on PD risk. In conclusion, serum BFRs showed an “inverted U” trend with PD.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Associations of the serum brominated flame retardants (BFRs) content with PD risk estimated by Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR). (A) Exposure-response functions for each BFRs with PD. (B) Combined effects of serum brominated flame retardants on PD risk. This plot showed the estimated difference in PD risk and 95% confidence interval when all BFRs concentrations were held at particular percentiles compared to their medians. Models were adjusted for gender, age, race, education, PIR, marital status, BMI, MET, drinking alcohol status, smoking status, and CCI.

Nonlinearity analysis using RCS

Based on the above analysis, we suspected a nonlinear relationship between serum PBB-153 and PD incidence. To clarify the relationship between the two, we carefully examined the nonlinear relationship between PBB-153 concentration and the probability of developing PD after Ln transformation using penalized spline smooth curve fitting (Figure 4). After adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, race, education level, marital status, family income, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and comorbidity index, the results of restricted spline analysis showed that the overall probability of developing PD first increased and then decreased with increasing serum PBB-153 concentration (Figure 4A), consistent with the findings of the above study. In addition, we found that the inverted U-shaped relationship between PBB-153 and PD was more pronounced in women and in people aged 37–58 years (Figures 4A,B).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Relationship between brominated flame retardants and PD during 2009–2016. (A) Entirety; (B) By gender; (C) By age. Adjusted for age, sex, race, education, marital status, income, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and CCI. The shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval.

Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis

The results of subgroup analyses are shown in Table 3. Subgroup analysis showed that the p value for interaction between subgroups was >0.05, suggesting no significant effect change. In conclusion, the effect of serum PBB-153 on PD risk remained consistent across subgroups including sex, age, race, PIR, BMI, drinking status, and smoking status.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Subgroup analyses on the association among brominated flame retardants with Parkinson.

In addition, considering that increasing age is the most dominant risk factor for PD and may introduce susceptibility bias, we considered excluding the 60 years and older and critical population (n = 2,090) for sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the study. A total of 5,071 subjects were included in the sensitivity analysis. In the multivariate Logistic regression analysis, serum PBB-153 concentration was transformed into Ln to fit the normal distribution, and PBB-153 was divided into quartiles (Q1–Q4) to explore the relationship between different concentrations of PBB-153 and the risk of PD. The results showed that in model 2, for every unit increase in PBB-153 concentration, the prevalence of PD increased by 67% (OR: 1.67, 95%CI: 1.22, 2.27, p < 0.05). The risk of PBB-153 Q4 was 8.14 times higher than that of Q1 (OR = 8.14, 95%CI: 1.55, 42.85, p < 0.05) (Table 4). In addition, RCS analysis was performed on the subjects in the sensitivity analysis to further clarify the nonlinear relationship between PBB-153 concentration and the probability of developing PD after Ln transformation (Figure 5). The results showed an inverted U-shaped relationship between PBB-153 and PD (Figure 5A). Similar to these findings, we found that the inverted U-shaped relationship was more pronounced among women when we grouped according to sex (Figure 5B). In summary, the sensitivity results were similar to those described above, further validating the robustness of this study.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Association between brominated flame retardants and Parkinson for sensitivity analysis.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis—relationship between brominated flame retardants and PD during 2009–2016. (A) Entirety; (B) By gender. Adjusted for age, sex, race, education, marital status, income, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and CCI. The shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study, we utilized data from the nationally representative NHANES survey, covering the period from 2009 to 2016, to examine the potential association between exposure to various BFRs and the risk of PD among U.S. adults. Our findings reveal a non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship between serum levels of PBB-153 and the likelihood of PD, even after adjusting for potential confounders. Specifically, PD risk increased with rising PBB-153 levels up to a threshold, beyond which the risk began to decline.

This non-linear association between PBB-153 exposure and PD risk is consistent with previous studies that have reported complex dose–response relationships between environmental exposures and neurodegenerative diseases (1315). Several mechanisms may underlie this inverted U-shaped relationship. Initially, low levels of PBB-153 exposure could induce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, both of which are well-established contributors to PD pathogenesis (16, 17). Oxidative stress leads to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage cellular components such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (18). Concurrently, neuroinflammation, marked by microglial activation and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, may exacerbate neuronal damage and contribute to neurodegeneration (19). These processes could potentially initiate or accelerate the progression of PD.

Conversely, at higher levels of exposure, PBB-153 may activate adaptive or protective mechanisms that reduce PD risk. One possible mechanism involves the activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway, which regulates the expression of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (20). Exposure to certain environmental pollutants, including some BFRs, has been shown to induce Nrf2 activation, leading to the upregulation of cytoprotective genes and enhanced cellular defenses against oxidative stress (21, 22). This adaptive response might mitigate the neurotoxic effects of PBB-153 at higher exposure levels, resulting in a lower PD risk.

Another plausible explanation for the observed inverted U-shaped relationship is the phenomenon of hormesis, where low doses of a stressor elicit beneficial or adaptive responses, while higher doses become harmful (23). Hormetic effects have been proposed as a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, including PD (24). At low levels of PBB-153 exposure, the mild cellular stress induced may activate adaptive pathways that enhance neuronal resilience, potentially preventing the accumulation of misfolded proteins, a hallmark of PD pathology (25). However, when exposure levels increase, the resultant cellular stress may exceed the capacity of these adaptive mechanisms, leading to neuronal dysfunction and cell death. The potential influence of age on this non-linear relationship also warrants consideration. Age is a well-known risk factor for PD, and our sensitivity analysis, which focused on participants younger than 60 years, revealed a more pronounced inverted U-shaped association between PBB-153 exposure and PD risk. This suggests that the non-linear relationship might be more prominent in younger individuals, possibly due to age-related differences in toxicokinetics, metabolic capacity, or cellular defense mechanisms (26).

The findings of this study are consistent with and build upon previous research exploring the link between environmental toxicants, such as BFRs, and PD. Earlier studies have suggested that certain BFRs, particularly PBDEs, may contribute to the development of neurodegenerative diseases by inducing oxidative stress and neuroinflammation (4, 6). Our study supports these mechanisms by demonstrating a significant association between BFR exposure and PD risk, specifically highlighting the inverted U-shaped dose–response relationship with PBB-153. This complex pattern aligns with previous work that has observed non-linear associations between environmental exposures and neurodegenerative outcomes, suggesting a hormetic effect where low-level exposure may initiate protective responses, but higher levels overwhelm these defenses, leading to neurotoxicity (23, 24).

Several potential biological mechanisms may explain the association between BFRs exposure and the risk of PD. One of the primary mechanisms involves oxidative stress, which is a well-established contributor to neurodegenerative diseases, including PD. BFRs, particularly PBDEs, have been found to increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS can lead to cellular damage, including the destruction of lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, which subsequently results in the dysfunction and death of dopaminergic neurons, a key pathological feature of PD (6, 9, 18). Additionally, neuroinflammation is another significant mechanism. Exposure to BFRs may activate microglia, the immune cells in the central nervous system, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Chronic inflammation in the brain can exacerbate neuronal damage and accelerate the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as PD (17, 19). Another possible pathway is mitochondrial dysfunction, which plays a central role in PD pathology. Studies suggest that BFRs can impair mitochondrial function, reducing the cells’ ability to produce energy and triggering apoptotic pathways, which can lead to the death of neurons in PD patients (16). Finally, the concept of hormesis, where low levels of exposure to toxicants like BFRs might initially activate protective mechanisms, but higher exposures lead to toxicity, may also explain the non-linear dose–response relationship observed between BFR exposure and PD risk. This biphasic response could involve adaptive cellular responses that temporarily mitigate neurotoxicity but ultimately fail at higher exposure levels (2325). These mechanisms highlight the complex and multifactorial effects of BFRs on the central nervous system and underscore the need for further mechanistic studies to better understand the link between BFR exposure and PD.

In our study, we observed a more pronounced inverted U-shaped relationship between serum PBB-153 levels and Parkinson’s Disease (PD) risk in women compared to men. Several factors may contribute to this gender-specific effect. Firstly, women undergo significant hormonal changes throughout their lives, including during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and menopause (27). Estrogen, a key hormone, is known to influence neuroinflammatory responses and oxidative stress—two mechanisms critical in PD development (28). Estrogen’s modulation of neuroprotective pathways may alter the body’s response to environmental toxins like brominated flame retardants (BFRs), potentially heightening women’s vulnerability to neurotoxic effects of compounds such as PBB-153 (29).

Additionally, gender-specific differences in exposure patterns could play a role. Women are more likely to spend time in indoor environments where BFR-containing products, such as electronics and upholstered furniture, are common. This increased exposure through household dust and consumer products may result in higher internal doses of BFRs in women, thereby heightening the associated health risks, including the risk of developing PD (30). Moreover, physiological differences between men and women, such as body fat composition, liver enzyme activity, and kidney function, can affect BFR metabolism and elimination (31). These differences can lead to slower elimination rates and higher bioaccumulation of BFRs in women, resulting in prolonged exposure and potentially greater adverse effects on the nervous system (31, 32).

Our subgroup analysis further supported this, showing a more pronounced non-linear association between PBB-153 exposure and PD risk in women compared to men. This gender-specific difference may be attributed to a variety of factors, including hormonal influences, variations in exposure patterns, or differences in metabolic pathways and elimination rates (33, 34). This finding aligns with recent studies highlighting gender-specific effects of environmental exposures on neurodegenerative diseases. The influence of sex hormones, such as estrogen, which may provide neuroprotective effects, could explain this difference (33). Estrogen has been shown to modulate neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, both of which are critical mechanisms in PD pathogenesis (34). Further research is needed to explore the role of hormonal factors and whether postmenopausal women or those with lower estrogen levels are at higher risk when exposed to BFRs. In addition, previous research has documented gender-specific effects of environmental exposures on neurodegenerative diseases, underscoring the importance of considering potential effect modifiers in risk assessment (35, 36). What’s more, the results from the BMI subgroup analysis were also noteworthy. We observed that individuals with higher BMI showed stronger associations between BFR exposure and PD risk. This may be due to the fact that BFRs, being lipophilic compounds, are more likely to accumulate in adipose tissue. As a result, individuals with higher body fat may have prolonged and higher internal exposure to BFRs, leading to increased neurotoxic effects. This interaction suggests that obesity could act as a modifying factor, enhancing the adverse effects of BFR exposure on the nervous system. The WQS regression analysis further revealed that PBB-153, along with other BFRs such as PBDE-153 and PBDE-85, significantly contributed to the overall mixture effect on PD risk. This finding highlights the importance of considering the cumulative impact of multiple environmental exposures, rather than focusing solely on individual compounds (37). The combined effects of these BFRs may stem from their shared capacities to induce oxidative stress, disrupt endocrine signaling, or interfere with other cellular processes relevant to neurodegeneration (38, 39).

While this study provides valuable insights into the potential association between BFR exposure and PD risk, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the cross-sectional design of the study precludes the establishment of causality, and the possibility of reverse causation cannot be entirely excluded. Longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the temporal relationship between BFR exposure and the development of PD. Second, the identification of PD cases in the NHANES dataset relied solely on self-reported medication use, which may have led to misclassification of disease status. Incorporating more comprehensive diagnostic criteria, including clinical evaluations and neuroimaging data, would improve the accuracy of case identification. Third, the NHANES data did not capture information on potential confounding factors specific to PD risk, such as occupational exposures, history of head trauma, or genetic predispositions. Although adjustments were made for a range of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, the potential influence of unmeasured confounders cannot be completely ruled out.

Despite these limitations, the present study has several strengths. The use of a nationally representative sample from the NHANES survey enhances the generalizability of the findings to the U.S. adult population. Additionally, the comprehensive assessment of multiple BFRs and the application of advanced statistical methods, such as WQS regression and BKMR, allowed for a more robust evaluation of the overall mixture effect and the identification of significant individual compounds. These methodological strengths contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between environmental exposures and PD risk.

In conclusion, this study provides evidence for a non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship between serum levels of PBB-153 and the risk of Parkinson’s disease in U.S. adults. The findings highlight the importance of considering complex dose–response relationships and potential effect modifiers when assessing the impact of environmental exposures on neurodegenerative diseases. Further research, including prospective cohort studies and mechanistic investigations, is warranted to elucidate the underlying biological pathways and to inform public health strategies for mitigating the potential risks associated with BFR exposure.

Conclusion

This nationally representative cross-sectional study identified a novel non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship between serum levels of the brominated flame retardant PBB-153 and the risk of Parkinson’s disease in U.S. adults. The risk initially increased with rising PBB-153 exposure, only to decline beyond a certain threshold. This complex dose–response pattern underscores the importance of considering potential hormetic mechanisms and effect modifiers in the evaluation of environmental exposures and neurodegenerative diseases. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying biological pathways and to inform the development of effective risk mitigation strategies.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

J-jL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Y-cZ: Data curation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft. X-yL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. L-jZ: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Z-mY: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. C-hY: Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. X-hW: Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1451686/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

BFRs, brominated flame retardants; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; MET, metabolic equivalent; OR, odds ratio; PIR, poverty to income ratio; PBB-153, 2,2′,4,4′,5,5´-Hexabromobiphenyl; PBDE-28, 2,4,4′-Tribromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-47, 2,2′,4,4´-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-85, 2,2′,3,4,4´-Tentabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-99, 2,2′,4,4′,5-Pentabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-100, 2,2′,4,4′,6-Pentabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-153, 2,2′,4,4′,5,5´-Hexabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-154, 2′,4,4′,5,6´-Hexabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-183, 2,2′,3,4,4′,5′,6-Heptabromodiphenyl ether; PBDE-209, decabromodiphenyl ether.

References

1. Samii, A, Nutt, JG, and Ransom, BR (2004). Parkinson's disease. Lancet 363:1783–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16305-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Pringsheim, T, Jette, N, Frolkis, A, and Steeves, TD (2014). The prevalence of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord 29:1583–90. doi: 10.1002/mds.25945

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Birnbaum, LS, and Staskal, DF (2004). Brominated flame retardants: cause for concern? Environ Health Perspect 112:9–17. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6559

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Herbstman, JB, Sjödin, A, Kurzon, M, Lederman, SA, Jones, RS, Rauh, V, et al. (2010). Prenatal exposure to PBDEs and neurodevelopment. Environ Health Perspect 118:712–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901340

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Jinhui, L, Yuan, C, and Wenjing, X (2017). Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in articles: a review of its applications and legislation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:4312–21. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4515-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bradner, JM, Suragh, TA, Wilson, WW, Lazo, CR, Stout, KA, Kim, HM, et al. (2013). Exposure to the polybrominated diphenyl ether mixture DE-71 damages the nigrostriatal dopamine system: role of dopamine handling in neurotoxicity. Exp Neurol 241:138–47. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.12.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kanthasamy, AG, Kitazawa, M, Yang, Y, Anantharam, V, and Kanthasamy, A (2008). Environmental neurotoxin dieldrin induces apoptosis via caspase-3-dependent proteolytic activation of protein kinase C delta (PKCdelta): implications for neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Mol Brain 1:12. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-1-12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Costa, LG, de Laat, R, Tagliaferri, S, and Pellacani, C (2014). A mechanistic view of polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) developmental neurotoxicity. Toxicol Lett 230:282–94. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.11.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Goldman, SM (2014). Environmental toxins and Parkinson's disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 54:141–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-135937

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Luo, K, Zhang, R, Aimuzi, R, Wang, Y, Nian, M, and Zhang, J (2020). Exposure to organophosphate esters and metabolic syndrome in adults. Environ Int 143:105941. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105941

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zeng, Z, Cen, Y, Wang, L, and Luo, X (2023). Association between dietary inflammatory index and Parkinson's disease from national health and nutrition examination survey (2003-2018): a cross-sectional study. Front Neurosci 17:1203979. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1203979

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zeng, Z, Cen, Y, and Luo, X (2023). Association between blood selenium with Parkinson's disease in the US (NHANES 2011-2020). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 30:117349–59. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30337-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Qiu, C, Kivipelto, M, and von Strauss, E (2009). Epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11:111–28. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/cqiu

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bauer, AZ, and Kriebel, D (2013). Prenatal and perinatal analgesic exposure and autism: an ecological link. Environ Health 12:41. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-41

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Si, M, Zhao, C, Burkinshaw, B, Zhang, B, Wei, D, Wang, Y, et al. (2017). Manganese scavenging and oxidative stress response mediated by type VI secretion system in Burkholderia thailandensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E2233–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614902114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Subramaniam, SR, and Chesselet, MF (2013). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease. Prog Neurobiol 106-107:17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Cheng, Q, Chen, J, Guo, H, Lu, JL, Zhou, J, Guo, XY, et al. (2021). Pyrroloquinoline quinone promotes mitochondrial biogenesis in rotenone-induced Parkinson's disease model via AMPK activation. Acta Pharmacol Sin 42:665–78. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0487-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mythri, RB, Venkateshappa, C, Harish, G, Mahadevan, A, Muthane, UB, Yasha, TC, et al. (2011). Evaluation of markers of oxidative stress, antioxidant function and astrocytic proliferation in the striatum and frontal cortex of Parkinson's disease brains. Neurochem Res 36:1452–63. doi: 10.1007/s11064-011-0471-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Janda, E, Isidoro, C, Carresi, C, and Mollace, V (2012). Defective autophagy in Parkinson's disease: role of oxidative stress. Mol Neurobiol 46:639–61. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8318-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nguyen, T, Nioi, P, and Pickett, CB (2009). The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 284:13291–5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R900010200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Park, HR, and Loch-Caruso, R (2014). Protective effect of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 on inflammatory cytokine response to brominated diphenyl ether-47 in the HTR-8/SVneo human first trimester extravillous trophoblast cell line. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 281:67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.09.015

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhuang, J, Jiang, Z, Chen, D, Li, J, Crabbe, MJC, Qiu, M, et al. (2023). Thyroid-disrupting effects of exposure to Fipronil and its metabolites from drinking water based on human thyroid follicular epithelial Nthy-ori 3-1 cell lines. Environ Sci Technol 57:6072–84. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08627

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mattson, MP (2008). Hormesis defined. Ageing Res Rev 7:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2007.08.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Elmazoglu, Z, Yar Saglam, AS, Sonmez, C, and Karasu, C (2020). Luteolin protects microglia against rotenone-induced toxicity in a hormetic manner through targeting oxidative stress response, genes associated with Parkinson's disease and inflammatory pathways. Drug Chem Toxicol 43:96–103. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2018.1504961

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Calabrese, EJ, and Baldwin, LA (2001). U-shaped dose-responses in biology, toxicology, and public health. Annu Rev Public Health 22:15–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.15

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Melnick, RL, and Huff, J. (1992). 1,3-Butadiene: toxicity and carcinogenicity in laboratory animals and in humans. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, 124, 111–144. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2864-6_5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. McEwen, BS, and Milner, TA (2007). Hippocampal formation: shedding light on the influence of sex and stress on the brain. Brain Res Rev 55:343–55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.02.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Yang, Z, Li, T, Li, S, Wei, M, Qi, H, Shen, B, et al. (2019). Altered expression levels of MicroRNA-132 and Nurr1 in peripheral blood of Parkinson's disease: potential disease biomarkers. ACS Chem Neurosci 10:2243–9. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00460

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Sousa, S, Maia, ML, Pestana, D, Teixeira, D, Ângelo-Dias, M, Martins, C, et al. (2022). Brominated flame retardants effect in MCF-7 cells: impact on vitamin D pathway. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 219:106079. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2022.106079

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Suzuki, G, Tue, NM, Malarvannan, G, Sudaryanto, A, Takahashi, S, Tanabe, S, et al. (2013). Similarities in the endocrine-disrupting potencies of indoor dust and flame retardants by using human osteosarcoma (U2OS) cell-based reporter gene assays. Environ Sci Technol 47:2898–908. doi: 10.1021/es304691a

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kalantzi, OI, Martin, FL, Thomas, GO, Alcock, RE, Tang, HR, Drury, SC, et al. (2004). Different levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and chlorinated compounds in breast milk from two U.K. regions. Environ Health Perspect 112:1085–91. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Omichessan, H, Perduca, V, Polidoro, S, Kvaskoff, M, Truong, T, Cano-Sancho, G, et al. (2022). Associations between plasma levels of brominated flame retardants and methylation of DNA from peripheral blood: a cross-sectional study in a cohort of French women. Environ Res 210:112788. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112788

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Farkouh, A, Riedl, T, Gottardi, R, Czejka, M, and Kautzky-Willer, A (2020). Sex-related differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of frequently prescribed drugs: a review of the literature. Adv Ther 37:644–55. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01201-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Matheson, J, Bourgault, Z, and Le Foll, B (2022). Sex differences in the neuropsychiatric effects and pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol: a scoping review. Biomol Ther 12:1462. doi: 10.3390/biom12101462

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Meng, D, Jin, Z, Gao, L, Wang, Y, Wang, R, Fang, J, et al. (2022). The quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: focus on gender difference. Brain Behav 12:e2517. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Adamson, A, Buck, SA, Freyberg, Z, and De Miranda, BR (2022). Sex differences in dopaminergic vulnerability to environmental toxicants – implications for Parkinson's disease. Curr Environ Health Rep 9:563–73. doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00380-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cunningham, R, and Hansen, CG (2022). The hippo pathway in cancer: YAP/TAZ and TEAD as therapeutic targets in cancer. Clin Sci (Lond) 136:197–222. doi: 10.1042/CS20201474

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhang, W, Liu, K, Chen, L, Chen, L, Lin, K, and Fu, R (2014). A multi-biomarker risk assessment of the impact of brominated flame retardant-decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209) on the antioxidant system of earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 38:297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.06.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Genskow, KR, Bradner, JM, Hossain, MM, Richardson, JR, and Caudle, WM (2015). Selective damage to dopaminergic transporters following exposure to the brominated flame retardant, HBCDD. Neurotoxicol Teratol 52:162–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.06.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: brominated flame retardants, Parkinson’s disease, The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, cross-sectional study, BKMR analysis

Citation: Lv J-j, Zhang Y-c, Li X-y, Zhang L-j, Yixi Z-m, Yang C-h and Wang X-h (2024) The association between brominated flame retardants exposure with Parkinson’s disease in US adults: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009–2016. Front. Public Health. 12:1451686. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1451686

Received: 24 June 2024; Accepted: 07 October 2024;
Published: 21 October 2024.

Edited by:

Ashu Johri, Independent researcher, New York, United States

Reviewed by:

Dieyi Chen, The Pennsylvania State University, United States
Nadeem Ali, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia

Copyright © 2024 Lv, Zhang, Li, Zhang, Yixi, Yang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xu-hui Wang, MTEwMjk5MTQ1NEBxcS5jb20=; Cheng-hao Yang, NTU0NjE2NjkxQHFxLmNvbQ==

These authors share first authorship

These authors share senior authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.