In the published article, there was an error in the captions of Figures 1, 2 as published. The correct captions of Figures 1, 2 appear below.
Figure 1
Figure 2
In the published article, Supplementary Figures 4, 5 were mistakenly not included in the publication. The missing figures, Supplementary Figures 4, 5, are included in the corrected version of the Supplementary Material.
In the published article, there was an error in the text. The text in 4.1. Mental health during the pandemic incorrectly cited Figure 1 when Supplementary Figure 4 should be cited. A correction has therefore been made to 4.1. Mental health during the pandemic.
The text previously stated:
“At the start of the pandemic, 16% of our respondents had more often depressive feelings after the first outbreak compared to before. Across all included countries, the share ranges from 9% (Denmark) to 31% (Spain). We observe the highest proportion of respondents with increased depressive feelings in Southern Europe (19%) and the lowest proportion in Northern Europe (12%) (see SCS1 in Figure 1).
As COVID-19 continued to rage across Europe, 12% of the respondents reported a worsening of mental health after the second outbreak, compared to the first outbreak. During the second outbreak, the Baltic states reported the highest proportion (15%) of increased depressive feelings, while the lowest proportion was observed in Northern Europe (6%) (see SCS2 in Figure 1). Although the proportion of individuals reporting a worsening of their mental health is highest after the first outbreak, we see that the pandemic continues to impact the mental health of older Europeans also after the first wave of infections. This is especially true for the Baltic states and Eastern Europe, where we do not observe a decline in the share of respondents indicating worsening mental health.”
The corrected text appears below:
“At the start of the pandemic, 17% of our respondents had more often depressive feelings after the first outbreak compared to before. Across all included countries, the share ranges from 9% (Denmark) to 31% (Spain). We observe the highest proportion of respondents with increased depressive feelings in Southern Europe (19%) and the lowest proportion in Northern Europe (12%) (see SCS1 in Supplementary Figure 4).
As COVID-19 continued to rage across Europe, 12% of the respondents reported a worsening of mental health after the second outbreak, compared to the first outbreak. During the second outbreak, the Baltic states reported the highest proportion (15%) of increased depressive feelings, while the lowest proportion was observed in Northern Europe (6%) (see SCS2 in Supplementary Figure 4). Although the proportion of individuals reporting a worsening of their mental health is highest after the first outbreak, we see that the pandemic continues to impact the mental health of older Europeans also after the first wave of infections. This is especially true for the Baltic states and Eastern Europe, where we do not observe a decline in the share of respondents indicating worsening mental health.”
In the published article, there was an error in the text. The text in 4.2. Intergenerational support during the pandemic incorrectly cited Figure 2 when Supplementary Figure 5 should be cited. A correction has therefore been made to 4.2. Intergenerational support during the pandemic.
The text previously stated:
“Looking at changes in receiving intergenerational support across Europe (see SCS1 in Figure 2), it seems that the family took up the role of caregiver more intensively as a response to the first outbreak of COVID-19. This trend was noticeable all over Europe with differences across regions being rather limited. Increases in intergenerational support during the first wave ranges between 18% in the Northern countries and 26% in the Western countries. In parallel, between 5% (in Southern Europe) and 4% (in Northern Europe) of respondents indicate a decrease in intergenerational support. As the pandemic continued some discrepancies between geographical regions emerged. These descriptives show that increases in support between parents and their adult children were more prominent in Southern Europe (13%), Eastern Europe (13%) and the Baltic States (12%), compared to Northern (4%) and Western Europe (7%).”
The corrected text appears below:
“Looking at changes in receiving intergenerational support across Europe (see SCS1 in Supplementary Figure 5), it seems that the family took up the role of caregiver more intensively as a response to the first outbreak of COVID-19. This trend was noticeable all over Europe with differences across regions being rather limited. Increases in intergenerational support during the first wave ranges between 18% in the Northern countries and 26% in the Western countries. In parallel, between 5% (in Southern Europe) and 4% (in Northern Europe) of respondents indicate a decrease in intergenerational support. As the pandemic continued some discrepancies between geographical regions emerged. These descriptives show that increases in support between parents and their adult children were more prominent in Southern Europe (13%), Eastern Europe (13%) and the Baltic States (12%), compared to Northern (4%) and Western Europe (7%) (see SCS2 in Supplementary Figure 5).”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
intergenerational support, intergenerational relations, informal care, mental health, COVID-19
Citation
Van Herreweghe L and Van Lancker W (2024) Corrigendum: The family as provider of intergenerational support during COVID-19: a study into the mental health consequences for 65+ Europeans. Front. Public Health 12:1530317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1530317
Received
18 November 2024
Accepted
25 November 2024
Published
10 December 2024
Volume
12 - 2024
Edited and reviewed by
Mohsen Saffari, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Van Herreweghe and Van Lancker.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lore Van Herreweghe lore.vanherreweghe@kuleuven.be
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.