Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1485343

Factors Influencing Implementation of a Self-Measured Blood Pressure Program in Community Health Centers: An Implementation Mapping Approach

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) at Houston School of Public Health, Dallas, United States
  • 2Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, UTHealth Houston, Houston, United States
  • 3Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, United States
  • 4Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: Uncontrolled hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, particularly among adults aged 45 years and older. Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) is an evidencebased intervention that can help patients manage hypertension outside of the clinical setting. We conducted a needs and assets assessment to identify 1) health center adopters and implementers and 2) barriers and facilitators to SMBP adoption and implementation in six community health centers in Texas.Methods: Data sources included: 1) needs and assets assessment surveys and semi-structured interviews; 2) site visits with participating health centers; and 3) detailed meeting notes and logs. Leaders and administrators from the participating health centers completed a self-administered 56-item survey. We computed descriptive statistics for survey data. For open-ended survey responses, interview data, and meeting notes, team members labeled the reported and observed barriers and facilitators to program implementation. Results: Barriers to SMBP adoption and implementation included staffing shortages, limited funding to procure blood pressure devices, and perceived challenges reaching patients and maintaining engagement in an SMBP program. Facilitators included existing hypertension management guidelines, health center familiarity with SMBP programs, and the use of nonphysician team members in hypertension management programs. Adopters included leadership professionals and administrators, and implementers included healthcare providers, and nonphysician team members. Conclusion: Findings inform our understanding of SMBP program adoption, implementation, and importantly, how to best allocate resources to incorporate SMBP programs into clinical workflows.

Keywords: Implementaiton mapping, Health Promotion, Hypertension, Self-measured blood pressure, remove patient monitoring, Program planning

Received: 23 Aug 2024; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Rodriguez, Velasco-Huerta, Sampson-Ansah, Garza, Perkison, Mathews, Pulicken and Fernandez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Serena Ann Rodriguez, Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) at Houston School of Public Health, Dallas, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.