ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508623
This article is part of the Research TopicImmunization Economics: Balancing Costs, Outcomes, and Equity in Public HealthView all 4 articles
Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening and HPV Vaccination: A Markov Model from the Healthcare Payer Perspective
Provisionally accepted- 1Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Province, China
- 2Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center, Haikou, Hainan Province, China
- 3Haina, haiko, Afghanistan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Substantial progress has been made in cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination in China. However, evidence on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions remains scarce, particularly for combined vaccination and screening strategies at the provincial level. To address this gap, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of alternative cervical cancer prevention strategies in a southern province of China from the healthcare payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate a cohort of 100,000 females beginning at age 9 and followed until death (up to 100 years). The model compared the outcomes of bivalent, quadrivalent, and 9-valent HPV vaccines combined with two screening methods: TCT and HPV testing. Analyses were conducted from the healthcare payer perspective, considering only direct medical costs. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), discounted at 3% annually. Herd immunity effects were not incorporated. Model calibration relied on data from the China Health Statistics Yearbook, and sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty. Reporting followed the CHEERS 2024 guidelines. Results: Thirteen strategies were evaluated, including no intervention, screening alone, and combinations of screening with the three HPV vaccines. The combination of HPV testing and the 9-valent vaccine was the most cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ¥139.58 per QALY, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold. By contrast, TCT combined with the 9-valent vaccine yielded the highest ICER at ¥193,240.60 per QALY, exceeding the threshold. Sensitivity analyses showed ICER estimates were most influenced by screening coverage, vaccination uptake, test sensitivity, and the discount rate. Conclusions: Within the current resource and policy context, combining HPV testing with the 9-valent vaccine provides the highest economic value. This strategy offers evidence to guide future cervical cancer prevention policies in southern China.
Keywords: cervical cancer, cost-effectiveness analysis, HPV vaccine, screening strategies, Markov model
Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Weixia, Hongxin, Xiaojun, Yan, KuanLie, Li and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jing Li, 17398381601@163.com
Wei Lu, hy0205044@hainmc.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.