Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Health Economics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508623

This article is part of the Research TopicImmunization Economics: Balancing Costs, Outcomes, and Equity in Public HealthView all 4 articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening and HPV Vaccination: A Markov Model from the Healthcare Payer Perspective

Provisionally accepted
LIU  WeixiaLIU Weixia1Huan  HongxinHuan Hongxin1Huang  XiaojunHuang Xiaojun1Xuan  YanXuan Yan2Jiang  KuanLieJiang KuanLie1Jing  LiJing Li3*Wei  LuWei Lu1,2*
  • 1Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Province, China
  • 2Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center, Haikou, Hainan Province, China
  • 3Haina, haiko, Afghanistan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Substantial progress has been made in cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination in China. However, evidence on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions remains scarce, particularly for combined vaccination and screening strategies at the provincial level. To address this gap, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of alternative cervical cancer prevention strategies in a southern province of China from the healthcare payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate a cohort of 100,000 females beginning at age 9 and followed until death (up to 100 years). The model compared the outcomes of bivalent, quadrivalent, and 9-valent HPV vaccines combined with two screening methods: TCT and HPV testing. Analyses were conducted from the healthcare payer perspective, considering only direct medical costs. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), discounted at 3% annually. Herd immunity effects were not incorporated. Model calibration relied on data from the China Health Statistics Yearbook, and sensitivity analyses assessed parameter uncertainty. Reporting followed the CHEERS 2024 guidelines. Results: Thirteen strategies were evaluated, including no intervention, screening alone, and combinations of screening with the three HPV vaccines. The combination of HPV testing and the 9-valent vaccine was the most cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ¥139.58 per QALY, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold. By contrast, TCT combined with the 9-valent vaccine yielded the highest ICER at ¥193,240.60 per QALY, exceeding the threshold. Sensitivity analyses showed ICER estimates were most influenced by screening coverage, vaccination uptake, test sensitivity, and the discount rate. Conclusions: Within the current resource and policy context, combining HPV testing with the 9-valent vaccine provides the highest economic value. This strategy offers evidence to guide future cervical cancer prevention policies in southern China.

Keywords: cervical cancer, cost-effectiveness analysis, HPV vaccine, screening strategies, Markov model

Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Weixia, Hongxin, Xiaojun, Yan, KuanLie, Li and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jing Li, 17398381601@163.com
Wei Lu, hy0205044@hainmc.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.