ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1525282

This article is part of the Research TopicHealth Literacy and Digital Health Literacy among Older Adults: Public Health InterventionsView all 17 articles

Status and influencing factors of dual health literacy in modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine among Chinese residents

Provisionally accepted
Fenfang  MiFenfang Mi1*Wenkai  ZhouWenkai Zhou2Lingzhi  WangLingzhi Wang1Fang  YuanFang Yuan1Qian  MinQian Min1Hongxia  ZhangHongxia Zhang1Ningjun  XuNingjun Xu1
  • 1Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Backgrounds: Dual Health Literacy (DHL), integrating modern and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), is crucial for health management in China. However, many struggle with both systems, causing fragmented decisions and poor outcomes. Most studies address only one system, overlooking their interplay. This study bridges the gap by assessing DHL and its key influencing factors to support integrated healthcare.Based on standardized 2017 questionnaires, this survey assessed health literacy based on modern medicine (HL) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM-HL) among Chinese residents aged 15 to 69, using sampling via an online Sojump questionnaire. Group differences were assessed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with HL, TCM-HL, and DHL.A total of 605 participants (median age: 23.0 years, IQR: 20-45 ) were surveyed, with the majority being female (69.4%), rural residents (59.8%), or holding junior college or undergraduate education (68.4%). Standard attainment rates were 27.1% for HL, 10.9% for TCM-HL, and 6.8% for DHL, with a strong correlation between HL and TCM-HL (r = 0.81). The lowest attainment was observed in basic medical literacy (13.2%), health skills (15.0%), chronic disease prevention & control (16%) within HL, and healthy lifestyle (0%) and appropriate methods of public health within TCM-HL (3.5%). DHL was higher in suburban and urban areas than in rural areas(13.3% and 9.4% vs. 4.7%; χ² = 6.453, p = 0.04). Urban residence(AOR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09-2.34, p = 0.016), higher education level (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.22-2.21, p = 0.001) and health insurance coverage (AOR = 2.74, 95% CI: 1.12-6.68, p = 0.027) were significantly associated with higher HL attainment. Higher education level (AOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.33-2.37, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with TCM-HL attainment.Given the strong correlation between HL and TCM-HL, promoting the integrated concept of DHL is essential. The low DHL level underscores the need for targeted support, particularly for rural, less educated and uninsured residents. Efforts should enhance both modern and TCM health strategies, emphasizing health skills, chronic disease prevention and basic medical literacy in HL and

Keywords: Health literature, Traditional Chinese medicine, China, modern medicine, Influencing factor

Received: 09 Nov 2024; Accepted: 08 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mi, Zhou, Wang, Yuan, Min, Zhang and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Fenfang Mi, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.