ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527521
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches in Psychosocial and Mental HealthView all 8 articles
Barriers underlying care gaps in Singapore's mental health landscape and suggestions for improvement from service providers' perspectives: A qualitative approach
Provisionally accepted- 1Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation, Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 2Bridgepoint Health, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 3PsyMed Consultants, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 4Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- 5KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 6Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Despite the high prevalence of mental health conditions globally, there are few studies investigating perspectives of providers on barriers underlying care gaps. Therefore, the primary aim of this project was to understand barriers underlying care gaps and suggestions for improvement from mental healthcare service providers in Singapore.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 mental healthcare providers from public and private sectors, including administrators, practitioners, and an advocate. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling and snowballing. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.Results: Barriers underlying service accessibility included insufficient integration across organizations and sectors for timely referrals and concerns about stigma of receiving services. Barriers to service effectiveness included limited public sector bandwidth and lack of supervision requirements for private sector allied health practitioners. General practitioners (GPs) faced financial and referral issues when serving as first touchpoint for mental healthcare. Fragmentation of information systems hindered coordinated care implementation, while lengthy referral forms and complex referral routes created additional obstacles. Public sector manpower issues and heterogeneity in frontline staff's skills for right-siting patients hindered capacity maintenance.Conclusion: These findings highlight systemic challenges related to under-resourcing and a lack of coordination across sectors and organizations, ultimately hindering equitable access to mental healthcare. To address these challenges, recommendations include expanding insurance coverage, strengthening private sector regulation, and reforming reimbursement structures for integrated care. Streamlining referrals and improving data sharing will enhance coordination. Additionally, normalizing mental health conversations, empowering support networks, and increasing access to community-based services will reduce stigma and provide timely care, ultimately improving service delivery and access.
Keywords: Mental Health, Care gaps, service providers' perspectives, Suggestions for improvement, Qualitative
Received: 13 Nov 2024; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Seah, Tan, Chew, Lim, Mahirah, Ho, Lee, Lee, Yoon, Marimuttu, Poon and Thumboo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dhiya Mahirah, Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation, Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.