Biomarker Changes Before and After the 2024 Peak Burning Period in Healthy, Diabetic, and Hypertensive Residents of Chiang Mai, Thailand

Surat Hongsibsong^1*Cao Xianfeng²Sumed Yadoung²Phanika Tongchai²Supansa Pata³Woottichai Khamduang³Kriangkrai Chawansuntati¹Supachai Yodkeeree⁴Anurak Wongta²Kanokwan Kulprachakarn²Natthapol Kosashunhanan^2*

• ¹Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
• ²School of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand, Chiang Mai, Thailand
• ³Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
• ⁴Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Introduction: Burning-related air pollution is a recurrent seasonal problem in Chiang Mai, Thailand, from March to May. Exposure has been linked to pulmonary damage and oxidative stress, measurable via serum Club Cell Protein 16 (CC16) and 8-Iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), especially 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP), are emitted during incomplete combustion and may contribute to diabetes and hypertension through oxidative pathways. Few studies have examined how PAH exposure from seasonal air pollution affects lung function biomarkers in individuals with these conditions in this region. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in three Chiang Mai locations, following 127 participants with diabetes and/or hypertension during the before-burning (Dec 2023) and after-burning (May 2024) periods. Urinary 1-OHP measured PAH exposure, while serum CC16 and 8-iso-PGF2α assessed pulmonary damage and oxidative stress. Structured questionnaires captured participant characteristics and symptoms. Quantitative health-risk assessment (QHRA) converted 1-OHP to benzo[a]pyrene-equivalent doses for estimating lifetime cancer risk (LCR) and hazard quotient (HQ). Results: From before-to after-burning, cohort-wide means increased significantly: urinary 1-OHP (0.24 ± 0.05 to 0.90 ± 1.21 µmol/mol Cre; p<0.01), serum CC16 (63.15 ± 25.74 to 101.31 ± 48.14 ng/mL; p<0.01), and serum 8-iso-PGF2α (47.44 ± 19.91 to 52.51 ± 20.56 ng/mL; p<0.01). Stratified by comorbidity, hypertensive participants showed a greater 1-OHP increase (0.25 ± 0.35 to 1.31 ± 1.67; p<0.01), while diabetic participants had larger CC16 rises (62.39 ± 18.96 to 93.23 ± 29.92; p<0.01). Among diabetics in the after-burning period, those reporting skin irritation or shortness of breath had lower urinary 1-OHP than asymptomatic peers (0.50 vs 1.14 and 0.48 vs 1.08 µmol/mol Cre; p=0.049 and 0.036, respectively). QHRA showed that during the burning season, several age–sex–disease subgroups exceeded the 1×10⁻⁴ LCR benchmark, notably men ≥50 years and some women >60 years, while all HQs remained <1. Conclusion: After burning in Chiang Mai substantially increases PAH exposure, pulmonary injury markers, and oxidative stress in individuals with diabetes and hypertension, with differential effects by comorbidity. Cancer risk thresholds were exceeded in older subgroups despite HQs below non-cancer hazard levels, highlighting the need for targeted protection strategies during burn seasons.