Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539459

A Retrospective Study on Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal Among Individuals Aged 15 Years and Above in the General Population of Bamenda I Sub-Division, Cameroon

Provisionally accepted
Yamssi  CedricYamssi Cedric1*Noumedem Anangmo  Christelle NadiaNoumedem Anangmo Christelle Nadia2Abongwa Delight  ChewahAbongwa Delight Chewah1Wenjuan  LuiWenjuan Lui3Ye  LiuYe Liu3Tako Djimefo  Alex KevinTako Djimefo Alex Kevin4Vincent  Khan PayneVincent Khan Payne2Haibo  HuHaibo Hu3
  • 1The University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon
  • 2University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
  • 3Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, China
  • 4University of douala, douala, Cameroon

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ABSTRACT Background: By the end of 2020, several vaccines aimed at combating COVID-19 were authorized for widespread immunization. The aim of this study was to assess the factors that were associated with COVID-19 Vaccine refusal in Bamenda I. Method: This was a retrospective study carried out in the subdivision of Bamenda I, from March to June 2024, through interviews and questionnaires in which participants were asked to recall important events during the COVID-19 pandemic. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to ensure diverse representation in the community study. The questionnaire comprised four sections: socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge about COVID-19 and vaccines, attitudes towards COVID-19, and beliefs about the vaccine. Data were collected during community gatherings, such as focus group discussions and training sessions, and also through Google Forms via the Kobo tool for participants with Android phones. Data were then transferred to SPSS for analysis, using the Pearson chi-square test to examine associations, with p-values <0.05 deemed significant. Results: Our results show that 42.40% participants had high knowledge about COVID-19, 39.40% had moderate knowledge while 18.20% had low knowledge. Their vaccination status, showed that, just 12.10% were vaccinated, and 87.90% were unvaccinated. Socio-demographic factors like age, gender, and education recorded significant associations with respect to vaccine refusal p-value < 0.05. Participants of the study (80.8%) were concerned about the potential side effects of vaccines, while 19.2% said they were not. Some participants (53.5%) mentioned that vaccines were not necessary now that the pandemic has slowed down, while 43.5% disagreed. When asked if they will advise their family and friends to get vaccinated, 9.1% strongly agreed, 21.2% agreed, 40.4% were neutral, 17.2% disagreed, and 12.1% strongly disagreed. A total of 17.2% had underlying health conditions which prevented them from receiving the vaccine while 82.8% had no underlying health conditions. Many believed that the vaccines were promoted for financial reasons. Conclusion: The study highlights significant knowledge gaps and widespread concerns about vaccine safety among the population in Bamenda I, indicating a need for targeted educational interventions to improve vaccination rates.

Keywords: COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, Vaccine hesitancy, Bamenda I, Vaccine misinformation

Received: 28 Jan 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cedric, Christelle Nadia, Chewah, Lui, Liu, Alex Kevin, Khan Payne and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yamssi Cedric, cyamssi@yahoo.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.