Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1542321

Evaluation of vaccination coverage and the knowledge of parturient admitted for labor in a public tertiary maternity hospital in western São Paulo, Brazil

Provisionally accepted
Luís Antônio  Gilberti PanucciLuís Antônio Gilberti Panucci1Luiza  Sant’Anna PinheiroLuiza Sant’Anna Pinheiro2João Pedro  Teixeira RoqueJoão Pedro Teixeira Roque1Edilson  Ferreira FloresEdilson Ferreira Flores3Luiz  Euribel Prestes-CarneiroLuiz Euribel Prestes-Carneiro2*
  • 1HOSPITAL ESTADUAL DE PRESIDENTE PRUDENTE, PRESIDENTE PRUDENTE, Brazil
  • 2University of Western São Paulo, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 3Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Word count: 265 Vaccination coverage among pregnant women in Brazil remains poorly documented, particularly in low-resource settings. This study aimed to (1) assess the completeness of vaccine records on prenatal cards and (2) evaluate pregnant women's knowledge of vaccines recommended by the Brazilian National Immunization Program (NIP). A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Hospital Estadual de Presidente Prudente (HEPP), a public tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, between August 2022 and April 2023. The study population comprised 1,130 women admitted for delivery, of whom 541 (47.9%) had prenatal cards available for review. Postpartum, data from the prenatal cards were extracted, and participants completed a structured questionnaire to assess their vaccine knowledge. Sociodemographic data were obtained from electronic medical records. Univariate analyses were performed using Pearson's Chi-Squared or Fisher's Exact Test. Only 11.2% of the reviewed prenatal cards documented complete vaccination with all four NIP-recommended vaccines, while 31% contained no vaccine records at all. The tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine had the highest documented coverage (61%). The mean age of participants was 27.1 ± 0.3 years. Although most participants (91.1%) believed they had been vaccinated during pregnancy, only 61.5% could specify which vaccines they had received. No significant association was found between sociodemographic factors and the completeness of vaccine documentation. The low level of vaccination documentation and the critical knowledge gaps identified in this study highlight deficiencies in the quality of prenatal care within Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS) in the Western region of São Paulo state. Addressing these issues requires concerted efforts to improve healthcare provider training, strengthen public health education, and standardize documentation practices.

Keywords: Prenatal card, Brazilian National Immunization Program, Vaccination coverage, Pregnancy, Misinformation pregnant card, Vaccines, vaccines knowledge, maternal education

Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 01 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gilberti Panucci, Sant’Anna Pinheiro, Teixeira Roque, Flores and Prestes-Carneiro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Luiz Euribel Prestes-Carneiro, luizepcarneiro@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.