ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1556263
This article is part of the Research TopicImpact of Environmental Factors on the Health of Children and Older AdultsView all 13 articles
Association between Insecticide exposomics and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: An Observational Study based on NHANES 2011-2014
Provisionally accepted- 1广州中医药大学, 广州市, China
- 2The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between exposure to insecticide exposomics and cognitive function, among adults aged 60 and above.: We employed a multi-stage probability sampling method to analyze data derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey ( NHANES) conducted between 2011 and 2014. The study investigated the impact of insecticides exposure on cognitive performance, as measured by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease(CERAD)Word Learning Test (CERAD-WL), CERAD Delayed Recall Test (CERAD-DR), Animal Fluency Test (ATF), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Logi stic regression models were used to evaluate the impact, with adjustments for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables, and subgroup analyses were conducted to further elucidate the findings.Results: A total of 1,544 participants were included after applying strict exclusion criteria. Logistic regression analysis disclosed a significant association between insecticides exposure and the risk of cognitive impairment. Specifically, for CERAD-WL, the unadjusted model showed an Odds Ratio(OR)of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49-0.93), p = 0.0174, and the adjusted model showed an OR of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51-0.99), p = 0.0466. CERAD-DR demonstrated an unadjusted OR of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46-0.88), p = 0.0060, and an adjusted OR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47-0.94), p = 0.021. The DSST indicated a correlation with pesticide exposure in the unadjusted model with p = 0.0214. Herbicides were notably assoc ated with ATF in the unadjusted model with an OR of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.14-2.53), p = 0.0093. However, after adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle var iables, some associations were no longer statistically significant. For instance, the association between insecticides exposure and CERAD-WL performance became non-significant (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.56-1.15, p = 0.2284), and similarly f or CERAD-DR (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.50-1.03, p = 0.0734).Our study indicates an association between insecticides exposure a nd cognitive impairment, particularly affecting memory and delayed recall. Yet, the cross-sectional design prevents conclusive causality claims. Future research should adopt longitudinal approaches, utilize biological markers for precise exposure measurement, and apply advanced statistical techniques to better understand the exposure-outcome relationship.
Keywords: Insecticide exposomics, Cognitive Function, elderly population, NHANES data, pesticide exposure, cognitive decline, Public Health Re search
Received: 06 Jan 2025; Accepted: 21 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Guo, Yuanjun, Liu and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xingdong Lin, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.