ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1557921

Trust in healthcare and perceived discrimination in Sweden: a fixed effects analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (AIHDA)

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden
  • 2Lund university, Malmoe, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Trust in healthcare is central to the delivery of care and unequally distributed between groups in society. Experiences of perceived discrimination have been associated with lack of such trust. Although the importance of trust in healthcare has been highlighted in recent years, studies in this area are relatively scarce.Material and Methods: We investigated the risk of low trust in healthcare in Sweden, using data from 11 consecutive National Public Health Surveys conducted in 2004–2014 (n=83,135). Applying an analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (AIHDA), we investigated the risk of low trust in healthcare across intersectional strata defined by experiences of perceived discrimination as well as sex/gender, educational level, migration status and age. We calculated strata-specific prevalences and prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to evaluate the discriminatory accuracy (DA) of the intersectional strata. Results: The overall prevalence of low trust in healthcare was 25.9%. While low trust was more common among individuals born abroad, with low education and of younger age, discrimination increased the risk of low trust in healthcare over and above the sociodemographic characteristics. The strata with the highest risk of low trust were foreign-born men aged 55–64 years with low income who had experienced discrimination (PR 3.13 [95% CI 2.49–3.95]) and foreign-born women aged 25–34 years with high education who had experienced discrimination (PR 3.05 [95% CI 2.50–3.73]). The DA of the intersectional strata was small (AUC=0.64), indicating large overlaps between and heterogeneities within strata.Conclusions: As experiences of discrimination, in healthcare and elsewhere, are associated with lack of trust in healthcare, it is incumbent on healthcare professionals to maintain trustworthiness by mitigating discriminatory practices including through striving towards patient-centered communication and care. Such efforts should be universal, although proportionally tailored to mitigate discrimination against patients with a migration background.

Keywords: trust in healthcare, Discrimination, Health inequities, AIHDA, Intersectionality, Sweden

Received: 09 Jan 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wemrell, Hassan, Pérez Vicente, Lindström, Öberg and Merlo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maria Wemrell, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.