ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570113
This article is part of the Research TopicPublic Health Outcomes: The Role of Social Security Systems in Improving Residents' Health WelfareView all 65 articles
Analysis of Subjective Well-Being in European Union Countries. Group DEA and NPE
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland
- 2Department of Mathematics and Cybernetics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The research aims to analyse the well-being in European Union countries' identified groups and indicate countries with efficient socio-economic policies. The study explores the differences in households' subjective well-being in the EU in 2022. The research is a two-pronged examination of selected factors determining well-being in the identified homogenous groups of EU countries. The clustering approach focused on similarities in "inputs and outputs" variables, incorporating key determinants of public health, particularly healthcare system efficiency, social protection policies, and education quality. The evidence-based approaches to health equity and public health assessment include grouping procedures based on variables, which may be defined as "inputs" in social policy and clustering based on variables describing well-being as outcomes in social policy. Furthermore, the efficiency of selected social policy areas in homogenous groups of EU countries was evaluated.The twofold efficiency analysis included Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to conduct a deepened study on efficient countries and the Non-Profit Efficiency (NPE) method, both supporting social policy recommendations design aimed at enhancing better health policy outcomes and health-related well-being. It is advisable to compare efficiencies among groups of homogeneous countries. The country's benchmark should be the DMU, which has similar socio-economic characteristics and health system features. Thus, the classification approach is justified and enables the drawing of much more reliable guidance and the fostering of social policies that contribute to better public health outcomes. The originality lies in establishing efficiency benchmarks in a two-step analysis involving clustering and efficiency determination with a direct application to developing sustainable social policies. The results of the modified NPE analysis were juxtaposed with benchmarks and targets obtained in DEA, additionally supporting recommendations for improving well-being and social policy effectiveness in the EU. 2011). Since there has been a considerable increase in material well-being levels, the issue of subjective well-being has gained in the social sciences. Parallel, new developments in the positive psychology and health research heightened deepened interest in well-being (
Keywords: Overall life satisfaction, Subjective well-being, Ward hierarchical clustering, Group data envelopment analysis, group DEA; group Non-Profit Efficiency, group NPE
Received: 02 Feb 2025; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dziechciarz and Szczeciński. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Marta Dziechciarz, Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.