ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1577897
This article is part of the Research TopicEnvironmental degradation, health, and socioeconomic impactsView all 18 articles
Decoding Population PM2.5 Exposure in China: Interplay of Emissions, Meteorology, and Inequality (2013-2020)
Provisionally accepted- 1Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- 2Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
- 3School of Business, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
- 4Huashang College, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
- 5Weihai Institute for Bionics, Jilin University, Weihai, China
- 6Yunnan University, Kunming, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Over the past decade, China has significantly improved air quality by integrating environmental policies with economic growth. Yet, environmental inequality remains a major challenge to social equity and sustainable development. This study examines the socioeconomic impacts of PM2.5 exposure using population data from 1,317 county towns across 32 provinces (2013-2020), employing meteorological normalization and population-weighted exposure indices. The findings reveal that lower-income regions (L4) achieved the highest PM2.5 reduction (54%), whereas wealthier regions (L1-L3), despite higher pollution levels, saw lower reductions (45%-50%), highlighting an unequal emission reduction burden. PM_dw exhibits more stable spatiotemporal patterns than PM2.5, offering clearer insights into emission trends. Despite overall improvements, residents in lessdeveloped areas still face higher exposure, while urban centers, benefiting from more resources, experience increased health risks. Vulnerable populations-including coal miners, the educated, women, and the elderly-disproportionately suffer from high exposure levels. Meteorological conditions have generally mitigated PM2.5 exposure, with the most significant dispersion effect in 2018. Notably, meteorology's role in mitigating inequality in occupational exposure significantly decreased from 43.7% in 2013 to 4.5% in 2019, while its exacerbating effect on urban-rural inequality, contributing 43.7% in 2010, drastically reduced by 2020, even shifting to a slight alleviating role. To achieve equitable environmental governance and robust pollution control, policies must not only address regional economic disparities and prioritize protection for disadvantaged communities but also account for the complex and evolving modulating role of meteorological conditions on exposure inequality.
Keywords: environmental inequality, PM2.5 exposure, meteorological normalization, Emission burden, environmental governance
Received: 16 Feb 2025; Accepted: 24 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Wang, Ma, Wang, Du and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Changhao Wu, Yunnan University, Kunming, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.