REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578848
Eye care interventions that reduce access inequities for women, rural residents and older people in low-middle-income countries: A scoping review
Provisionally accepted- 1Research Advisory Team, Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Australia
- 2School of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- 3Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- 4The Fred Hollows Foundation Kenya, Melbourne, Australia
- 5The Fred Hollows Foundation Pakistan, Melbourne, Australia
- 6The Fred Hollows Foundation Vietnam, Melbourne, Australia
- 7Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 8School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 9National Vision Research Institute, Australian College of Optometry, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Women, older people and rural residents in low-middle-income settings are mainly impacted by the economic and psychosocial consequences of preventable blindness from undiagnosed and untreated cataracts, diabetic retinopathy, and uncorrected refractive error. This review of PubMed 2002-2023 and the grey literature aimed to identify strategies effective in reducing access inequities to eye health screening and treatment for the above vulnerable groups. Thirty-nine publications from 16 countries were included. Fifteen focused on cataract, 17 on diabetic retinopathy, and seven on general ophthalmology. This article focuses on the twenty-four studies of moderate or high quality as assessed by the modified Hoy risk of bias tool. Rural residents were more likely to benefit (16 studies) while direct effectiveness among women were reported in seven studies. Only three studies reported actual benefits for older people. Outreach services and teleophthalmology were effective interventions increasing screening attendance and referral rates for women and rural residents. Health financing to enhance cataract surgery acceptance and actual surgical rates reported effectiveness for rural residents but showed only modest improvements. Digital technology improved overall appointment uptake and referral adherence for rural residents but not significantly for women. Teleophthalmology was successful in building local capacity for accurate diagnosis but its impact on referral compliance was not demonstrated. Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of health education alone to boost screening attendance for either subgroup. The evidence for effectiveness in reducing inequities is not always direct, uses mixed outcomes, and had heterogenous designs. Yet, the results of the higher quality publications in this review indicate modest improvements worth pursuing further.
Keywords: inequities, eye care barrier, Blindness, Low-middle-income, screening, Cataract, Diabetic Retinopathy, Surgery
Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cardona, Alwenya, Ur Rehman, Olalo, Thai, Rangi, Perez and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Magnolia Cardona, Research Advisory Team, Fred Hollows Foundation, Melbourne, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.