ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585985
This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Multidimensional Impact of Homelessness on Health and Social InclusionView all 12 articles
Fair space? Community relations as a booster for improving resilience
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- 2Tangram Health Care Consultancy, Doetinchem, Netherlands
- 3RecoveryTalent, Middelburg, Netherlands
- 4Department Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- 5Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The opportunities of health and happiness are unequally distributed. Multiple triggers lead to social exclusion and can result in homelessness. Efforts are still failing to counter health inequity. Our ethnographic research explores the social pathways of citizens deprived of a home. How can we sustainably promote fair opportunities for all? Methods: Urgent information needs prompted field research among Dutch homeless service users. In semi-structured interviews, we collected information on health and needs. A transdiagnostic, generic strategy is used. Our focus is on the three themes of recovery (meaning, symptoms, the social dimension), and their evolution over time. From a human rights perspective, the study examines the interactions between homeless service users and their environments. Case descriptions are added for a better understanding of dynamics.Results: The dual snowball sampling resulted in a representative sample of Dutch homeless service users in 2015-2017 (16 facilities, 436 users). The health and needs patterns reveal many interrelations of multiple needs. The user – system interactions uncover a systemic failure to match vital needs of the neediest. The interactions over time expose how social decline occurs and identify opportunities for improvement. The survival strategies show that stress often generates communication barriers, conflict, alienation and neglect. This has a negative impact on the self-image, (in)formal networks and place of users in society. A ‘deadlocked case’ from a local experiment demonstrates how community relations can overcome modern system obstacles, while creating stable conditions for growth.Discussion: Despite abundant care and welfare facilities, many shelter users feel abandoned. Our rights-based ecosystem approach leads to the root causes of unfairness, inherent in the healthcare system and culture. The findings disclose that the resilience of Dutch society suffers (but can withstand) significant erosion. By extension, this applies to modern care systems in high-income countries. Fostering resilience requires meaningful social relationships that offer creative solutions. Exploring dynamics stimulates shared learning in safe and public spaces. Providing networks with concrete tools, the approach can foster a coherent, systematic commitment to enrich fair opportunities and pathways toward thriving.
Keywords: Social pathways, multiple interdependent needs, user research, rights-based ecosystem approach, Mutual learning, Fair space
Received: 01 Mar 2025; Accepted: 04 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Everdingen, Peerenboom, Giessen, Velden and Delespaul. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Coline van Everdingen, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.