ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Substance Use Disorders and Behavioral Addictions

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1586447

This article is part of the Research TopicGlobal youth e-cigarette use: prevalence, risks, and regulatory policy impactsView all 7 articles

Socioeconomic status and its limited influence on perceptions of heated tobacco products and cigarettes: no relation with physical health, but association with mental health benefits and lower sensitivity to peer pressure

Provisionally accepted
Magdalena  KozelaMagdalena Kozela1*Janusz  Sytnik-CzetwertyńskiJanusz Sytnik-Czetwertyński2Maciej  PolakMaciej Polak1Barbara  Gradowicz-PrajsnarBarbara Gradowicz-Prajsnar1Maciej  RogalaMaciej Rogala1
  • 1Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
  • 2Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Socioeconomic status is related with individuals' attitudes toward health behaviors and perceptions of risk. This study investigated the relationships between socioeconomic status and perceptions of the impact of heated tobacco products (HTPs) and cigarette smoking on the physical, mental, and social well-being of users. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a population-based random sample of 2,500 HTP users and former smokers over the age of 25. The computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) method was employed to gather data. Information on gender, age, education, place of residence, income, and detailed perceptions of the impact of HTPs use and cigarette smoking on physical, mental, and social well-being was collected. A socioeconomic status score was derived based on education and income data. Multivariable multinomial regression analysis was used to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on perceptions of HTPs use and cigarette smoking in relation to physical, mental, and social well-being, controlling for age, place of residence, and perceived health status. The reference category was middle socioeconomic status and the middle category of perceived impact. Results: A total of 2,254 participants were included in the analysis. Socioeconomic status was not related with perceptions of the impact of HTPs use or cigarette smoking on physical well-being. Compared to those with middle socioeconomic status, individuals with low socioeconomic status were more likely to perceive a positive impact of HTPs use on mental well-being (OR=1.71, 95% CI: 1.12-2.60). Women with low socioeconomic status showed a stronger perception of being unaffected by peer pressure, both against smoking cigarettes and using HTPs (OR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.11-2.57; OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.10-2.12, respectively). Conclusion: While socioeconomic status did not differentiate perceptions of the impact of HTPs use or smoking on physical health, more tailored public health strategies that consider socioeconomic factors may be needed when addressing mental health perceptions and the influence of peer pressure.

Keywords: Socioeconomic status, heated tobacco products, tobacco, smoking, Physical wellbeing, Mental well-being, peer pressure,

Received: 02 Mar 2025; Accepted: 07 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kozela, Sytnik-Czetwertyński, Polak, Gradowicz-Prajsnar and Rogala. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Magdalena Kozela, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.