Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Policy

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1588227

This article is part of the Research TopicMathematical Optimization for Decision Support Systems: Practices and Strategies for Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementView all articles

Lessons learned from redesigning public health medicines supply chain model in Uttar

Provisionally accepted
Vasanthakumar  NamasivayamVasanthakumar Namasivayam1*Manuj  PurwarManuj Purwar2,3Sushant  JainSushant Jain2Shivalingappa  HalliShivalingappa Halli2Jagdeesh  KumarJagdeesh Kumar4Vikas  GothalwalVikas Gothalwal2Marissa  BeckerMarissa Becker2James  BlanchardJames Blanchard2Ties  BoermaTies Boerma2Ravi  PrakashRavi Prakash2
  • 1Government of India, Union Territory of Ladakh, Leh, India
  • 2University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • 3India Health Action Trust, Lucknow, India
  • 4Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state of India, with 238 million people, has 30,000+ public health facilities. Ensuring continuous availability of essential medicines in all these facilities is a significant challenge. An audit conducted in 2017 indicated large gaps in essential medicines availability in public health facilities. This manuscript describes the lessons from Tamil Nadu’s Medical Supplies Corporation (TNMSC) adapted to inform Uttar Pradesh’s Medical Supplies Corporation’s (UPMSC) model and processes redesign. We identified seven essential pillars for a successful public health supply chain system through desk review and learnings from TNMSC. This included stable list of essential medicines, warehouses, centralized procurement, passbook system, quality control, centralized payment, and digital e-tracking enabling real-time inventory and procurement decisions. The system design established clear responsibility matrix. UPMSC is responsible for availability of all essential medicines in the district warehouses at all times. The facility in-charge is responsible for the required drugs at the facility. The facilities are notionally allotted budget and have complete freedom to pickup medicines needed from the warehouse within the budget available. Under these seven essential pillars, some key processes were undertaken to improve vendor participation, reduce vendor dependency, synchronize tender for all essential drugs and roster for facilities to pick up drugs from warehouse. These efforts lead to improvement in the availability of essential medicines from ~40% to ~100% and average availability of 275 medicines out of 287 per warehouse. The supply orders increased from $58M to $112M and facilities consumption value from $38M to $90M by April 2024. The challenges of last-mile delivery and prompt payment to vendors remain. The paper underscores the importance of system design in public health supply chain and will be useful for other Indian states, Low and Low Middle Income Countries (LMICs) with similar context.

Keywords: supply chain, Health Systems, Essential medicines, procurement, Uttar Pradesh

Received: 05 Mar 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Namasivayam, Purwar, Jain, Halli, Kumar, Gothalwal, Becker, Blanchard, Boerma and Prakash. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Vasanthakumar Namasivayam, Government of India, Union Territory of Ladakh, Leh, India

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.