ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591804
This article is part of the Research TopicPublic Health Outcomes: The Role of Social Security Systems in Improving Residents' Health WelfareView all 60 articles
Decomposition analysis of public health service utilization and health disparities among urban and rural elderly migrants in China
Provisionally accepted- 1Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- 2960 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Against the backdrop of growing urban-rural development disparities in China, this study aims to examine the differences in public health service utilization and health status between urban and rural elderly migrants and quantify the contribution of relevant influencing factors.Methods: This study utilized data from the 2018 China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS). Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were used to examine the distribution of three types of public health services-health education, health record establishment, and family doctor contracting-as well as self-reported health status among urban and rural elderly migrants. Multiple linear regression models were applied to identify factors associated with public health service utilization and health status. Finally, the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method was used to quantify the extent to which various factors contributed to urban-rural disparities in health service utilization and health outcomes.Results: Rural elderly migrants exhibited slightly higher utilization rates of public health services-health education, health records, and family doctor contracting-compared to their urban counterparts. However, their self-reported health status was significantly lower (76.88% vs. 79.12%). Regression analysis revealed that age, mobility range, education level, income, health insurance coverage, and geographic region were significant factors influencing both service utilization and health outcomes. Public health service use was positively associated with better health in both urban and rural groups. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition indicated that age, mobility range, and household income were the primary contributors to urban-rural disparities in health education; age, mobility range, and region contributed most to differences in health record establishment and family doctor contracting; and family doctor contracting, age, mobility range, and region were key drivers of disparities in health status.Conclusion: There are differences in public health service utilization and health status between urban and rural elderly migrants in China. While rural elderly migrants use public health services at a slightly higher rate, they experience worse health outcomes than their urban counterparts-largely due to socio-economic and regional disparities. Targeted interventions aimed at improving access, enhancing health education, optimizing service delivery, and strengthening policy support are essential to narrowing these urban-rural health gaps and promoting health equity among elderly migrants.
Keywords: China, Elderly migrant population, Public health equalization, health equity, Urban-rural differences
Received: 11 Mar 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bo, Meng Han and Jing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zong Jing, 960 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, jinan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.