ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Policy

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1597941

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Strategies for Urban Public Health Resilience in Crisis SituationsView all 17 articles

Insights from the front line: Uplifting stories of the COVID-19 pandemic through the eyes of the public health workforce in Iowa

Provisionally accepted
Heidi  HainesHeidi Haines1Amanda  SurselyAmanda Sursely1Hahn  PhamHahn Pham1Rylee  BeltranRylee Beltran1Daniel  K SewellDaniel K Sewell1Lina  Tucker ReindersLina Tucker Reinders2Natoshia  AskelsonNatoshia Askelson1Sarah  DixonSarah Dixon3Kaitlin  EmrichKaitlin Emrich4Christine  EstleChristine Estle5Michelle  LewisMichelle Lewis6Edith  ParkerEdith Parker1Jimmy  ReyesJimmy Reyes7Laurie  WalknerLaurie Walkner1Kelly  Wells SittigKelly Wells Sittig8Rima  A AfifiRima A Afifi1*
  • 1College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
  • 2Iowa Public Health Association, Des Moines, United States
  • 3Iowa Primary Care Association, Des Moines, United States
  • 4Black Hawk County Public Health, Waterloo, United States
  • 5Jefferson County Public Health, Fairfield, United States
  • 6Siouxland District Health Department, Sioux City, United States
  • 7University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, United States
  • 8Iowa Cancer Consortium, North Liberty, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: SARS-coV-2 was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Studies have characterized some of the negative impact of the pandemic on public health workers (PHW), but few have explored the strength and coping strategies used. Our study documents the experiences of PHW in Iowa during the pandemic. Methods: We used an innovative mixed methods data collection tool, SenseMaker® to gather stories from PHW in Iowa between March-July 2022. Participants provided additional data about their story via structured follow-up questions. We conducted descriptive analyses of the quantitative questions. A qualitative thematic and sentiment analysis was applied to all stories. Results: The final sample size was 163 stories. PHW who submitted stories identified as mostly white (93.9%), and women (83.4%). Respondents were most likely to feel that in the story they told: the ability to act was out of their control; the strongest influence was from political considerations; decisions were made out of necessity; they wished for more focus on evidence-based public health. PHW were most likely to described their emotional state at the height of the pandemic as frustration (61%), uncertainty (55%), and helplessness (50%). Those who felt in control were more likely to express positive emotions. Qualitative thematic analysis of these stories revealed 8 themes, highlighting facilitators (e.g. strong partnerships and collaborations) and barriers (e.g. politicization and controversial government response) to effective pandemic response. Discussion: The stories PHW shared powerfully illustrate the context of the pandemic in Iowa, a state that spent the least time under high stringency policies.

Keywords: COVID-19, public health workforce, SenseMaker, mixed-methods, Rural Health, Mental Health

Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Haines, Sursely, Pham, Beltran, Sewell, Tucker Reinders, Askelson, Dixon, Emrich, Estle, Lewis, Parker, Reyes, Walkner, Wells Sittig and Afifi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rima A Afifi, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.