ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1599754
This article is part of the Research TopicNon-Ionizing Radiation: Impacts on Human Health from Exposures in Occupational SettingsView all 4 articles
Results of a national survey among occupational physicians to estimate the number of workers with active medical devices and their types in the context of managing electromagnetic hazards
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- 2Physical Agents Sector, Regional Public Health Laboratory, South-East Tuscany Health Unit, Siena, Italy
- 3Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic and Ageing-Associated Diseases, National Institute of Health (ISS), Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 4Department of Medicine, Epidemiology, Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 5Department of Information Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications, Faculty of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Statistics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Lazio, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is almost ubiquitous: workers with Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMD) and Active Wearable Medical Devices (AWMD) are considered at particular risk with respect to occupational risk assessment and health surveillance (HS) procedures, due to possible electromagnetic hazards resulting in interference problems. The identification of these workers is therefore fundamental for prevention purposes. Aim of the study is to provide an estimate of the proportion of workers with AIMD and AWMD, and to list the main types of devices involved. We performed an online survey among a sample of Occupational Physicians (OPs) from two Italian Regions. 132 OPs responded, based their answers on a whole number of more than 200,000 workers visited within HS activities in the previous year. Our results show that the 0.8% of the working population in Italy can be estimated as "particularly at risk" for EMF exposure at the workplaces due to the presence of AIMD or AWMD. The most common AIMD resulted pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators, involving the 0.24% of the workers. Considering AWMD, the most common resulted hearing aids and hormones/drugs pumps, respectively worn by the 0.25 and the 0.17% of the working population. It should be taken into account that potential interference problems could also occur for levels of exposure to EMFs comparable to those measurable for non-professionally exposed populations. Accordingly, the conditions of increased susceptibility to EMF hazards must be carefully considered for a proper occupational EMF risk prevention: the data presented in this work provide a solid foundation for quantifying the actual impact of workers with AIMD and AWMD in the workplaces, and the main types of devices involved.
Keywords: Electromagnetic interference, active implanted medical devices, active wearable medical devices, occupational electromagnetic fields exposure, Workers' health surveillance
Received: 25 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gasparini, Gobba, Bogi, Calcagnini, Censi, Falsaperla, Mattei, Vivarelli, D'agostino and Modenese. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alberto Modenese, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, 41121, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.