ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601577
Analysis of Key Factors and Equity in Influenza Vaccination among Chinese Adults-Evidence from a Large National Cross-Sectional Survey
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 2School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
- 3Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, United States
- 4School of Humanities and Management, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, hangzhou, China
- 5960 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Influenza is prevalent globally, leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Vaccination remains a critical strategy for influenza prevention. Although previous studies in China have primarily focused on influenza vaccination among children, limited research has addressed the key determinants and equity issues concerning adult influenza vaccination. This study is the first to examine the key factors influencing adult influenza vaccination and its equity using data from the nationally representative Chinese General Social Survey. Results showed that the influenza vaccination rate among Chinese adults is low (6.75%). Key factors identified as influencing adult vaccination include government trust, physician trust, income, aging concerns, health insurance, age, education, and health status. These factors not only have independent effects but also interact to influence vaccination behavior. Regarding individual effects, government trust, physician trust, income, and aging concerns showed positive associations with vaccination rates. Conversely, health insurance status, age, educational attainment, and health status demonstrated negative associations. Regarding the interaction terms, there were positive associations between health insurance and government trust, education and government trust, health and physician trust, government trust, as well as education level and age with the target variables. In contrast, interactions between income and health insurance, as well as income and physician trust negatively influenced vaccination rates. The concentration index for adult influenza vaccination was 0.092. There was inequity in vaccination, with the distribution of vaccinations being skewed toward higher-income individuals. Decomposition analysis further revealed that the primary contributors to vaccination inequity, in descending order of magnitude, were income (32.6%), government trust (9.1%), education (8.7%), age (8.2%), and aging concerns (2.6%). To improve adult influenza vaccination rates and promote vaccination equity, it should be noted to emphasize building trust, subsidizing vaccination costs, and implementing comprehensive, targeted interventions..
Keywords: adults, influenza, Vaccination, Key factors, Equity
Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 16 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bo, Lei, Jiang and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yue Han, 960 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.