BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health and Nutrition
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601990
This article is part of the Research TopicHealth and Nutrition in The First 1000 Days of LifeView all 13 articles
Economic Evaluation: Costing participatory learning and action cycles with women's groups to improve feeding, care and dental hygiene for South Asian infants in London
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 3Aceso Global Health Consultants, Singapore, Singapore
- 4Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 5Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, London, United Kingdom
- 6Women and Children First, London, United Kingdom
- 7Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 8Children’s Health 0-19 Service, London Borough of Newham, London, United Kingdom
- 9Tower Hamlets GP Care Group, Mile End Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background The Nurture Early for Optimal Nutrition (NEON) programme was designed to promote equitable early childhood development by educating mothers of South Asian origin in two boroughs (Newham and Tower Hamlets) in East London on optimal feeding, care, and dental hygiene practices. The study found that the adapted Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) approach was highly acceptable and well-received by participants, with improvements in maternal confidence, infant feeding practices, and community engagement. This study conducted a cost analysis of the NEON programme and evaluated its financial sustainability. Methods We conducted a financial and economic costing from the provider perspective. Estimates of total and average costs per mother are presented along with affordability assessments, expressed as a proportion of the borough's annual child development expenditure. All costs were discounted and reported in 2022 pound sterling and in 2022 international dollars. Results The total cost of NEON design and delivery was £68,165 ($INT 102,658), and the average cost per mother participating in the programme was £439($INT 661) in the face-to face arm and £407($INT 614) in the online arm. The largest contributor to the total cost was materials (50%), followed by staff costs (45%) and capital investments (5%). The total cost of intervention delivery in Newham accounted for around 0.047% of the borough’s annual child development expenditure, while the total intervention cost in Tower Hamlets was equivalent to 0.003% of its spending on children’s development. Conclusion The delivery of NEON is largely within local authorities’ budget for childhood development.
Keywords: Participatory learning and action women's groups, Early childhood development, Costs, Affordability, Nutritional intervention
Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Patil, Chaudhary, Kondhare, Faijue, Lakhanpaul, Heys, Drazdzewska, Llewellyn, Webb-Martin, Irish, Archibong, Gilmour, Kalungi, Skordis, Manikam and Batura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Logan Manikam, logan.manikam.10@ucl.ac.uk
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.