ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Children and Health
Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire–Specific in Caregivers of Children with Epilepsy
Provisionally accepted- 1Nursing Unit of Pediatric Neurology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- 3Department of Pharmacy, Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 4Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
There are 10.5 million children with epilepsy (CWE) around the world. About 70% of people with epilepsy could become seizure-free with appropriate antiseizure therapy. Beliefs may play an important role in medication adherence according to the Health Belief Model. The Belief about Medicines Questionnaire–Specific (BMQ-S) was developed to assess individuals' beliefs about medicines, yet few studies have examined its application among caregivers of CWE in China. The study aimed to verify the validity and reliability of the Chinese BMQ-S among caregivers of CWE. A cross-sectional study was conducted in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, from June 2021 to May 2024. The Chinese version of the BMQ-S, originally validated for depression, was adapted for use in this study. After obtaining informed consent, participants were asked to complete a general information questionnaire and the Chinese BMQ-S. Reliability was assessed using McDonald's omega in SPSS 26 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article NY, USA), and construct validity was evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis in Mplus 8.1 (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale was used to assess medicines adherence of CWE. The relationship between BMQ-S and adherence was explored by the binary logistic regression. A total of 2,730 caregivers were recruited, of whom 2,405 (88.01%) completed the survey. The children of participants included 1,283 (53.35%) boys and 1,122 (46.65%) girls, ranging in age from 0.08–17.80 years. McDonald's omega values were 0.808 for BMQ-Necessity and 0.709 for BMQ-Concern. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the following fit indices for the final two-factor model: comparative fit index = 0.975, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.964, standardized root mean square residual = 0.038, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.079. The results indicated that 1,513 CWE (62.91%) were adherent to their medicines therapy, and 892 (37.09%) were nonadherent. However, no statistically significant association was observed between BMQ-S scores and medicines adherence. The Chinese BMQ-S is a reliable and valid tool for assessing medicines beliefs among caregivers of CWE. Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between BMQ scores and antiseizure medicines adherence.
Keywords: Epilepsy, beliefs about medicine—specific, validity, Reliability, Caregivers, Children
Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Tao, Xue, Yang and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chunsong Yang
Rong Luo
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
