Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1611720

Funding the Future: Safeguarding Pediatric Health Equity Through CMS and CHIP

Provisionally accepted
Carlie  MyersCarlie Myers1*Meera  RaoMeera Rao2Rishiraj  BandiRishiraj Bandi2Sebastian  DensleySebastian Densley2Daniella  DiazDaniella Diaz2Michelle  KnechtMichelle Knecht2Lea  SaccaLea Sacca3
  • 1Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
  • 2Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States
  • 3Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pediatric health disparities remain widespread among marginalized populations, driven by structural racism, poverty, and unequal access to care. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) have advanced equity in pediatric healthcare, ongoing threats to federal funding jeopardize this progress. This commentary examines four CMS-funded interventions that address pediatric health inequities by targeting key social determinants of health (SDoH), including access to care, neighborhood conditions, and insurance coverage.Interventions reviewed include Functional Family Therapy for adjudicated youth, a hospital-led asthma management initiative in Ohio, community-based care engagement strategies in disorganized Chicago neighborhoods, and a national policy analysis of CHIP's effectiveness. Across these studies, common themes emerged: community engagement, cross-sector collaboration, and expanded insurance access improved outcomes and reduced costs. Medicaid expansion reduced in-hospital mortality and improved access to rehabilitative care, while CHIP increased preventive service use among near-poor children.However, persistent barriers-including racial and geographic inequities-continue to limit care engagement.While pediatric healthcare research has moved beyond disparity detection, implementation of targeted, evidence-based interventions remains limited. Without sustained investment in CMS and CHIP, the infrastructure supporting equitable pediatric care may erode, exacerbating health gaps for the most vulnerable. Policymakers must prioritize funding and support for initiatives that integrate medical, social, and structural solutions to pediatric health disparities. Strengthening CMS-supported programs is essential not only for improving child health outcomes but also for reducing long-term healthcare costs and advancing pediatric health equity.

Keywords: ChIP, Medicare, CMS, Public insurance, pediatric, Health Disparities, Health inequities

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Myers, Rao, Bandi, Densley, Diaz, Knecht and Sacca. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Carlie Myers, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.