Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 23 July 2025

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612480

This article is part of the Research TopicMeasuring Vaccination Perception, Confidence, and Uptake: Advancing Instrument Development and ValidationView all 3 articles

Factors influencing Chinese young adults' intention to receive HPV vaccination: the mediating role of attitude


Hongyan Wu
Hongyan Wu1*Guateng LiowGuateng Liow2Zhengxi ZhouZhengxi Zhou1Jifeng LiJifeng Li3
  • 1School of Humanities and Management, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
  • 2School of Business, Shandong Xiehe University, Shandong, China
  • 3Finance Department, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China

Introduction: This study examines the intention of young adults to receive the Human Papillomavirus vaccination in China, with a specific focus on the mediating role of attitude within an integrated framework of the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Methods: A convenience sampling method was utilized to collect data through an online questionnaire targeting young adults aged 18 to 26. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation modeling to explore the relationships between various factors affecting vaccination intention.

Results: The findings revealed that perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived benefits have significant positive effects on attitudes toward the HPV vaccine. Subjective norms, attitude and perceived behavioral control positively influence the intention to receive the HPV vaccination. Attitude was identified as a significant mediator between these variables and intention to receive HPV vaccination.

Discussion: This study highlights the need for targeted educational campaigns to improve young adults' HPV vaccine attitudes. Public health initiatives may potentially increase HPV vaccination rates.

Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a globally prevalent sexually transmitted infection, affecting both men and women. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly all sexually active individuals will contract HPV at some stage in their lives (1, 2). In China, HPV poses a significant public health burdens, with an estimated infection rate of 17.70% (3) and a substantial burden of HPV-related cancers, especially cervical cancer (4). It underscores the critical need for effective vaccination strategies to mitigate the impact of HPV on public health.

Vaccine hesitancy has become a pressing global health concern, the World Health Organization listed it as one of the top ten public health threats in 2019 (5). In China, HPV vaccination rates among young adults remain alarmingly low. A nationwide survey of 4,220 students revealed that only 11.0% had received the HPV vaccine (6). Similarly, another study involving 4,000 females and 1,000 males across 31 provinces found that a mere 3% of female participants had been vaccinated (7). These findings underscore the urgent need to identify and address barriers to HPV vaccine uptake among young adults.

To better understand vaccine acceptance, researchers have applied various theoretical frameworks, including the Health Belief Model (HBM) (8), Protection Motivation Theory (9), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (10), Social Cognitive Theory (11), and the Transtheoretical Model (12). However, no single theory has consistently demonstrated superior predictive power in explaining HPV vaccination behavior (1319). This study proposed an integrated model that combines perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived benefits with TPB to understand HPV vaccination intention among Chinese young adults. This integrated model aims to enhance the model's predictive validity and providing deeper insights into the psychological determinants of vaccination decisions. The findings could inform targeted interventions to increase HPV vaccine acceptance among Chinese young adults. Specifically, this study focuses on the mediating role of attitude, understanding how attitude mediates the relationship between perceived threat and benefits and vaccination intentions can provide valuable insights for developing effective public health campaigns.

Theoretical background

Health belief model

The HBM is a well-established theoretical framework grounded in cognitive psychology, employed to examine health-related decision-making and health behavior adoption. The model posits that individuals' health behaviors are shaped by their perceived susceptibility and severity of a health threat, as well as by their assessment of the benefits and barriers of preventive actions (20). Additionally, the HBM incorporates cues to action that prompt behavioral responses and self-efficacy, which indicates an individual's confidence in their ability to carry out the desired behavior. The HBM is recognized as a dominant framework for health behavior research (21). Empirical studies have extensively applied the HBM across various health domains, providing a solid foundation for health intervention design, including breast cancer screening (22, 23), weight management (24), self-care practices (25), cervical cancer screening (26), oral health behaviors (27), and vaccination adherence (28). However, evidence indicates that HBM's predictive power is relatively weak (29). It suggests that theoretical integration is needed to enhance its explanatory power.

Theory of Planned Behavior

TPB, articulated by Ajzen (10) has been instrumental in explaining a broad spectrum of behaviors, notably in the realm of health. At the core of this theoretical model lies behavioral intention, which represents the most immediate and powerful determinant of actual behavior, capturing an individual's motivation and commitment to perform a specific action. This theory posits that behavioral intentions are determined through an interplay of three core psychological factors. Attitude toward the behavior represents an individual's overall favorable or unfavorable assessment of performing the specific action. Subjective norms capture the perceived social expectations from important referents and the motivation to comply with these social pressures. Perceived behavioral control incorporates the perceived obstacles or facilitators to performing the behavior and the person's self-efficacy in overcoming potential barriers (10). These factors interact dynamically to influence an individual's likelihood of acting on their intentions, thus playing a critical role in predicting and understanding behavioral change. TPB is esteemed as a suitable theoretical framework due to its robustness and simplicity, demonstrating wide-ranging predictive power for human actions. It has been corroborated in over 1,000 empirical studies, including those examining sex behaviors (30), breast self-examination practices (31).

Integrating the health belief model and Theory of Planned Behavior

This study integrated HBM and TPB into a unified theoretical framework to improve and predict behavioral intentions toward HPV vaccination (see Figure 1). Existing research has applied these theories independently, but their combined potential to explain behavioral variance remains underexplored. Drawing on Baranowski's (32) assertion that integrating robust predictors enhances the explanatory power of health behavior models, this study addresses critical overlaps and gaps between HBM and TPB. Notably, constructs such as HBM's perceived barriers and self-efficacy exhibit conceptual alignment with TPB's perceived behavioral control (33). To mitigate multicollinearity risks, these overlapping constructs (i.e., barriers and self-efficacy) are excluded from the integrated model, preserving theoretical distinctiveness. Prior studies comparing the HBM and TPB have predominantly focused on their predictive utility rather than synthesizing their frameworks to elucidate causal pathways (34). This integration is critical, as TPB does not explicitly account for health-specific threat and benefit appraisals central to the HBM. Fishbein and Yzer (35) argue that threat-benefit analyses should inform attitude formation within TPB. These constructs reflect behavioral beliefs, which act as antecedents to attitudes and intentions (3639). This study examines the interplay between health cognitions and TPB core determinants by unifying these constructs. This approach advances theoretical understanding by delineating how health beliefs catalyze attitude formation and subsequent intention development. This study thus provides a nuanced lens to explore HPV vaccination bridging health-specific cognitions and social-behavioral mechanisms.

Figure 1
Diagram showing the relationships between factors influencing the intention to receive HPV vaccination. Perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived behavior control influence attitude. Subjective norm and attitude influence the intention to receive the vaccination. Hypothetical pathways are labeled H1 to H9.

Figure 1. Research model.

Research model and hypotheses

Perceived susceptibility

Perceived susceptibility involves an individual's subjective evaluation of their likelihood of acquiring a specific disease or health-related condition (20). Rooted in the HBM (8), this construct posits that heightened perceptions of vulnerability to adverse health outcomes motivate individuals to adopt protective behaviors. Empirical studies indicate substantial variability in perceived susceptibility across populations, with elevated risk perceptions consistently linked to greater engagement in preventive actions (40). For instance, Liao et al. (41) demonstrated a significant positive association between perceived susceptibility and affective attitude in the context of influenza vaccination. Extending these findings to HPV vaccination behaviors, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H1: Perceived susceptibility will positively influence young adults' attitudes toward HPV vaccine.

Perceived severity

Perceived severity involves an individual's subjective assessment of the potential harm or adverse consequences related to a health-related threat (20). This construct is commonly operationalized through evaluations of the clinical and psychosocial seriousness of a disease or health condition, encompassing both physical outcomes (e.g., pain, disability, mortality) and socio-functional ramifications (e.g., occupational disruption, familial strain) (40, 42). Empirical investigations, such as Bulgurcu et al. (43), demonstrate that heightened threat salience correlates with enhanced motivation to adopt protective behaviors through attitude formation. Recent studies further substantiate this relationship. Chu et al. (44) identified a direct positive association between perceived severity and favorable attitudes toward vaccination, while Lennox et al. (45) highlighted its predictive utility in shaping attitudes toward preventive health technologies. Consequently, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H2: Perceived severity will positively influence young adults' attitudes toward HPV vaccine.

Perceived benefits

Perceived benefits refer to an individual's evaluation of the potential advantages or effectiveness of adopting health-protective behaviors to reduce disease risk (20). Within HBM, this construct posits that behavioral adoption is driven by the anticipation of tangible outcomes, such as lowered disease susceptibility or avoidance of health complications. In the context of HPV vaccination, perceived benefits may include direct health advantages (e.g., immunity against high-risk HPV strains) and indirect gains, such as reduced long-term healthcare expenditures or enhanced quality of life. The meta-analysis conducted by Janz and Becker (40) demonstrated that in 81% of the studies reviewed, perceived benefits were identified as the second most influential element among the core constructs of the HBM. The scope of perceived benefits extends beyond traditional health contexts. In consumer behavior research, Choi et al. (46) demonstrated that perceived benefits significantly enhance attitudes toward street food consumption. Similarly, Al-Debei et al. (47) revealed that perceived benefits serve as primary drivers of positive attitudes toward online shopping platforms. Recent investigations into health-related behaviors further corroborate this relationship. Yasa et al. (48) discovered that perceived benefits of medical mask usage exerted a positive effect on public attitudes toward mask adoption. According to previous studies, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H3: Perceived benefits will positively influence young adults' attitudes toward HPV vaccine.

Attitude

Within the TPB, attitude is conceptualized as a central antecedent to behavioral intentions and actions, reflecting an individual's favorable or unfavorable evaluation of engaging in a specific behavior (10). Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that positive attitudinal evaluations increase the likelihood of adopting health-protective behaviors (4951). In the context of HPV vaccination, numerous studies underscore the predictive utility of attitude. Catalano et al. (49) identified attitude as the strongest predictor of vaccination intentions among male college students. Similarly, Jozkowski and Geshnizjani (50) reported a robust association between favorable attitudes and vaccination intentions in female college students. Askelson et al. (13) revealed that maternal attitudes significantly predicted intentions to vaccinate adolescent daughters. Collectively, these findings affirm attitude as a critical determinant of HPV vaccination. Hence, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H4: Attitude will positively influence young adults' intention to receive the HPV vaccination.

Subjective norm

Subjective norm, a core construct of the TPB, is shaped by normative beliefs that reflect an individual's perception of significant others' expectations regarding their engagement in or avoidance of a specific behavior (52). Recent studies, such as that by Prasetyo et al. (53), have demonstrated the significant impact of subjective norms on the intention to comply with preventive health measures. In the context of HPV vaccination, several investigations have underscored the influence of subjective norms on individuals' intention to receive the vaccination. Reiter et al. (54) noted that young males who valued peer approval experienced regret for not being vaccinated against HPV and perceived an increased likelihood of vaccination due to perceived risk. Askelson et al. (13) also confirmed that subjective norms influenced mothers' intentions to vaccinate their daughters against HPV. Drawing on prior research, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H5: Subjective norm will positively influence young adults' intention to receive the HPV vaccination.

Perceived behavioral control

Perceived behavioral control reflects an individual's confidence in their capability to carry out a particular behavior, which is affected by perceived access to resources, opportunities, and self-efficacy (10). Empirical evidence underscores its predictive validity across health behaviors. A meta-analysis by Cooke and French (55) of 33 studies demonstrated that perceived behavioral control moderately to strongly predicts behavioral intentions, with higher perceived behavioral control correlating with a stronger intention to act. In the context of HPV vaccination, a stronger perceived behavioral control is anticipated to foster a stronger intention to get vaccinated. Numerous studies (13, 5658) have found that perceived behavioral control has a significant and positive impact on the intention to receive the HPV vaccine. Consequently, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H6: Perceived behavioral control will positively influence young adults' intention to receive the HPV vaccination.

The mediating role of attitude

Attitude, a core component in Fishbein and Ajzen's (59) belief-attitude-intention framework, is defined by Casalo et al. (60) as a learned predisposition toward positive or negative evaluations of specific objects. In the present study, attitudes toward HPV vaccine are influenced by an individual's health beliefs and environmental factors. This study used the transmittal approach (61) to elucidate the mediating role of young adult's attitudes toward HPV vaccines. Specifically, it is hypothesized that attitude will intervene in relationship between perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits and the intention to receive HPV vaccination. Extensive research has consistently identified attitude as a primary determinant of behavioral intention across diverse contexts (6264). Haddock and Maio (65) define attitude as an evaluative judgment directed toward a stimulus object, which aligns with the Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm proposed by Mehrabian and Russell (66). This paradigm delineates how an individual's response to environmental stimuli. Within this study, the stimulus (dimensions of HBM beliefs) impacts attitude (the organism), which in turn influences the intention to receive the HPV vaccination (the response). Empirical evidence from various settings corroborates the mediating role of attitude, which is shaped by health beliefs such as perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived benefits (43, 6770). Accordingly, the following hypothesis is put forward:

H7: Attitude toward the HPV vaccine mediates the relationship between perceived susceptibility and intention to receive vaccination.

H8: Attitude toward the HPV vaccine mediates the relationship between perceived severity and intention to receive vaccination.

H9: Attitude toward the HPV vaccine mediates the relationship between perceived benefits and intention to receive vaccination.

Materials and methods

Participants

The convenience sampling method was employed due to the absence of a comprehensive sampling frame for young adults aged 18–26 in China. This target population was selected for two main reasons. First, catch-up vaccinations are recommended up to the age of 26 (71). Second, in China, individuals under 18 years of age are legally considered minors, with parents typically exercising decision-making authority regarding their children's vaccinations. In contrast, young adults generally have greater autonomy in deciding whether to receive vaccinations. Therefore, this study targets young adults aged 18 to 26 as survey participants.

Data collection

The research employed a cross-sectional design utilizing a web-based survey platform hosted on www.wjx.cn, with dissemination channels comprising mainstream Chinese social media applications (WeChat and QQ). The privacy of the participants was strictly safeguarded. Data collection was conducted from March 2 to April 5, 2024, with 581 online questionnaires completed. After data cleaning, 516 valid responses were retained. Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the participants, which includes information on sex, age, occupation, educational background, scared of needles.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The demographics of the sample (N = 516).

Measures

Perceived susceptibility

Perceived susceptibility were assessed with six items, adapted from Champion (20): “My chances of getting the HPV virus are great,” “It is likely that I will be infected with the HPV virus,” “I feel that my chances of getting HPV-related cancer in the future are high,” “There is a good possibility that I will get HPV-related cancer,” “I worry a lot about getting HPV-related cancer,” and “In the future, I may get HPV-related cancer.” These items utilized a 5-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 5 = “strongly agree”).

Perceived severity

Perceived severity were assessed with six items, adapted from Krawczyk et al. (72): “I think HPV infection is serious,” “If I am infected with HPV, it would be serious,” “If I am infected with HPV, it would significantly affect my life,” “I think HPV-related cancer is a serious illness,” “If I got HPV-related cancer, it would be serious,” and “If I got HPV-related cancer, it would significantly affect my life.” These items utilized a 5-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 5 = “strongly agree”).

Perceived benefits

Perceived benefits were assessed with three items, adapted from Tatar et al. (73): “I think that the HPV vaccine is effective in helping to prevent diseases caused by HPV,” “I think that the HPV vaccine may be effective in helping to prevent the HPV virus,” and “I think that the HPV vaccine may be effective in helping to prevent HPV-related cancer.” These items utilized a 5-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 5 = “strongly agree”).

Subjective norm

Subjective norm were assessed with four items, adapted from Britt and Englebert (74): “Most people who are important to me think I should get the HPV vaccination,” “My parents or family members think I should get the HPV vaccination,” “My friends think I should get the HPV vaccination,” and “People who are important to me influence my decision to have HPV vaccination.” These items utilized a 5-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 5 = “strongly agree”).

Perceived behavioral control

Perceived behavioral control were assessed with five items, adapted from De Perio et al. (75): “It is my decision whether to get the HPV vaccination,” “I am confident I could get the HPV vaccination if I wanted,” “I do have the time to get the HPV vaccination,” “I do have the money to get the HPV vaccination,” and “Getting the HPV vaccination does not require a lot of effort on my part.” These items utilized a 5-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 5 = “strongly agree”).

Attitude

Attitude was measured by four items, adapted from Xiao (70): “For me, getting the HPV vaccine would be useful,” “For me, getting the HPV vaccine would be valuable,” “For me, getting the HPV vaccine would be important,” and “For me, getting the HPV vaccine would be effective.” These items utilized a 7-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 7 = “strongly agree”).

Behavioral intention

Behavioral intention were assessed with five items, adapted from Gerend and Shepherd (33): “I will try to get more information about HPV vaccination,” “I will consider getting vaccinated for HPV,” “I will try to get vaccinated against HPV,” “I will actually get the HPV vaccination,” and “If the doctor provides me with the HPV vaccine, I will get vaccinated.” These items utilized a 7-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree” to 7 = “strongly agree”).

Data analysis

Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) has advantages in dealing with model complexity, which is more advantageous than covariance-based structural equation modeling. (76). Given the complexity and prediction-oriented nature of the conceptual model in this study, PLS-SEM was deemed the appropriate analytical technique (77, 78). The conceptual model in this study comprises seven latent variables, with six independent variables, one mediator, and one dependent variable, surpassing the mean in terms of complexity and the number of paths and variables, as noted by Hair et al. (76). Akter et al. (79) further supports the superiority of PLS-SEM for analyzing multiple regressions involving numerous independent and intervening variables within a single analytical framework.

Considering the intricate nature of this study's model, SmartPLS 4 (v 4.1.0.3) software was employed to assess the measurement and structural model. In line with Hair et al. (77, 80), evaluating of the reflective measurement model involves testing indicator loadings, internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The subsequent phase involves the structural model assessment upon achieving satisfactory results in the measurement model evaluation. The standard criteria for structural model assessment encompass the Variance Inflated Factor, coefficient of determination (R2), effect sizes (f2), predictive relevance (Q2), and the significance of the path coefficients, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of the model's predictive and explanatory power.

Results

Measurement model assessment

In accordance with the recommendations of Hair et al. (77, 80), the measurement model was evaluated to establish reliability and convergent validity by examining Cronbach's α (>0.7), factor loadings (>0.5), composite reliability (>0.7), and average variance extracted (>0.5). As shown in Table 2, the results indicate that Cronbach's α values range from 0.830 to 0.961. The factor loadings are within the interval of 0.573 to 0.942. The composite reliability values are reasonable, falling between 0.881 and 0.970. Additionally, the average variance extracted values range from 0.556 to 0.864.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Result of reliability and convergent validity.

Discriminant validity was evaluated using the conservative heterotrait—monotrait (HTMT) ratio approach recommended by Henseler et al. (81), Table 3 confirms all HTMT values below the 0.85 threshold, indicating no discriminant validity issues among the constructs. The results demonstrated that the measurement model satisfies the reliability and validity in this study.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. HTMT ratio analysis.

Structural model assessment

Table 4 presents the values of the determination coefficient (R2) and predictive relevance (Q2). Attitude variance is 29.5% explained by perceived susceptibility, severity, and benefits, while 53.2% of behavioral intention variance is attributable to attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. R2 values indicated that all external variables have a satisfactory effect on internal dependent variables (77, 78). Moreover, Q2 values for a specific endogenous construct should be greater than zero to indicate good predictive relevance (81). As shown in Table 4, all Q2 values are greater than 0 (attitude = 0.200, behavioral intention = 0.457), confirming that the PLS-SEM model exhibits good predictive power.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. R2 and Q2.

Following Hair et al. (77, 80), all hypotheses were assessed using 5000 bootstrap samples with one-tailed testing. The PLS-bootstrapping results shown in Figure 2 and Table 5 presents that perceived susceptibility (β = 0.109, t = 2.658, p < 0.05), perceived severity (β = 0.456, t = 13.323, p < 0.05), and perceived benefits (β = 0.175, t = 5.413, p < 0.05) have significant positive effects on attitude toward the HPV vaccine. These findings support hypotheses H1, H2, and H3. Besides, subjective norm (β = 0.070, t = 2.407, p < 0.05), attitude (β = 0.397, t = 11.378, p < 0.05), and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.454, t = 11.693, p < 0.05) have significant positive effects on the intention to receive HPV vaccination. Thus, hypotheses H4, H5, and H6 are supported. Besides, the VIF was employed to assess multicollinearity among items. The VIF values ranged from 1.019 to 1.215, indicating no multicollinearity issue.

Figure 2
Flowchart illustrating relationships between elements labeled PSU, PSE, PB, SN, ATT, INT, and PBC. Circles represent main nodes connected by arrows with numerical values, leading to rectangular nodes with labels like PSU1, SN1, ATT1, and INT1. Arrows indicate directional flow and quantitative influence.

Figure 2. Results of path coefficients.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Path coefficients.

Mediation effect

In this study, the attitude was treated as a mediating effect. The mediation effect was assessed using the bootstrap method proposed by Preacher and Hayes (82), which is endorsed by Hair et al. (80) as a suitable approach for PLS-SEM. As shown in Table 6, Attitude serves as a positive mediator in the relationship between perceived susceptibility (β = 0.043, t-value = 2.598, p < 0.05), perceived severity (β = 0.181, t-value = 8.114, p < 0.05), perceived benefits (β = 0.070, t-value = 4.918, p < 0.05), and intention to receive HPV vaccination. Therefore, hypotheses H7, H8, and H9 are supported.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Results of the mediation analysis.

Discussion

This study examines young adults' HPV vaccine perceptions and vaccination intention, targeting a high-risk demographic within catch-up immunization age. The data analysis outcomes provide empirical support for all the hypotheses examined in this research. Key findings indicate perceived susceptibility and severity significantly increase HPV vaccination intention among young adults. This aligns with prior research, such as Marlow et al. (17) and Rose et al. (83), who reported that higher perceived susceptibility and perceived severity correlate with a higher intention to receive HPV vaccination. This outcome is anticipated as individuals' assessment of health risks or threats can generate uncertainty, which may either encourage or discourage them from taking preventive measures. The findings support the notion that “prevention is better than cure.” If young adults believe that being susceptible to HPV infection could lead to serious consequences, they are more likely to prioritize vaccination as a preventive measure. Hence, it is crucial to design campaigns that specifically target these perceptions. Social media platforms, for example, can be effectively utilized to disseminate evidence-based information. This information should clearly highlight the risks of HPV infection and the severity of its related health consequences.

Perceived benefits of HPV vaccination have a positive impact on young adults' intention to receive HPV vaccination. This result consistent with several previous studies, which have consistently indicated that understanding the benefits of HPV vaccination positively affects the intention to vaccination, particularly among females (17, 18). The positive perception of the benefits of HPV vaccination stems from several factors. Firstly, HPV vaccination campaigns and education initiatives have played a key role in highlighting the long-term health benefits of vaccination, including the prevention of cervical cancer and other diseases caused by HPV. These campaigns spread information about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, helping to eliminate misunderstandings and alleviate concerns that individuals may be prevented from seeking vaccination. Besides, the social and cultural context can also influence the perceived benefits of HPV vaccination. In a society that values health awareness and preventive medicine, individuals are more likely to view vaccination as a beneficial and responsible health choice. It is reinforced by the endorsement of HPV vaccination by healthcare professionals and public health organizations, which adds credibility and trust to the perceived benefits.

The concept of subjective norm, which encompasses the societal expectations and opinions of valued individuals such as family, friends, and peers, influences health behaviors. The normative influence is particularly pronounced in collectivistic societies, where there is a strong inclination to conform to social norms and to be integrated within the community (84). In such contexts, the subjective norm has been identified to have a significant positive correlation with young adults' intentions to receive HPV vaccination. It aligns with the empirical findings of Li and Li (85), who observed a positive relationship between subjective norms and the intention of young females to receive HPV vaccination in China. Besides, the role of healthcare professionals, particularly doctors, in shaping vaccination behavior cannot be understated. Studies have shown that medical advice regarding HPV vaccination is significantly associated with the likelihood of females receiving the vaccine (51, 86). Although young adults over the age of 18 are not legally required to seek parental consent for vaccination, parental approval and the desire to align with parental expectations continue to play a pivotal role in vaccination decisions. It underscores the fact that in a collectivistic culture like China's, people are more inclined to follow behaviors that are considered appropriate by the majority (87). The findings of this study, therefore, highlight the importance of positive reinforcement from significant others in promoting the intention to receive HPV vaccination. It suggests that communication strategies that emphasize the endorsement and support of the HPV vaccine by influential figures in an individual's life can be instrumental in encouraging vaccination uptake.

The empirical results reveal that attitude is positively correlated with young adults' intention to receive HPV vaccination. This positive link between attitude and intention shows that when young adults hold favorable views toward HPV vaccination, they are more inclined to get vaccinated. The consistency of this finding with previous studies (49, 50) indicates that the relationship between attitude and health behavior has a robust pattern. It emphasizes the importance of shaping public attitudes and addressing concerns that may affect individuals' attitudes toward vaccination. In addition, the findings emphasize the need for public health campaigns and educational interventions to improve attitudes toward HPV vaccination. These efforts can foster a more positive attitude among young adults by providing clear evidence-based information on HPV vaccination and eliminating misunderstandings. This, in turn, will increase the intention to receive the vaccine, and ultimately promote higher vaccination rates and improve public health outcomes.

As anticipated, the empirical results revealed a positive association between perceived behavioral control and young adults' intentions to receive HPV vaccination. Specifically, the stronger the perceived behavioral control among young adults, the more pronounced their intention to get vaccinated. This outcome is congruent with previous studies (56, 85, 88). In this study, perceived behavioral control (f2 = 0.371) exerts a significant influence on the intention to receive HPV vaccination, underscoring its significance role in young adults' decision-making process. This belief in control is predicated on a combination of external and internal factors, including opportunities, competencies, resources, information access, and self-determination (52, 89). The perception of greater resources and fewer barriers enhances individuals' perceived behavioral control, which in turn enhances their intention to to receive HPV vaccination. Consequently, future interventions should not only strengthen the knowledge of HPV vaccination, but also focus on enhancing self-efficacy and perceived control of HPV vaccination. For example, interventions could provide practical resources and information about vaccination sites, costs and appointment procedures through accessible platforms such as social media or community health centers. These interventions can empower the confidence and autonomy of young adults and enable them to make informed decisions about their health, which may increase the HPV vaccination rate.

The results revealed the mediating role of attitude toward HPV vaccines between perceived sensitivity, perceived severity, perceived benefit and intention to receive the intention. This mediating effect suggests that the individual's overall attitude is a key mechanism that links perception with behavioral intention. The consistency of these findings with previous studies (68, 90, 91) reinforces the validity of the mediating effect of attitude in various research contexts. The results confirmed the mediating role of attitude in the decision-making process of HPV vaccination among young adults. Public health initiatives can be more effectively designed to promote HPV vaccination uptake. Specifically, regarding perceptions of HPV susceptibility and severity, public health initiatives can utilize social media to disseminate evidence-based information about HPV risks and vaccination benefits. Additionally, collaborating with healthcare professionals and trusted community figures ensures the dissemination of accurate and reliable information, which is vital for cultivating positive attitudes toward HPV vaccination.

Conclusion

This study, based on an integrated model of the HBM and TPB, examined the factors influencing young adults' intention to receive the HPV vaccination, with a particular focus on the mediating role of attitude. PLS-SEM was utilized for data analysis. The results indicated that perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived benefits significantly and positively influenced attitudes toward the HPV vaccine. Subjective norms, attitude, and perceived behavioral control positively affected the intention to receive the HPV vaccination. Attitude played a significant mediating role between perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and intention to receive HPV vaccination. The study underscores the importance of implementing targeted initiatives to enhance young adults' attitudes toward HPV vaccination, which can increase vaccination rates and promote public health. Specifically, it is essential to design promotional campaigns through social media that target susceptibility and severity, using evidence-based information to highlight the risks of HPV and the benefits of vaccination. Additionally, Supportive communication from influential figures, such as family, friends, and healthcare professionals, significantly enhances HPV vaccination intention, Moreover, providing clear and practical information about HPV vaccination to improve perceived behavioral control can help young people make informed decisions. When these strategies are combined with accurate information and tailored to the cultural context, they can effectively shape positive attitudes and increase the intention to receive the HPV vaccination.

Limitations and future work

This study explored the factors influencing the intention of young adults to receive HPV vaccination in China. However, there are still some limitations to be addressed in future research. First, the cross-section design limits causal inference. Future research should adopt a longitudinal approach to observe the evolution of HPV vaccination intention over time, so as to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting vaccination behavior. Secondly, the current study focuses on constructs from the TPB and the HBM. Future research could consider incorporating additional influential factors. For instance, cultural values, social norms, and the potential stigmatization associated with the decision to receive HPV vaccination. Thirdly, the research is based on self-reported data, which may be affected by social desirability bias and recall errors. Future research should explore utilizing multiple data sources, such as medical records and administrative data. Fourthly, the convenience sampling method may limit the generalizability of findings due to potential selection bias. Future studies could employ stratified or probability sampling to enhance representativeness.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants.

Author contributions

HW: Formal analysis, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation. GL: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. ZZ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – review & editing, Investigation.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by Scientific Research Basic Ability Improvement Project of Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Universities of Guangxi “Study on the Intention and Influencing Factors of HPV Vaccination among Young Women in Guangxi” (Grant No. 2023KY0520); Guangxi “Social Medicine and Health Management” Bagui Scholar Project (grant number 2020GXWFSAA57146).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human Papillomavirus (2024). Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/hpv/about/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/hpv/parents/about-hpv.html (Accessed March 3, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. Liu Y-Q, He X, Xu S-S, Qu J-x, Wang Y, Diao X-l, et al. Epidemiology and genotype distribution of high risk human papillomavirus in population of hospital opportunistic screening. Int J Clin Exp Med. (2015) 8 9:16007-14.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

3. Han S, Lin M, Liu M, Wu S, Guo P, Guo J, et al. Prevalence, trends, and geographic distribution of human papillomavirus infection in chinese women: a summative analysis of 2,728,321 cases. BMC Med. (2025) 23:158. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03975-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Collado JJ, Gómez D, et al. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in China. Available online at: https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/CHN.pdf (Accessed March 4, 2025).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

5. World Health Organization. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019 (2019). Available online from: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019 (Accessed March 6, 2025)

Google Scholar

6. You D, Han L, Li L, Hu JD, Zimet G, Alias H, et al. Human Papillomavirus (Hpv) vaccine uptake and the willingness to receive the Hpv vaccination among female college students in China: a multicenter study. Vaccines. (2020) 8:31. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8010031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hu S, Xu X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Yang C, Wang Y, et al. A nationwide post-marketing survey of knowledge, attitude and practice toward human papillomavirus vaccine in general population: implications for vaccine roll-out in mainland china. Vaccine. (2021) 39:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. (1974) 2:354–86. doi: 10.1177/109019817400200405

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rogers RW, A. Protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. J Psychol. (1975) 91:93–114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. (1991) 50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. (2001) 52:1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. (1997) 12:38–48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Askelson NM, Campo S, Lowe JB, Dennis LK, Smith S, Andsager J. Factors related to physicians' willingness to vaccinate girls against Hpv: the importance of subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Women Health. (2010) 50:144–58. doi: 10.1080/03630241003705094

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bowyer HL, Forster AS, Marlow LAV, Waller J. Predicting human papillomavirus vaccination behaviour among adolescent girls in England: results from a prospective survey. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. (2014) 40:14–22. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100583

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kahn JA, Zimet GD, Bernstein DI, Riedesel JM, Lan D, Huang B, et al. Pediatricians' intention to administer human papillomavirus vaccine: the role of practice characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes. J Adoles Health. (2005) 37:502–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.07.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Huang R, Wang Z, Yuan T, Nadarzynski T, Qian H-Z, Li P, et al. Using protection motivation theory to explain the intention to initiate human papillomavirus vaccination among men who have sex with men in China. Tumour Virus Res. (2021) 12:200222. doi: 10.1016/j.tvr.2021.200222

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Marlow LAV, Waller J, Evans REC, Wardle J. Predictors of interest in Hpv vaccination: a study of british adolescents. Vaccine. (2009) 27:2483–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Choi KB, Mo HS, Kim JS. Factors associated with the intention to recommend human papillomavirus vaccination among school health teachers. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. (2013) 18:297–310. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shah SFA, Ginossar T, Bentley JM, Zimet G, McGrail JP. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify correlates of Hpv vaccination uptake among college students attending a rural university in Alabama. Vaccine. (2021) 39:7421–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.082

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Champion VL. Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci. (1984) 6:73–85. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198404000-00011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Carpenter CJ, A. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun. (2010) 25:661–9. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2010.521906

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Darvishpour A, Vajari SM, Noroozi S. Can health belief model predict breast cancer screening behaviors? Open Access Maced J Med Sci. (2018) 6:949–53. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.183

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. VanDyke SD, Shell MD. Health beliefs and breast cancer screening in rural appalachia: an evaluation of the health belief model. J Rural Health. (2017) 33:350–60. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. McArthur LH, Riggs A, Uribe F, Spaulding TJ. Health Belief model offers opportunities for designing weight management interventions for college students. J Nutr Educ Behav. (2018) 50:485–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Liu C, Chen X, Huang M, Xie Q, Lin Q, Chen S, et al. Effect of health belief model education on increasing cognition and self-care behaviour among elderly women with malignant gynaecological tumours in Fujian, China. J Healthcare Eng. (2021) 2021:1904752. doi: 10.1155/2021/1904752

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Dsouza JP, Van den Broucke S, Pattanshetty S, Dhoore W. The application of health behavior theories to promote cervical cancer screening uptake. Public Health Nurs. (2021) 38:1039–79. doi: 10.1111/phn.12944

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sanaeinasab H, Saffari M, Taghavi H, Karimi Zarchi A, Rahmati F, Al Zaben F, et al. An educational intervention using the health belief model for improvement of oral health behavior in grade-schoolers: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. (2022) 22:94. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02132-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wong LP, Haridah A, Pooi-Fong W, Yen LH, AbuBakar S. The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the Covid-19 vaccine and willingness to pay. Human Vacci Immunother. (2020) 16:2204–14. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1790279

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Social cognition models and health behaviour: a structured review. Psychology Health. (2000) 15:173–89. doi: 10.1080/08870440008400299

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wang X, Jin Y, Tian M, Zhuo Q, Lin C-L, Hu P, et al. Safe-sex behavioral intention of Chinese college students: examining the effect of sexual knowledge using the theory of planned behavior. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:805371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805371

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Khani Jeihooni A, Moayedi ZS, Momenabadi V, Ghalegolab F, Afzali Harsini P. Effect of educational intervention based on Theory of Planned Behavior (Tpb) on doing breast self-examination in a sample of iranian women. Breast Cancer. (2023) 17:11782234221145417. doi: 10.1177/11782234221145417

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Baranowski T. Integration of two models, or dominance of one? J Health Psychol. (2005) 10:19–21. doi: 10.1177/1359105305048550

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Gerend MA, Shepherd JE. Predicting human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in young adult women: comparing the health belief model and theory of planned behavior. Ann Behav Med. (2012) 44:171–80. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9366-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Yang ZJ. Predicting young adults' intentions to get the H1n1 vaccine: an integrated model. J Health Commun. (2015) 20:69–79. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.904023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Fishbein M, Yzer MC. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory. (2003) 13:164–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00287.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Fishbein M. The role of theory in Hiv prevention. AIDS Care. (2000) 12:273–8. doi: 10.1080/09540120050042918

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Reid AE, Aiken LS. Integration of five health behaviour models: common strengths and unique contributions to understanding condom use. Psychol Health. (2011) 26:1499–520. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.572259

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Marmarà D, Marmarà V, Hubbard G. Health beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. (2017) 17:416. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4324-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Witte K, Allen M, A. meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. (2000) 27:591–615.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Quart. (1984) 11:1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Liao Q, Cowling BJ, Lam WWT, Fielding R. Factors Affecting intention to receive and self-reported receipt of 2009 pandemic (H1n1) vaccine in Hong Kong: a longitudinal study. PLoS One. (2011) 6:e17713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017713

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Bish A, Yardley L, Nicoll A, Michie S. Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review. Vaccine. (2011) 29:6472–84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bulgurcu, Cavusoglu, Benbasat. Information security policy compliance: an empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quart. (2010) 34:523. doi: 10.2307/25750690

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Chu H, Liu S. Risk-efficacy framework – a new perspective on threat and efficacy appraisal and the role of disparity. Curr Psychol. (2024) 43:5999–6012. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04813-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Lennox A. Müller R-a, Coffie IS. Encouraging continuous usage of wearable activity trackers: the interplay of perceived severity, susceptibility and social media influencers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2024) 21:1549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Choi J, Lee A, Ok C. The effects of consumers' perceived risk and benefit on attitude and behavioral intention: a study of street food. J Travel Tour Market. (2013) 30:222–37. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2013.774916

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Al-Debei MM, Akroush MN, Ashouri MI. Consumer attitudes towards online shopping. Internet Res. (2015) 25:707–33. doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0146

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Yasa NNK, Rahmayanti PLD, Telagawathi NLWS, Witarsana IGAG, Liestiandre HK. Covid-19 perceptions, subjective norms, and perceived benefits to attitude and behavior of continuous using of medical mask. Linguist Cult Rev. (2021) 5:1259–80. doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1805

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Catalano HP, Knowlden AP, Birch DA, Leeper JD, Paschal AM, Usdan SL. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict Hpv vaccination intentions of college men. J Am College Health. (2017) 65:197–207. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2016.1269771

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Jozkowski KN, Geshnizjani A. Using a reasoned action approach to examine Us college women's intention to get the Hpv vaccine. Health Educ J. (2016) 75:14–26. doi: 10.1177/0017896914561100

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ratanasiripong NT. Factors related to Human Papillomavirus (Hpv) vaccination in college men. Public Health Nurs. (2015) 32:645–53. doi: 10.1111/phn.12198

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Applied Social Pyschol. (2002) 32:665–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Prasetyo YT, Castillo AM, Salonga LJ, Sia JA, Seneta JA. Factors affecting perceived effectiveness of covid-19 prevention measures among filipinos during enhanced community quarantine in Luzon, Philippines: integrating protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior. Int J Infect Dis. (2020) 99:312–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Reiter PL, McRee AL, Kadis JA, Brewer NT. Hpv vaccine and adolescent males. Vaccine. (2011) 29:5595–602. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Cooke R, French DP. How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis Psychology Health. (2008) 23:745–65. doi: 10.1080/08870440701544437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Hertweck SP, LaJoie AS, Pinto MD, Flamini L, Lynch T, Logsdon MC. Health care decision making by mothers for their adolescent daughters regarding the quadrivalent Hpv vaccine. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. (2013) 26:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.10.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Roberto AJ, Krieger JL, Katz ML, Goei R, Jain P. Predicting pediatricians' communication with parents about the Human Papillomavirus (Hpv) Vaccine: an application of the theory of reasoned action. Health Commun. (2011) 26:303–12. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2010.550021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Teitelman AM, Stringer M, Nguyen GT, Hanlon AL, Averbuch T, Stimpfel AW. Social cognitive and clinical factors associated with Hpv vaccine initiation among urban, economically disadvantaged women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. (2011) 40:691–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01297.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1975).

Google Scholar

60. Casaló LV, Flavián C, Guinalíu M. Understanding the intention to follow the advice obtained in an online travel community. Computers Human Behav. (2011) 27:622–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Rungtusanatham M, Miller JW, Boyer KK. Theorizing, testing, and concluding for mediation in scm research: tutorial and procedural recommendations. J Ops Manag. (2014) 32:99–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Jun J, Arendt SW. Understanding healthy eating behaviors at casual dining restaurants using the extended theory of planned behavior. Int J Hospital Manag. (2016) 53:106–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.12.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Ru X, Wang S, Chen Q, Yan S. Exploring the interaction effects of norms and attitudes on green travel intention: an empirical study in Eastern China. J Clean Product. (2018) 197:1317–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.293

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Rhodes RE, Kates A. Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Ann Behav Med. (2015) 49:715–31. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Haddock G, Maio G. Attitudes: Content, Structure, and Function. Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective (Oxford: Blackwell) (2007):112–3.

Google Scholar

66. Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press (1974). xii, 266-xii, p.

Google Scholar

67. Anderson, Agarwal. Practicing safe computing: a multimethod empirical examination of home computer user security behavioral intentions. MIS Quart. (2010) 34:613. doi: 10.2307/25750694

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Lin TTC, Bautista JR. Predicting intention to take protective measures during haze: the roles of efficacy, threat, media trust, and affective attitude. J Health Commun. (2016) 21:790–9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1157657

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Zani B. The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Qual Prefer. (2012) 25:163–70. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.02.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Xiao X. Follow the heart or the mind? Examining cognitive and affective attitude on Hpv vaccination intention. Atlan J Commun. (2021) 29:93–105. doi: 10.1080/15456870.2019.1708743

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Meites E, Szilagyi PG, Chesson HW, Unger ER, Romero JR, Markowitz LE. Human papillomavirus vaccination for adults: updated recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. Am J Trans. (2019) 19:3202–6. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15633

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Krawczyk AL, Perez S, Lau E, Holcroft CA, Amsel R, Knäuper B, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination intentions and uptake in college women. Health Psychol. (2012) 31:685–93. doi: 10.1037/a0027012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Tatar O, Perez S, Naz A, Shapiro GK, Rosberger Z. Psychosocial correlates of Hpv vaccine acceptability in college males: a cross-sectional exploratory study. Papillomavirus Res. (2017) 4:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pvr.2017.11.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Britt RK, Englebert AM. Behavioral determinants for vaccine acceptability among rurally located college students. Health Psychol Behav Med. (2018) 6:262–76. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1505519

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. De Perio MA, Wiegand DM, Evans SM. Low influenza vaccination rates among child care workers in the United States: assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. J Community Health. (2012) 37:272–81. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9478-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Partial least squares: the better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Plann. (2012) 45:312–9. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of Pls-Sem. EBR. (2019) 31:2–24. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, A. Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Pls-Sem). 3rd Edn Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (2022). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Akter S, Fosso Wamba S, Dewan S. Why Pls-Sem is suitable for complex modelling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality. Produc Plan Control. (2017) 28:1011–21. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1267411

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Thiele KO. Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J Acad Mark Sci. (2017) 45:616–32. doi: 10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, A. new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. (2015) 43:115–35. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Met. (2008) 40:879–91. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Rose SB, Lawton BA, Lanumata TS, Hibma M, Baker MG. Predictors of intent to vaccinate against Hpv/cervical cancer: a multi-ethnic survey of 769 parents in New Zealand. NZ Med J. (2012) 125:51–62.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

84. Smith ER, Seger CR, Mackie DM. Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2007) 93:431–46. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.431

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Li L, Li J. Factors affecting young chinese women's intentions to uptake human papillomavirus vaccination: an extension of the theory of planned behavior model. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2020) 16:3123–30. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1779518

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Pierre-Victor D, Page TF, Trepka MJ, Stephens DP Li T, Madhivanan P. Impact of Virginia's school-entry vaccine mandate on human papillomavirus vaccination among 13-17-year-old females. J Womens Health. (2017) 26:266–75. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5869

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Earley PC. Social loafing and collectivism: a comparison of the United States and the people's Republic of China. Administr Sci Quart. (1989) 34:565. doi: 10.2307/2393567

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Juraskova I, O'Brien M, Mullan B, Bari R, Laidsaar-Powell R, McCaffery K. Hpv Vaccination and the effect of information framing on intentions and behaviour: an application of the theory of planned behaviour and moral norm. IntJ Behav Med. (2012) 19:518–25. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9182-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. (2011) 26:1113–27. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Huang X, Dai S, Xu H. Predicting tourists' health risk preventative behaviour and travelling satisfaction in Tibet: combining the theory of planned behaviour and health belief model. Tour Manag Perspect. (2020) 33:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100589

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Nam C, Dong H, Lee Y-A. Factors influencing consumers' purchase intention of green sportswear. Fash Text. (2017) 4:2. doi: 10.1186/s40691-017-0091-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: HPV vaccination, health belief model, Theory of Planned Behavior, behavioral intention, attitude, Chinese young adults

Citation: Wu H, Liow G, Zhou Z and Li J (2025) Factors influencing Chinese young adults' intention to receive HPV vaccination: the mediating role of attitude. Front. Public Health 13:1612480. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612480

Received: 15 April 2025; Accepted: 03 July 2025;
Published: 23 July 2025.

Edited by:

Divya S. Subramaniam, Saint Louis University, United States

Reviewed by:

Ozden Gokdemir, Izmir University of Economics, Türkiye
Nobila Jean Marc Ouedraogo, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany

Copyright © 2025 Wu, Liow, Zhou and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hongyan Wu, aG9uZ3lhbnd1ODlAZ21haWwuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.