Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health, 10 July 2025

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612741

This article is part of the Research TopicMental Health Challenges in Long-term Pharmacotherapy for Patients with Chronic DiseasesView all 10 articles

Effects of traditional Chinese exercise on lung function and mental health in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • School of Marxism, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

Objective: Despite their widespread use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pharmacological treatments often demonstrate limited efficacy in alleviating symptoms such as dyspnea and psychological pressure. These limitations highlight the need for complementary nonpharmacological interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) in improving lung function and mental health among patients with COPD.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across several databases: CNKI (1979–2024), Wanfang (1998–2024), PubMed (1966–2024), the Cochrane Library (1999–2024), and Web of Science (1961–2024), up to September 2024, to gather all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies that evaluated the effects of TCE as the primary intervention for patients with COPD. The results were analyzed and presented using Review Manager 5.4 software, ensuring a systematic approach to data interpretation and visualization.

Results: 67 studies were included and encompassing 5,475 patients. The meta-analysis demonstrated that TCE significantly improved various outcomes in COPD patients, including FEV1 [MD = 0.28, 95% CI (0.23, 0.33), p < 0.001], FEV1% [MD = 5.53, 95% CI (4.41, 6.65), p < 0.001], FVC [MD = 0.31, 95% CI (0.29, 0.34), p < 0.001], FEV1/FVC (%) [MD = 6.00, 95% CI (4.27, 7.73), p < 0.001], the 6MWT [MD = 42.14, 95% CI (36.54, 47.73), p < 0.001], CAT [MD = −4.20, 95% CI (−4.74, −3.66), p < 0.001], anxiety [MD = −1.26, 95% CI (−1.64, −0.89), p < 0.001], and depression [MD = −1.26, 95% CI (−1.59, −0.94), p < 0.001].

Conclusion: TCE significantly improved lung function and alleviated anxiety and depression in COPD patients. This study not only highlights the value of TCE as a nonpharmacological intervention but also offers new directions for psychological management, warranting broader implementation.

Systematic review registration: CRD42024586079, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024586079.

1 Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant global public health concern that profoundly affects patients’ quality of life, and the incidence rate among individuals over 40 years old globally has reached 10% (1). The progressive and irreversible nature of persistent airflow limitation makes daily activities increasingly challenging. Additionally, the prevalence of COPD among individuals aged 40 and older has reached 10%, making it the fourth leading cause of death from respiratory diseases (2). COPD presents with sudden onset, persistent, and recurrent symptoms, which not only impose psychological burdens but also exacerbate anxiety and depression, leading to a decrease in confidence in recovery. Furthermore, the substantial medical resources required to manage COPD contribute to an increased socioeconomic burden. Currently, standardized rehabilitation for COPD is still being explored, with pulmonary rehabilitation considered a crucial part of comprehensive care, with a primary focus on exercise and endurance training (3). However, COPD patients frequently experience shortness of breath, weakness, and limited physical activity, which can entrap them in a vicious cycle of inactivity. Therefore, finding an efficient exercise program with moderate to low intensity has become a pressing need.

Traditional Chinese exercise (TCE), which includes Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing, is characterized by slow, smooth, gentle movements that have a low impact (4). These exercises combine breath control, psychological awareness, mental focus, and physical activity to promote greater mental calmness and a sense of inner well-being. TCEs typically require no specialized equipment and can be practiced in small indoor spaces or outdoor settings such as parks, making them highly accessible. A typical exercise lasts 20 to 40 min, with a recommended frequency of 3 to 5 times per week, and different training plans can be developed according to the patient’s needs. While some forms such as Baduanjin and Liuzijue are simple enough to be self-taught using instructional videos or classes, others like Taichi, Wuqinxi and Yijinjing may require initial coaching from trained instructors to ensure proper technique. As a multi-modal mind–body intervention, TCE aligns well with the exercise needs of COPD patients. Research has shown that TCE can serve as an alternative therapy to improve lung function, flexibility and balance, quality of life, and mental health in COPD patients (5). However, individual studies are often affected by differences in sample size, inclusion criteria, and research methods, resulting in a lack of robust evidence-based research on the efficacy of different types of TCE for treating COPD. This variability makes it challenging to guide clinical practice effectively.

In this study, we implemented an extensive meta-analysis to investigate the impact of TCE as an alternative treatment on the lung function and mental health of patients with COPD. This research fills a gap in the literature and provides new insights and robust psychological intervention strategies for the supportive treatment of COPD.

2 Methods

2.1 Registration

This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024586079). The PICO tool was used to develop the search strategy, where the Population of interest was patients with COPD, the Intervention was TCEs, the Comparison was usual care or daily activities, and the Outcomes were lung function, health status, and mental health.

2.2 Search strategy

Two researchers (S. N. Liu and D. B. Xu) independently searched five databases, including CNKI (1979–2024), Wanfang (1998–2024), PubMed (1966–2024), the Cochrane Library (1999–2024), and Web of Science (1961–2024), for randomized controlled trial (RCT) exploring the effects of TCE on patients with COPD up to September 2024. Since all reviewed studies were published, there was no requirement for ethical approval or patient consent. The search strategy was created by a combination of medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and free words, in which the MeSH terms are “Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive OR COPD” and “Taichi,” “Qigong.” Free words are synonyms of each subject word, including “Traditional Chinese Exercise,” “Baduanjin,” “Taiji,” “Liuzijue,” “Wuqinxi,” and “Yijinjing.” All databases were searched in any language. In cases of disagreement between the two researchers, a third researcher was consulted to reach a resolution.

2.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria included: (1) the study type was an RCT assessing the effects of various TCE on COPD; (2) the experimental group employed TCE (Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, or Yijinjing), whereas the control group received standard treatment, with or without additional exercise interventions; (3) participants were COPD patients diagnosed according to the COPD guidelines of the Chinese Medical Association Respiratory Diseases Society or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (6); (4) multiple outcomes or indicators were used to assess the efficacy of TCE; (5) the experimental outcomes or indicators included one of the following measures: lung function (FEV1, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC%, FVC), health status (6MWT, CAT), and mental health (SAS, SDS, HAM-A, HAM-D, HADS).

The exclusion criteria included: (1) reviews, letters, conference abstracts, and similar types of publications; (2) non-RCT designs, case reports, dissertations, or animal studies; (3) studies with incomplete data that could not be extracted for the calculation of mean values and standard deviations; and (4) studies with patients lacking general exercise capacity or compliance, making it difficult to cooperate with training, evaluation, and treatment.

2.4 Study selection and data extraction

Two researchers (S. N. Liu and D. B. Xu) independently examined all the studies. After removing duplicates according to predefined criteria, they independently screened and excluded studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The following information was extracted from the remaining studies: authors, publication year, demographic characteristics, specific intervention and control plans, measurement methods, and outcome indicators. In cases of disagreement between the two researchers, a third researcher was consulted to reach a resolution.

2.5 Quality appraisal

Two researchers (S. N. Liu and D. B. Xu) independently assessed the risk of bias for all the retrieved studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and if the results were inconsistent, a third researcher was consulted to reach a resolution. The quality assessment of the included studies was represented with “low risk of bias” (+) displayed in green, “high risk of bias” (−) displayed in red, and “unclear risk of bias” (?) displayed in yellow (7).

2.6 Data synthesis and analysis

The analysis and exhibition of the survey results in this study were executed using Manager 5.4 software. The lung function and mental health outcomes examined are continuous variables, analyzed using mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD), each accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI). To assess statistical heterogeneity, Chi-square tests and I2 statistics were applied. A fixed-effects model was selected when heterogeneity is not significant (I2 < 50% and/or p > 0.05). Conversely, when heterogeneity is significant (I2 ≥ 50% and/or p ≤ 0.05), a random-effects model was employed, along with subgroup analyses on the basis of exercise duration and frequency, to identify the sources of heterogeneity (8). Furthermore, p ≤ 0.05 indicates a significant difference, demonstrating statistical significance in the meta-analysis results.

3 Results

3.1 Study characteristics

This study included 67 studies published in China between 2008 and 2024 (Figure 1). A total of 5,475 participants were involved, with 2,745 in the treatment group and 2,730 in the control group; participants’ ages ranged from 45 to 82 years, with intervention durations ranging from 8 to 108 weeks, frequencies ranging from 1 to 7 times per week, and durations ranging from 15 to 90 min per session. Among the 67 eligible studies, 20 focused on Baduanjin, 18 on Taichi, 18 on Liuzijue, 9 on Wuqinxi, and 2 on Yijinjing. Among them, 19 studies utilized follow-up assessments to determine the benefits of TCE on anxiety and depression. Supplementary Table S1 provides a comprehensive overview of these RCTs.

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the selection process for a meta-analysis. Identification stage shows records from databases and other sources totaling one thousand four hundred forty-seven. Screening shows 612 records after duplicates removed; 106 reviews. Eligibility shows 506 full-text articles assessed; 439 excluded for reasons such as wrong outcome, patients, study design, or lack of full text. Sixty-seven studies included in quantitative synthesis.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature screening process.

3.2 Risk of bias assessment

The assessment of bias risk reached a consensus after discussion (975). For random sequence generation, 48 studies utilized randomization methods and were evaluated as having a low risk of bias. Of the remaining 19 studies, 12 did not mention the randomization method (17, 31, 35, 36, 39, 41, 46, 63, 66, 68, 71, 72), and 7 grouped patients by age or sex, resulting in a high-risk rating (24, 26, 29, 33, 53, 70, 73). With respect to allocation concealment, 3 studies provided detailed descriptions and were rated as low risk (50, 56, 67), whereas 4 were open-label trials and received a high-risk rating (24, 30, 70, 73). Four studies did not employ blinding and were considered high risk (29, 33, 70, 73), whereas 8 studies applied blinding during outcome assessment and were deemed to have a low risk of bias (13, 33, 43, 50, 56, 61, 67, 75). Outcome data and selective reporting were complete across all studies, indicating low risk. For the category of “other biases,” none of the studies provided details, and they were rated as having an unclear risk (Figures 2, 3).

Figure 2
Bar chart showing bias risk for seven categories: Random sequence generation, Allocation concealment, Blinding of participants and personnel, Blinding of outcome assessment, Incomplete outcome data, Selective reporting, and Other bias. Color key indicates low (green), unclear (yellow), and high risk (red). Most categories show a mix of unclear and low risk, with minimal high risk.

Figure 2. Risk of bias assessment.

Figure 3
Chart displaying risk of bias assessment for various studies from 2008 to 2024. Categories evaluated include random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. Each study has colored indicators: green for low risk, yellow for unclear risk, and red for high risk.

Figure 3. Summary of bias risk for each bias risk.

3.3 Results of the meta-analysis

3.3.1 FEV1 (L)

Among the 45 included studies (9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 1823, 25, 28, 30, 3335, 3740, 4247, 4951, 5559, 6164, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75), the effects of TCE on FEV1 in patients with COPD were reported. These studies examined five different types of exercises: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. The experimental group consisted of 1,895 participants, while the control group included 1,883 participants. The random-effects model indicated no statistical heterogeneity in the Liuzijue and Yijinjing groups (p = 0.45, I2 = 0%), (p = 0.76, I2 = 0%). All TCE groups showed significantly higher FEV1 compared to the control group. Results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = 0.32, 95% CI (0.25, 0.40), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = 0.21, 95% CI (0.12, 0.30), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = 0.21, 95% CI (0.16, 0.25), p < 0.001], Wuqinxi [MD = 0.42, 95% CI (−0.11, 0.73), p < 0.001], and Yijinjing [MD = 0.54, 95% CI (0.36, 0.73), p < 0.001].

Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention duration and frequency. In the analysis of intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly higher FEV1than did the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = 0.27, 95% CI (0.21, 0.34), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in FEV1 [MD = 0.29, 95% CI (0.21, 0.38), p < 0.001]. Additionally, no significant heterogeneity was observed in the subgroup with a frequency of ≤ 5 times per week (p = 0.63, I2 = 0%). Significant differences were found at frequencies of ≤ 5 times per week [MD = 0.25, 95% CI (0.22, 0.28), p < 0.001] and > 5 times per week [MD = 0.29, 95% CI (0.26, 0.32), p < 0.001] (Figure 4).

Figure 4

3.3.2 FEV1 (%)

Among the 35 included studies (9, 12, 15, 17, 19, 23, 25, 2729, 3133, 35, 38, 41, 42, 4550, 52, 53, 5961, 63, 67, 68, 71, 7375), the effects of TCE on FEV1% in patients with COPD were reported. These studies focused on five specific exercise forms: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. The experimental group consisted of 1,270 participants, while the control group included 1,274 participants. The random-effects model indicated no statistical heterogeneity in the Taichi and Liuzijue groups (p = 0.06, I2 = 44%), (p = 0.32, I2 = 13%). However, except for the Yijinjing group, all TCE groups showed significantly higher FEV1% compared to the control group. The results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = 6.26, 95% CI (3.71, 8.81), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = 3.81, 95% CI (2.59, 5.02), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = 8.19, 95% CI (6.39, 9.99), p < 0.001], Wuqinxi [MD = 4.70, 95% CI (0.74, 8.67), p < 0.002], and Yijinjing [MD = 7.30, 95% CI (−0.60, 15.20), p = 0.07].

Subgroup analyses were performed based on both intervention duration and frequency. In the analysis based on intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly higher FEV1% than did the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = 6.02, 95% CI (4.31, 7.74), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in FEV1% [MD = 5.11, 95% CI (3.58, 6.65), p < 0.001]. The subgroup analysis based on exercise frequency indicated that both groups in the experimental cohort, significant differences at frequencies of ≤ 5 times per week [MD = 6.32, 95% CI (4.08, 8.56), p < 0.001] and > 5 times per week [MD = 5.23, 95% CI (3.92, 6.55), p < 0.001] (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Forest plot comparing the mean differences of five exercise interventions: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing with control groups. Each subgroup shows multiple studies with their respective mean differences and confidence intervals. Subtotals and overall effects are provided, indicating a favor towards experimental groups with a combined mean difference of 5.53. Heterogeneity and statistical tests are noted for each subgroup and overall. Forest plot showing meta-analysis of studies comparing FEV1 percentage improvements in experimental versus control groups at two time intervals: less than 24 weeks and greater than or equal to 24 weeks. The plot includes individual study data, mean differences, confidence intervals, and weights. Subtotals indicate significant overall treatment effects favoring the experimental group for both time intervals, with high heterogeneity. Forest plot showing a meta-analysis of studies comparing experimental and control groups at different frequencies per week. Studies are divided into subgroups: ≤5 times/week and >5 times/week. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals are displayed. Heterogeneity statistics and overall effects are indicated with diamonds. Results suggest the experimental group generally favors improved outcomes.

Figure 5. Effect of TCE on FEV1% in patients with COPD. (A) Types of intervention; (B) Duration of intervention; (C) Frequency of intervention.

3.3.3 FVC

In the included literature, 29 studies reported the effects of TCE on FVC in patients with COPD (11, 12, 14, 1623, 25, 28, 30, 33, 34, 37, 39, 40, 4244, 48, 52, 57, 58, 67, 68, 72). These studies encompassed four exercise methods: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi. The experimental group comprised 1,304 participants, whereas the control group included 1,291 participants. The fixed-effects model indicated no statistical heterogeneity in the Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi groups (p = 0.18, I2 = 26%), (p = 0.06, I2 = 45%), (p = 0.63, I2 = 0%), (p = 0.27, I2 = 18%). Compared with the control group, all TCE groups presented a significantly greater FVC. The results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = 0.33, 95% CI (0.30, 0.37), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = 0.28, 95% CI (0.22, 0.34), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = 0.22, 95% CI (0.15, 0.30), p < 0.001], and Wuqinxi [MD = 0.47, 95% CI (0.36, 0.58), p < 0.001] (Figure 6).

Figure 6
A forest plot showing the mean difference between experimental and control groups across several studies on different interventions: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi. Subgroup results are displayed with confidence intervals. Overall mean difference favors the experimental group, with total mean difference and heterogeneity statistics provided.

Figure 6. Effect of TCE on FVC in patients with COPD. Types of intervention.

3.3.4 FEV1/FVC (%)

Among the 43 included studies (9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 27, 28, 30, 3235, 3741, 4345, 4752, 5557, 61, 62, 6668, 7072, 74, 75), the effects of TCE on FEV1/FVC (%) in patients with COPD were reported. These studies encompassed five types of exercises: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. The experimental group consisted of 1,793 participants, whereas the control group included 1,783 participants. The random-effects model indicated that all TCE groups showed significantly higher FEV1/FVC (%) compared to the control group. Results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = 6.98, 95% CI (4.88, 9.07), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = 3.89, 95% CI (1.36, 6.42), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = 5.91, 95% CI (3.66, 8.15), p < 0.001], Wuqinxi [MD = 9.54, 95% CI (3.13, 15.95), p < 0.004], and Yijinjing [MD = 4.46, 95% CI (2.55, 6.36), p < 0.001].

Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of intervention duration and frequency. In the analysis of intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly higher FEV1/FVC (%) than did the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = 6.70, 95% CI (4.61, 8.80), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in FEV1/FVC (%) [MD = 5.27, 95% CI (3.88, 6.67), p < 0.001]. The subgroup analysis based on exercise frequency indicated that both groups in the experimental cohort, those exercising ≤ 5 times per week and those exercising > 5 times per week, achieved significantly higher FEV1/FVC (%) than the control group, with statistically significant differences of [MD = 6.65, 95% CI (4.63, 8.67), p < 0.001] and [MD = 6.04, 95% CI (4.28, 7.79), p < 0.001], respectively (Figure 7).

Figure 7
Forest plot showing a meta-analysis of various studies comparing different interventions: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liujuie, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. The plot displays mean differences, confidence intervals, study weights, and heterogeneity measures. Each study's data is listed, with diamonds representing pooled estimates. Overall effect size favors the experimental interventions with a combined mean difference of 6.13. Forest plot illustrating a meta-analysis of studies comparing FEV1/FVC ratios in experimental versus control groups. Each study lists mean differences, confidence intervals, and weights. Subgroups are categorized by duration: less than twenty-four weeks and more than twenty-four weeks. The overall mean difference favors the experimental group with a pooled estimate of 6.13. Heterogeneity and statistical significance are noted, with diamonds representing summary estimates and confidence intervals across studies. Forest plot displaying meta-analysis results for two subgroups: frequency less than or equal to five times per week, and frequency greater than five times per week. Each row shows study names, mean differences, confidence intervals, and weights. Diamonds at the bottom of each subgroup indicate the overall effect size with confidence intervals. Horizontal lines represent confidence intervals for individual studies. The total effect size is displayed at the bottom with a diamond symbol. Heterogeneity statistics are also provided.

Figure 7. Effect of TCE on FEV1/FVC (%) in patients with COPD. (A) Types of intervention; (B) Duration of intervention; (C) Frequency of intervention.

3.3.5 6MWT

Among the included studies, 40 articles reported the effects of TCE on the 6MWT in patients with COPD (11, 1315, 1721, 2325, 2729, 3134, 38, 4045, 57, 5965, 67, 68, 7275). These studies investigated five types of exercises: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. The experimental group consisted of 1,701 participants, whereas the control group included 1,695 participants. The random-effects model showed no statistical heterogeneity among the Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing groups (p = 0.28, I2 = 20%; p = 0.14, I2 = 43%), (p = 0.41, I2 = 0%). Each TCE group demonstrated significantly higher 6MWT results compared to the control group, specifically Baduanjin [MD = 45.35, 95% CI (37.39, 53.30), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = 42.57, 95% CI (31.51, 53.64), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = 39.18, 95% CI (30.75, 47.62), p < 0.001], Wuqinxi [MD = 45.72, 95% CI (38.34, 53.10), p < 0.004], and Yijinjing [MD = 15.98, 95% CI (11.72, 20.23), p < 0.001].

Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of intervention duration and frequency. In the analysis of intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly higher 6MWT than did the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = 42.43, 95% CI (36.52, 48.35), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in 6MWT [MD = 40.62, 95% CI (36.52, 47.71), p < 0.001]. The subgroup analysis based on exercise frequency indicated that both groups in the experimental cohort presented statistical differences at frequencies of ≤ 5 times per week [MD = 44.76, 95% CI (35.65, 53.87), p < 0.001] and > 5 times per week [MD = 40.76, 95% CI (34.09, 47.42), p < 0.001] (Figure 8).

Figure 8
A forest plot depicting meta-analysis results from various studies on interventions like Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. The plot shows mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for each subgroup, with diamonds representing pooled effects. It indicates a favor towards experimental interventions over controls with a total pooled mean difference of 42.12. Heterogeneity statistics are included for each subgroup and overall. Forest plot illustrating mean differences in a six-minute walk test (6MWT) between experimental and control groups across multiple studies. Each study's mean difference with confidence intervals is represented, showing heterogeneity and overall effect size. Subtotals and total effects for periods under and over four weeks are indicated with black diamonds emphasizing combined effect sizes. Forest plot showing a meta-analysis of multiple studies on frequency of exercise. Two subgroups are compared: frequency less than or equal to five times a week, and more than five times a week. The plot illustrates mean differences with confidence intervals, favoring experimental groups in most cases. Overall and subgroup test results indicate significant effects in favor of experimental conditions.

Figure 8. Effect of TCE on 6MWT in patients with COPD. (A) Types of intervention; (B) Duration of intervention; (C) Frequency of intervention.

3.3.6 CAT

Among the included studies, 21 articles reported the effects of TCE on the CAT in patients with COPD (10, 13, 14, 16, 24, 25, 29, 32, 4145, 48, 56, 57, 60, 61, 66, 70, 73). These studies encompassed four types of exercises: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi. The experimental group consisted of 802 participants, whereas the control group included 805 participants. The random-effects model showed no statistical heterogeneity among the Taichi and Wuqinxi groups (p = 0.13, I2 = 39%), (p = 0.33, I2 = 11%). Each TCE groups showed significantly lower CAT compared to the control group. The results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = −4.79, 95% CI (−5.68, −3.90), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = −3.86, 95% CI (−4.48, −3.23), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = −3.76, 95% CI (−5.01, −2.51), p < 0.001], and Wuqinxi [MD = −3.94, 95% CI (−5.38, −2.50), p < 0.001].

Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of intervention duration and frequency. In the subgroup analysis based on intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly lower CAT than did the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = −4.25, 95% CI (−5.02, −3.47), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in CAT [MD = −4.14, 95% CI (−4.97, −3.32), p < 0.001]. The subgroup analysis based on exercise frequency indicated that both groups in the experimental cohort, those exercising ≤ 5 times per week and those exercising > 5 times per week, achieved significantly lower CAT than did the control group, with statistically significant differences of [MD = −4.68, 95% CI (−5.35, −4.01), p < 0.001] and [MD = −3.89, 95% CI (−4.65, −3.13), p < 0.001], respectively (Figure 9).

Figure 9
Forest plots compare the mean differences between experimental and control groups across multiple studies. Plot A shows subgroups based on interventions (Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi) with overall and subgroup estimates using a random effects model. Plot B divides studies by duration (<24 weeks and ≥24 weeks), presenting similar statistical details. Diamonds represent total effects, with lines indicating confidence intervals. Forest plot showing subgroup analysis comparing experimental and control groups on frequency of occurrence. Two subgroups are analyzed: frequency less than or equal to five times per week, and more than five times per week. Each study is represented with mean differences and confidence intervals. The overall effect favors the experimental group with a total mean difference of -4.20, indicating a significant effect with P < 0.00001. Subgroup heterogeneity and individual study weights are also detailed.

Figure 9. Effect of TCE on CAT in patients with COPD. (A) Types of intervention; (B) Duration of intervention; (C) Frequency of intervention.

3.3.7 Anxiety

Among the 19 included studies (9, 10, 14, 21, 22, 2426, 36, 42, 44, 48, 5356, 65, 66, 69), the effects of TCE on anxiety in patients with COPD were reported. These studies involved four types of exercises: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi. The experimental group consisted of 816 participants, whereas the control group included 807 participants. The studies utilized SMD to compile data on anxiety symptoms using assessment tools such as the SAS, HAM-A, and HADS. The random-effects model indicated that all TCE groups showed significantly lower anxiety than did the control group. The results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = −1.62, 95% CI (−2.31, −0.94), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = −0.54, 95% CI (−1.28, 0.20), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = −1.03, 95% CI (−1.46, −0.59), p < 0.001], and Wuqinxi [MD = −1.44, 95% CI (−2.35, −0.52), p < 0.001].

Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of intervention duration and frequency. In the analysis of intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly lower anxiety than did the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−1.93, −0.83), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant alleviation of anxiety [MD = −1.03, 95% CI (−1.31, −0.74), p < 0.001]. The subgroup analysis based on exercise frequency indicated that both groups in the experimental cohort presented significant differences at frequencies of ≤ 5 times per week [MD = −1.45, 95% CI (−2.12, −0.79), p < 0.001] and > 5 times per week [MD = −1.07, 95% CI (−1.39, −0.75), p < 0.001] (Figure 10).

Figure 10
Forest plots from a meta-analysis in sections A and B display data comparing experimental and control groups. Each plot shows individual study results with mean differences and confidence intervals, using black diamonds for overall effects. Section A is divided into subgroups: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi. Section B compares effects on anxiety for periods under and over two weeks. The overall effect favors the experimental group in both sections, with summary statistics indicating heterogeneity and confidence intervals. Forest plot showing a meta-analysis of studies on frequency of treatment sessions, comparing experimental and control groups. The studies are divided into two subgroups based on treatment frequency: ≤5 times per week and >5 times per week. Each study's standardized mean difference and confidence intervals are displayed with green squares indicating individual study effects and diamonds representing pooled effects. Overall effect sizes are −1.45 for the first subgroup, −1.07 for the second, and −1.26 overall, favoring the experimental group. Heterogeneity and statistical tests are reported with significance levels.

Figure 10. Effect of TCE on anxiety in patients with COPD. (A) Types of intervention; (B) Duration of intervention; (C) Frequency of intervention.

3.3.8 Depression

Among the 19 included studies (9, 10, 14, 21, 22, 2426, 36, 42, 44, 48, 5356, 65, 66, 69), the effects of TCE on depression in patients with COPD were reported. These studies involved four types of exercises: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi. The experimental group consisted of 816 participants, whereas the control group included 807 participants. The studies utilized SMD to compile data on anxiety symptoms using assessment tools such as the SDS, HAM-D, and HADS. The random-effects model indicated that all TCE groups showed significantly lower depression than did the control group. The results for each group included Baduanjin [MD = −1.51, 95% CI (−2.10, −0.92), p < 0.001], Taichi [MD = −1.11, 95% CI (−2.06, 0.17), p < 0.001], Liuzijue [MD = −1.12, 95% CI (−1.50, −0.74), p < 0.001], and Wuqinxi [MD = −0.98, 95% CI (−1.66, −0.30), p < 0.001].

Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of intervention duration and frequency. In the analysis of intervention duration, the experimental group exhibited a significantly lower depression than the control group before 24 weeks of TCE [MD = −1.47, 95% CI (−1.89, −1.05), p < 0.001]. Similarly, for interventions lasting 24 weeks or longer, the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant alleviation of depression [MD = −0.82, 95% CI (−1.10, −0.54), p < 0.001]. The subgroup analysis based on exercise frequency indicated that both groups in the experimental cohort presented significant differences at frequencies of ≤ 5 times per week [MD = −1.29, 95% CI (−1.72, −0.87), p < 0.001] and > 5 times per week [MD = −2.24, 95% CI (−1.76, −0.71), p < 0.001] (Figure 11).

Figure 11
Forest plots comparing standardized mean differences between experimental and control groups in two sections, A and B. Section A analyzes studies on Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, and Wuqinxi, showing varied mean differences and confidence intervals. Section B subdivides into depression less than and more than two weeks, displaying heterogeneity and overall effects. Diamonds represent pooled estimates, and horizontal lines indicate confidence intervals, with the center line at zero for no effect. Forest plot showing the standardized mean differences between experimental and control groups for studies grouped by frequency (≤5 times/week and >5 times/week). The plot includes diamond and line markers representing the mean differences and confidence intervals, indicating the overall effect sizes and heterogeneity for each group and total. The results favor the experimental groups across most studies.

Figure 11. Effect of TCE on depression in patients with COPD. (A) Types of intervention; (B) Duration of intervention; (C) Frequency of intervention.

3.4 Publication bias and sensitivity analysis

Given the restricted literature included, this study exclusively focused on bias in the test outcomes for FEV1 and FEV1/FVC (%). A visual inspection of the funnel plot indicated symmetry (Figure 12). To further validate these findings, the Egger’s test was conducted, yielding p ≥ 0.05 (p = 0.984), (p = 0.495). Consequently, no significant publication bias or other biases were observed. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that excluding individual studies did not lead to significant changes in the groups or outcomes. Consequently, the findings of the sensitivity analysis support the reliability of the study results (Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 12
Funnel plots labeled A and B depict the relationship between the standard error of the mean difference (SE(MD)) and the mean difference (MD). Both plots show data points clustering within triangular boundaries, representing precision in meta-analyses. Plot A has a narrow range of MD and SE(MD), while plot B spans a wider range, indicating different levels of data variability. Dashed lines form the funnel shape.

Figure 12. Funnel plot of FEV1, FEV1/FVC (%). (A) FEV1; (B) FEV1/FVC (%).

4 Discussion

In this study, 67 RCTs involving 5,475 cases were included, with a focus on five exercise methods: Baduanjin, Taichi, Liuzijue, Wuqinxi, and Yijinjing. These results indicate that TCE significantly improves lung function and mental health in COPD patients. Sensitivity analysis found no substantial changes, suggesting that the included studies are relatively stable, the funnel plots and the Egger’s test indicated no publication bias in this study. However, owing to the unique characteristics of different exercise methods, heterogeneity is relatively high, which may lead to greater clinical variability. Therefore, we categorized the different exercise methods for analysis. Subgroup analysis did not significantly reduce heterogeneity, possibly because of age differences, blinding methods, and varying degrees of outcome improvement. A deeper exploration of potential sources of heterogeneity is warranted. Specifically, cultural perceptions of TCE may influence participant motivation and adherence. In regions where TCE is embedded in daily life and traditional health practices, such as in China, patients may perceive these exercises as familiar, credible, and low-barrier interventions. In contrast, in Western contexts, a lack of cultural familiarity or skepticism toward traditional practices may lead to lower adherence or different expectations. Moreover, regional disparities in healthcare infrastructure, instructor qualifications, and educational forms may further contribute to variations in intervention veracity and patient outcomes. These contextual factors, though often unreported, likely represent significant sources of heterogeneity across studies. Thus, higher-quality evidence may be needed to confirm our findings (76). The subgroup analysis clearly suggested that traditional Chinese exercises can improve various lung function parameters in COPD patients to different extents, thus alleviating disease symptoms and enhancing their quality of life.

COPD is a multifaceted systemic disease that has become a major global public health issue. It not only causes damage to lung function but also leads to peripheral muscle dysfunction, negatively impacting physical and mental health (77). Previous research has confirmed the significant health benefits of traditional Chinese exercise, indicating that regular practice can enhance aerobic capacity, strengthen respiratory muscles, improve physical fitness, regulate breathing functions, enhance gas exchange efficiency, slow the decline in lung function, and promote health-related quality of life and mental well-being. Since COPD requires long-term exercise rehabilitation interventions, the study of the effects of TCE on health outcomes has continued to expand and become a key focus for many COPD patients.

TCEs are an essential part of nonpharmacological therapies and involves a series of relaxed and controlled postures that integrate breathing control with functional movements. These exercises stimulate the body’s functional reserves following illness and promote recovery after acute conditions. They are not limited by space and do not require any special equipment or settings. With repeated practice over time, traditional Chinese exercises support maximum functional recovery, enhance neuroplasticity and proprioception, and help remodel cardiopulmonary dynamics and muscle tone. As a form of aerobic exercise, the mechanisms by which traditional Chinese exercises improve lung function in COPD patients may include reducing the spasmodic state of small arteries, preventing bronchial airway obstruction and increasing ventilation, improving lung oxygen diffusion, and increasing partial oxygen pressure. Unlike modern exercise forms such as high-intensity interval training, resistance training, or structured gym-based rehabilitation, TCEs focus on low-impact, rhythmical movements combined with breath control and mental focus. Modern exercises that emphasize physical intensity and measurable performance outcomes, often require specific facilities, equipment, or professional supervision, which can present barriers to access for older adults or those in low-resource settings. In contrast, TCEs emphasize balance, relaxation, and internal energy regulation, are low-cost, low-impact, adaptable to a wide range of physical conditions, and can be practiced independently in various environments, including at home or in community parks. Moreover, TCEs typically place greater emphasis on harmonizing the body and mind, cultivating relaxation, and promoting emotional resilience. These psychological benefits are often under-addressed in conventional exercise. For patients with COPD, who frequently experience anxiety and depression, the Physical and psychological recovery ability of TCE may offer unique advantages beyond those conferred by physical training alone. Additionally, COPD self-management education is a vital element in the implementation of traditional Chinese exercise. This educational approach incorporates disease knowledge, skill training, and strategies for behavior modification. Increasing patients’ understanding of the importance and benefits of traditional Chinese exercises can lead to improvements in quality of life, reductions in acute exacerbations and hospitalizations, changes in sedentary lifestyles, and increased motivation for exercise rehabilitation. Consequently, self-management and education play a significant role in the early identification, prevention, and rehabilitation of COPD (78). In the field of public health, traditional Chinese exercises emphasize practitioners’ cultural understanding and cognitive identification. As a practice combining exercise and meditation, they can alleviate stress, enhance emotional regulation, and improve symptoms of anxiety and depression by inhibiting the activation of the sympathetic nervous system. For example, workers often face more serious of emotional stress, and integrating traditional Chinese exercises into daily life can provide a valuable self-care method to support mental health. Similarly, incorporating traditional Chinese exercises into student groups facing academic pressure and uncertainty may help reduce stress and enhance their focus in daily life.

Traditional Chinese exercises exhibit unique compatibility, making them a versatile supplement to comprehensive treatment plans. Their simplicity and ease of learning make them particularly suitable for older adults, providing a moderate yet holistic form of exercise that encompasses breathing, cardiovascular function, endurance training, psychological regulation, and limb coordination. This enhances older adults’ ability to meet various health needs and complements medical interventions. For younger age groups, traditional Chinese exercises may offer greater benefits in regulating the autonomic nervous system. However, since the intensity of these exercises may not meet the recommended levels of aerobic activity, their effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular disease might be limited. Therefore, in the rehabilitation of COPD patients, combining traditional Chinese exercises with modern exercise regimens may be more effective than relying solely on one form of exercise. Meanwhile, the practical application of TCE in COPD management requires attention to healthcare context and cultural adaptability. In Eastern healthcare systems, where TCE is widely accepted and even reimbursed in some cases, clinicians can incorporate these interventions seamlessly into routine pulmonary rehabilitation programs. In contrast, in Western healthcare systems, successful integration may depend on exercises category, patient education, and availability of qualified instructors. Introducing culturally tailored exercise types, pilot community-based TCE programs, or integrating TCE into existing physiotherapy services could enhance feasibility and uptake. Furthermore, some researchers have evaluated improvements in patients’ physical function by analyzing results such as exercise performance, scale evaluation, neural imaging activation, and physiological indicators, which can provide more comprehensive evidence for the role of TCE in promoting COPD rehabilitation.

This review has several limitations. First, in some of the included RCTs, traditional Chinese exercises were combined with other therapies, which may have diluted the specific effects of traditional Chinese exercise. The observed effects may have been impacted by these additional therapies, and making it difficult to attribute the improvement in the disease solely to traditional Chinese exercises. Second, variations in study quality, sample size, exercise duration, frequency, intensity, outcome measures, and patient factors (e.g., participants’ proficiency, age, and compliance in performing the exercises) may have contributed to heterogeneity in the results. Most included studies did not report concealment or blinding of the allocation of participants and researchers, limiting the ability to draw clear conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention measures. Finally, since most research has been conducted in China, the findings may not be easily generalizable to other countries. As more research in this area continues to emerge, future studies should aim to include larger, high-quality, multicenter trials. These limitations emphasize the need for future research to combine rigorously designed controlled trials, standard implementation of blinding methods, and precise statistical approaches to provide stronger evidence regarding the independent efficacy of TCE in the rehabilitation of COPD patients.

5 Conclusion

To summarize, this study shows that TCE have a significant influence on improving lung function, alleviating anxiety and depression in COPD patients. Compared with drug intervention, TCEs are simple, inexpensive, easy to learn and practice, and not limited by the venue. They are one of the important means to alleviate the social and economic burden caused by COPD, providing more choices for clinical treatment. This study not only highlights the nonpharmacological intervention value of TCE but also provides new directions for psychological intervention, which deserves wider promotion.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

SL: Data curation, Validation, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Software, Visualization. DX: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612741/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; TCE, Traditional Chinese Exercise; RCTs, Randomized Controlled Trials; MeSH, Medical Subject Heading; FEV1, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s; FEV1%, the First second Forced Vital Capacity Percentage of Expected Value; FVC, Forced Vital Capacity; FEV1/FVC (%), the Ratio of the First second Forced Vital Capacity of Forced Vital Capacity; 6MWT, 6-Minute Walk Test; CAT, the COPD Assessment Test; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores; SDS, Self-Rating Depression Scale scores; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale scores; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; MD, mean difference; SMD, Standardized mean differences; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.

References

1. Vestbo, J, Hurd, SS, Agustí, AG, Jones, PW, Vogelmeier, C, Anzueto, A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2013) 187:347–65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201204-0596PP

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Christenson, SA, Smith, BM, Bafadhel, M, and Putcha, N. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. (2022) 399:2227–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00470-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ferrera, MC, Labaki, WW, and Han, MK. Advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Annu Rev Med. (2021) 72:119–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-080919-112707

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chang, PS, Knobf, MT, Oh, B, and Funk, M. Physical and psychological effects of qigong exercise in community-dwelling older adults: an exploratory study. Geriatr Nurs. (2018) 39:88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.07.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Li, L, Huang, H, Song, J, Yu, Y, Jia, Y, Wang, Y, et al. Network Meta-analysis of the effects of different types of traditional Chinese exercises on pulmonary function, endurance capacity and quality of life in patients with COPD. Front Med. (2022) 9:806025. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.806025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Singh, D, Agusti, A, Anzueto, A, Barnes, PJ, Bourbeau, J, Celli, BR, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J. (2019) 53:1900164. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00164-2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sterne, JAC, Savović, J, Page, MJ, Elbers, RG, Blencowe, NS, Boutron, I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. (2019) 366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Higgins, JP, and Thompson, SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. (2002) 21:1539–58. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cao, C, Guo, X, Chen, N, Yan, X, and Zhang,. Study on the effect of Baduanjin on improving anxiety and depression in older adult patients with lung and spleen qi deficiency syndrome in COPD stable period. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med. (2016) 18:120–3. doi: 10.13194/j.issn.1673-842x.2016.08.038.

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dong, X, Wei, Y, Li, H, and Lu, W. Study on the effect of health qigong Baduanjin combined with comprehensive nursing on the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Med Innov. (2020) 17:100–3.

Google Scholar

11. Hou, D, Huang, F, Yu, S, Tan, Y, Luo, J, and Yuan, Q. Study on the effect of Baduanjin combined with respiratory training on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in community. Guangzhou Med. (2017) 48:29–32.

Google Scholar

12. Huang, F, and Gao, Y. Application of Baduanjin combined with respiratory training in rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in community. Nurs Pract Res. (2016) 13:146–7.

Google Scholar

13. Huang, Y . Effect of Baduanjin combined with pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function and exercise endurance in patients with stable COPD. Reflexother Rehabilit Med. (2021) 2:37–40.

Google Scholar

14. Jiang, X, Yang, Y, Liu, T, Wang, B, and Hua, W. Effects of traditional Baduanjin on pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Health Care. (2023) 41:62–4.

Google Scholar

15. Liu, S, and Chen, Y. Clinical study on the improvement of 6-minute walking distance in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by health qigong baduanjin. Sichuan Yi Xue Yuan Xue Bao. (2013) 34:1090–2. doi: 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2013.08.018

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Liu, Y . Application of acupoint application combined with Baduanjin in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Henan Med Res. (2021) 30:6480–2.

Google Scholar

17. Ma, C, Yao, J, and Li, Y. Clinical effect of regular Baduanjin exercise on the improvement of 6-minute walking distance in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pract Clin Nurs Electron J. (2020) 5:32–40.

Google Scholar

18. Ma, L, Zhang, S, and Zhao, C. The effect of Baduanjin exercise combined with pulmonary rehabilitation training on lung function, exercise endurance and blood gas analysis in older adult patients with stable COPD. China Health Eng. (2022) 21:840–2. doi: 10.19937/j.issn.1671-4199.2022.05.046

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wang, L, and Fang, L. Effect of practicing Baduanjin on pulmonary function in stable stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tradit Chin Med. (2018) 24:86–7. doi: 10.13862/j.cnki.cn43-1446/r.2018.03.029

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang, Y, Wang, L, and Zheng, L. Effect of Baduanjin combined with pulmonary rehabilitation training on pulmonary function in patients with stable COPD. China Rehabil. (2022) 37:232–5.

Google Scholar

21. Xu, C . Effect of Baduanjin combined with vertical respiratory gymnastics on pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Nurs. (2021) 40:2000–4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190906-00578

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Xia, T . Analysis of the application effect of respiratory Baduanjin combined with comprehensive chronic disease management on patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Commun Phys. (2022) 38:65–7.

Google Scholar

23. Yu, Y . Efficacy evaluation of health qigong Baduanjin in pulmonary rehabilitation of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Contin Electr J. (2019) 19:210–1. doi: 10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2019.84.139

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yao, L, Yao, X, Xue, L, Liang, Z, Xiang, S, and Zhang, M. Clinical study on comprehensive nursing intervention combined with Baduanjin to improve the efficacy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Commun Phys. (2022) 2022:139–42.

Google Scholar

25. Yang, X, and Wang, Y. Effects of Baduanjin on pulmonary function and psychological status of perimenopausal women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Women Child Health Guide. (2023) 2:61–3.

Google Scholar

26. Zhang, W, Chen, W, Jin, X, Wu, W, Yang, R, and Yu, Y. The effect of group exercise therapy on anxiety and depression in patients with COPD in remission stage. Chin J Rehabil Med. (2008) 23:732–4.

Google Scholar

27. Zhang, T, Ma, X, Chen, R, and Yang, Y. Evaluation of the effect of regular Baduanjin exercise on lung function, fatigue and activity endurance in patients with stable COPD. World J Integr Tradit Chin West Med. (2019) 14:415–8. doi: 10.13935/j.cnki.sjzx.190330

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zhu, Z, and Chen, Y. Effects of sitting Baduanjin exercise on pulmonary function in patients with COPD. World J Integr Tradit Chin West Med. (2014) 8:846–8. doi: 10.13935/j.cnki.sjzx.140817

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chen, D . The intervention value of tai Chi exercise on pulmonary function in middle-aged patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Med Pharm. (2020) 10:214–7.

Google Scholar

30. Chi, X, Zhang, X, Jiang, H, Wang, J, Zhang, G, and Li, Q. Observation on the effect of tai Chi rehabilitation exercise on acute exacerbation of COPD patients in moderate and severe stable stage. Geriatr Study. (2021) 2:5–8.

Google Scholar

31. Deng, Z, Chen, H, Xu, Z, Jiang, P, Du, Y, and Song, L. The role of Taijiquan in pulmonary rehabilitation of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Anhui Health Vocat Techn Coll. (2016) 15:18–9.

Google Scholar

32. Du, S, Ding, L, Wang, C, Yang, F, Xing, B, and Liu, Z. Effects of tai chi exercise on exercise tolerance and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Rehabil Med. (2013) 28:374–6.

Google Scholar

33. Gu, G, Zhou, Y, Wang, D, Chen, L, Zhong, N, and Ran, P. Effects of simple tai Chi exercise on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Med. (2012) 92:952–5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2012.14.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. He, Y . Effect of tai Chi on pulmonary function and activity in patients with stable COPD. E-J Pract Clin Nurs. (2020) 5:43–50.

Google Scholar

35. Hu, J, Han, P, Sang, X, Hu, J, Wu, X, and Mo, L. Clinical efficacy of tai Chi rehabilitation training on middle-aged and older adult patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Geriatr. (2020) 40:5225–7.

Google Scholar

36. Li, Z . Clinical efficacy of tai Chi exercise in relieving depression and anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Cosmet Med. (2011) 20:129–30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6455.2011.z6.114

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Li, Q, Fang, W, and Liu, C. The effect of tai Chi combined with respiratory function training on the rehabilitation of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Rehabil Med. (2012) 27:825–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2012.09.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Li, S, Li, A, Sun, J, and Wang, H. The effect of tai Chi rehabilitation on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Binzhou Med Univ. (2016) 39:275–7.

Google Scholar

39. Li, F, Xing, J, Zhang, H, Zhao, H, and Zhang, J. The effect of tai Chi combined with respiratory training on the quality of life of patients with stable COPD. Electr J Pract Clin Nurs. (2019) 4:36–41.

Google Scholar

40. Liu, H, Xu, Y, Yang, C, Wang, Y, and Zheng, J. The effects of twenty-four simplified tai Chi combined with respiratory function training on lung function, exercise endurance and psychological status of middle-aged and older adult patients with COPD. Mod Biomed Prog. (2021) 21:2858–62. doi: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2021.15.012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Liu, D, and Zhang, Y. The effect of tai Chi exercise on pulmonary function in middle-aged patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Commun Phys. (2019) 35:154–7.

Google Scholar

42. Pan, Y, Wang, Z, Min, J, Xiao, W, Huang, Y, and Mao, B. Efficacy evaluation of 24-type simplified tai Chi in pulmonary rehabilitation of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhongguo Kangfu Yixue Zazhi. (2018) 33:681–6.

Google Scholar

43. Peng, H, Wang, P, Wang, Y, Mao, M, and Qi, C. Effect of tai Chi rehabilitation six-style exercise on pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Shanghai Pharm. (2020) 41:58–62.

Google Scholar

44. Ren, Z, Zhang, X, Hou, G, Yang, B, Kang, X, and Wang, Z. Effect of tai Chi Chan on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Tradit Chin Med. (2017) 32:3507–10.

Google Scholar

45. Zhang, X, Cai, Y, Zhang, W, and Wang, P. The effect of twenty-four-style tai Chi and respiratory function training combined with western medicine on patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Tradit Chin Med. (2014) 55:1937–41.

Google Scholar

46. Zhang, Y, and Liu, D. Effects of 24-style tai Chi combined with respiratory rehabilitation training on lung function and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pract Chin Med J. (2019) 35:350–1.

Google Scholar

47. Chen, J, Zhang, W, Zheng, G, Zheng, L, Li, Z, and Ge, L. The application of 'Liuzijue' breathing method in pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with stable COPD. J Fujian Univ Tradit Chin Med. (2008) 18:3–4.

Google Scholar

48. Chen, H, Peng, L, Fan, B, and Lu, J. Clinical study of fitness 'Liuzijue' combined with Yiqi Huoxue method to promote pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable COPD. Henan Tradit Chin Med. (2016) 36:835–7. doi: 10.16367/j.issn.1003-5028.2016.05.0354

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Cao, Q, Wang, Z, Ji, S, Hu, J, Chen, J, and Shi, X. Effect of Liuzijue in water on pulmonary function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. TCM Bull. (2022) 21:40–2. doi: 10.14046/j.cnki.zyytb2002.2022.06.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Deng, L, Chen, J, Chen, Y, Fan, L, Zhou, H, and Chen, F. Study on the effect of Liuzijue on older adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with lung qi deficiency syndrome. Chin Med Innov. (2020) 17:112–7.

Google Scholar

51. Hou, M, and Cui, X. Observation on the quality of life of COPD patients with lung and kidney qi deficiency by simplified Liuzijue. Guangming J Chin Med. (2017) 32:3518–21.

Google Scholar

52. Ji, S, Luo, G, Shi, K, Liu, X, Yang, P, and Wang, Z. Clinical study of Liuzijue intervention in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. West China Med J. (2019) 32:111–4. doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2019.07.025

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Jian, F, Wang, F, Liao, S, Lin, Q, Zhong, Q, and Li, Y. The effect of sitting and horizontal 'Liuzijue' breathing exercises on AECOPD patients with non-invasive ventilation. Nurs Pract Res. (2021) 18:3685–8.

Google Scholar

54. Wang, Z, Tang, J, Huang, H, Zhang, Z, Wang, Y, and Zou, Z. A multi-center randomized controlled clinical study on the effect of intensive 'Liuzijue' pulmonary rehabilitation exercise on the efficacy of stable COPD. Shanghai J Tradit Chin Med. (2014) 48:51–4. doi: 10.16305/j.1007-1334.2014.09.032

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zhao, J, Liu, H, Shan, X, and Dong, Q. Clinical study on the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory rehabilitation exercise and fitness qigong 'Liuzijue' combined with conventional western medicine therapy. Int J Tradit Chin Med. (2018) 40:710–4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2018.08.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Liu, T, Luo, B, Yu, Z, Qi, E, and Yang, Z. Application of acupoint massage combined with 'liuzijue' in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Nurs. (2018) 33:41–4.

Google Scholar

57. Ju, J, He, Y, and Li, Q. Effects of Liuzijue breathing exercises combined with acupoint massage on symptoms and quality of life in patients with stable COPD. Zhejiang Med. (2022) 44:970–3.

Google Scholar

58. Li, C, Ren, J, and Huang, W. Effects of acupoint application of traditional Chinese medicine combined with Liuzijue breathing exercise on pulmonary function and respiratory function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Reflexoth Rehabil Med. (2024) 5:26–9.

Google Scholar

59. Sun, N, Li, D, and Sun, Y. The effect of Liuzijue combined with lip-shrinking abdominal breathing training on lung function and quality of life in patients with stable COPD. Med Clini Res. (2019) 36:1003–4.

Google Scholar

60. Wang, Q, Liu, S, Cao, H, Qu, X, Zhang, L, and Bi, H. Clinical study of Liuzijue combined with inspiratory muscle training in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rehabil J. (2023) 33:148–53.

Google Scholar

61. Xu, L, Hu, J, Cao, Q, and Wang, Z. Study on the rehabilitation effect of Liuzijue in water on patients with lung and kidney qi deficiency syndrome in stable COPD. China Geriatric Health Med. (2021) 19:13–7.

Google Scholar

62. Yan, Z, Sun, Z, Min, J, and Feng, Y. Clinical observation of acupoint application combined with 'Liuzijue' breathing method in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in older adult individuals. China's Naturop. (2023) 31:56–9. doi: 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2023.2417

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Zhao, D, Zhou, Y, Li, F, and Zhang, N. Rehabilitation effect of modified exercise prescription on patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Respir. (2012) 32:678–82. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-436X.2012.009.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zhang, F . The effect of traditional 'Liuzijue breathing exercise' on rehabilitation nursing of patients with stable COPD. Chinese Med Guide. (2019) 17:248. doi: 10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2019.01.206

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Chen, Q, Tian, J, Jiang, J, and Zhang, W. The clinical observation of modified traditional Chinese medicine respiratory guidance rehabilitation technology in the treatment of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Shanghai Univ Tradit Chin Med. (2017) 31:33–9. doi: 10.16306/j.1008-861x.2017.03.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. He, R, Cheng, Y, and Wei, S. Traditional Huatuo Wuqinxi exercises improve quality of life in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin J Tradit Chin Med. (2015) 27:966–8.

Google Scholar

67. Gao, Y, Qu, Y, and Chen, M. The effect of Wuqinxi exercise on lung function and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during discharge. Clin Pathol J. (2017) 37:975–80.

Google Scholar

68. Liu, F, and Tan, P. Application of community exercise Wuqinxi in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Henan Med College. (2020) 32:522–4.

Google Scholar

69. Ni, X, Zhang, X, and Ge, L. The effect of health qigong Wuqinxi on anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with stable COPD. Chin Med Innov. (2019) 16:166–9.

Google Scholar

70. Sun, J, Yang, Y, Xue, H, and Cheng, Y. Observation on the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine five-tone therapy combined with bird play of Wuqinxi on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Res Trad Chin Med. (2021) 13:52–4.

Google Scholar

71. Wei, S, Cheng, Y, and He, R. Effect of traditional Hua Tuo Wuqinxi on pulmonary function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Clin Med. (2015) 27:793–5. doi: 10.16448/j.cjtcm.2015.0304

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Xiao, F, Du, J, and Liang, Y. Effects of exercise pulmonary rehabilitation training combined with 'Wuqinxi' on lung function, immune function and exercise endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Jilin Yi Yao. (2023) 44:2981–4.

Google Scholar

73. Zang, M, Cai, G, Lin, W, Zhang, W, Zhu, Y, and Wu, G. Effects of Wuqinxi Birdplay combined with simple breathing exercises on quality of life and immune function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Guangzhou Univ Tradit Chin Med. (2017) 34:819–23. doi: 10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2017.06.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Gao, Y . Study on health qigong Yijinjing promoting pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable COPD. J Chengde Med Coll. (2016) 33:307–9. doi: 10.15921/j.cnki.cyxb.2016.04.018

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Zhang, M, Xu, G, Li, F, Luo, F, Meng, D, and Ji, Y. Health qigong yijinjing promotes rehabilitation of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin J Sports Med. (2016) 35:339–43. doi: 10.16038/j.1000-6710.2016.04.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Gloeckl, R, Marinov, B, and Pitta, F. Practical recommendations for exercise training in patients with COPD. Eur Respir Rev. (2013) 22:178–86. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00000513

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Alschuler, L, Chiasson, AM, Horwitz, R, Sternberg, E, Crocker, R, Weil, A, et al. Integrative medicine considerations for convalescence from mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease. Explore. (2022) 18:140–8. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.12.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Kurt, Z, Sice, P, Krajewska, K, Elvin, G, Xie, H, Ogwu, S, et al. A pilot study on the impacts of lung-strengthening qigong on wellbeing. Complement Ther Med. (2022) 71:102891. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102891

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: COPD, traditional Chinese exercise, lung function, mental health, systematic review

Citation: Liu S and Xu D (2025) Effects of traditional Chinese exercise on lung function and mental health in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Public Health. 13:1612741. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612741

Received: 16 April 2025; Accepted: 30 June 2025;
Published: 10 July 2025.

Edited by:

Zhao Yin, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China

Reviewed by:

Marcos Edgar Herkenhoff, Santa Catarina State University, Brazil
Fedor Malykhin, Stavropol State Medical University, Russia
Zainol Akbar Zainal, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia

Copyright © 2025 Liu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Debin Xu, eHVkZWJpbjA1MjdAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.