ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612820
This article is part of the Research TopicCommunity Series In Mental-Health-Related Stigma and Discrimination: Prevention, Role, and Management Strategies, Volume IIIView all 21 articles
Factor structure and predictors of causal beliefs about seven mental illnesses among the Singapore general population
Provisionally accepted- 1Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
- 2Silver Ribbon Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 3Leipzig University, Leipzig, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 4Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Knowledge about the causes of mental illness is a crucial component of mental health literacy. Poor understanding of the etiology of mental illness can lead to stigmatizing behaviors and hinder access to appropriate help. The current cross-sectional study examined the general population's causal beliefs about seven mental illnesses and explored the factor structure of the revised causal beliefs scale.Methods: 4195 respondents were randomly assigned a vignette and were asked questions on their recognition of the mental illness depicted, causal beliefs, and prior experience related to the mental illness (similar problems, had a mental health-related job or family and friends with similar problems). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the causal beliefs scale. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine its predictors.Factor analyses revealed a four-factor structure of causal beliefs: physical, psychosocial, personality, and biogenetic. Causal beliefs differed across the vignettes: Compared to schizophrenia, biogenetic beliefs were less likely to be endorsed for all mental illnesses except dementia, while personality beliefs were more likely to be endorsed for depression with suicidality. Compared to respondents who did not recognize the mental illness, those with correct recognition were more likely to endorse biogenetic and psychosocial beliefs, and less likely to endorse physical and personality beliefs.Discussion: Factor structure of the original causal beliefs scale is validated in the Singapore population. Individuals who correctly recognized the mental illness appeared to comprehend its etiology well. However, some misconceptions about the etiology of mental illness persist, particularly with regards to relating obsessive-compulsive disorder to physical factors (e.g., virus) and depression with suicidality to personality flaws. As future awareness campaigns continue to address the gaps in literacy levels, careful promotion of certain causal beliefs is crucial to avoid conveying unintended messages.
Keywords: causal beliefs, factor structure, general population, Mental health literacy, mental illness
Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 09 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tan, Tay, Shahwan, Gunasekaran, Lim, Tan, Ong, Shafie, Abdin, Poh, Schomerus, Chong and Subramaniam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yoke Boon Tan, Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.