ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1616129
Why did people refuse vaccination during the pandemic? Exploring the impacts of trust and vaccine risk perception on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China
Provisionally accepted- 1City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
- 2Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Background: Vaccination was a critical step in combating the COVID-19 outbreak, but vaccine hesitancy was a prominent global concern in the pandemic. In China, the behavior of vaccination might be affected by the past vaccine-related scandals. Objective: This study investigated the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy in China, with a focus on trust, vaccine risk perception, and self-efficacy. It aims to explore the predictors and mechanisms that influence vaccine hesitancy in China during the pandemic. Method: The study utilized a national survey fielded in 2021, with a representative sample of 3,000 Chinese adults. Quota sampling was employed to ensure regional and demographic representation of the sample. Key variables were measured adopting established scales from previous studies. A mediated moderation model was proposed. Mediated moderation regressions were performed for model estimation. Results: Our analyses show that institutional trust was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy (b = −.41, p < .001, 95% CI [-.47, -.35]), while scientific trust and media trust was positively associated with vaccine hesitancy (b = .36, p < .001, 95% CI [.32, .40]; b = .21, p < .001, 95% CI [.15, .27]). Vaccine risk perception was also positively associated with vaccine hesitancy (b = .72, p < .001, 95% CI [.68, .76]), with self-efficacy moderating the relationship. The relationship was more profound among those who had higher self efficacy (b The study utilized a cross-sectional survey design, drawing on a representative sample of 3000 adults in China. Institutional, media and scientific trust were measured. A mediated moderation model was proposed. Trusts were hypothesized to affect vaccine hesitancy through vaccine risk perception. Moderation effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between vaccine risk perception and vaccine hesitancy was also proposed. 删除[Huang Dan]: = .29, p < .001, 95% CI [0.21, 0.37). Additionally, the mediating effects of vaccine risk perception were found. Conclusion: The findings revealed that trust in institutions significantly reduced vaccine hesitancy by lowering perceived risks. In contrast, media and scientific trust heightened vaccine risk perception and hesitancy. Additionally, the study demonstrated the role of self-efficacy in moderating these effects.
Keywords: Vaccine hesitancy, Trust, Risk Perception, self-efficacy, COVID-19, China
Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 11 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Wu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yi Wu, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
Hui Li, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.