ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1616402
Informing future Seasonal Influenza and Covid-19 Vaccination Campaigns based on past experience: A mixed-method approach with eligible populations and healthcare professionals
Provisionally accepted- 1Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Lusophone University, Lisbon, Portugal
- 2Research Center for Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- 3Directorate-General of Health (DGS), Lisboa, Portugal
- 4Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- 5Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 6Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade do Uso da Terra e dos Serviços dos Ecossistemas – TERRA, Lisbon, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Seasonal vaccination campaigns against influenza and COVID-19 are critical for protecting vulnerable populations. Scientific evidence on past campaigns is essential for the effectiveness of future campaigns. This study aims to: 1) assess predictors of influenza and COVID-19 vaccination intentions 2) explore perceived barriers and facilitators of 2023-2024 seasonal vaccination campaign. Methods: A cross-sectional study employing both quantitative and qualitative methods was conducted. The quantitative study involved a sample of 231 respondents from Portugal, including healthcare professionals and vaccination eligible population: individuals over 60 years of age, and individuals with chronic diseases. Quantitative data were collected via an online survey to assess vaccination literacy, attitudes, and future vaccination intention. The qualitative study consisted of four focus groups with a total of 17 participants: vaccinated/unvaccinated individuals and healthcare professionals. Thematic analysis was used to explore perceptions of eligible populations about this vaccination campaign. Results: Quantitative analysis revealed that attitudes towards vaccination and factors related to personal/family health predicted future vaccination intentions for influenza and COVID-19. Thematic analysis identified key facilitators, such as positive perceptions of pharmacies as vaccination sites and an early start of the campaign specifically for vaccinated groups. Barriers were related to campaign communication, fear of side effects, vaccination fatigue, and the co-occurence of high temperatures during the campaign start. Unvaccinated individuals expressed lower perceived susceptibility and severity. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of clear communication, addressing vaccination fatigue, and considering environmental factors. Improving proximity between health professionals as trusted information sources and the population, alongside customized communication, may also enhance vaccination uptake among the eligible population. The potential influence of weather conditions on the acceptance of vaccination campaigns is a topic that deserves further consideration in the future, within the scope of climate changes.
Keywords: influenza, COVID-19, Vaccination intention, Seasonal Vaccination Campaigns, social communication
Received: 22 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Oliveira, Gonzalez, T., Paulino, Gaspar, António, Costa, Pinto, Costa and Telo De Arriaga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bárbara Gonzalez, Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Lusophone University, Lisbon, Portugal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.