ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1618570
This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Health Literacy as a Pathway to Better Mental Well-beingView all 5 articles
Differential Impacts of Digital Interactive Media and Print Media on Mental Health: Mediating Mechanism of Health Literacy and Group Heterogeneity
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Brain Disease Prevention and Treatment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aims to investigate the differential pathways through which print media and digital interactive media influence depressive symptoms (measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ) and anxiety symptoms (measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, GAD), with a focus on the mediating role of health literacy and its heterogeneity across age groups.Methods: Using data from the 2021 China Mental and Behavioral Survey, a total of 9,966 adults aged 19 and older were selected as the study sample. Key variables included: independent variables-frequency of print media and digital interactive media use; mediating variables-three dimensions of health literacy (healthcare, disease prevention, and health promotion); and dependent variables-scores on depression and anxiety symptoms. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation analysis, ANOVA, and bootstrap-based mediation tests (resampled 1,000 times) were conducted to systematically examine how different media types affect mental health through specific mechanisms. Results: Digital interactive media use was significantly positively correlated with all dimensions of health literacy (r = 0.242-0.297, p < 0.01). It directly reduced levels of depression and anxiety (PHQ-9 effect size = -0.138; GAD-7 effect size = -0.145) and partially mediated this effect through the "disease prevention" dimension of health literacy (β = -0.021, 95% CI [-0.105, -0.025]). In contrast, print media use was positively associated with depression and anxiety scores (r = 0.025-0.039, p < 0.05), and all three dimensions of health literacy-"healthcare," "disease prevention," and "health promotion"-exerted a suppressing effect on this relationship (β = 0.003-0.004). Moreover, these mechanisms varied significantly across age groups: among individuals aged 19-40 and 41-60, the "disease prevention" dimension served as the primary mediator; whereas in the 61+ age group, the "health promotion" dimension emerged as the dominant pathway.Conclusion: Print and digital interactive media influence mental health through different mechanisms, which vary significantly across age groups. Based on these findings, a stratified intervention strategy-"digital prevention + print promotion"-is recommended: for younger populations, leveraging digital media to enhance disease prevention awareness is essential, while for older populations, an integrated media ecosystem should be developed to reduce cognitive load.
Keywords: Print Media, Digital interactive media, Health Literacy, Depression, Anxiety
Received: 20 May 2025; Accepted: 22 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 YUAN and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lin Luo, School of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.