ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619355
This article is part of the Research TopicNavigating Environmental Hazards in the Workplace: Impacts and InterventionsView all 24 articles
Trends and Risk Factors of bloodborne occupational exposure (BOE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital (2012-2022)
Provisionally accepted- 1Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- 2Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics and long-term trends of bloodborne occupational exposure (BOE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a tertiary hospital in China from 2012 to 2022 (11 years) and evaluate BOE-associated factors during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of 1,725 self-reported cases of BOE were analyzed. The study comprised: (1) Descriptive analysis of demographic and professional variables; (2) Trend analysis of exposure events by season, month, sex, age, professional role, department, exposure source and occupational factors; and (3) Logistic regression analysis, with BOEs during the COVID-19 pandemic as the dependent variable. Results BOEs were most prevalent among female, formally employed staff, nurses, 25-year-olds, those with 1–5 years of experience, and junior-title holders. High-risk settings included the neurosurgery department and wards; common exposure types were needlestick injuries (mostly to ungloved hands) and first-time exposures. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the primary exposure source, with most exposed individuals having a prior HBV vaccination history. Exposure frequency peaked in December and the fourth quarter of the year. (2) Longitudinal trends showed rising BOE incidence in December, spring, and among specific groups: females, 25-year-olds, hospital doctors (including postgraduate/doctoral trainees), nurses (including interns), and staff with 10–15 years of experience. Syphilis/suspected syphilis-related exposures also demonstrated an upward trend. (3) Logistic regression identified exposure month, occupation, length of service as independent factors associated with BOE during the COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.05). Conclusion: Targeted prevention and control strategies that focus on high-risk personnel, clinical departments, and specific procedures are essential to reduce the incidence of BOE) among healthcare workers. Particular attention is required during public health emergencies (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic), especially in addressing the January exposure peak, protecting physicians and mid-career staff with 16–20 years of service, and establishing cross-institutional mechanisms for coordinated BOE reporting and follow-up of support staff, in order to further minimize occupational risks. In addition, preventive measures such as targeted training programs, simulation-based exercises, and routine monitoring of HBV immunization status should be systematically implemented for trainees and newly recruited personnel.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, Healthcare workers, Long-term trends, occupationalcomposition, bloodborne occupational exposure, professional title
Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Gao, Li, Guo, Cao, Zhao, Wang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yan Liu, liuyanly_l@126.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.