Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Digital Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619378

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Healthcare AI: Evaluating Accuracy and Future DirectionsView all 8 articles

Integrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Nursing: Education, Clinical Practice, Workload Management, and Professional Perceptions

Provisionally accepted
Rabie Adel  ElArabRabie Adel ElArab1Omayma  AbdulazizOmayma Abdulaziz1Mette  SagbakkenMette Sagbakken2*Ahmed  GhannamAhmed Ghannam3Fuad  AbuadasFuad Abuadas4Joel G  SomervilleJoel G Somerville5Abbas  Al MutairAbbas Al Mutair1
  • 1Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Al Ahsaa, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman, Amman, Jordan
  • 4College of Nursing, Al Jouf University, Sakaka Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
  • 5University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, Scotland, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the nursing profession, presenting significant opportunities and challenges..Aim: This integrative review systematically evaluates the integration of AI in nursing practice, with a specific focus on nursing education, clinical care, workload management, and professional perceptions.Methods: Guided by PRISMA 2020 and the SPIDER framework, a thematic synthesis was conducted. Results: This review encompassed 25 studies, from which six overarching themes emerged. Education & Training: AI-powered simulations and content-creation platforms enriched nursing curricula by presenting realistic clinical scenarios, which consistently yielded deeper student engagement, enhanced case-management performance, and higher satisfaction scores. Learners also reported an increased cognitive load and heightened stress levels when navigating these more complex, AI-driven activities. Clinical Decision Support & Monitoring: AI-enabled alert algorithms and wearable sensors enabled nurses to detect subtle signs of patient deterioration and fever significantly earlier than conventional methods, supporting timelier clinical interventions. Qualitative feedback from critical-care staff underscores that these automated insights must be balanced with professional judgment to avoid overreliance. Rehabilitation & Postoperative Care: In neurosurgical, gynecological, and orthopaedic settings, AI-guided imaging tools and personalized follow-up pathways were linked to smoother recovery trajectories, streamlined follow-up processes and richer patient feedback, and exceptionally high patient satisfaction. Nurses noted that these technologies enhanced the precision of assessments without wholly replacing the need for human touch. Workload & Workflow Management: AI systems that automated routine follow-up tasks and generated predictive workload models freed nurses from repetitive, non-clinical duties and offered data-driven insights to inform staffing decisions. Nursing Perceptions: Across practice settings, nurses broadly welcomed AI's ability to streamline workflows and support decision-making, recognizing its potential to elevate patient care and professional practice. Ethical Implications: Simultaneously, nurses voiced significant ethical concerns-chiefly around safeguarding patient data privacy, mitigating algorithmic bias, and preserving the compassionate, human-centered essence of nursing in an increasingly automated environment Framework and Recommendations: The Nursing AI Integration Roadmap (NAIIR) was developed. This framework offers a structured, ethically informed, and user-centric approach, advocating for AI as complementary to human expertise planning that addresses educational, clinical, ethical, organizational, participatory, and economic dimensions, reinforcing the core humanistic values of nursing.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, Nursing education, nursing practice, Workload Management, Clinical decision support, Patient monitoring

Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 ElArab, Abdulaziz, Sagbakken, Ghannam, Abuadas, Somerville and Al Mutair. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mette Sagbakken, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, 0130, Norway

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.