ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619730

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring Bereavement and Public Health: The Role of Family and Friend Caregivers in Community Well-BeingView all 5 articles

Grief trajectories and long-term health effects in bereaved relatives: a prospective, population-based cohort study with tenyear follow-up

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 2Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 3Section for Specialist Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 4Department of Clinical medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 5Danish Cancer Institute, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Bereavement may affect the health of relatives, causing increased use of health care services and increased mortality shortly after the patient's death. However, the long-term consequences for those with a high level of grief symptoms remain largely unexplored.We aimed to investigate associations between grief symptom trajectories and four long-term health outcomes among relatives bereaved by natural death: contacts to general practice and mental health services, use of psychotropic prescription medication, and mortality, over a period of three to ten years post-bereavement.We assessed grief symptoms using the Prolonged Grief-13 scale in a cohort of 1,735 bereaved relatives at three different time points (prior to bereavement, six months after bereavement, and three years after bereavement) and identified five main grief trajectories. The trajectory with persistent low levels of grief symptoms in relatives (n=670 (45%)) was called the low grief trajectory (LGT) and was used as reference. The high grief trajectory (HGT) consisted of 107 (6%) relatives with persistent high grief symptom levels. We investigated associations between grief trajectories and 1) contacts to general practitioner (GP) including out-of-hours using negative binomial regression analysis, 2) contacts to mental health services (GP talk therapy, private-practice psychologist or psychiatrist), 3) use of psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anxiolytics and sedatives) using logistic regression analysis, and 4) mortality using Cox regression analysis. The follow-up period started at three years after bereavement and long-term outcome were further followed until ten years after the patient's death.Relatives in the HGT had a significantly higher yearly incidence of GP contacts until seven years after bereavement compared to the LGT. The HGT was associated with higher use of mental health services (OR=2.86 (95%CI 1.58;5.19)), antidepressants (OR=5.63 (95% CI 3.52; 9.01)), sedatives and anxiolytics (OR=2.60 (95%CI 1.63;4.14)), and excess mortality (OR=1.88 (95% CI 1.1;3.2)) compared to the LGT.This study shows that patients with high and sustained grief symptoms have an increased healthcare use up to ten years after loss. Future research should assess whether current health care services sufficiently meet the prolonged needs of these relatives.

Keywords: grief, bereavement, relatives, general practice (GP), Health care use, Mortality, medication use, Primary Care

Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nielsen, Pedersen, Sparle Christensen, Neergaard, Bidstrup and Guldin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mette Kjaergaard Nielsen, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.