Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1626620

The Role of Health Literacy Within the Social Determinants of Health Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study on Smoking Behavior in Fujian, China

Provisionally accepted
  • 1School of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China
  • 2Quanzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quanzhou, China
  • 3School of Health Management, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Smoking is a leading preventable cause of death, and its prevalence varies with social determinants of health (SDoH) such as education, age, and urban/rural residence. Health literacy (HL) may influence tobacco use, but its interplay with SDoH in China is unclear. This study examined associations between HL, key SDoH, and current smoking among residents aged 15-69 in Quanzhou, Fujian, China. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2024 among 3,200 residents of Quanzhou, Fujian Province, selected via multistage random sampling. Data on smoking status, health literacy, and SDoH were collected using the nationally standardised questionnaire developed by the Chinese Center for Health Education. Associations between smoking status, HL, and SDoH were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 3,200 participants, the overall prevalence of current smoking was 25.680%, with significant gender differences (P < 0.001). Given the extremely low prevalence of current smoking among females (0.66%), the following results are based exclusively on male participants. Among males (n = 1,533), smoking prevalence was higher in rural areas (51.37%) than in urban areas (41.83%, P = 0.002), and increased with age, peaking at 58.74% among those aged 55-64 (P < 0.001). Smoking prevalence declined with higher educational attainment, from 54.27% in those with junior high school education to 18.380% in those with a bachelor's degree or higher (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that age was associated with increased odds of smoking (e.g., OR = 5.699, 95% CI: 3.091-10.508 for ages 55-64 vs. 15-24; P < 0.001), and higher education was associated with reduced odds (e.g., bachelor's degree vs. no formal education: OR = 0.180, 95% CI: 0.087-0.374; P < 0.001).Among HL dimensions, only inadequate practical health skills remained significantly associated with current smoking (OR = 1.358, 95% CI: 1.015-1.817; P = 0.039). Conclusion: HL and SDoH jointly influenced smoking in Chinese men; low practical health skills and being older, less educated, or from a rural area were linked to higher risk. Strategies that enhance practical health skills and address social disparities may help reduce smoking, supporting Healthy China 2030 and WHO tobaccocontrol goals.

Keywords: tobacco use1, Smoking behavior2, health literacy3, Social determinants of health/SDoH4, Educational inequalities5, Male6, Cross-Sectional Study7

Received: 13 May 2025; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Zheng, Lin, Chen, Zheng and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zulin Chen, School of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China
Hongmiao Chen, School of Physical Education, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.