SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1630054
It's not just droplets: A systematic review and meta-analysis of modes of transmission of group A Streptococcus
Provisionally accepted- 1Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
- 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, Perth, Australia
- 3The George institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- 4SA Cochrane Centre, South African Medical Research Council, Francie van Zijl Dr, Parow Valley 7501, South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Transmission of Group A Streptococcus (Strep A) via droplets has been the dominant transmission paradigm to date, but little is known about the relative contribution of other modes of transmission. We aimed to systematically summarise contemporary evidence of Strep A transmission. Using a comprehensive search strategy to identify Strep A transmission studies published in English between 1980 and 2019, full-text articles were identified and included against predefined criteria. Studies were included if molecular techniques were used to identify the same strain of Strep A in both clinical and environmental swabs. We used the random effects meta-analysis model to aggregate attack rate estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and incorporated the Freeman-Tukey transformation to account for between study variability. Thirty four transmission cohorts were included. The overall Strep A attack rate was 18.4% (95% CI, 13.1% to 24.2%, I 2 = 95.9%), for direct contact 20.5% (95% CI 8.3% to 35.4%) and indirect contact 19.1% (95% CI 13.2% to 25.7%). Pooled attack rates by geographical location was 30.38% (95% CI 20.89% to 40.75%) in non-urban settings and 7.36% (95% CI 2.60% to 14.21%) in urban settings. Direct contact is no longer the dominant form of Strep A transmission. Our contemporary findings have implications for the development of evidence based environmental health prevention strategies to reduce Strep A transmission.
Keywords: group A streptococcus, Systematic review, Environmental Health, Infectious diseases, Meta - analysis, transmission
Received: 16 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Barth, Daw, Enkel, Mcrae, Carapetis, Wyber, Bowen and Engel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dylan D Barth, Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.