- 1School of Physical Education, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China
- 2Department of Sport and Exercise Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- 3School of Physical Education, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, China
Background: The 24-h movement guidelines integrate physical activity (PA), screen time, and sleep for health benefits, yet little is known about how adherence to these guidelines relates to physical fitness (PF) among adolescents, particularly in the context of ethnic and residential differences. This study examines the independent and combined associations of adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines with self-reported PF among Han and Zhuang adolescents in southern China, while exploring potential differences by residence and ethnicity.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from 6,913 adolescents were analyzed using a validated self-reported questionnaire to assess adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and PF components (cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, speed/agility, muscular strength, and flexibility). Generalized linear models were used to examine associations.
Results: In this sample, only 1.6% of participants met the overall guidelines. Meeting more guidelines was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with better self-reported PF indicators. The combinations containing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) guideline were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with self-reported PF indicators enhancement compared to those combinations without MVPA guideline. Meeting screen time guideline was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with more self-reported PF indicators, but not in the case of meeting sleep duration guideline. Most of the results were similar for Han and Zhuang ethnicity, whereas residence differences exerted a significant impact on the relationship between adherence to “Screen only,” “Sleep only,” and “Screen + sleep” guideline and self-reported PF indicators.
Conclusion: Our findings highlight the critical role of adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines, mainly MVPA, in improving self-reported PF among adolescents and underscore the need to address urban–rural disparities in promoting the 24-h movement guidelines.
1 Introduction
Physical fitness (PF) is defined as the capacity to perform physical activity (PA) and encompasses qualities such as cardiorespiratory fitness (also called aerobic capacity), muscular fitness, speed/agility, and flexibility (1). PF is widely acknowledged as a vital marker of physical and mental well-being in children and adolescents (2, 3). Extensive evidence has demonstrated positive associations between PF and various health indicators, such as cardiovascular and metabolic health (4, 5), motor competence (6), bone health (7), mental well-being (8), and a lower risk of non-communicable diseases (9, 10). Additionally, PF is linked to cognitive function and academic performance in children (11, 12). Unfortunately, declines in cardiorespiratory fitness and strength have been observed in recent decades (13–15), likely driven in part by rising sedentary behavior, insufficient PA, and environmental constraints on active living (16–20). This trend underscores the urgency of promoting PF as a public health priority.
In recent years, growing evidence has shown independent associations between sufficient PA (16, 17), limited screen time (18, 19), and appropriate sleep duration (19, 20) with higher levels PF in children and adolescents. However, previous research has also reported contrary findings (21, 22). These results highlight the need for holistic approaches to enhance PF. In 2016, Canada released the world’s first 24-h movement guidelines for children and adolescents, recommending ≥ 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) daily, ≤ 2 h of screen time, and age-appropriate sleep duration (9–11 h for children aged 5–13 and 8–10 h for adolescents aged 14–17) (23). This paradigm shift emphasizes integrated movement behaviors for health (24) and has been widely adopted by scholars in numerous countries (24–26), including China (27).
To our knowledge, only five empirical studies have explored the association between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and PF in children and adolescents. The studies conducted by Carson et al. (28) in Canada, Chen et al. (29) and Cai et al. (30) in China, as well as Tapia-Serrano et al. (31) in Spain, all found that meeting the three guidelines was associated with better PF or some components of PF. Conversely, the study conducted by Tanaka et al. in Japan reported that meeting all three guidelines was unrelated to PF (i.e., muscular fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, and flexibility) (32). In addition, these studies also revealed significant disparities in the prevalence of meeting the guidelines (0.9% or 12.4% in China, 5.7% in Spain, 9.1% in Japan, and 17% in Canada) (28–32), as well as variability in the relationship between specific guideline combinations and PF indicators (28, 29, 32). These discrepancies may stem from study design heterogeneity, as well as geographical and demographic factors such as country, residence, and ethnicity. Geographical disparities imply varying influences of institutional norms, socioeconomic and cultural contexts, built environments, lifestyles, and community dynamics on human behavioral patterns and health outcomes (33, 34). Ethnic factors also play a critical role in health research, as various health outcomes are shaped by genetic inheritance and ethnicity-specific characteristics (e.g., dietary habits, living environment, traditions and lifestyles) (35–37). Given these influences, one study has called for further investigation into how geographical context and ethnicity may moderate the association between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and health indicators (26). However, no study has examined geographical or ethnic differences in the association between the 24-h movement guidelines and PF among adolescents, highlighting the need for further research in diverse regions and ethnic groups.
China is a multi-ethnic country in which the Han majority comprises 91% of the population. The Zhuang, the largest ethnic minority, number around 20 million (38) and is concentrated in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Guangxi) of southern China. Guangxi is a subtropical, high-precipitation border province noted for its karst landscapes, cultural diversity, and comparatively low economic development (39). Adherence to health-related lifestyle behaviors—including smoking abstinence, limited alcohol consumption, PA, and a balanced diet—remains low across Guangxi, with notable urban–rural disparities (40). Compared with Han adolescents, Zhuang adolescents exhibit distinct dietary patterns (e.g., frequent consumption of wild edible plants and corn-based staples) (35, 41, 42) and actively participate in ethnic-specific cultural activities, including traditional festivals, folk singing, and group dancing (43). These characteristics suggest that Han and Zhuang adolescents may display distinct 24-h movement behaviors and PF. However, the association between adherence to 24-h movement guidelines with PF and its components among Chinese Han and Zhuang adolescents in southern China remains to be well established, and it remains unknown whether the relationship differs by ethnicity or residence. Addressing this gap, this study aims to examine the associations between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported PF among Han and Zhuang adolescents in southern China, while exploring potential differences by residence and ethnicity. The findings are intended to inform targeted interventions to improve PF in diverse adolescent sub-populations.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Participants and procedure
This study, supported by the local education commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, was conducted between July and August 2024 in 12 public primary schools across two cities with a high concentration of the Zhuang ethnic group. Previous research indicated that children aged 10 years or older possess adequate reading comprehension skills to complete self-report questionnaires (44). In China, fourth-grade students are typically around 10 years old. Therefore, students in the fourth grade and above were included as qualified participants.
The aim of the study was presented to the participants and their guardians in a written format. This survey is intended to collect data about demographic information, self-reported PA, screen time, sleep duration and PF. Participants voluntarily completed the questionnaire using electronic devices (e.g., computers or mobile phones). Students without personal access to electronic devices were encouraged to use their parents’ equipment. If electronic devices were unavailable, students completed a paper-based questionnaire, and school staff manually converted into an electronic format. Only participants who provided consent were able to proceed to the formal data collection pages. All data were collected and analyzed anonymously. The study received ethical approval from Wuhan Sports University (No. 2025019).
A total of 10,170 participants completed the questionnaire. We excluded those who (i) completed the questionnaire in < 300 s, (ii) were neither Han nor Zhuang, or (iii) had implausible values for age, physical activity, screen time, or sleep. After considering the availability of the necessary variables, the final sample for analysis comprised 6,913 students, as shown in Figure 1.
2.2 Measures
2.2.1 Demographics
Demographic information was gathered as the initial section of the questionnaire, encompassing age, sex, grade, number of siblings, household-registered residence (Rural: residents registered in a village, suburban: residents registered in a township or in the peri-urban districts of a city, and urban: residents registered within the city proper of a county-level city or above), and household-registered ethnicity. These variables have been accounted for in statistical analyses to mitigate confounding bias (29, 31, 44–47). Thus, during subsequent statistical analysis, these variables (excluding those being examined for interaction effects) were regarded as covariates.
2.2.2 24-h movement behaviors
PA was measured using a reliable and valid item sourced from the Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) survey (48). The item was formulated as follows: “How many days did you engage in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for at least 60 min in the past week? (0 = none, 1 = 1 day, 2 = 2 days, 3 = 3 days, 4 = 4 days, 5 = 5 days, 6 = 6 days, 7 = 7 days).” MVPA was defined as activities that induced at least moderate breathlessness and sweating during daily life, physical education classes, and other exercise sessions (49).
Screen time was assessed using the relevant items in the HBSC survey (48). The time spent on three distinct screen-based behaviors (i.e., TV/movies, video games, and other screen-based activities) over the past 7 days were measured. The average daily screen time was computed by considering school days and weekend days. For example, the formula for calculating the average daily TV/movie time was [(daily TV/movies time on school days × 5) + (daily TV/movies time on weekend days × 2)]/7.
Sleep duration was measured using the entry on sleep duration from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): “How many hours did you actually sleep at night in the past month?” The Chinese version of the PSQI has been validated among Chinese adolescents (50).
Furthermore, all the above-mentioned items have been widely applied in research involving Chinese children and adolescents, including Zhuang and other ethnic minorities (27, 29, 46, 51)—confirming their suitability for the target population of the present study. According to the Canadian 24-h Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth, reporting ≥60 min of MVPA daily was considered to meet the PA guideline; ≤2 h per day of screen time was considered to meet the screen time guideline; 9–11 h of sleep duration for children aged 5–13, and 8–10 h of sleep duration for adolescents aged 14–17, respectively, were considered to meet the sleep guideline (23).
2.2.3 Physical fitness
PF was evaluated using the Chinese-version of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS-C). This scale has been proven to be a reliable tool for assessing PF (Cronbach’s α = 0.72) (52, 53) and widely applied in Chinese children and adolescents (29, 51). For the sample of the present study, the test–retest reliability remained satisfactory (Cronbach’s α = 0.832). The scale consists of five components: general physical fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, speed and agility, muscular strength, and flexibility. Responses for each component are measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with options ranging from “very poor” to “very good.”
2.3 Analytical methods and tools
All statistical analyses were carried out with the SPSS software (version 26, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistical methods were employed to present the basic characteristics of the participants. For continuous variables (e.g., age), data were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables (e.g., ethnicity and residence) were presented as counts and percentages.
Two sets of pairwise regression models were constructed. In the first set, all possible pairwise comparisons were conducted across levels of the number of 24-h movement guidelines met (0, 1, 2, or 3), resulting in six independent models (e.g., 3 vs. 2, 3 vs. 1, 3 vs. 0, etc.), with p-values adjusted using the Šidák method. In the second set, we examined all possible pairwise contrasts among the eight possible combinations of guideline adherence (e.g., all vs. sleep only, MVPA only vs. None, etc.), yielding 28 additional independent models. Given the large number of comparisons, the Holm–Bonferroni method was applied to balance rigorous error control with statistical power. To explore whether the association between guideline adherence and PF differed by ethnicity or residence, interaction terms were included in the primary models. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with normal distribution and identity link function were employed to estimate the aforementioned relationships (54–56). The unstandardized regression coefficient (B) represents the adjusted mean difference in PF scores between the compared groups, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Given the observed SD of PF scores (SD = 0.81, as shown in Supplementary Table S1), a B value of ≥ 0.405 (0.5 SD) was considered a moderate, potentially meaningful change, and ≥ 0.162 (0.2 SD) a small but detectable change, based on established benchmarks for patient-reported outcomes (57, 58).
3 Results
3.1 Descriptive characteristics of the participants
The descriptive characteristics of the participants, classified by residence and ethnicity, are presented in Table 1. The sample consisted of 21.5% Han ethnicity (45.1% girls) and 78.5% Zhuang ethnicity (49.9% girls), with a mean age recorded of 11.6 years (SD = 1.0), and 63.0, 18.0, and 19.0% of participants lived in rural, suburban and urban regions, respectively. Regarding the exposure variables, 28.0% of the participants did not meet any guideline, while only 1.6% met all three guidelines. 2.4, 10.1, and 37.9% of participants met only the MVPA guideline, the screen time guideline, and the sleep guideline, respectively. A greater proportion of Han participants met all three guidelines, but a lower proportion met guideline for sleep duration. A greater proportion of rural participants met guideline for sleep duration, but a lower proportion met guideline for MVPA (see Supplementary Table S2 for details). Regarding the outcome variables, approximately 50% of the participants perceived themselves as “average.” A higher proportion of participants reported evaluations of “good” and “very good” compared to those reporting “poor” and “very poor.” Moreover, a greater proportion of urban participants reported evaluations of “very good” (as shown in Supplementary Table S2).
Table 1. The descriptive characteristics of the participants classified by residence and ethnicity, respectively (n = 6,913).
3.2 Associations between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported PF indicators
Figure 2 presents the pairwise comparison of the associations between the number of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators. Meeting more guidelines was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with better PF indicators. Additionally, a consistent dose-effect pattern was observed, with more guidelines met corresponding to higher B values.
Figure 2. The heatmap visually represents the associations between the number of 24-h movement guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators. The y-axis displays pairwise comparisons of guideline adherence levels (e.g., “3 vs. 0” compares meeting all three guidelines versus meeting none), while the x-axis lists the five PF components. Each cell shows the unstandardized regression coefficient (B value), with statistical significance indicated by asterisks (“***” denotes p < 0.001). The map is color-coded according to the magnitude of the B value, with darker shades representing higher absolute values, indicating stronger associations.
Figure 3 presents the pairwise comparison of the associations between the specific combinations of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators. Compared to meeting none of the guidelines, any combination of guidelines met was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with improved PF indicators except for muscular strength in terms of “Screen only vs. None.” In the pairwise comparison of “Sleep only vs. Screen only,” “MVPA + screen vs. MVPA only,” “MVPA + sleep vs. MVPA + screen,” “MVPA + sleep vs. MVPA only,” “Screen + sleep vs. Screen only,” “All vs. MVPA + sleep,” and “All vs. MVPA + screen,” no significant (p > 0.05) enhancement was found with any PF indicators. In addition, the combinations containing MVPA guideline were significantly (B > 0.22, p < 0.05) associated with the majority of PF indicators enhancement compared to those combinations without MVPA guideline. Finally, by comparing the pairwise combinations of “Sleep only VS Screen only,” “MVPA + screen vs. MVPA only,” “MVPA + sleep vs. MVPA only,” “MVPA + sleep vs. MVPA + screen,” “Screen + sleep vs. Screen only,” “Screen + sleep vs. Sleep only,” “All vs. MVPA + screen,” “All vs. MVPA + sleep,” and “All vs. MVPA + screen,” it is found that meeting the screen guideline was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with more PF indicators.
Figure 3. The heatmap visually represents the associations between specific combinations of 24-h movement guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators. The y-axis displays pairwise comparisons based on the number of guidelines adhered to (e.g., “All vs. None” compares meeting all three guidelines versus meeting none). The x-axis lists the five PF components. Each cell shows the unstandardized regression coefficient (B value) for the corresponding association, with statistical significance denoted by asterisks. “***” indicates p < 0.001, “**” indicates p < 0.01, and “*” indicates p < 0.05. Cells with non-significant B values (p ≥ 0.05) are outlined with a red dashed border. Color intensity is scaled from blue to red according to the B values. Dark blue represents the most negative (unfavorable) association, while dark red represents the most positive (favorable) association.
3.3 Associations between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported PF indicators by ethnicity and residence
Table 2 presents the associations between the number of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators, compared to meeting none of the guidelines, stratified by ethnicity and residence. The data show that meeting any number of guidelines was significantly associated with enhanced PF indicators in both Han and Zhuang adolescents (p < 0.01). Additionally, meeting any number of guidelines was significantly associated with enhanced PF indicators in rural adolescents (p < 0.001). Meeting all three guidelines was significantly associated with enhanced PF indicators in adolescents from any residence (B > 0.44, p < 0.05). Meeting only one guideline was not significantly associated with enhanced PF indicators in both suburban and urban adolescents (p > 0.05). Meeting two guidelines was not significantly associated with enhanced flexibility in urban adolescents (p > 0.05).
Table 2. Associations between the number of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators by ethnicity and residence.
Table 3 presents the associations between specific combinations of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators, compared to meeting none of the guidelines, stratified by ethnicity and residence. The data show that among Han adolescents, meeting the screen time guideline alone or in combination with MVPA or sleep guidelines showed no significant association with the majority of PF indicators (p > 0.05 for most comparisons). Meeting the MVPA guideline alone was not significantly associated with general PF or flexibility (p > 0.05). Among Zhuang adolescents, no significant (p > 0.05) correlation exists between meeting the screen time or “MVPA + screen” guidelines and the muscular strength. In all Han and Zhuang participants, all other combinations are significantly (p < 0.001) correlated with all better PF indicators. In addition, any specific combinations of guidelines met was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with enhanced PF indicators in rural adolescents, except for muscular strength, which showed no significant association with adherence to the screen time only or “MVPA + screen” guidelines. In urban adolescents, meeting “Screen only,” “Sleep only,” and “Screen + sleep” combinations of guidelines were not significantly (p > 0.05) associated with all PF indicators.
Table 3. Associations between the specific combinations of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators by residence and ethnicity.
4 Discussion
This study aimed to investigate the associations between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported PF among Han and Zhuang ethnic adolescents in southern China, as well as to explore potential differences by residence and ethnicity. The findings of the current study are as follows: (i) A very small proportion of adolescents met the three 24-h movement guidelines of MVPA, screen time, and sleep duration. (ii) Greater adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines was significantly associated with higher levels of self-reported PF indicators, demonstrating a dose–response relationship (i.e., 3 > 2 > 1 > 0). (iii) Adherence to the MVPA, screen time, and sleep duration guidelines independently was significantly associated with better self-reported PF indicators. However, the effects of adherence to the screen time and sleep duration guidelines appeared to be obscured in the pairwise comparisons of the associations between the specific combinations of guidelines met and self-reported PF indicators. Furthermore, this association may primarily depend on meeting the MVPA guideline, followed by screen time and sleep duration. (iv) Ethnic differences had a minimal influence on the relationship between guidelines adherence and self-reported PF indicators, whereas residence differences significantly impacted the associations between adherence to the “Screen only,” “Sleep only,” and “Screen + Sleep” guidelines and self-reported PF indicators.
4.1 The prevalence of adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines
In this sample, only 1.6% of adolescents met the overall guidelines. This result was similar to the findings of two other studies on Chinese children and adolescents (29, 46), but significantly lower than those reported in studies from other countries (31, 32, 59, 60). A nationwide survey in China reported that 12.4% of adolescents aged 13–22 fully adhered to all guidelines, whereas adherence among those aged 13–17 was markedly lower (3.7%). This disparity may be associated with intense academic pressures in primary and secondary education settings and may also reflect younger adolescents’ limited self-regulatory capacity (30). Because the present data were collected exclusively in Guangxi, the even lower adherence observed here might additionally reflect the region’s relatively underdeveloped economy and lower health literacy (40).
In terms of meeting individual movement guidelines, 2.4, 10.1, and 37.9% of participants met the MVPA guideline, the screen time guideline, and the sleep duration guideline, respectively. Only the prevalence of meeting the sleep duration guideline was higher than the world average (17.7%), while the proportions of meeting the MVPA and screen time guidelines were both lower than the world average (7.7% for MVPA and 19.5% for screen time). More details are shown in Supplementary Table S3. These findings suggest that the low overall adherence is driven primarily by non-compliance with MVPA and screen-time recommendations.
Taken together, the results highlight a critical public health concern that warrants immediate attention and targeted interventions. Future efforts should therefore focus on enhancing guideline-adherence awareness among younger adolescents and developing programs specifically targeting MVPA and screen time behaviors.
4.2 Implications of adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines on self-reported PF indicators
The results of this study show that adhering to any number of the 24-h movement guidelines is more likely to lead to a higher level of PF, which suggests that sufficient physical activity, limited screen time, and appropriate sleep are related to the improvement of PF. However, previous studies (29, 31, 32) have indicated that meeting only one guideline, the screen time guideline, or the sleep duration guideline is not associated with PF improvement, which contrasts with the findings of our study. This discrepancy may be attributed to differences in experimental design or study population characteristics. Notably, although adherence to a single guideline was associated with higher PF, the effect size was small (B < 0.162), suggesting the association may be statistically detectable but of limited practical importance. Furthermore, this study reveals that meeting a greater number of the 24-h movement guidelines is increasingly and positively correlated with better PF indicators (i.e., 3 > 2 > 1 > 0). Meeting all three guidelines was associated with a PF gain of at least 0.44 points, exceeding the 0.405-point threshold for a moderate and meaningful improvement. These findings underscore the importance of adhering to all three 24-h movement guidelines (20) and provide empirical support for their holistic application in public health strategies.
In addition, all the combinations containing the MVPA guideline were significantly associated with PF indicators enhancement compared to those without the MVPA guideline (B > 0.22). This directly illustrates the leading role of meeting MVPA guideline in improving PF, which is consistent with the findings of Chen et al. (29), Cai et al. (30) and Tapia-Serrano et al. (31). Previous systematic reviews reported that there was strong, consistent evidence that MVPA was favorably associated with PF (20, 61). Specifically, MVPA enhances cardiorespiratory fitness via cardiorespiratory adaptation (62, 63), boosts muscular fitness (64, 65), and optimizes body composition (66, 67). These synergistic mechanisms collectively drive the significant association between MVPA and PF (20, 61). Moreover, increasing MVPA is likely to displace sedentary behaviors (including screen time) and improve sleep, thereby generating a synergistic effect that further enhances PF (30, 47, 68).
Interestingly, adherence to either the screen time or sleep duration guideline alone was significantly associated with improved PF. However, these associations tended to become non-significant or attenuated in pairwise comparisons of specific guideline combinations—a phenomenon that may reflect statistical interactions or mutual adjustment when other behaviors (e.g., MVPA) are concurrently considered. Notably, the associations with screen time adherence appeared more consistent across PF indicators than those with sleep duration adherence. Yet, the effect sizes for both guidelines were small (B < 0.18), suggesting limited practical relevance. Currently, controversies surround the relationships between screen time, sleep duration, and PF, respectively (22, 29, 30, 32). Some studies have reported a negative correlation between screen time and PF (45, 69, 70), whereas others have found a positive correlation between sleep duration and specific PF indicators (e.g., cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness, and flexibility) (71). In detail, screen time (a major sedentary behavior) reduces the duration of MVPA, which may in turn impair PF (66). In contrast, sleep enhances PF by promoting nutrient absorption, regulating hormonal balance, modulating neural activity, and facilitating fatigue recovery—benefits that are especially prominent in children (20, 28).
Collectively, the data from the present study suggest that the effects of adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines on PF primarily depend on MVPA, followed by screen time and sleep duration. However, this is the first study of its kind to conduct pairwise comparisons among different combinations of meeting the 24-h movement guidelines. It is expected that more studies will be carried out in the future to clarify the relationship between meeting the 24-h movement guidelines and PF.
4.3 Ethnic and residential differences in the association between adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported PF indicators
Minimal differences in the association between the 24-h movement guidelines and PF were observed across ethnic groups. This may be because all participants lived in the same geographic region. Despite differing ethnic backgrounds, shared environmental factors likely led to similar lifestyle patterns.
However, adherence to the screen time, “MVPA + screen” or “Screen + sleep” guidelines was not associated with improvements in most PF indicators among Han adolescents, a pattern not seen in Zhuang adolescents. Several explanations may account for this disparity. First, this may indicate differences in screen behavior patterns between the two groups. Among parents of Han adolescents in China, expectations for their children’s academic achievement are relatively higher (72, 73), and this parental expectation may contribute to increased screen-based learning behaviors and longer weekend screen time among Han adolescents (20, 74). Such differences could weaken the beneficial effects of adhering to screen guidelines on PF, primarily by elevating adolescents’ academic pressure and reducing their engagement in PA (20, 75). Second, given the relatively small effect size (B < 0.19) of screen behaviors on PF, this association is highly susceptible to interference from other confounding factors. For instance, although both groups reside in the same broader region, Zhuang adolescents were more likely to live in rural areas and experience lower socioeconomic conditions (42). In these settings, lower parental education and limited household resources may restrict digital access and structured academic activities (72, 73), while traditional customs, such as participation in festivals, folk singing, and communal dancing, are more likely to be preserved (43). These communities also tend to maintain a distinct dietary culture (41, 42). In contrast, Han adolescents may face higher academic demands and calorie intake due to urban residence and higher socioeconomic status (76, 77), which could indirectly suppress PF despite guideline adherence. While these socioeconomic gradients were not measured in our study, they may underlie the observed differences in the association between movement behaviors and PF, suggesting that the findings reflect not just cultural variation, but also social context.
In summary, although unmeasured socioeconomic factors may contribute to contextual differences, our findings indicate that adherence to screen time, “MVPA + screen” or “Screen + sleep” guidelines does not confer the same PF benefits among Han adolescents as observed in their Zhuang peers. This disparity likely reflects differences in behavioral context, such as socioeconomic status, parental education, family structure, academic pressure, and cultural practices, and highlights the need for integrated, context-sensitive approaches that move beyond isolated movement behavior recommendations.
Another finding of this study is that significant differences exist in the relationship between meeting the 24-h movement guidelines and multiple PF indicators across residence groups. Among rural adolescents, adherence to any combination of guidelines was significantly associated with higher PF level. In contrast, among urban adolescents, no significant association was observed between adherence to screen time guideline, sleep guideline, or their combination and improvements in the majority of PF indicators. First, a large body of research has demonstrated the existence of urban–rural disparities in adolescents’ screen behaviors and sleep quality (71, 74). Urban adolescents often face higher academic expectations, which may contribute to increased screen-based learning activities, sedentary behaviors, and poorer sleep quality (71, 78, 79). Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the beneficial effects of adhering to screen time and sleep guidelines on PF may be weakened among urban adolescents—a phenomenon potentially driven by their elevated academic stress and reduced levels of PA (66, 71). Furthermore, urban adolescents in China generally have higher socioeconomic status than their rural peers, which contributes to more diverse lifestyles and potentially greater exposure to PF-related risk factors (34). For instance, urban adolescents tend to have a higher intake of calorie-dense foods (76), engage in less active commuting (e.g., walking or cycling) (34), and experience greater academic pressure (33, 51). Collectively, the influence of these factors may weaken the association between adherence to screen time and sleep guidelines and PF among urban adolescents.
However, due to the lack of data on these potential confounders, we are unable to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Therefore, future research is needed to examine how screen behavior patterns and sleep quality relate to PF in this population. It should also explore how these associations vary by socioeconomic status, with the aim of informing equitable, evidence-based interventions aligned with the 24-h movement guidelines. Furthermore, although the associations of adherence to screen time, sleep duration, and their combination with PF differed significantly between urban and rural areas, the effect size differences were relatively small (B < 0.19), suggesting limited practical significance.
4.4 Limitations and strengths
This study has some inherent limitations. First, the cross-sectional research design cannot infer causal relationships between variables. Longitudinal tracking or experimental studies are required to determine the directionality of the association between meeting the 24-h movement guidelines and PF. Second, self-reported data may be affected by subjects’ recall bias and social desirability. Objectively measured devices can avoid such biases. Third, the use of convenience sampling may limit the representativeness of the sample, as it may not fully reflect the characteristics of Han and Zhuang adolescents. Future studies should employ more rigorous sampling methods (e.g., stratified random sampling) and larger sample sizes to enhance the generalizability of the findings. Finally, some important confounding factors (such as dietary habits, socioeconomic status, parental education, peer support, family structure and built environment) were not included in the investigation, which may limit the interpretation of the research results. Nevertheless, this study also has several strengths that need to be emphasized. First, it is the first large-sample exploration to focus on Han and Zhuang adolescents, expanding the scope of the population for understanding adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines. Second, it is the first pairwise comparison of the number and combination of adhering to the 24-h movement guideline. The relationships between different numbers and combinations regarding the 24-h movement guidelines and PF are more intuitive and reliable. Third, it is the first exploration of the impact of ethnicity and place of residence on the relationship between adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines and PF, providing more valuable clues for the promotion and optimization of the 24-h movement guidelines.
5 Conclusion
Meeting more of the recommendations in the 24-h movement guidelines is incrementally and positively correlated with better self-reported PF indicators in adolescents of Chinese Han and Zhuang ethnicities. This positive association is primarily determined by MVPA, followed by screen time and sleep duration. In addition, the associations between adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported PF are similar between the Han and Zhuang ethnic groups, but there are differences between urban, suburban, and rural regions. Given that only 1.6% of the sample meets all three guidelines, it is urgently necessary to actively promote the implementation of these guidelines.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Wuhan Sports University (No. 2025019). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
HQ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JinT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JiaT: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the 2023 provincial teaching reform research project of undergraduate universities in Hubei Province (Grant No. 2023430).
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the valuable contribution of all the study participants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1631277/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Caspersen, CJ, Powell, KE, and Christenson, GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. (1985) 100:126–31.
2. Ortega, FB, Ruiz, JR, Castillo, MJ, and Sjöström, M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. (2008) 32:1–11. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774
3. Ruiz, JR, Castro-Piñero, J, Artero, EG, Ortega, FB, Sjöström, M, Suni, J, et al. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. (2009) 43:909–23. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.056499
4. Eisenmann, JC, Wickel, EE, Welk, GJ, and Blair, SN. Relationship between adolescent fitness and fatness and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adulthood: the aerobics Center longitudinal study (ACLS). Am Heart J. (2005) 149:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.016
5. Garcia-Hermoso, A, Ramirez-Velez, R, Garcia-Alonso, Y, Alonso-Martinez, AM, and Izquierdo, M. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness levels during Youth with health risk later in life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. (2020) 174:952–60. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2400
6. Cattuzzo, MT, Henrique, RS, Nicolai, RAH, de Oliveira, IS, Melo, BM, Moura, MS, et al. Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. (2016) 19:123–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.004
7. Smith, JJ, Eather, N, Morgan, PJ, Plotnikoff, RC, Faigenbaum, AD, and Lubans, DR. The health benefits of muscular fitness for children and adolescents: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. (2014) 44:1209–23. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0196-4
8. Cadenas-Sanchez, C, Mena-Molina, A, Torres-Lopez, LV, Migueles, JH, Rodriguez-Ayllon, M, Lubans, DR, et al. Healthier minds in fitter bodies: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of the association between physical fitness and mental health in youth. Sports Med. (2021) 51:2571–605. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01520-y
9. Hanson, MA, and Gluckman, PD. Developmental origins of health and disease - global public health implications. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. (2015) 29:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.06.007
10. García-Hermoso, A, Ramírez-Campillo, R, and Izquierdo, M. Is muscular fitness associated with future health benefits in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sports Med. (2019) 49:1079–94. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01098-6
11. Donnelly, JE, Hillman, CH, Castelli, D, Etnier, JL, Lee, S, Tomporowski, P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2016) 48:1197–222. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000901
12. Etnier, JL, Salazar, W, Landers, DM, Petruzzello, SJ, Han, M, and Nowell, P. The influence of physical fitness and exercise upon cognitive functioning: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol. (1997) 19:249–77. doi: 10.1123/jsep.19.3.249
13. Fühner, T, Kliegl, R, Arntz, F, Kriemler, S, and Granacher, U. An update on secular trends in physical fitness of children and adolescents from 1972 to 2015: a systematic review. Sports Med. (2021) 51:303–20. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01373-x
14. Tomkinson, GR, Lang, JJ, and Tremblay, MS. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents representing 19 high-income and upper middle-income countries between 1981 and 2014. Br J Sports Med. (2019) 53:478–86. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097982
15. Li, C, Zhang, J, Maisiwute, M, Zhou, Z, and Zang, L. Temporal trends and distributional changes in cardiorespiratory fitness among Chinese children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2024) 34:e14669. doi: 10.1111/sms.14669
16. Morrow, JR Jr, Tucker, JS, Jackson, AW, Martin, SB, Greenleaf, CA, and Petrie, TA. Meeting physical activity guidelines and health-related fitness in youth. Am J Prev Med. (2013) 44:439–44. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.008
17. Neil-Sztramko, SE, Caldwell, H, and Dobbins, M. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2021) 9:CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3
18. Aires, L, Pratt, M, Lobelo, F, Santos, RM, Santos, MP, and Mota, J. Associations of cardiorespiratory fitness in children and adolescents with physical activity, active commuting to school, and screen time. J Phys Act Health. (2011) 8:S198–205. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s198
19. Tambalis, KD, Panagiotakos, DB, Psarra, G, and Sidossis, LS. Insufficient sleep duration is associated with dietary habits, screen time, and obesity in children. J Clin Sleep Med. (2018) 14:1689–96. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7374
20. Wilhite, K, Booker, B, Huang, BH, Antczak, D, Corbett, L, Parker, P, et al. Combinations of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep duration and their associations with physical, psychological, and educational outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Am J Epidemiol. (2023) 192:665–79. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac212
21. Thivel, D, Isacco, L, Aucouturier, J, Pereira, B, Lazaar, N, Ratel, S, et al. Bedtime and sleep timing but not sleep duration are associated with eating habits in primary school children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. (2015) 36:158–65. doi: 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000131
22. Aguilar, MM, Vergara, FA, Velásquez, EJA, Marina, R, and García-Hermoso, A. Screen time impairs the relationship between physical fitness and academic attainment in children. J Pediatr. (2015) 91:339–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2014.10.004
23. Tremblay, MS, Carson, V, and Chaput, JP. Introduction to the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2016) 41:S331–27. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0203
24. Tremblay, MS. Introducing 24-hour movement guidelines for the early years: a new paradigm gaining momentum. J Phys Act Health. (2020) 17:92–5. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0401
25. Zhao, H, Wu, N, Haapala, EA, and Gao, Y. Association between meeting 24-H movement guidelines and health in children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1351972. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351972
26. Rollo, S, Antsygina, O, and Tremblay, MS. The whole day matters: understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan. J Sport Health Sci. (2020) 9:493–510. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004
27. Yang, Y, Yuan, S, Liu, Q, Li, F, Dong, Y, Dong, B, et al. Meeting 24-hour movement and dietary guidelines: prevalence, correlates and association with weight status among children and adolescents: a National Cross-Sectional Study in China. Nutrients. (2022) 14:2822. doi: 10.3390/nu14142822
28. Carson, V, Chaput, JP, Janssen, I, and Tremblay, MS. Health associations with meeting new 24-hour movement guidelines for Canadian children and youth. Prev Med. (2017) 95:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.005
29. Chen, Z, Chi, G, Wang, L, Chen, S, Yan, J, and Li, S. The combinations of physical activity, screen time, and sleep, and their associations with self-reported physical fitness in children and adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:5783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105783
30. Cai, S, Zhong, P, Dang, J, Liu, Y, Shi, D, Chen, Z, et al. Associations between combinations of 24-H movement Behaviors and physical fitness among Chinese adolescents: sex and age disparities. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2023) 33:1779–91. doi: 10.1111/sms.14427
31. Tapia-Serrano, M, López-Gil, JF, Sevil-Serrano, J, García-Hermoso, A, and Sánchez-Miguel, PA. What is the role of adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines in relation to physical fitness components among adolescents? Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2023) 33:1373–83. doi: 10.1111/sms.14357
32. Tanaka, C, Tremblay, MS, Okuda, M, and Tanaka, S. Association between 24-hour movement guidelines and physical fitness in children. Pediatr Int. (2020) 62:1381–7. doi: 10.1111/ped.14322
33. Zhu, Z, Tang, Y, Zhuang, J, Liu, Y, Wu, X, Cai, Y, et al. Physical activity, screen viewing time, and overweight/obesity among Chinese children and adolescents: an update from the 2017 physical activity and fitness in China-the youth study. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:197. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6515-9
34. Zhu, Z, Yang, Y, Kong, Z, Zhang, Y, and Zhuang, J. Prevalence of physical fitness in Chinese school-aged children: findings from the 2016 physical activity and fitness in China-the youth study. J Sport Health Sci. (2017) 6:395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.09.003
35. Yin, R, Chen, Y, Pan, S, He, F, Liu, T, Yang, D, et al. Comparison of lipid levels, hyperlipidemia prevalence and its risk factors between Guangxi Hei Yi Zhuang and Han populations. Arch Med Res. (2006) 37:787–93. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.12.005
36. Taylor, RW, Haszard, JJ, Farmer, VL, Richards, R, Te Morenga, L, Meredith-Jones, K, et al. Do differences in compositional time use explain ethnic variation in the prevalence of obesity in children? Analyses using 24-hour accelerometry. Int J Obes. (2020) 44:94–103. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0377-1
37. Kracht, CL, Webster, EK, and Staiano, AE. Sociodemographic differences in young children meeting 24-hour movement guidelines. J Phys Act Health. (2019) 16:908–15. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0018
38. Consus OotLGotSCftSNP. China population census yearbook 2020 (Book1): 1–4 population by gender and ethnicity in each region Beijing: China statistics Press (2022) Available online at: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/7rp/zk/indexch.htm (Accessed January 11, 2020).
39. Zhao, Y-j, and Lu, Y. Mapping determinants of rural poverty in Guangxi—a less developed region of China. J Mt Sci. (2020) 17:1749–62. doi: 10.1007/s11629-019-5760-9
40. Mai, LX, Liu, Y, Wen, H, and Zeng, ZY. The correlation between healthy lifestyle habits and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Guangxi. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:2226. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19718-w
41. Liu, S, Huang, X, Bin, Z, Yu, B, Lu, Z, Hu, R, et al. Wild edible plants and their cultural significance among the Zhuang ethnic Group in Fangchenggang, Guangxi, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. (2023) 19:52. doi: 10.1186/s13002-023-00623-2
42. Wen, Z, Long, J, Zhu, L, Liu, S, Zeng, X, Huang, D, et al. Associations of dietary, sociodemographic, and anthropometric factors with Anemia among the Zhuang ethnic adults: a cross-sectional study in Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region, China. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23:1934. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16697-2
43. Lin, Y, and Liu, H. Rice and rhyme: seeing Zhuang rice-related folklore through their folk songs. Folklore. (2021) 132:34–58. doi: 10.1080/0015587X.2020.1754663
44. Chen, S-T, Liu, Y, Tremblay, MS, Hong, J-T, Tang, Y, Cao, Z-B, et al. Meeting 24-H movement guidelines: prevalence, correlates, and the relationships with overweight and obesity among Chinese children and adolescents. J Sport Health Sci. (2021) 10:349–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.002
45. Bai, Y, Chen, S, Laurson, KR, Kim, Y, Saint-Maurice, PF, and Welk, GJ. The associations of youth physical activity and screen time with fatness and fitness: the 2012 NHANES National Youth Fitness Survey. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0148038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148038
46. Chen, S, Liang, K, López-Gil, JF, Drenowatz, C, and Tremblay, MS. Association between meeting 24-H movement guidelines and academic performance in a sample of 67,281 Chinese children and adolescents. Eur J Sport Sci. (2024) 24:487–98. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12034
47. Carson, V, Tremblay, MS, Chaput, JP, and Chastin, SF. Associations between sleep duration, sedentary time, physical activity, and health indicators among Canadian children and youth using compositional analyses. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2016) 41:S294–302. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0026
48. Liu, Y, Wang, M, Tynjälä, J, Lv, Y, Villberg, J, Zhang, Z, et al. Test-retest reliability of selected items of health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) survey questionnaire in Beijing, China. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2010) 10:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-73
49. Nupponen, H, Laakso, L, Rimpelä, A, Pere, L, and Telama, R. Questionnaire-assessed moderate to vigorous physical activity of the Finnish youth in 1979-2005. Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2010) 20:e20–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00875.x
50. Ho, KY, Lam, KKW, Xia, W, Chung, JOK, Cheung, AT, Ho, LLK, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) among Hong Kong Chinese childhood Cancer survivors. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2021) 19:176. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01803-y
51. Liu, X, Tang, J, Long, W, Zou, Y, and Tan, J. Comparison of physical activity and physical fitness in children and adolescents of Chinese Han and Tibet ethnicity. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1392803. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1392803
52. Bao, R, Chen, S, Kastelic, K, Drenowatz, C, Li, M, Zhang, J, et al. Reliability of international fitness scale (IFIS) in Chinese children and adolescents. Children (Basel). (2022) 9:531. doi: 10.3390/children9040531
53. De Moraes, ACF, Vilanova-Campelo, RC, Torres-Leal, FL, and Carvalho, HB. Is self-reported physical fitness useful for estimating fitness levels in children and adolescents? A reliability and validity study. Medicina (Kaunas). (2019) 55:286. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060286
54. Harpe, SE. How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Curr. Pharm. Teach. Learn. (2015) 7:836–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
55. Norman, G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “Laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ. (2010) 15:625–32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
56. Carifio, J, and Perla, RJ. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. J Soc Sci. (2007) 3:106–16. doi: 10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116
57. Jaeschke, R, Singer, J, and Guyatt, GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. (1989) 10:407–15. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
58. Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd) Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1988). p. 25–27.
59. Jakubec, L, Gába, A, Dygrýn, J, Rubín, L, Šimůnek, A, and Sigmund, E. Is adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines associated with a reduced risk of adiposity among children and adolescents? BMC Public Health. (2020) 20:1119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09213-3
60. Roman-Viñas, B, Chaput, JP, Katzmarzyk, PT, Fogelholm, M, Lambert, EV, Maher, C, et al. Proportion of children meeting recommendations for 24-hour movement guidelines and associations with adiposity in a 12-country study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2016) 13:123. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0449-8
61. Poitras, VJ, Gray, CE, Borghese, MM, Carson, V, Chaput, JP, Janssen, I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2016) 41:S197–239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663
62. Kriemler, S, Zahner, L, Schindler, C, Meyer, U, Hartmann, T, Hebestreit, H, et al. Effect of school based physical activity programme (kiss) on fitness and adiposity in primary schoolchildren: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed). (2010) 340:c785. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c785
63. Carson, V, Rinaldi, RL, Torrance, B, Maximova, K, Ball, GD, Majumdar, SR, et al. Vigorous physical activity and longitudinal associations with cardiometabolic risk factors in youth. Int J Obes. (2014) 38:16–21. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.135
64. Marques, A, Santos, R, Ekelund, U, and Sardinha, LB. Association between physical activity, sedentary time, and healthy fitness in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2015) 47:575–80. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000426
65. Moliner-Urdiales, D, Ortega, FB, Vicente-Rodriguez, G, Rey-Lopez, JP, Gracia-Marco, L, Widhalm, K, et al. Association of Physical Activity with muscular strength and fat-free mass in adolescents: the Helena study. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2010) 109:1119–27. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1457-z
66. Boone, JE, Gordon-Larsen, P, Adair, LS, and Popkin, BM. Screen time and physical activity during adolescence: longitudinal effects on obesity in young adulthood. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2007) 4:26. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-26
67. Butte, NF, Puyau, MR, Adolph, AL, Vohra, FA, and Zakeri, I. Physical activity in nonoverweight and overweight Hispanic children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2007) 39:1257–66. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180621fb6
68. Fairclough, SJ, Dumuid, D, Taylor, S, Curry, W, McGrane, B, Stratton, G, et al. Fitness, fatness and the reallocation of time between children's daily movement behaviours: an analysis of compositional data. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2017) 14:64. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0521-z
69. Arango, CM, Parra, DC, Gómez, LF, Lema, L, Lobelo, F, and Ekelund, U. Screen time, cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity among school-age children from Monteria, Colombia. J Sci Med Sport. (2014) 17:491–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.09.010
70. Aggio, D, Ogunleye, AA, Voss, C, and Sandercock, GR. Temporal relationships between screen-time and physical activity with cardiorespiratory fitness in English schoolchildren: a 2-year longitudinal study. Prev Med. (2012) 55:37–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.012
71. Fonseca, A, de Azevedo, CVM, and Santos, RMR. Sleep and health-related physical fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Sleep Sci. (2021) 14:357–65. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20200125
72. Wei, Q, Pan, Y, Zhang, S, Yin, W, Lin, Q, Pan, S, et al. Epidemiology of childhood trauma and its association with insomnia and psychotic-like experiences in Chinese Zhuang adolescents. Front Psych. (2022) 13:974674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974674
73. Wan, G, Wang, M, and Chen, S. Child abuse in ethnic regions: evidence from 2899 girls in Southwest China. Child Youth Serv Rev. (2019) 105:104457. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104457
74. Ding, X, Ji, Y, Dong, Y, Li, Z, and Zhang, Y. The impact of family factors and communication on recreational sedentary screen time among primary school-aged children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:1733. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19128-y
75. Dong, Y, Chen, M, Chen, L, Wen, B, Yang, Y, Wang, Z, et al. Individual-, family-, and school-level ecological correlates with physical fitness among Chinese school-aged children and adolescents: a National Cross-Sectional Survey in 2014. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:684286. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.684286
76. Luo, S, Liao, S, Luo, B, Xiong, A, Ma, W, and Zhao, L. Dietary patterns of Chinese children and adolescents and their associations with family characteristics and functioning: a Multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24:3492. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21068-6
77. Ruixing, Y, Limei, Y, Yuming, C, Dezhai, Y, Weixiong, L, Muyan, L, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in the Guangxi Hei Yi Zhuang and Han populations. Hypertens Res. (2006) 29:423–32. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.423
78. Zhang, Y, Huang, Z, Zhang, M, Li, C, Zhao, Z, and Zhang, X. Sleep status among children and adolescents aged 6–17 years—China, 2016–2017. China CDC Weekly. (2023) 5:11–6. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.003
Keywords: physical fitness, physical activity, screen time, sleep duration, movement guidelines, ethnicity, residence
Citation: Qian H, Tan J, Tang J and Zou Y (2025) Ethnic and residential differences in adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported physical fitness among Zhuang and Han adolescents in southern China. Front. Public Health. 13:1631277. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1631277
Edited by:
Chin Ngien Siong, Institute of Teacher Education Malaysia Batu Lintang Campus, MalaysiaReviewed by:
Xueting Ding, University of California, Irvine, United StatesNguang Ung Siong, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia
Copyright © 2025 Qian, Tan, Tang and Zou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yu Zou, em91eXV6eUB6anUuZWR1LmNu