Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Policy

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1631799

This article is part of the Research TopicInclusive Health Communication: Strategies for Equitable Information DisseminationView all 15 articles

The Deadly Triple M (Mistrust, Misinformation, and Missed Opportunities): Understanding Romania's COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign and Its Lasting Impact on Public Health

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 2Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
  • 3Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • 4Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • 5Department of Endocrinology "Titu Maiorescu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
  • 6Department of Endocrinology, C.F.2 Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • 7Department of Immunology, "Titu Mairescu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
  • 8Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 9King’s College, London, United Kingdom
  • 10Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, United Kingdom
  • 11Dunarea de Jos University, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Galati, Romania
  • 12Clinical Emergency Hospital “Sf Ap Andrei”, Galati, Romania
  • 13Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
  • 14Family Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
  • 15Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • 16Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
  • 17Regional Centre of Public Health, Timisoara, Romania
  • 18Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  • 19Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Romania's COVID-19 vaccination campaign presents a compelling case study on the intersection of public health policy, societal dynamics, and political influences in pandemic response. Despite an initially promising rollout, Romania ultimately achieved one of the lowest vaccination rates in the European Union, with severe consequences during the subsequent pandemic waves. This review examines the key factors contributing to the campaign's shortcomings, including pre-existing vaccine hesitancy, widespread misinformation, inadequate governmental communication strategies, and the politicisation of public health efforts. We explore the deep-seated mistrust in governmental institutions, exacerbated by restrictive measures implemented without adequate public engagement, as well as the influential role of religious communities and the rise of populist political forces that actively opposed vaccination efforts. Additionally, we discuss the impact of media sensationalism, conspiracy theories, and the failure to regulate anti-vaccine rhetoric within the medical profession. While logistical and infrastructural challenges were largely addressed, the inability to effectively engage key societal stakeholders led to lagging of vaccine uptake. The consequences of this failure extended beyond COVID-19, contributing to a severe measles outbreak in 2023, which underscored the long-term deleterious effects of vaccine hesitancy. Drawing from Romania's experience, we highlight critical lessons for future public health campaigns, emphasising the need for trust-building initiatives, targeted misinformation countermeasures, stronger community engagement, and enhanced collaboration with religious and cultural institutions. By addressing these challenges, countries worldwide can strengthen their public health frameworks and improve the resilience of their immunisation programmes in the face of future crises.

Keywords: Public Health, Romania, misinformation, COVID-19 vaccination, Vaccine hesitancy

Received: 20 May 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dascalu, Raiu, Olteanu, Comanici, Comanici, Toma, Robu, Mihailov, Mina-Raiu, Dumitra, Azoicai, Popovici and Apetrei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Stefan Dascalu, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Cristian Apetrei, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.