Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Planetary Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1632799

This article is part of the Research TopicPlanetary Health Challenges: Interventions for Effective Knowledge Mobilization for Policy- And Decision-Makers and Science CommunicationView all 4 articles

A dual approach of Knowledge Translation and Mobilization of Climate Change Research into Public Health Action: A Scoping Review

Provisionally accepted
Chanelle  MulopoChanelle Mulopo1,2*Nyamongo  OnkobaNyamongo Onkoba3Samuel  AbimbolaSamuel Abimbola4Ezgi  BaltaciEzgi Baltaci5Caradee  WrightCaradee Wright6,7Bey-Marrie  SchmidtBey-Marrie Schmidt2,8
  • 1Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • 2University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
  • 3The Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 4Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
  • 5Universitat Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 6South African Medical Research council, Environment and Health Research Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
  • 7University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
  • 8South African Medical Research Council, Health Systems Research Unit, Cape Town, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

There are gaps in translating climate change research into public health action at the global level. Knowledge translation refers to the methods used to bridge the gap between knowledge and action. Given the significant impacts of climate change on health, it is essential to integrate climate research into health decision-making processes. This integration ensures that evidence effectively informs policies and practices at all levels, leading to more timely, equitable, and impactful public health responses.This scoping review examines key approaches and identifies gaps in knowledge translation methods for integrating climate change research into public health decision-making.A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus using a pre-defined search string to identify climate change and health studies published between 1 st January 2003 to 1 st March 2024, with no geographic restrictions. Retrieved articles were screened and data extracted using Covidence software. Thematic analysis was performed in ATLAS.TI employing Braun and Clark's six step method. Knowledge translation approaches identified were categorized according to the Cochrane Knowledge Translation Framework. Findings Our findings highlight five primary knowledge translation approaches: (1) monitoring the coverage of climate change and health across media, scientific literature, and government responses; (2) engaging citizens of all ages in participatory activities to address local climate challenges and co-develop policy solutions; (3) integrating knowledge generation, synthesis, and dissemination for effective communication; (4) emphasizing advocacy and education to foster collaborations and gain support from decision-makers; and (5) leveraging health impact assessment tools to guide decision-making related to climate change and health. Nonetheless, we did not find any primary studies on climate change research and knowledge translation in Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs).There is a need for primary studies on the knowledge translation of climate change research, especially in relation to adaptation, into meaningful public health actions that can inform decision-making and contribute to building climate-resilient health systems in LMICs.

Keywords: Climate Change, Planetary health, Knowledge translation, policy, Public Health, decision-making, Health and Climate Interventions

Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mulopo, Onkoba, Abimbola, Baltaci, Wright and Schmidt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chanelle Mulopo, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.