ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1632828
"Doing extra work and not getting extra help": The burden of work generated to manage the "no visitors" policy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada
Provisionally accepted- 1Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada
- 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- 3Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: During the pandemic, a "no visitors" policy was implemented across hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Without caregivers present in-hospital to support patient-care (e.g., treatment decision-making, advocacy, treatment compliance, social support), there was a perceived decline in care quality. Despite existing research on the extra work required to navigate the loss of caregiver support in-hospital, there is a paucity of understanding about the work required to manage the "no visitors" policy itself—including creative ways to work around it. This qualitative research study draws attention to the "no visitors" policy and the work to manage and work around these limitations across healthcare system silos (drawing on cancer-care and alternate level of care as case examples) in Ontario, Canada. Methods: In total, 5 focus groups and 53 interviews were conducted with 68 participants (10 patients, 7 caregivers, 40 healthcare providers, 11 healthcare decision-makers). The authors engaged in codebook thematic analysis. Findings: Managing the "no visitors" policy and push back against it generated a significant burden of work for patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and healthcare decision-makers at a time when difficult emotions were at a high and resources and capacity were at a low. Five themes are discussed that depict the burden of work: 1) work of making individual exceptions to the "no visitors" policy, 2) work of standardizing exceptions, 3) work to remedy and navigate inconsistencies across hospital units or partner organizations, 4) work arounds to gain in-hospital entry via "hot words" and sneaking in, 5) work arounds when in-hospital entry was not possible via technology and visiting through windows. Conclusions: The denial of caregivers' entry into hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic undermined their value as essential care partners, despite their contributions to patient care. Unintended consequences of such public health policy, including generation of burdensome work to manage and work around it for all involved, must therefore be more carefully considered for future pandemic preparedness.
Keywords: Patient- and Family-Centred Care, Caregivers, cancer-care, Healthcare team, delayeddischarge, alternative level of care, COVID-19, pandemic
Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jacobson, Birze, Mansfield, Wodchis, Tang, Ammi, Guilcher and Kuluski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Danielle Jacobson, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.