ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1634264
This article is part of the Research TopicWorld Mental Health Day: Mental Health in the WorkplaceView all 32 articles
Patience is a Virtue: Lessons from a participatory approach to contextually tailor and co-create an employee wellness intervention for community health educators
Provisionally accepted- Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Community health educators (CHE) translate empirical health evidence into actionable information to improve the health and wellbeing of communities, including underserved populations. However, the wellbeing of CHE themselves is threatened by chronic work-related stress. One understudied CHE cohort are employees of the federal Cooperative Extension System (herein: Cooperative Extension). The objective of this present study was to co-create a wellness intervention that is feasible and acceptable to CHE of Cooperative Extension. Applying a co-creation method, we first gathered formative data from an ongoing integrated research-practice partnership (IRPP) with CHE of Cooperative Extension to guide adaptations on intervention content, dose, and delivery. IRPP members shared key intervention considerations which informed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach. To garner contextual considerations and phenomena, we conducted four focus group sessions with CHE from nine different states (N=21, n=4 to 6 per session). We built a follow up survey based on qualitative findings to inform intervention delivery. Members of the IRPP preferred holistic wellbeing, i.e., flourishing, as a comprehensive target for a CHE wellness intervention. Eighty-one percent (n=17) of focus group participants (90% Female, 62% White) completed the follow up survey. Focus group findings demonstrated a desire for a multi-component intervention (e.g., education, accessible group yoga practices) to address the multiple domains of flourishing and provided guidance on imagery and messaging of recruitment materials. Notably, participants emphasized scheduling as the greatest barrier to overcome. One participant shared that "I think there are probably solutions for this, but it may take a lot of patience while figuring it out." Survey data elucidated intervention delivery preferences including timing for the intervention (47% preferring a Jan-Mar launch), time of day (early morning ranked highest); facilitator (52% yoga teachers, 24% peer CHE, 0% administrators); as well as the order of content delivery in intervention sessions. Data from co-creation methods with CHE captured often overlooked nuance important for implementation, particularly tailoring the timing of intervention delivery. Beginning with the end in mind and taking careful consideration of contextual factors may improve feasibility and acceptability of intervention characteristics and ultimately increase reach, representativeness, and efficacy.
Keywords: co-creation, flourishing, wellbeing, holistic, Yoga, adaptation, implementation, dissemination
Received: 20 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Frazier, Tech and Harden. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mary C Frazier, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.