ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1634641
This article is part of the Research TopicFrom Simulation to Implementation: Policy Tools and Practice Evaluation for One HealthView all articles
Performance of the One Health Platform in Zoonotic Disease Surveillance in Guinea
Provisionally accepted- 1Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Infectiologie de Guinée, Conakry, Guinea
- 2Institut Spuerieur des Sciences et de Medecine Veterinaire (ISSMV) de Dalaba/Guinée, Dalaba, Guinea
- 3Universite Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea
- 4Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Infectiologie de Guinee, Conakry, Guinea
- 5Université de Labé, Labé, Guinea
- 6Ministère de l'agriculture et de l'Elevage de Guinée, Conakry, Guinea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Zoonoses are a major global health threat, especially in low-income countries, due to their prevalence and emergence. Repeated outbreaks emphasize the need for integrated, multisectoral surveillance. While the One Health approach is essential, its implementation faces major barriers. Tools like JEE and OH-EpiCap help assess and improve these systems. This study aims to assess the functioning and effectiveness of regional One Health platforms in Guinea.A cross-sectional study was conducted across the eight administrative regions of Guinea to evaluate the performance of regional One Health (OH) platforms. Data were collected through structured interviews with 160 stakeholders involved in zoonotic disease surveillance, preparedness, and response. The evaluation focused on several key components: coordination; case recording and disease detection; epidemic preparedness and response; mobilization of material resources; stakeholder training; and financing mechanisms. Regional performance was assessed using the standardized evaluation tool developed by the Africa CDC. A comparative analysis was performed using radar charts to identify performance gaps between regions and to highlight disparities in the implementation of the One Health approach.The overall One Health performance score in Guinea was 41%, indicating a limited level of implementation at the national scale. None of the eight assessed regions reached the 60% performance threshold. Indicator-level analysis revealed significant heterogeneity across regions. Conakry demonstrated strong performance in the domain of legislation (89%), whereas all regions exhibited weak capacities in the mobilization of material resources (9%), highlighting a major cross-cutting challenge. Regional performance scores varied considerably, with particularly low levels observed in Labé, Kindia, and Faranah (33%), underscoring major disparities in the implementation of the One Health framework.This study identified critical gaps in the performance of Guinea's One Health platforms, notably in resource mobilization and regional disparities. Strengthening local capacities, harmonizing practices, and improving multi-sectoral coordination are essential. Using the Africa CDC assessment tool revealed actionable insights to inform policy and investment.These findings emphasize the urgent need to reinforce One Health implementation amid persistent zoonotic threats in the country.
Keywords: One Health approach, Platform performance, Zoonotic disease, epidemiologic surveillance, Guinea
Received: 24 May 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 BONGONO, SIDIBE, Hounmenou, Mbaye, Kadio, Nabé, Diaby, Beavogui, Doumbouya, Delamou, Touré, Camara and Keita. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Emile Faya BONGONO, Centre de Recherche et de Formation en Infectiologie de Guinée, Conakry, Guinea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.