ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1635694
A Geo-Additive Spatial Analysis of Condom Use Among Women Aged 15-49 in Rwanda
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
- 2Center for Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, DC Department of Health., District of Columbia, United States
- 3University of KwaZulu-Natal College of Agriculture Engineering and Science, Durban, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Condom use in Rwanda is a significant public health topic, especially in efforts to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV/AIDS, unplanned pregnancies and other health problems such as cervical cancer. In Rwanda, the government and various organizations actively promote condom use through comprehensive sexual and reproductive health initiatives such as sexual health education and condom distribution in schools, communities and public places. Despite these efforts, many individuals still fail to adopt consistent condom use, leading to significant health consequences. To enhance health and condom promotion programs, it is crucial to understand the factors contributing to low condom use and to identify regions with the lowest uptake.Methods: This study analyzes data from the 2019/2020 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS) to investigate the prevalence and determinants of condom use during the last sexual intercourse among reproductive-aged women in Rwanda. A geo-additive model was employed to account for geographical variation in condom use, enabling the identification of regional disparities and spatial patterns. These methodological approaches provide a robust framework for understanding individual and contextual factors influencing condom use in Rwanda.The findings revealed a 10.8% prevalence of condom use and highlighted significant regional disparities in usage patterns. Women who reported living with a man had significantly lower odds of condom use compared to those not living with a man (AOR = 0.07, 95% CrI: 0.06-0.09). Those with primary education had significantly higher odds of condom use compared to those with no education (AOR = 1.39, 95% CrI: 1.04-1.84). Central and Northern districts, such as Ruhango and Musanze, showed positive structured spatial effects, suggesting regionally correlated factors promoting condom use. Unstructured spatial effects highlighted significant district-specific variations, with areas like Ruhango and Rusizi exhibiting higher odds of condom use, while Nyamagabe and Gasabo had lower odds.: Spatial disparities in condom use suggest a need for region-specific interventions, particularly in the Southern and Northern regions of Rwanda. Efforts should focus on enhancing education access and economic empowerment while addressing cultural and relational barriers to condom use in cohabiting relationships.
Keywords: Condom use, Geo-additive model, spatial analysis, Women, Rwanda
Received: 26 May 2025; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sithole, Batidzirai, Yirga and Chifurira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mkhombiseni Zamani Sithole, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.