ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1636004
This article is part of the Research TopicWorld Mental Health Day: Mental Health in the WorkplaceView all 30 articles
Psychological interventions mitigated occupational stress in high-risk workers in Shenzhen, China
Provisionally accepted- 1Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, China
- 2Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 3Shenzhen Mental Health Center, Shenzhen, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Occupational stress has emerged as a significant factor impacting the physical and mental well-being of workers in China. This study investigated occupational stress among the potential high-risk workers in Shenzhen, China, and evaluated the psychological interventions subsequently implemented.Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was employed, randomly selecting one quarter of clusters (clustered by work unit) from each of the four strata (stratified by occupational category) including firefighters, bus drivers, video display terminal (VDT) operators, and port workers respectively as the study cohort. Occupational stress was assessed at baseline and after psychological interventions using the “Job Content Questionnaire”. The interventions primarily included regular occupational mental health training and group psychological support sessions. Baseline occupational stress detection rates and high social support rates were analyzed, along with their post-intervention changes, to comprehensively evaluate the intervention effectiveness.Results: The cohort comprised 3,237 participants, with a median age of 31 years, 92.18% were male, and 96.14% were Han Chinese. The baseline occupational stress detection rate was 52.73%, and the high social support rate was 21.19%. Comparative analysis revealed statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05) in occupational stress detection rates across different age groups, ethnicities, education levels, smoking habits, weekly working hours, and working years. Similarly, high social support rates varied significantly (all P< 0.05) by age, education level, marital status, exercise habit, occupation category, weekly working hour, and working year. After 2 years of intervention, the occupational stress detection rate decreased significantly to 47.82% (P < 0.001), while the high social support rate (19.68%) showed no significant change. Subgroup analysis indicated significant reductions in occupational stress detection rates (all P< 0.05) among individuals aged ≥27 years, males, Han Chinese, those with high school or vocational school or higher, married individuals, never or occasional drinkers, firefighters or bus drivers, those working 40-48 or >56 hours per week, and those with >6 years of work. Conclusions: Occupational stress is a prominent issue among firefighters, bus drivers, VDT operators, and port workers in Shenzhen, China. Mental health interventions could effectively reduce occupational stress, demonstrating significant value in improving the psychological well-being of high-risk populations.
Keywords: Occupational stress, social support, Job Content Questionnaire, group psychological support session, Mental health training
Received: 27 May 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zhou, Xiao, Weng, Zhang, Zhu, Wang, Nian and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Naixing Zhang, Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, China
Dafeng Lin, Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.