Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Substance Use Disorders and Behavioral Addictions

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1637846

This article is part of the Research TopicSubstance Use Research and Population HealthView all articles

"HEAL Together": A randomized, hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial protocol of a peer-delivered behavioral activation intervention to improve methadone treatment retention

Provisionally accepted
Jessica  F MagidsonJessica F Magidson1*Valerie  D BradleyValerie D Bradley1Jessica  AnaneJessica Anane1Mary  B KleinmanMary B Kleinman1Julia  W FeltonJulia W Felton2Abigail  C HinesAbigail C Hines1Rithika  BaskarRithika Baskar1Aaron  D GreenblattAaron D Greenblatt3Dwayne  DeanDwayne Dean1Morgan  AnvariMorgan Anvari1Heather  FitzsimonsHeather Fitzsimons3Melanie  E BennettMelanie E Bennett3Annabelle (Mimi)  BelcherAnnabelle (Mimi) Belcher3
  • 1University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, United States
  • 2Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
  • 3University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Although medications exist to effectively treat opioid use disorder (OUD), treatment retention is a pressing challenge. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) may play an important role in OUD treatment retention, yet few evidence-based interventions to support OUD retention have been developed specifically for PRS delivery. Behavioral activation is a brief, reinforcement-based intervention with empirical support for improving depression and substance use outcomes, delivered typically by specialist mental health providers. Informed by key stakeholder feedback, our team adapted a behavioral activation and problem-solving intervention for PRS delivery ("Peer Activate") to improve methadone treatment retention. Building on a successful open-label pilot trial demonstrating initial feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of Peer Activate, the current type 1 hybrid randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of Peer Activate compared to treatment as usual on six-month methadone retention (primary) and longer-term implementation outcomes. Methods: The trial is being conducted at a large methadone treatment program in Baltimore City, Maryland. We are enrolling 200 patients who recently initiated methadone treatment or are experiencing challenges with methadone adherence in a randomized 1:1 ratio to receive Peer Activate plus treatment as usual (PA+TAU) or TAU only. Additionally, we are recruiting 12 stakeholders to provide feedback on implementation and sustainability. Peer Activate consists of four core intervention sessions delivered by a PRS with relevant lived experience and training in the intervention. Sessions focus on problem-solving barriers to retention and behavioral activation-increasing value-driven, substance-free activities-and continued skill practice and relapse prevention. Assessments are administered at baseline, post-treatment (approximately three months), and six months. The primary effectiveness outcome is methadone retention over six months, measured using chart review. Implementation outcomes are defined based on Proctor's model, including feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of the intervention.Discussion: This trial will provide insight as to whether a PRS-delivered intervention may be effective and feasible for improving methadone treatment retention and other behavioral health outcomes. If findings are promising, Peer Activate may provide a platform on which to incorporate an evidence-based behavioral activation approach into PRS training nationally.

Keywords: Peer recovery specialists, behavioral activation, Medication for opioid use disorder, retention, Methadone, Opioid use disorder

Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Magidson, Bradley, Anane, Kleinman, Felton, Hines, Baskar, Greenblatt, Dean, Anvari, Fitzsimons, Bennett and Belcher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jessica F Magidson, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.