ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641590
This article is part of the Research TopicImpact of Physical Activity on Health and Behavioral Risks in AdolescentsView all 19 articles
The Effects of an 8-Week Functional Training Program on Functional Movement and Physical Fitness in Male University Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China
- 2Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: The physical fitness and functional movement capabilities of university students are fundamental to their long-term health, yet traditional physical education models may have limitations in concurrently enhancing both aspects. This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week functional training (FT) program versus a traditional training (TT) program on functional movement quality and comprehensive physical fitness in non-athlete male university students.Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. Thirty-five healthy male university students (mean age 18.8 ± 0.9 years) were randomly assigned to either a functional training group (FT group; n=20) or a traditional training group (TT group; n=20). During the 8-week intervention, the FT group performed exercises centered on integrated, multi-joint, multi-planar movements.The TT group engaged in a traditional physical education program of matched duration and frequency, which focused on isolated fitness exercises and basic sports skills. Assessments were conducted at baseline (week 0), mid-intervention (week 4), and post-intervention (week 8). Main outcome measures included scores for the seven components of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and five physical fitness indicators (50-meter sprint, 1000-meter run, sit-and-reach, standing long jump, and vital capacity).Results: Significant time × group interaction effects were observed for most outcome measures.Compared to the TT group, the FT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in the total FMS score and several components, particularly those assessing dynamic stability and core control (e.g., Active Straight-Leg Raise, Rotary Stability; P < 0.01). Furthermore, the FT group showed superior gains across all five physical fitness indicators, including speed, endurance, flexibility, power, and vital capacity (all interaction effects, P < 0.05).Conclusion: For male university students, an 8-week functional training program is more effective than a traditional training regimen for concurrently improving functional movement patterns and comprehensive physical fitness. These findings support the integration of functional training principles and methods into university physical education curricula to more effectively enhance students' overall physical preparedness and movement quality.
Keywords: Functional Movement Screen (FMS), core stability, Movement patterns, Physical Education, injury prevention
Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Yao and Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Siqi Yao, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Qingfu Shi, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.